Curt Doolittle

Form: Thread

  • GREAT QUESTION (counter intuitive answer) a) Our ‘care of our own’ requires pres

    GREAT QUESTION
    (counter intuitive answer)
    a) Our ‘care of our own’ requires preserving the advantages that we’ve spent since 1945 creating, ending the age of empires and monopoly trade routes and massive wars, by converting to nation states, federations, and free trade routes, limiting the scale of wars.
    b) to accomplish this feat we ‘burned down’ the advantages of our laboring, working, and middle classes by bribing countries into free trade, and weaponized our upper middle and upper classes through financialization to pay for it, and using the military to insure it worldwide (largely because economics = petroleum(energy) per capita).
    c) Since Trump’s election we have been (he has been) trying to force the developed world to share the burden of the cost of policing the world.
    d) But we didn’t expect china or russia or iran to double down on imperialism. But they saw the opportunity to preserve their authoritarianism and privilege as we gradually withdrew. In other words, we were too optimistic about the ‘lagging civilizations’.
    e) So the only way to prevent a restoration of empires and world wars, and poverty that results, we are trying to wear out the last breath of these wanna-be empires.
    f) Israel and Ukraine (somewhat like South Korea and Japan) are extremely cheap means of preventing these empires, exhausting them, until the natural weight of their political failures causes (what we hope is) the transformation to nation states and federations that equally value the extraordinary value of free trade, and the end of and prohibition on empires that destroy the returns on that free trade.

    So to summarize, no, there is no better cheaper way with fewer deaths, than repatriation of production and restoration of laboring, working, and middle class incomes, but at the same time, preserving the rules based world order of free trade, respected borders, and natural (human) rights, tehreby directing all state energies to domeistic improvement rather than foreign aggression.

    We are doing the right thing.
    The fact that It takes this particular philosopher and social scientist to explain such a thing is the only thing that bothers me – the politicians for some reason think americans are too stupid to grasp this rather simple argument.

    Reply addressees: @SoulSentinel89 @fucktheNSA1979

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-23 20:34:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1650236651824721927

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1650233259660328961

  • RT @elonmusk: @TheRabbitHole84 Population collapse is a massive threat to civili

    RT @elonmusk: @TheRabbitHole84 Population collapse is a massive threat to civilization

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-18 03:09:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648161756429033476

  • RT @stillgray: It’s incredibly disappointing how OpenAI, which @elonmusk helped

    RT @stillgray: It’s incredibly disappointing how OpenAI, which @elonmusk helped to fund and organize, sold out to Microsoft. TruthGPT will…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-18 02:24:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648150542185635843

  • RT @alx: BREAKING: @ElonMusk discusses creating an alternative to OpenAI, TruthG

    RT @alx: BREAKING: @ElonMusk discusses creating an alternative to OpenAI, TruthGPT, because it is being trained to be politically correct a…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-18 02:23:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648150334097817600

  • RT @elonmusk: “I used to be in crypto, but now I got interested in AI”

    RT @elonmusk: “I used to be in crypto, but now I got interested in AI”

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-18 02:23:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648150252048744455

  • RT @KonstantinKisin: One of the biggest unspoken truths of modern Western societ

    RT @KonstantinKisin: One of the biggest unspoken truths of modern Western society is that women have been brainwashed into acting in ways t…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-18 01:13:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648132624748011521

  • Quite the opposite. SHORT LIST OF FEMALE MEANS OF ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR, EVADING R

    Quite the opposite.

    SHORT LIST OF FEMALE MEANS OF ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR, EVADING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMMONS WHILE HIDING BEHIND MORAL PRETENSE

    CAUSE: Evasion of responsibility for the common but demand for control of the commons, externalizing consequential responsibility to males.

    Industrialize the sale and distribution of false promises by the tactics of by means of:

    Denial
    1. Dismissal of the Evidence, History, Argument, Incentives, Norm, or Tradition
    2. Evading providing a competitive, equally criticizable and testable alternative.
    3. Equating Desirability-Undesirability and Approval-Disapproval or Denial with Truth and Falsehood
    4. Face-Before-Truth rather than European truth-before-face, or threat to the dominance or competence hierarchy.
    4. NAXALT – “Not All X Are Like  That” – Denying a general rule describing a distribution is false because there are some cases at the tails.

