RT @curtdoolittle: STRICT CONSTRUCTION OF ALL BEHAVIOR FROM FIRST PRINCIPLES?
If we construct our proofs (arguments) from first principles,…
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-13 19:12:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657463750545358849
RT @curtdoolittle: @Nefertiiti @FernandoGLV1212 @just_atweethere @nellie_popper @anneapplebaum Britain Moved Away From Germanic Civ
1) Brit…
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-11 18:24:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656726943931170819
Britain Moved Away From Germanic Civ
1) Britain separated from Germanic civ in about 1830.
2) Britain and Germany civ both divorced from traditional Germanic civ in the world war (european civil war ending empires). With Britain going ‘feminine’ like France – at least outside of what remained of the aristocracy.
3) USA is the only remaining (or was until 1990) fully Anglo-Germanic civilization. With Australia falling off the ledge. And canada pushed off the ledge by French Canada (the french are always wrong about everything.)
4) USA is now as Jewish-Marxist as it is Anglo-Empirical and Germanic-Rational, only because the 1950’s attempt to suppress the introgression of judeo-marxism into the states failed.
4) So the European civil war really did complete the french objective followed by the Jewish objective of destroying western civilization.
Reply addressees: @Nefertiiti @FernandoGLV1212 @just_atweethere @nellie_popper @anneapplebaum
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-11 18:24:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656726925404930057
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656719150759260163
RT @curtdoolittle: @Will86042755099 @TOOEdit WHY THE RIGHT GET’S PURGED AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT.
As far as I can tell, at least on twitter,…
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-09 23:44:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1656082781137510400
TESTIMONY: OUR OBJECTIVES
Sorry. I criticize ideas, beliefs, cultures, and civilizations. I don’t do the race thing. IMO race differences are largely differences in class size that place different demands on norms, traditions, laws, and institutions – but that we can all cooperate under the natural law, and that all people can evolve toward rule of law by the natural law that suppresses crime, corruption, and bad government – given enough time and effort. I recognize that europeans invented these things and as such we have a long head start. Sure. But when you realize western civ is just ‘science all the way down’ you realize that everyone can adopt the science (understanding) and technology (institutions) to make the same ‘goods’ available for all.
Now I’m aware that (a) the west got stuck selling democracy vs communism instead of rule of law vs authoritarianism. Because frankly, democracy is almost irrelevant – it’s rule of law by the natural law that provides peace and prosperity. And good govenment is only possible under rule of law by the natural law.
And I undrestand that OUR laws aren’t suppressing the cult-of-hatred that communism mutated into, called liberalism-feminism-woke. But I also understand that we can, and you can, quite easily write constitutions that prevent these evil cults of hatred just as we prohibited evil religions that preceded them in the past.
I might work for my people first. But As far as I know I work for all mankind – whether you like the taste of the medicine or not, it’s what will cure your ills. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-05 19:12:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654564861978836992
1) france is and always will be as great an enemy of europe as russia has been, and for the same reasons: a false and unearned sense of superiority.
2) france has maintained colonies and relative autarky in an attempt to slowly conquer europe with political manipulation just as Russia has maintained empire and has sought relative autarky in an attempt to quickly conquer europe opportunistically with force.
3) The only solution is the unification of germanic and eastern europe (which is what france and russia feared), producing the latin, continental, and russian spheres, in a balance of power.
4) Each country is best producing it’s own military (as we have through history and the british mastered with the Regimental system) but adhereing to certain standards, which nato has been successful at establishing. Right now The ukrainians and the Finns have the best militaries in europe. France second. England, germany, and the rest of europe can barely mount an effective military operation at anything other than symbolic scale.
4) Yes the optimum solution remains to use NATO, and the decline of american dominance of NATO, replace with the emphasis on the contental (german-slavic) centrality of NATO until France and Russia are no longer threats to the continental center. This is in progress as we speak with poland the dominant driver, and the intermarium that will include poland and ukraine achieving it’s useful purpose over time. (as predicted prewar).
5) Within a generation or so it will be possible to integrate Russia – and necessary for Russia – assuming this conflict ends with a russian ‘change of mind’. The young will drive the change especially if we restore internet service and produce russian language news and analysis.
6) At the same time the woke disaster (and libralism) are destroying the western civilization and our offer to other countries. So the internal war is destroying woke, liberalism, feminism, and tolerance for sedition against the natural law the europeans dont even grasp that is their foundation.
Reply addressees: @cavaller_humil
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-05 16:56:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654530404999626759
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654522018904113153
When colonizing space there are at least the problems for humans:
1 – Space is a vast irradiated wasteland hostile to life.
