THE INTERTEMPORAL DIVISION OF MORAL INTUITIONS REFLECTING THE INTERTEMPORAL DIVISION OF PERCEPTION, LABOR, AND ADVOCACY.
Form: Sketch
-
Differences in Families, Clans, Tribes, Nations, Races
Working theory: PROBLEM Constant regression toward the mean creates the need for persistent pressures to maintain a genetic advantage in the group. Meaning that groups can regress easily at any point through admixture, or shifting of rates of reproduction within the group. VALUE Man can adapt to any circumstance without requiring evolutionary mutation, but due simply to the frequency of expression of traits in a population as they are needed. This produces an extremely adaptive organism. We adapt by learning, by social norms, and by rates of reproduction between the classes. Because classes are, and always have been, superior and inferior genetic expressions. SPECIATION Yes, it appears that we have been in the process of first eradicating all competitors to homo sapiens sapiens, then through our races beginning to speciate. There are four major races: negroid, mongoloid, Caucasoid: European (northern/forest/plain) Caucasoid, Iranian (southern/desert/steppe) Caucasoid, and many sub-races within them such as Semitic(african/iranian-caucusoid), all of which had begun to speciate. But these differences are explicable as endocrinal, since humans are ‘grown’ and modifying endocrinal expressions produces the differences in the behavior (and look) of the races. THEREFORE1) Most evolutionary differences in the races of homo sapiens are endocrinal. …a) Greater or less sexual dimorphism …b) Greater or less sexual maturity (aggression / impulsivity) …c) Faster or slower sexual maturity (aggression / impulsivity) (Asians low sexual maturity, longer lifespans, low testosterone, followed by whites in the middle, and people of color much higher)) (jewish sexual reversal, African exaggerated masculinity, Asian sexual immaturity, white high sexual dimorphism and delayed maturity) …d) Bigger(more expensive/hotter) or smaller(less expensive/cooler) bodies and brains. …e) Female verbal/empathic and male spatial/operational tendencies are ‘grown’ and largely the result of in-utero development. A male brain is essentially ‘damaged’ by testosterone, and then the remaining brain ‘grows’ by exaggerating a minority of characteristics. Egro endocrinal differences in utero in families can produce wide variations in human traits) 2) Next, some groups have used upward redistribution of reproduction by the upward distribution of food, care, and shelter, and the downward distribution of stresses. …a) Assortative (voluntary) mate selection (good) vs arranged marriages (bad) …b) the prohibition (good) on close cousin marriage (very bad). …c) late marriage (good) vs early marriage (bad) …d) property requirement before marriage (good) or not (bad) …e) ‘taxing’ the underclass so that they bear the brunt of starvation, illness, hard physical labor, and accumulated cellular damage. …f) Manorialism – particularly in Europe and china/japan. (or anywhere there was slavery or serfdom) combines all these features. …g) (and underrated:) high rates of child and infant mortality dependent largely on caloric intake and stresses. 3) The remaining differences are in culling the bottom of the distribution. …a) cold climates where long time preference is required are unforgiving to the impulsive. …b) exposure (killing) of unwanted children …a) Sacrificing the undesirable. …b) Hanging/burning/strangling, the undesirable, criminal. …c) Ostracizing the undesirable under agrarianism (a death sentence) …b) War in all its historical versions. This is a pretty simple set of rules that does not require any material genetic experimentation (mutation) in order to evolve differences between groups other than by the expression of traits. THE SECRET OF WESTERN MAN? We’re the most eugenic peoples ever. We aren’t better per se. We’ve just successfully killed off all the worst for so long that far more good families, clans, and tribes survive than bad families. THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION CHANGED ALL THAT because we could now profit from organizing production and selling to the underclasses, rather than profiting from upward redistribution away from the underclasses. UNIVERSAL DEMOCRACY CHANGED ALL THAT Democracy changed this ancient culture strategy because we changed from one productive family (not one man) one vote, to equal votes for all – and since women are reproductively irresponsible (dysgenic), and the lower classes reproductively damaging(dysgenic), and together are more numerous, they implemented policies that reversed western genetic exceptionalism. We have experienced a temporary ‘burst’ (Flynn effect) which appears to me (statistically) to be an artifact of improving the nutrition of the bottom, and the distribution of scientific (a few general rules) rather than recipes (many specific rules). But this effect will be neutralized (reversed), as the rates of reproduction of the underclasses continue to expand. (There is some promise that all the underclasses will slow reproduction, but this appears to be an artifact of the right-distribution of prior generations, and it’s going to disappear also). IT’S REALLY THAT SIMPLE. You cannot have liberty and prosperity unless you have eugenic civilization.