    Undermining by Ad Hominem (GSRRM)
    Consisting of:
    1. Poisoning the Well (Polluting the Informational Commons)
    2. GSRRM:
    … denial
    … disapproval,
    … outraging
    … ridicule,
    … shaming,
    … moralizing,
    … psychologizing,
    … rallying,
    … gossiping,
    … reputation destruction
    … and Social Construction

    Creating Plausible Deniability
    1. Hiding Behind Moral Pretense
    2. Hiding behind Voluntary Choice
    3. Hiding behind Sympathy for Hyper consumption (experiences)
    4. Hiding Behind (Selective) Evasion of Responsibility
    5. Heaping Undue Criticism (Persecution) and Undue Praise (personalizing)

    Fraud by: Claiming Oppression by individuals as a proxy for laws of nature, or conversely claiming false promise of possibility of evading the laws of nature:
    1. False Promise of Freedom from Formal Laws (logic, truth) by the use of social construction of repetitive feedback of information counter to formal, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws.
    2. False Promise of Freedom from Physical Laws (scarcity, false promise of endless growth). by the false promise of endless growth, an end to scarcity, and an end to human competition by demonstrated acquisition.
    3. False Promise of Freedom Natural Laws (of self-interest, rational choice, amorality, reciprocity, competitive organization), by the false promise of an end to kin selection, koinophillia, ethnocentrism, sex, class, subrace, and racial differences, and the sexual, social, economic, and political value of organization by ethnocentrism given the class, subrace, and subrace differences in sexual, social, economic, and political value to one another, given the substantial evolutionary difference between the races and subraces.
    4. False Promise of Freedom from Evolutionary Laws ( ending natural, and market selection, accumulating mutation and regulation, the impossibility of isolation, inescapable regression, accumulated genetic load, dysgenia, and the red queen of resources, competitors, biological, climatological, geological, solar, and galactic risks. ).

    Using “Storytelling” by:
    1. Faith Healing, delaying into hazard. Faith Healing consists of providing temporary psychological relief while allowing the cause to persist, grow, and evolve.
    2. False Story Telling, baiting you into empathy, loading, framing, obscurantism, suggestion, suspension of disbelief and overloading.
    3. False Promise, baiting into hazard. Baiting into hazard consists of making false promises of freedom from the laws of the universe. arguing them with sophistry to idealism, magic to pseudoscience, or occult to theology.
    4. False Criticism, undermining into hazard.
    5. Duplicitous, Double Standard, Irreciprocal, and Poly Logical Ethics, like their polylogical unequal laws,

    Escalating from the least burdensome to the most burdensome tactic:
    1. Faith healing at every opportunity (lie and deny)
    2. Selling false promise if they can (fraud)
    3. Evading or silencing at every necessity (shaming, moralizing, psychologizing)
    4. Undermining if they have opportunity to (sedition)
    5. Attack if they can get away with it (de-platforming, conspiracy)
    6. Hiding behind plausible deniability of freedom of choice (non-coercion)
    he opposite.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-17 20:13:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648057143784886280

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648045661147877415

  • Quite the opposite. SHORT LIST OF FEMALE MEANS OF ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR, EVADING R

    Quite the opposite.

    SHORT LIST OF FEMALE MEANS OF ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR, EVADING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMMONS WHILE HIDING BEHIND MORAL PRETENSE

    CAUSE: Evasion of responsibility for the common but demand for control of the commons, externalizing consequential responsibility to males.

    Industrialize the sale and distribution of false promises by the tactics of by means of:

    Denial
    1. Dismissal of the Evidence, History, Argument, Incentives, Norm, or Tradition
    2. Evading providing a competitive, equally criticizable and testable alternative.
    3. Equating Desirability-Undesirability and Approval-Disapproval or Denial with Truth and Falsehood
    4. Face-Before-Truth rather than European truth-before-face, or threat to the dominance or competence hierarchy.
    4. NAXALT – “Not All X Are Like  That” – Denying a general rule describing a distribution is false because there are some cases at the tails.

    Undermining by Ad Hominem (GSRRM)
    Consisting of:
    1. Poisoning the Well (Polluting the Informational Commons)
    2. GSRRM:
    … denial
    … disapproval,
    … outraging
    … ridicule,
    … shaming,
    … moralizing,
    … psychologizing,
    … rallying,
    … gossiping,
    … reputation destruction
    … and Social Construction

    Creating Plausible Deniability
    1. Hiding Behind Moral Pretense
    2. Hiding behind Voluntary Choice
    3. Hiding behind Sympathy for Hyper consumption (experiences)
    4. Hiding Behind (Selective) Evasion of Responsibility
    5. Heaping Undue Criticism (Persecution) and Undue Praise (personalizing)

    Fraud by: Claiming Oppression by individuals as a proxy for laws of nature, or conversely claiming false promise of possibility of evading the laws of nature:
    1. False Promise of Freedom from Formal Laws (logic, truth) by the use of social construction of repetitive feedback of information counter to formal, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws.
    2. False Promise of Freedom from Physical Laws (scarcity, false promise of endless growth). by the false promise of endless growth, an end to scarcity, and an end to human competition by demonstrated acquisition.
    3. False Promise of Freedom Natural Laws (of self-interest, rational choice, amorality, reciprocity, competitive organization), by the false promise of an end to kin selection, koinophillia, ethnocentrism, sex, class, subrace, and racial differences, and the sexual, social, economic, and political value of organization by ethnocentrism given the class, subrace, and subrace differences in sexual, social, economic, and political value to one another, given the substantial evolutionary difference between the races and subraces.
    4. False Promise of Freedom from Evolutionary Laws ( ending natural, and market selection, accumulating mutation and regulation, the impossibility of isolation, inescapable regression, accumulated genetic load, dysgenia, and the red queen of resources, competitors, biological, climatological, geological, solar, and galactic risks. ).

