NLI members and friends. You’re in the list.
I don’t think you’re a candidate for the other list.
Even that list I’m going to pare down.
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-12 01:08:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645957061618946048
Reply addressees: @anderstegn
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645953134660034560
@HAARETZcom, All;
The european ‘aristocratic’ interpretation of the ‘jewish problem’ was that the culture and religion of an insular diaspora prohibited the formation of a sufficient state that would force the primacy of the behavior of masculine realism in politics rather than jewish feminine idealism in social orders.
The jewish ethic favors feminine consensus by pilpul seeking agreement, instead of the western logical and empircal discovery of truth as a means of consensus. The difference is that the responsibility of diasporic separatists reliant on feminine consensus or agreement rather than landed state-creating warriors reliant on evidentiary and material truth, and responsibiilty for private and common before self and family.
So this feminine ethic allowed claims of pretense of innocence and victimhood despite the irreciprocal means of profiting from host populations.
So, at least among our learned class, our ‘hope’ has been, at least since we proposed the ‘relocation of the jews to their homeland’, that once responsible for a state, the jewish self identity, ethic, morals, politics, and ‘laws’ would reform to reflect the necessity of self preservation of autonomy in a modern rule of law state, thus ending the “problem of jewish asymmetric ethics and specialization in rent seeking and baiting into hazard.”
It’s very hard to build and hold a state by the social construction of ideas, philosophies, ethics, morals, laws and scripture that for all intents and purposes violate the laws of the universe.
There are no feminine states for a reason.
And there never will be.
And frankly an assertive israel, that achieves the population of the netherlands, will dominate the region for obvious reasons too impolitic to state here in this forum.
And that would better the jewish people, repair their deserved reputation for parasitism and sedition, and make themselves, the middle east, and the rest of the world by externality, a better place for all of us.
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-12 01:07:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645956753668882432
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645301834398027776
@HAARETZcom, All;
The european ‘aristocratic’ interpretation of the ‘jewish problem’ was that the culture and religion of an insular diaspora prohibited the formation of a sufficient state that would force the primacy of the behavior of masculine realism in politics rather than jewish feminine idealism in social orders.
The jewish ethic favors feminine consensus by pilpul seeking agreement, instead of the western logical and empircal discovery of truth as a means of consensus. The difference is that the responsibility of diasporic separatists reliant on feminine consensus or agreement rather than landed state-creating warriors reliant on evidentiary and material truth, and responsibiilty for private and common before self and family.
So this feminine ethic allowed claims of pretense of innocence and victimhood despite the irreciprocal means of profiting from host populations.
So, at least among our learned class, our ‘hope’ has been, at least since we proposed the ‘relocation of the jews to their homeland’, that once responsible for a state, the jewish self identity, ethic, morals, politics, and ‘laws’ would reform to reflect the necessity of self preservation of autonomy in a modern rule of law state, thus ending the “problem of jewish asymmetric ethics and specialization in rent seeking and baiting into hazard.”
It’s very hard to build and hold a state by the social construction of ideas, philosophies, ethics, morals, laws and scripture that for all intents and purposes violate the laws of the universe.
There are no feminine states for a reason.
And there never will be.
And frankly an assertive israel, that achieves the population of the netherlands, will dominate the region for obvious reasons too impolitic to state here in this forum.
And that would better the jewish people, repair their deserved reputation for parasitism and sedition, and make themselves, the middle east, and the rest of the world by externality, a better place for all of us.
Reply addressees: @haaretzcom
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-12 01:07:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645956753455022081
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645301834398027776
FWIW:
1) The present wiki article on classical liberalism isn’t bad.
2) Doing the right thing isn’t an opinion, it’s science:
Reciprocal insurance of self determination by self determined means, by tests of sovereignty in demonstrated intersts, reciprocity in display word and deed, limiting us to cooperative markets for the private (the market) and common (legislature), and argument, the duel, and the court of the common concurrent natural law by these criteria for the resolution of our differences, thus producing the most cooperation at the largest scale,with the greatest rewards, at the greatest velocity, at the lowest risk, with the greatest certainty, at the lowest cost that is possible for mankind.
3) Leftism is an attempt to violate responsibility for all of the above, by generating conflict that these set of criteria is oppression rather than the domestication of the human animal for it’s own good and the betterment of all in a pareto distribution of competency and a nash equilibrium of rewards.