-
Differences in Families, Clans, Tribes, Nations, Races
Working theory: PROBLEM Constant regression toward the mean creates the need for persistent pressures to maintain a genetic advantage in the group. Meaning that groups can regress easily at any point through admixture, or shifting of rates of reproduction within the group. VALUE Man can adapt to any circumstance without requiring evolutionary mutation, but due simply to the frequency of expression of traits in a population as they are needed. This produces an extremely adaptive organism. We adapt by learning, by social norms, and by rates of reproduction between the classes. Because classes are, and always have been, superior and inferior genetic expressions. SPECIATION Yes, it appears that we have been in the process of first eradicating all competitors to homo sapiens sapiens, then through our races beginning to speciate. There are four major races: negroid, mongoloid, Caucasoid: European (northern/forest/plain) Caucasoid, Iranian (southern/desert/steppe) Caucasoid, and many sub-races within them such as Semitic(african/iranian-caucusoid), all of which had begun to speciate. But these differences are explicable as endocrinal, since humans are ‘grown’ and modifying endocrinal expressions produces the differences in the behavior (and look) of the races. THEREFORE1) Most evolutionary differences in the races of homo sapiens are endocrinal. …a) Greater or less sexual dimorphism …b) Greater or less sexual maturity (aggression / impulsivity) …c) Faster or slower sexual maturity (aggression / impulsivity) (Asians low sexual maturity, longer lifespans, low testosterone, followed by whites in the middle, and people of color much higher)) (jewish sexual reversal, African exaggerated masculinity, Asian sexual immaturity, white high sexual dimorphism and delayed maturity) …d) Bigger(more expensive/hotter) or smaller(less expensive/cooler) bodies and brains. …e) Female verbal/empathic and male spatial/operational tendencies are ‘grown’ and largely the result of in-utero development. A male brain is essentially ‘damaged’ by testosterone, and then the remaining brain ‘grows’ by exaggerating a minority of characteristics. Egro endocrinal differences in utero in families can produce wide variations in human traits) 2) Next, some groups have used upward redistribution of reproduction by the upward distribution of food, care, and shelter, and the downward distribution of stresses. …a) Assortative (voluntary) mate selection (good) vs arranged marriages (bad) …b) the prohibition (good) on close cousin marriage (very bad). …c) late marriage (good) vs early marriage (bad) …d) property requirement before marriage (good) or not (bad) …e) ‘taxing’ the underclass so that they bear the brunt of starvation, illness, hard physical labor, and accumulated cellular damage. …f) Manorialism – particularly in Europe and china/japan. (or anywhere there was slavery or serfdom) combines all these features. …g) (and underrated:) high rates of child and infant mortality dependent largely on caloric intake and stresses. 3) The remaining differences are in culling the bottom of the distribution. …a) cold climates where long time preference is required are unforgiving to the impulsive. …b) exposure (killing) of unwanted children …a) Sacrificing the undesirable. …b) Hanging/burning/strangling, the undesirable, criminal. …c) Ostracizing the undesirable under agrarianism (a death sentence) …b) War in all its historical versions. This is a pretty simple set of rules that does not require any material genetic experimentation (mutation) in order to evolve differences between groups other than by the expression of traits. THE SECRET OF WESTERN MAN? We’re the most eugenic peoples ever. We aren’t better per se. We’ve just successfully killed off all the worst for so long that far more good families, clans, and tribes survive than bad families. THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION CHANGED ALL THAT because we could now profit from organizing production and selling to the underclasses, rather than profiting from upward redistribution away from the underclasses. UNIVERSAL DEMOCRACY CHANGED ALL THAT Democracy changed this ancient culture strategy because we changed from one productive family (not one man) one vote, to equal votes for all – and since women are reproductively irresponsible (dysgenic), and the lower classes reproductively damaging(dysgenic), and together are more numerous, they implemented policies that reversed western genetic exceptionalism. We have experienced a temporary ‘burst’ (Flynn effect) which appears to me (statistically) to be an artifact of improving the nutrition of the bottom, and the distribution of scientific (a few general rules) rather than recipes (many specific rules). But this effect will be neutralized (reversed), as the rates of reproduction of the underclasses continue to expand. (There is some promise that all the underclasses will slow reproduction, but this appears to be an artifact of the right-distribution of prior generations, and it’s going to disappear also). IT’S REALLY THAT SIMPLE. You cannot have liberty and prosperity unless you have eugenic civilization.
