CLARITY (TIME) —“We are constantly moving through spacetime but we just trade

CLARITY (TIME)

—“We are constantly moving through spacetime but we just trade movement in time for movement in space and vice versa, just like a function in cartesian space trades position in the x axis for position in the y axis. Gravity is reducible to a change in the elasticity of that trade.”—Thomas Wiltshire

Simple.

WHY IS CURT WRITING ABOUT THIS:

Today. One philosopher and four physicists debating time, and sounding like a bunch of chipmunks. The underlying question is whether what we call time (rate of change) is merely altered by the expansion and contraction of space, or whether it is a product of the expansion and contraction of space.

I can’t understand logically how it can be the latter, and still produce a dynamic universe of ANY kind.

And as far as i know that is the the question, and we can’t answer it.

But saying that time doesn’t exist is just pseudoscience. And we don’t know more than that (that I know of). And I haven’t ever encountered anything in physics that I can’t understand once we state it operationally.

The universe is not complicated it is merley causally dense with operations (symmetries) forming by coincidence at increasingly complex (dense) levels.

I have seen nothing in the universe at ALL that cannot be represented mathematically and geometrically once we understand the prevailing forces.

The history of human knowledge expansion is this: everything is far more simple than we intuit. It’s people who are complicated. Because most of what we do is ‘lie’.