Click for video: videos/10000000_148836895867664_3674976831108284416_n_10155887857227264.mp4
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-16 16:41:00 UTC
Source: Facebook
-
Click for video: photos_and_videos/videos/10000000_144190829558632_5246782785242
Click for video: photos_and_videos/videos/10000000_144190829558632_5246782785242267648_n_10155887798042264.mp4 Live from Yale (Starbucks)Group: Meta /// ChanAidan SearsOh boiNov 16, 2017 4:18pmGroup: Meta /// ChanSeonaidh MacGobhainGood day Gents!Nov 16, 2017 4:19pmGroup: Meta /// ChanStuart SüdekumI love those dinosaur paintings!Nov 16, 2017 4:19pmGroup: Meta /// ChanJames BrittinghamHey guys.Nov 16, 2017 4:20pmGroup: Meta /// ChanAnne SummersHeyee! Good to see you.Nov 16, 2017 4:20pmGroup: Meta /// ChanJeff OdgisHigh Right!Nov 16, 2017 4:21pmGroup: Meta /// ChanAidan SearsTop ten anime crossoversNov 16, 2017 4:22pmGroup: Meta /// ChanCharles HesseyoooNov 16, 2017 4:24pmGroup: Meta /// ChanJeff OdgisThose were the days; good riddance to analog deprivationNov 16, 2017 4:25pmGroup: Meta /// ChanJeffery McCarthy HughesHowdy gentlemenNov 16, 2017 4:26pmGroup: Meta /// ChanJeff OdgisWorking over the telephone @[206543704000:274:Phone Losers of America]Nov 16, 2017 4:26pmGroup: Meta /// ChanCharles HesseIs that @[605597:2048:Kashif Vikaas] on the left?Nov 16, 2017 4:26pmGroup: Meta /// ChanCurt DoolittleYesNov 16, 2017 4:27pmGroup: Meta /// ChanJeffery McCarthy HughesEase of research produces indolenceNov 16, 2017 4:27pmGroup: Meta /// ChanStuart SüdekumGoogle books is a pretty good justification for the technological nightmare future we live in.Nov 16, 2017 4:27pmGroup: Meta /// ChanJeffery McCarthy HughesLanguage that trancends all characters and numerals is geometryNov 16, 2017 4:28pmGroup: Meta /// ChanStuart SüdekumThe ooze in TMNT?Nov 16, 2017 4:30pmGroup: Meta /// ChanJeffery McCarthy HughesUltra materialism in science begins with rejection of the 0, as it’s tangent has served it’s purposeNov 16, 2017 4:34pmGroup: Meta /// ChanDavid StennettHmmm, I could use a venti hot chocolate and cinnemon roll from Starbucks right about now … but then I remember that Schutlz is a cock.Nov 16, 2017 4:35pmGroup: Meta /// ChanJeffery McCarthy HughesEquilateral triad?Nov 16, 2017 4:36pmGroup: Meta /// ChanJeff OdgisExcellent analysis CurtNov 16, 2017 4:36pmGroup: Meta /// ChanJeffery McCarthy HughesAI won’t work in binary, and all programming language is too taxonomicNov 16, 2017 4:38pmGroup: Meta /// ChanCurt DoolittleBrett–I’m working on a self-referencing triad of political reconciliation in the meta-right. The essay with @[100011057055806:2048:Aedhan] it should be out soon in Counter-Currents–KashifNov 16, 2017 4:40pmGroup: Meta /// ChanEric BumpusWhat happens when AI comes to the conclusion that it has not power over its own existence? It decides that we can terminate it at any time and it needs to have sovereignty over its own life.Nov 16, 2017 4:41pmGroup: Meta /// ChanJeff OdgisSeems the video abruptly terminatedNov 16, 2017 4:44pmGroup: Meta /// ChanTom TomorrowWould have to be a self-referencing tercenary systemNov 16, 2017 4:44pmGroup: Meta /// ChanTom TomorrowYES :PNov 16, 2017 4:45pmGroup: Meta /// ChanTom Tomorrow@[100000595185452:2048:Matt Nagy] combined with some advancements coming out of metamodernism in the next few months we can build a foundation for computer science to understand language in the most reduced manner even while accounting for postmodernismNov 