“Furthermore, your oddly concise requirements to define humanity apart from anim

—“Furthermore, your oddly concise requirements to define humanity apart from animals isn’t the presence of a soul, or broad IQ. It seems to be that exact line between female and minority “failure”, and dominant white, male failure. Although your statistics utterly failed to mention male consumerism, which almost always has *overt* victims, rather than covert ones. … You’ve found the absolute best line in the sand to draw; for the purposes of your “natural” dominion, of course.

I don’t like male-bashing on my page any more than others, but I’m happy to finally delve into the ways intelligent, handsome white men are royally screwing things up.”—Brooke Lauren Brothers

Do you think you made an argument there other than “that’s not fair on my terms?”

You didn’t. You didn’t ask what was true. instead, you proved me right …. again.

What’s ‘true’? What is the point of demarcation where Homo Sapiens is no longer guided by animal impulse and is fully human?

The answer is ‘When his or her judgements are decidable without appeal to instinct’.

In other words, when all judgements are calculable.

Only when all judgements are calculable are we free of animal instinct.

What do you think P-law provides?

Universal calculability.

Universal commensurability and universal calculability,

Regardless of grammar or context.