Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • THE DEMARCATION BETWEEN HUMAN AND ANIMAL What is the point of demarcation where

    THE DEMARCATION BETWEEN HUMAN AND ANIMAL

    What is the point of demarcation where Homo Sapiens is no longer guided by animal impulse and is fully human?

    The answer is ‘When his or her judgements are decidable without appeal to instinct’.

    In other words, when all judgements are calculable.

    Only when all judgements are calculable are we free of animal instinct.

    What do you think P-law provides?

    Universal calculability.

    Universal commensurability

    and universal calculability,

    regardless of grammar or context.

    P.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-03 17:03:00 UTC

  • ADDITIONAL TELEGRAM CHANNEL ADDED @curtdoolittleslaw “Curt Doolittle’s Law” Gave

    ADDITIONAL TELEGRAM CHANNEL ADDED

    @curtdoolittleslaw “Curt Doolittle’s Law”

    Gave into requests. Subscribe to both @propertarians (group) and @curtdoolittleslaw (channel). Martin manages Telegram chat. Telegram Channel is just a stream from twitter, which in turn is a stream from Facebook, plus whatever I write on twitter directly.

    Workflow Updated:

    1. Facebook (Eric Danelaw, Curt Doolittle) >

    … 2. Facebook Manual Updates >

    … … Propertarian Institute Page (Brandon, Martin, Alain)

    … … Brandon Hayes (Brandon – all movement posts)

    … … Christian Propertarians (Team)

    … … Curt Doolittle’s Incremental Suppression Services

    … … Scientific Praxeology

    … 3. Twitter (Autopost) >

    … … 4. Telegram Channel: @curtdoolittleslaw (auto)

    … … 5. Telegram Chat: @propertarians (Propertarians) (auto)

    … 6. Propertarianism.com http://Propertarianism.com Site (The Institute) (Manual Update)

    … … 7. Back Posted to FB Curt Doolittle Ideas Page (Auto)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-03 17:01:00 UTC

  • “Furthermore, your oddly concise requirements to define humanity apart from anim

    —“Furthermore, your oddly concise requirements to define humanity apart from animals isn’t the presence of a soul, or broad IQ. It seems to be that exact line between female and minority “failure”, and dominant white, male failure. Although your statistics utterly failed to mention male consumerism, which almost always has *overt* victims, rather than covert ones. … You’ve found the absolute best line in the sand to draw; for the purposes of your “natural” dominion, of course.

    I don’t like male-bashing on my page any more than others, but I’m happy to finally delve into the ways intelligent, handsome white men are royally screwing things up.”—Brooke Lauren Brothers

    Do you think you made an argument there other than “that’s not fair on my terms?”

    You didn’t. You didn’t ask what was true. instead, you proved me right …. again.

    What’s ‘true’? What is the point of demarcation where Homo Sapiens is no longer guided by animal impulse and is fully human?

    The answer is ‘When his or her judgements are decidable without appeal to instinct’.

    In other words, when all judgements are calculable.

    Only when all judgements are calculable are we free of animal instinct.

    What do you think P-law provides?

    Universal calculability.

    Universal commensurability and universal calculability,

    Regardless of grammar or context.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-03 14:43:00 UTC

  • THE TEN CANONICAL PRINCIPLES IN THE NATURAL LAW OF SOVEREIGNS. 1. Commensurabili

    THE TEN CANONICAL PRINCIPLES IN THE NATURAL LAW OF SOVEREIGNS.

    1. Commensurability: Definitions by Disambiguation by Serialization and Operationalization

    2. Truth: Satisfaction of demand for infallibility.

    3. Testimony: Due diligence against perceivable dimensions.

    4. Reciprocity: Due diligence against incentive to retaliate.

    5. Property In Toto: Measurements of Demonstrated intersets

    6. Compatibilism: Gender and class division of perception, cognition, memory, advocacy, and cooperation.

    7. Trifunctionalism: Three possible means of coercion, produces three competing specializations of elites.

    8. Perfect Government: rule of law, monarchy as judge of last resort, houses for regions, classes, genders, with one family one vote – adapting to authority under threat, markets under peace, and redistribution during windfalls.