-
ENLIGHTENMENT PROGRESSION The British Enlightenment Era and Assertion : Trafalga
ENLIGHTENMENT PROGRESSION
The British Enlightenment Era and Assertion : Trafalgar (Martial/commercial) Capitulation: (WW1, decolonialization)
The American Enlightenment Era and Assertion : Revolution (Legal) Capitulation: Vietnam/NeoconFailure
The French Enlightenment Era And Assertion : Revolution (Moral/Napoleon-force) Capitulation (napoleon’s defeat)(decolonialization)
The German Enlightenment Era And Assertion : Unification (Rational using consent and reason) Capitulation: postwar germany.
The Russian Enlightenment Era and Assertion : Revolution (Bolshevik using force and propaganda) Capitulation: return to authoritarian economy and polity.
The Jewish Enlightenment Era and Assertion : 19th-20th Century (Pseudoscience using media) Capitulation: (just starting now, plus the anticipated failure of israel.)
The Chinese Enlightenment Era and Assertion : (Maoist Revolution using force and propaganda) Capitulation: Abandonment of communism and socialism and restoration of mixed economy.
The Hindu Enlightenment Era and Assertion : Unification, Independence, non expansion. Capitulation: (abandonment of socialism, and inability to solve domestic corruption and disorder,)
The Latin Enlightenment Era and Assertion (Socialism) Capitulation: In progress.
The Arab Enlightenment Era and Resistance : (Arab Spring) Capitulation? (perhaps not. perhaps their method of expansion by reproduction and raiding is superior to modernity.)
THE DECLINE 1914-1992
THE CONFLICT 2020 -> ?
THE REFORMATION ???? -> ???
Only solution I see is return to tribalism and abandonment of corporatism as science tells us the painful truth that none of our images of expansion is possible.
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-20 04:37:00 UTC
-
SKETCH – THE CORPORATION AND DEMOCRACY BOTH FAIL? So, if we know democracy is a
SKETCH – THE CORPORATION AND DEMOCRACY BOTH FAIL?
So, if we know democracy is a failed experiment in government(commons production), and a failed experiment in the economy (good and services production);
And if we know that shareholders are not in fact owners in any sense of the word, but merely claimants on:
(a) rapidly liquid non cash holdings of assets (store of value),
(b) speculative growth (hedging an asset against depreciation),
(c) dividends – when there are dividends (income), and;
(b) the dissolution value of the asset in the cast of failure.
And if we know that bond holders are merely an early position claimant on the income stream. And that bonds produce only defensive returns (hedging an asset against inflation).
And if we know that corporations decreasingly control tangible assets, and are increasingly dependent upon intangible networks, in increasingly complex layers of production.
And if we know much of this ‘scheme’ is insured by the sale of risk instruments, which do in fact protect against minor failures, but produce catastrophic chain reactions when there are systemic failures in the economy.
Then does that mean that we can eliminate the Corporation and S-Corporation, and Double Taxation?
5 – Political Order (The whole range)
4 – CORP (Democracy) and S-CORP (Democracy),
3 – LLC (Hierarchy),
2 – Partnership(Peerage),
1 – Personal Property (Personage).
Why don’t we just create ‘truthful’ instruments for the modern world rather than these legally complicated dishonest instruments left over from the demonstrated failures of the industrial era of family owned companies managed by professionals, and democratic polities governed by senior members of tribes?
If we understand we must eliminate democracies and return to private monarchies, why must we not also eliminate corporations – also democracies – and return to partnerships, with limited liability (LLC’s).