16, 2017 4:47pmGroup: Meta /// ChanTom TomorrowThat would be the goal. Building it would take 5 years of full-time work from inception to endNov 16, 2017 4:54pmGroup: Meta /// ChanTom TomorrowWe’ll put you to work don’t worryNov 16, 2017 4:56pmGroup: Meta /// ChanTom Tomorrow;)Nov 16, 2017 4:58pmGroup: Meta /// ChanMichael PattinsonCheers Curt Doolittle , you are my hero!Nov 16, 2017 5:37pmGroup: Meta /// ChanWyatt PipohCurt that scarf is dashingNov 16, 2017 7:45pmGroup: Meta /// ChanRoy D. CunninghamYale University? What is the Alt Right population at Yale?Nov 16, 2017 7:47pmGroup: Meta /// ChanTom Tomorrow1%Nov 16, 2017 7:48pmGroup: Meta /// ChanRoy D. CunninghamWe need to bump those numbers up.Nov 16, 2017 7:50pmGroup: Meta /// ChanTom TomorrowWe’ll put a few people in their philosophy departmentNov 16, 2017 7:50pmGroup: Meta /// ChanChrissy McClellanFound this on The Frederick Douglass Papers page https://www.pcmag.com/commentary/350984/digital-humanities-the-most-exciting-field-youve-never-heaNov 17, 2017 9:46amGroup: Meta /// ChanWilliam L. BengeBallarinas? Well, ya! pahaNov 17, 2017 10:06amGroup: Meta /// ChanWilliam L. BengeA multiplicity of interests are queued up, awaiting this new language technology. We’re making progress.
Push onward, brothers! Changing the world…Nov 17, 2017 10:39amGroup: Meta /// ChanAndrew Taylor@[1001605662:2048:Thomas Caussat]Nov 17, 2017 2:27pmGroup: Meta /// ChanSpencer JohnsonHelloJul 14, 2018 2:04amGroup: Meta /// ChanNeil A. Bucklewmissed it. where is the rest?Jul 14, 2018 3:47amGroup: Meta /// ChanPeter Isaac Simon😍Jul 14, 2018 7:50amGroup: Meta /// ChanPeter Isaac SimonCurt why does Jennifer (and others) find it hard to trust you?Jul 14, 2018 7:51amGroup: Meta /// ChanPeter Isaac SimonCheers Kaashif, I would follow you into Armageddon.Jul 14, 2018 7:52amLive from Yale (Starbucks)
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-16 16:17:00 UTC
-
Click for video: videos/10000000_144190829558632_5246782785242267648_n_101558877
Click for video: videos/10000000_144190829558632_5246782785242267648_n_10155887798042264.mp4 Live from Yale (Starbucks)
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-16 16:17:00 UTC
-
CLARITY (TIME) —“We are constantly moving through spacetime but we just trade
CLARITY (TIME)
—“We are constantly moving through spacetime but we just trade movement in time for movement in space and vice versa, just like a function in cartesian space trades position in the x axis for position in the y axis. Gravity is reducible to a change in the elasticity of that trade.”—Thomas Wiltshire
Simple.
WHY IS CURT WRITING ABOUT THIS:
Today. One philosopher and four physicists debating time, and sounding like a bunch of chipmunks. The underlying question is whether what we call time (rate of change) is merely altered by the expansion and contraction of space, or whether it is a product of the expansion and contraction of space.
I can’t understand logically how it can be the latter, and still produce a dynamic universe of ANY kind.
And as far as i know that is the the question, and we can’t answer it.
But saying that time doesn’t exist is just pseudoscience. And we don’t know more than that (that I know of). And I haven’t ever encountered anything in physics that I can’t understand once we state it operationally.
The universe is not complicated it is merley causally dense with operations (symmetries) forming by coincidence at increasingly complex (dense) levels.