2 – Humans would need the equivalent of a large, hollow, rotating asteroid, and some sort of drive to move it.
3 – Enough people for a colony: > 1200, but more is better.
4 – A vast store of supplies for during and after.
5 – Virtual immortality AND hibernation ability
6 – As near to perfect recycling as possible
7 – Energy to supply humans and the drive
8 – Movement even at one constant G of acceleration would make colonization possible, but at high speeds, despite the vast emptiness of space, impact with anything would be catastrophic.
9 – Yes there are lots of planets but how many:
… a) are around a class G star
… b) in a relatively low density (safe) arm of a galaxy
… c) have large outer planets to protect it from asteroids and worse.
… d) are in the habitable zone
… e) aren’t tidally locked
… f) have a rocky, watery, surface
… g) a molten core creating a magnetosphere
… h) that together are safe enough long enough to develop life
… i) have evolved an atmosphere of nitrogen oxygen
… j) and are at least relatively free of hostile elements, geology and life forms?
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-03 21:15:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653870964138995712
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653863440350593025
When colonizing space there are at least the problems for humans:
1 – Space is a vast irradiated wasteland hostile to life.
2 – Humans would need the equivalent of a large, hollow, rotating asteroid, and some sort of drive to move it.
3 – Enough people for a colony: > 1200, but more is better.
4 – A vast store of supplies for during and after.
5 – Virtual immortality AND hibernation ability
6 – As near to perfect recycling as possible
7 – Energy to supply humans and the drive
8 – Movement even at one constant G of acceleration would make colonization possible, but at high speeds, despite the vast emptiness of space, impact with anything would be catastrophic.
9 – Yes there are lots of planets but how many:
… a) are around a class G star
… b) in a relatively low density (safe) arm of a galaxy
… c) have large outer planets to protect it from asteroids and worse.
… d) are in the habitable zone
… e) aren’t tidally locked
… f) have a rocky, watery, surface
… g) a molten core creating a magnetosphere
… h) that together are safe enough long enough to develop life
… i) have evolved an atmosphere of nitrogen oxygen
… j) and are at least relatively free of hostile elements, geology and life forms?
Reply addressees: @aldafa_ir @TheAutistocrat
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-03 21:15:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653870964030025729
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653863440350593025
TERNARY LOGIC AND TRIFUNCTIONALISM
(Another Toy)
. . . . . . . . . . . Differences in Prosperity
. . . . . . . .Differences in Energy Per Capita
. . . . . . . .Rates of Civilizational Evolution
. . . . . . . . . . . Civilizational Differences
. . . .Trifunctional Institutional Path Dependence
. . . . . . . . .Trifunctional Formal Institutions
. . . . . . . . Trifunctional Elites by Influence
. . . . . . Three Means of Influence-Coercion
. . . . . . . .Talking, Working Fighting Classes
. . . . . . . . . . Family, Clan, Tribe, Nation
. . . . . . . . . . . . Informal Institutions
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Organization
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reproduction
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reciprocity
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Cooperation
. . . . . . . . . . .(F-) Sex Differences (M+)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisition
. . . . . . . . . . . Demonstrated Interests
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Before . . . . . . . . . . . . During . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . After
Physical Laws …. Behavioral Laws …. Evolutionary Laws
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Logical Laws
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Ternary Logic
. . . . . . . . . . . . Ternary First Principles
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Science (Testimony)
. . . . . . . . . . .The Grammars (Language)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Disciplines
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Outliers
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 20:02:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652765469567340549
TERNARY LOGIC AND TRIFUNCTIONALISM
(Another Toy)
. . . . . . . . . . . Differences in Prosperity
. . . . . . . .Differences in Energy Per Capita
. . . . . . . .Rates of Civilizational Evolution
. . . . . . . . . . . Civilizational Differences
. . . .Trifunctional Institutional Path Dependence
. . . . . . . . .Trifunctional Formal Institutions
. . . . . . . . Trifunctional Elites by Influence
. . . . . . Three Means of Influence-Coercion
. . . . . . . .Talking, Working Fighting Classes
. . . . . . . . . . Family, Clan, Tribe, Nation
. . . . . . . . . . . . Informal Institutions
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Organization
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reproduction
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reciprocity
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Cooperation
. . . . . . . . . . .(F-) Sex Differences (M+)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisition
. . . . . . . . . . . Demonstrated Interests
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Before . . . . . . . . . . . . During . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . After
Physical Laws …. Behavioral Laws …. Evolutionary Laws
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Logical Laws
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Ternary Logic
. . . . . . . . . . . . Ternary First Principles
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Science (Testimony)
. . . . . . . . . . .The Grammars (Language)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Disciplines
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Outliers
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 20:02:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652765469735022592