4) The child and in large part the female, and in lesser part the male, evade responsibility because either they are incompetent, or can obtain privileges by claims of oppression, or because the cost of responsibility for policing the private and common exposes them to conflict over conflict resolution that they fear becaus of their relative physical weakness. This is why women fail in voting – they are disinclined to take responsibiilty when a vote is a proxy for the violence needed use the state for the suppression of irresponsibility and the maximization of individual responsiblity.
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-11 14:19:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645793626927124480
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645457477410988032
FWIW:
1) The present wiki article on classical liberalism isn’t bad.
2) Doing the right thing isn’t an opinion, it’s science:
Reciprocal insurance of self determination by self determined means, by tests of sovereignty in demonstrated intersts, reciprocity in display word and deed, limiting us to cooperative markets for the private (the market) and common (legislature), and argument, the duel, and the court of the common concurrent natural law by these criteria for the resolution of our differences, thus producing the most cooperation at the largest scale,with the greatest rewards, at the greatest velocity, at the lowest risk, with the greatest certainty, at the lowest cost that is possible for mankind.
3) Leftism is an attempt to violate responsibility for all of the above, by generating conflict that these set of criteria is oppression rather than the domestication of the human animal for it’s own good and the betterment of all in a pareto distribution of competency and a nash equilibrium of rewards.
4) The child and in large part the female, and in lesser part the male, evade responsibility because either they are incompetent, or can obtain privileges by claims of oppression, or because the cost of responsibility for policing the private and common exposes them to conflict over conflict resolution that they fear becaus of their relative physical weakness. This is why women fail in voting – they are disinclined to take responsibiilty when a vote is a proxy for the violence needed use the state for the suppression of irresponsibility and the maximization of individual responsiblity.
Reply addressees: @ConceptualJames @Koestghost @TheLaurenChen
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-11 14:19:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645793626801225728
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645457477410988032
AMPLIFYING LINDSAY:
Lindsay’s doing a spectacular job of getting the message out using the same method of ‘critique’ the enemy has used to undermine our civilization.
I think one of the logical bits he’s missing that would help his arguments, is that the history of classical liberalism going back to the greeks (and really back to the steppe), is the use of classical liberal institutions to produce responsibility in exchange for self determination.
In other words, european ‘aristocratic egalitarianism’ through most of european institutional history grants freedom first and influence second, in exchange for demonstrated responsibility for the contribution to the commons, and NOT engaging in irresponsibility.
This is because the west defeats the rest by outpacing the rest in the bronze, iron, and steel ages, by the production of commons, and especially the commons of trust, by truth before face, reciprocity before self, and duty before self, and commons first.
– Truth(reciprocity in display word and deed for the benefit of the commons),
– Duty(responsibility to the commons),
– Excellence(contribution to the commons, especially novel contribution of competitive advantage to the commons)
– Beauty (contribution to the commons especially in aesthetic contribution to the competitive advantage ofthe commons)
So James is using religious, philosophical, and moral language which is more accessible to the masses than universal language of the science of human behavior: economics(positive) and law(negative).
What we learn from James’ success in communication is that we have failed to educate the citizenry (population) in the science of behavior.
And that’s partly because it’s useful for the left via the education system to NOT teach geography, history, comparative civilization, the common concurrent natural law of cooperation, and the reducibility of all human behavior to economic terms.
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-11 14:09:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645791063435538433
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645455345261633537
AMPLIFYING LINDSAY:
Lindsay’s doing a spectacular job of getting the message out using the same method of ‘critique’ the enemy has used to undermine our civilization.
I think one of the logical bits he’s missing that would help his arguments, is that the history of classical liberalism going back to the greeks (and really back to the steppe), is the use of classical liberal institutions to produce responsibility in exchange for self determination.
In other words, european ‘aristocratic egalitarianism’ through most of european institutional history grants freedom first and influence second, in exchange for demonstrated responsibility for the contribution to the commons, and NOT engaging in irresponsibility.
This is because the west defeats the rest by outpacing the rest in the bronze, iron, and steel ages, by the production of commons, and especially the commons of trust, by truth before face, reciprocity before self, and duty before self, and commons first.