I have seen nothing in the universe at ALL that cannot be represented mathematically and geometrically once we understand the prevailing forces.
The history of human knowledge expansion is this: everything is far more simple than we intuit. It’s people who are complicated. Because most of what we do is ‘lie’.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-16 12:51:00 UTC
-
Gravity and Expansion determine the rate of change of that trade. The idea that
Gravity and Expansion determine the rate of change of that trade.
The idea that changes at different rates at different velocities consist of nothing other than experience, is nonsense, because all change in velocity produces uniform changes in everything at every level of reality.
If we send a mechanical device, or a decaying radioactive element to space and back they do in fact change at different (miniscule) rates. So it’s not psychological phenomenon.
I hate pseudoscientific nonsense.
AFAIK its just as likely that the rate of change is exaggerated by the expansion and contraction of space time, but that the rate of change is a constant (time), as it is that time is fully dependent upon the rate of change of the universe, and that it ceases if expansion ceases.
I mean, I would love it if someone would correct me if I err, but you know, I haven’t found anything in any discipline that is terribly complicated.
In fact, most of the problems of complexity were manufactured by the development of symbols. If we had done mathematics like they did in the time of newton then every idiot in the world would understand it.
To say time passes, is simply a statement of memory. To say that all changes in state occur in sequence and that such a sequence occurs independent of perception, regardless of whether space-time is expanding or contracting.
I perceive a sequence of changes in state. We can increase our velocity and slow or decrease our velocity and speed changes, but we cannot reverse it, nor can we speed or slow it to extremes.
Now, there is a vast difference between observing phenomenon and travelling phenomenon. Light is just a view into history. And that light-history may be created at different rates. that’s all.
I am not sure why this leads philosophers and scientists to disagree – or to fail to articulate such differences.
I suspect that it is the open question of whether time (change) exists (and universe exists) beyond the expansion of our universe. (or if we are even correct about our vision of a universe.)
Public Physics has become all too much like magic.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-16 11:44:00 UTC
-
“Time” is the new pseudoscience. The faster we move through that space the slowe
“Time” is the new pseudoscience.
The faster we move through that space the slower we experience relative change. The shower we move through space, the faster we experience relative change. We are always in motion. The higher the gravity (density) the slower the relative change. The lower the gravity the faster the relative change. As far as I know the universe (space) that we exist within is expanding. Expanding at something approaching the speed of light. The speed of light appears to be the maximum rate of expansion at our current pressure, but the rate of expansion appears to have been higher at earlier pressure. Would the rate of change been different at higher pressure and higher velocity – as far as I know it was the same. So the rate of change at any point in the universe is determined by the rate of expansion minus the local density of space time that creates the opposite of expansion: gravity. So the fact that we experience entropy (change) faster or slower does not mean that time (change) ever stops, only that maximum and minimum rates of time change are existentially possible. Nor does it mean that it’s reversible. So when a physicist proposes that time is an illusion that’s nonsense. Memory allows us to differentiate between a sequence of states. And the rate of change that we call time varies depending upon relative velocity. And yes you can slow time down at higher velocity, although it is extremely expensive to do so (and dangerous). And yes you can speed time up at higher density. But it is expensive to do so (and dangerous). So the conflation of space and time into space time is a half truth. The truth is we have no idea what happens to the rate of change (speed of time) at the margins. It is possible that time has no meaning outside of expansion or contraction. But it is more likely that rates of time (change) are consistent and that expansion(faster) and contraction (slower) merely alter that rate of change. Similarly it is very difficult to believe that our universe is the only universe and that other universes don’t behave by the same laws. But for scientific purposes at the scale of our ability to act, it is certainly better science to assume we are alone than to envision standing on the backs of turtles ‘all the way down”.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-16 10:12:00 UTC
-
The only other people of relative equality we have discovered on this earth are
The only other people of relative equality we have discovered on this earth are the japanese. And at present they are certainly being smarter than we are.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-15 15:17:00 UTC
-
I’m using it to refer to a technology: (overloading): (The Conflation of (a)hist
I’m using it to refer to a technology: (overloading):
(The Conflation of (a)history and myth, (b)wisdom and law, (c)mysticism and supernaturalism, (d) truth and utility) > Pilpul > ( Judaism > Christianity > Islam ) > ( French literary) > (German/Kantian Rationalism) > Ashkenazi Pseudoscience (Marx, Boaz, Freud, Cantor, Mises, and the entire Frankfurt school)) > Jewish/Soviet Propagandism (russians still practice it) > (and then once the ashkenazi pseudoscientific counter-enligthenment failed, French literary v2 : Postmodernism – they just resorted to outright lying and suppression of truth.).