    Using “Storytelling” by:
    1. Faith Healing, delaying into hazard. Faith Healing consists of providing temporary psychological relief while allowing the cause to persist, grow, and evolve.
    2. False Story Telling, baiting you into empathy, loading, framing, obscurantism, suggestion, suspension of disbelief and overloading.
    3. False Promise, baiting into hazard. Baiting into hazard consists of making false promises of freedom from the laws of the universe. arguing them with sophistry to idealism, magic to pseudoscience, or occult to theology.
    4. False Criticism, undermining into hazard.
    5. Duplicitous, Double Standard, Irreciprocal, and Poly Logical Ethics, like their polylogical unequal laws,

    Escalating from the least burdensome to the most burdensome tactic:
    1. Faith healing at every opportunity (lie and deny)
    2. Selling false promise if they can (fraud)
    3. Evading or silencing at every necessity (shaming, moralizing, psychologizing)
    4. Undermining if they have opportunity to (sedition)
    5. Attack if they can get away with it (de-platforming, conspiracy)
    6. Hiding behind plausible deniability of freedom of choice (non-coercion)
    he opposite.

    Reply addressees: @WomanPissedoff

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-17 20:13:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648057143289958421

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648045661147877415

  • Men may be bad. But women are evil. Do you want to be terrified and have trouble

    Men may be bad. But women are evil.
    Do you want to be terrified and have trouble facing the world every day?
    Given Feminine, empathizing, in-time, hyperconsumption and status by evasion of responsibility for the common
    vs
    Masculine systematizing, over time, capitalization, and status by responsibility accumulation for the commons.
    What is the difference in moral intuitions? All sex differences in moral intuitions are reducible to sex differences in the pursuit of responsibility or irresponsibility for the commons.
    Ergo; whenever a woman disagrees with a man in matters public, seek only to determine what irresponsibility for the commons she is avoiding.
    Likewise, when any man disagrees with a woman in matters private, seek only what responsibility for the commons is he attempting to impose on the individual

    If you develop any skill at this you will then be ready to learn sex differences in lying, so that you can rapidly identify what ‘theft’ the opposite sex making or prohibiting, and what method of argument he or she is using to do so.

    The truth is that the industrialization of lying by false promise of continuous hyperconsumption has been produced to cause women to defect from civilization the second time (as they did by Christianity, now marxism-femininsm-woke) because women treat demand for responsibly for the commons as oppression rather than civilized domestication.

    Sorry. Just is.
    I didn’t set out to do this.
    Discovering how and why industrialization of lying was made possible led me to yet one painful truth after another.

    Men may be bad (predatory). But women are evil (seditious)

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-17 18:17:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648027948446806038

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648024561856675840

  • Men may be bad. But women are evil. Do you want to be terrified and have trouble

    Men may be bad. But women are evil.
    Do you want to be terrified and have trouble facing the world every day?
    Given Feminine, empathizing, in-time, hyperconsumption and status by evasion of responsibility for the common
    vs
    Masculine systematizing, over time, capitalization, and status by responsibility accumulation for the commons.
    What is the difference in moral intuitions? All sex differences in moral intuitions are reducible to sex differences in the pursuit of responsibility or irresponsibility for the commons.
    Ergo; whenever a woman disagrees with a man in matters public, seek only to determine what irresponsibility for the commons she is avoiding.
    Likewise, when any man disagrees with a woman in matters private, seek only what responsibility for the commons is he attempting to impose on the individual

    If you develop any skill at this you will then be ready to learn sex differences in lying, so that you can rapidly identify what ‘theft’ the opposite sex making or prohibiting, and what method of argument he or she is using to do so.

    The truth is that the industrialization of lying by false promise of continuous hyperconsumption has been produced to cause women to defect from civilization the second time (as they did by Christianity, now marxism-femininsm-woke) because women treat demand for responsibly for the commons as oppression rather than civilized domestication.

    Sorry. Just is.
    I didn’t set out to do this.
    Discovering how and why industrialization of lying was made possible led me to yet one painful truth after another.

    Men may be bad (predatory). But women are evil (seditious)

    Reply addressees: @gentKarter91 @KaeleyT @RealCandaceO

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-17 18:17:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648027948283297792

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648024561856675840