    9. Transcendence: Evolutionary necessity ‘to become the red queen’ – we may never stop nor never rest.

    10. Western Group Evolutionary strategy is “OODA” meaning technology, maneuver and initiative. This strategy is created by excellence and beauty, heroism and duty, truth and oath, sovereignty and reciprocity, rule of law and jury, and markets in everything: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and war – while suppressing the reproduction of the underclasses, and devoting the surpluses to the production of commons, and the multiples for all that result.

    That’s the core of P.

    The rest is application.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-03 14:23:00 UTC

  • “It’s ok to have an opinion. But it’s better to not.”—Stephen Thomas

    —“It’s ok to have an opinion. But it’s better to not.”—Stephen Thomas

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-03 14:10:00 UTC

  • “No one should read Jung without having first read his Autobiography. Jung wrote

    —“No one should read Jung without having first read his Autobiography. Jung wrote his Autobiography at the end of his life and reflects upon his life’s work and how he came to have the thoughts and beliefs that he did. He answers and corrects misinformation about his work that is sorely needed when you are taught about his work. For instance the concept of archetypes does not negate the literal existence of deity, but simply explains our minds ability to comprehend and communicate with them.”—AunMarie Grooms

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-03 13:43:00 UTC

  • “CURT, OF THESE THREE CHOICES, WHAT CITY SHOULD I MOVE TO?” Boston = cold, colle

    “CURT, OF THESE THREE CHOICES, WHAT CITY SHOULD I MOVE TO?”

    Boston = cold, college, insurance and medical – very very expensive – family prohibitive – ‘multicultural’

    Seattle = raining, hiking and microsoft tech – families in the suburbs, very expensive – multicultural now (didn’t used to be)

    Austin = sunshine, and open source tech – families, less expensive – becoming multicultural.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-03 13:20:00 UTC

  • YES WE ARCHIVE EVERYTHING IN THE MOVEMENT —“Is this all being catalogued ?”—

    YES WE ARCHIVE EVERYTHING IN THE MOVEMENT

    —“Is this all being catalogued ?”—Matt Fahnestock

    I don’t understand?

    PROCESS:

    I Post on Facebook > weekly backup > post to website > continuous backup > Integrate into ‘book’ on website > continuous backup > publish book.

    I am irregular at posting from FB to the site because I don’t have a way of automating it. I usually do a few months at a time. There are well over ten thousand posts there.

    The website also auto-posts to an hidden fb account as backup.

    We download FB and Site backups regularly

    I do, Brandon does, Martin does.

    In the event anything happens to me ownership passes to individuals in the movement.

    In addition Brandon Hayes collects key posts from everyone and organizes them by dozens of topics. He is also working on a book. Brandon’s inventory is organized differently from the site and my book but it collects information from more members of the movement.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-03 12:15:00 UTC

  • “I’m not sure making being wrong and lying the same is going to work. Intent is

    —“I’m not sure making being wrong and lying the same is going to work. Intent is an incredibly powerful part of our system. It’s the only substantial difference between murder and justifiable homicide. Judging just action/outcome without judging the intent isn’t going to create a workable system”—Greg Hamilton

    That can’t be true, because our legal system already does it. It always has. All this does is extend it from commercial to political speech.

    Think of it this way: philosophy was invented as a competition to the law to give permission to lie.

    —“Well I’m missing something because it appears you are saying being wrong is lying. … That without intent to deceive to are as guilty as if you had intent. “—Greg Hamilton

    Being wrong, or failing due diligence?

    You can perform due diligence and still be wrong without fault. You cannot avoid due diligence and still be wrong without fault.

    This is why the law distinguishes between Restitution, escalating to Punishment, and escalating to Prevention.

    Means motive and opportunity.

    We cannot know intent.

    We can however know due diligence.

    Which is how we test your truth or lie in law.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-03 11:33:00 UTC

  • Updated Apr 3, 2020, 11:27 AM

    Updated Apr 3, 2020, 11:27 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-03 11:27:00 UTC