Effectively Pilpul was invented for the purpose of textual interpretation (hermeneutic and textual equivalent of numerology and astrology) which uses overloading to ‘find in anything what we wish to find there’).
I mean, between The first abrahamic disaster (christianity and islam) and it’s following abrahamic dark age of 250M dead, and the second abrahamic disaster (the counter enlightenment) culminating in marxism-socialism’s 100M dead, and postmodernism’s current disaster that this is putting upon the west in the current century, then abrahamism is the cause of more death and destruction than all but malaria and the plague.
Abrahamism is has done more damage to humanity than any other human invention.
So that is what I work on. How to eliminate the ability to use overloading to in verbal (common speech), philosophical(rational) textual(hermeneutic), scientific (pseudoscience) and
mathematical(innumeracy).
The technique is generally held under the term “Fictionalism” but this does not provide insight into the historical origins of the art of lying – pilpul.
Nor does it help western civilization understand the importance of our discovery of deflationary truth, and the reason for western excellenc ein the ancient and modern worlds: truth.
The very truth that postmodernists seek to suppress under the rubric of politically correct speech.
So, the problem for westerners is the remnant of Abrahamism in both religious and pseudo intellectual forms.
And since we have dragged humanity out of ignorance and poverty twice now, perhaps we are strong enough to correct the abrahamic technique of deception forever, and restore the world once again – saving it from yet another abrahamic dark age.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-15 14:29:00 UTC
-
Rule of Law by Natural Law of Reciprocity. Hereditary Monarchy as a Judge of Las
Rule of Law by Natural Law of Reciprocity.
Hereditary Monarchy as a Judge of Last Resort.
Independent judiciary, militia, and army.
Treasury as Insurer of Last Resort.
Houses of the Commons for Justice and Military(Male); Finance, industry, and business; The Employed; Women and Family(Female).
Contracts of the Commons can be constructed between any willing group and must merely survive the law and the military veto on legal or strategic grounds, and survive veto by the monarchy.
The function of all law: the individual.
The function of all policy: the family.
Zero intertemporal (involuntary) transfer.
Universal standing. Universal application. No retroactivity. Strict construction in operational language.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-15 10:34:00 UTC
-
Other Great Reasons for Life in Ukraine. Holidays. There is a holiday about ever
Other Great Reasons for Life in Ukraine. Holidays. There is a holiday about every three days in Ukraine. (Really). But the winter is the best.
Christmas Shops open by the 1st of December.
St Nicholas Day is on the 15th. (Think of it as santa’s day).
Pagans can do the solstice.
Catholic Christmas on the 25th.
New Year’s Day on the 1st.
Orthodox Christmas on the 7th.
Old New Year’s on the 14th.
So basically you celebrate for six weeks straight.
Nothing gets done.
It’s …. wonderful.
Of course, while food and internet cost nothing, you have to live on cash, because the banks never work, half of them are on the verge of bankruptcy, the ATM’s run out of cash frequently. The network goes down frequently. People steal your card number at every opportunity and sell it to indonesian or other low trust countries. Gas (Petrol) is 4x as expensive. And surprisingly, apartments are ridiculously overpriced.
And, I would much rather worry about that kind of thing than the internecine warfare and vast underclass burden that is a substitute for american social order….
I remember a homogenous america. And it was infinitely better.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-15 10:18:00 UTC