– Truth(reciprocity in display word and deed for the benefit of the commons),
– Duty(responsibility to the commons),
– Excellence(contribution to the commons, especially novel contribution of competitive advantage to the commons)
– Beauty (contribution to the commons especially in aesthetic contribution to the competitive advantage ofthe commons)
So James is using religious, philosophical, and moral language which is more accessible to the masses than universal language of the science of human behavior: economics(positive) and law(negative).
What we learn from James’ success in communication is that we have failed to educate the citizenry (population) in the science of behavior.
And that’s partly because it’s useful for the left via the education system to NOT teach geography, history, comparative civilization, the common concurrent natural law of cooperation, and the reducibility of all human behavior to economic terms.
Reply addressees: @ConceptualJames @TheLaurenChen
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-11 14:09:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645791063293022208
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645455345261633537
We don’t have a gun violence problem.
We have a black violence problem.
Becuase we have a black family problem.
Because we have a black community problem.
Because we have a prohibition on full integration problem.
And because we have a forced association problem, without full integration.
Because in the 1960’s the democrats destroyed the black family, the black community, and the rise of black-centric middle class and elites, and relocated blacks, using the soviet model, to urban slums, to tilt elections in democratic favor, and the result has been the ‘destruction of our cities’ and the ‘black family and community’ as a consequence.
It takes only about 6 to 8% of a hostile minority to destroy the society, polity, and economy of a city. And you’ve done it and yoi keep doing it.
So no, you may not end our right to defend against an increasingly authoritarian government because you cannot create stable families, cannot control the behavior of your community, AND you vote for the people who won’t control it, AND you blame others for your failure in both casese, while falsely claiming you’re the victims.
So, own it.
Yes, ‘whitness’ (logic, science, natural law) is the most emotionally and psychologically difficult personal, social, economic, and political order man has invented, because it maximizes individual responsibility, and punishes by market and institutional means those who cannot or will not accept personal responsibility.
Yes there is some truth to the earlier and deeper sexual maturity of the black community driving greater chances of conflict over status. But denying this fact exacerbates the problem.
If you are saying your people are unfit for advanced civilization, then the evidence is to the contrary, because most of the progress of black america was made BEFORE the civil rights movement, forced integration (mutual destruction) and johnson’s (soviet) relocation program.
As always, the man in the mirror is to blame.
Own it.
You aren’t victims.
Of anything other than yourselves.
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-10 12:32:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645404407809359872
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645151525742804994
We don’t have a gun violence problem.
We have a black violence problem.
Becuase we have a black family problem.
Because we have a black community problem.
Because we have a prohibition on full integration problem.
And because we have a forced association problem, without full integration.
Because in the 1960’s the democrats destroyed the black family, the black community, and the rise of black-centric middle class and elites, and relocated blacks, using the soviet model, to urban slums, to tilt elections in democratic favor, and the result has been the ‘destruction of our cities’ and the ‘black family and community’ as a consequence.
It takes only about 6 to 8% of a hostile minority to destroy the society, polity, and economy of a city. And you’ve done it and yoi keep doing it.
So no, you may not end our right to defend against an increasingly authoritarian government because you cannot create stable families, cannot control the behavior of your community, AND you vote for the people who won’t control it, AND you blame others for your failure in both casese, while falsely claiming you’re the victims.
So, own it.
Yes, ‘whitness’ (logic, science, natural law) is the most emotionally and psychologically difficult personal, social, economic, and political order man has invented, because it maximizes individual responsibility, and punishes by market and institutional means those who cannot or will not accept personal responsibility.
Yes there is some truth to the earlier and deeper sexual maturity of the black community driving greater chances of conflict over status. But denying this fact exacerbates the problem.
If you are saying your people are unfit for advanced civilization, then the evidence is to the contrary, because most of the progress of black america was made BEFORE the civil rights movement, forced integration (mutual destruction) and johnson’s (soviet) relocation program.
As always, the man in the mirror is to blame.
Own it.
You aren’t victims.
Of anything other than yourselves.
Reply addressees: @Justinjpearson
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-10 12:32:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645404407608008706
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645151525742804994
THREAD
–“I’m sick of herding a bunch of special needs kids pretending to be a movement.”–
Why is social media a false promise of political organizing?
Why are relationships, meetings, email and forums more effective? https://twitter.com/DeadScrump/status/1644476360558034944
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-10 12:17:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645400584906760199