I have seen nothing in board rooms, shareholder meetings, during my lifetime to suggest that this ridiculous experiment with democracy is anything but an overlapping set of lies we tell each other.
I have no idea why shareholders who are too ignorant of anything have any say whatsoever, other than in court of law. I have no idea why we must push all this transparency out into public and pay all these high costs and endure all this politicking, when what we need is simply good record keeping, legal accountability and perhaps bonding of all people within an organization, and vigorous prosecution of offenders. I mean, we overly protect companies as it is. It’s not the 19th century. This is absurd.
Source date (UTC): 2016-05-19 04:25:00 UTC
-
British vs American vs German Cultural Rules
Amoral (non-cooperative)
Objectively Moral (necessary for formation of a cooperative polity)
Normatively Moral (adaptations for structures of reproduction / production /Commons) Assuming a moral norm may be moral, if not amoral, or immoral.
Contractually Moral (adaptations for structures of reproduction / production / commons) Assuming a moral contract may be moral, if not amoral, or immoral.
Lawfully Moral (codifications of structures of reproduction / production / commons)
Assuming a law may be moral, if not amoral, or immoral )
Legislation is either moral, amoral, or immoral
Regulation is either moral, amoral, or immoral
Discretion is either moral, amoral, or immoral. -
Additive Sculpture (clay), and moral relations vs Subtractive Sculpture (stone)
Additive Sculpture (clay), and moral relations vs Subtractive Sculpture (stone) and moral liberty.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-30 08:33:00 UTC
-
WHAT IS THE NEXT ORDER? 1 – Farming led to Religious Order (ostracism / inclusio
WHAT IS THE NEXT ORDER?
1 – Farming led to Religious Order (ostracism / inclusion)
2 – Trade led to Legal Order ( restitution / punishment )
3 – Industry led to Credit Order ( consumption / deprivation )
4 – Technology will lead to Information Order? (opportunity / missed?)
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-22 07:00:00 UTC
-
Still Stuck with the Success of the German Literary over the Anglo Analytic
[I] am still stuck with the problem : 1) THE THREE CITIES a) The anglos had the right language mode (science), the right political model (rule of law common law), the right commons model (market for commons) but the wrong theory of man (equality),.
b) the germans had the wrong language model (literary rationalism), a typical political model (bibartate continental law), a typical commons model (decision by professional bureaucracy), and the right theory of man (hierarchy). c) the jews had the wrong language model (legalistic pseudoscience), political model (propaganda), commons model (none), and the wrong theory of man (separatism) 2) THE PEDAGOGICAL VS THE DECIDABLE The german model is one of regulation for the prevention of conflicts at the expense of innovation. The american is one of dispute resolution for the preservation of liberty in experimentation. The german model of man is empirical while the anglo model is ideological – a superior german transition from aristocracy to bureaucracy. The german model is pedagogical an literary (literary philosophy), and the anglo model is anti-pedagogical, and limited to dispute resolution.. The german model is to seek rational optimums while the american model is to use competition to discover optimums. 3) THE SUCCESS OF THE PEDAGOGICAL OVER THE DECIDABLE What troubles me is the success of the pedagogical german model in contrast to decidable anglo model. I am an anglo analytic philosopher. I know my function. But does that mean other authors will have to create pedagogical models of my work and that it is THEY who will be successful and not I? -
Still Stuck with the Success of the German Literary over the Anglo Analytic
[I] am still stuck with the problem : 1) THE THREE CITIES a) The anglos had the right language mode (science), the right political model (rule of law common law), the right commons model (market for commons) but the wrong theory of man (equality),.
b) the germans had the wrong language model (literary rationalism), a typical political model (bibartate continental law), a typical commons model (decision by professional bureaucracy), and the right theory of man (hierarchy). c) the jews had the wrong language model (legalistic pseudoscience), political model (propaganda), commons model (none), and the wrong theory of man (separatism) 2) THE PEDAGOGICAL VS THE DECIDABLE The german model is one of regulation for the prevention of conflicts at the expense of innovation. The american is one of dispute resolution for the preservation of liberty in experimentation. The german model of man is empirical while the anglo model is ideological – a superior german transition from aristocracy to bureaucracy. The german model is pedagogical an literary (literary philosophy), and the anglo model is anti-pedagogical, and limited to dispute resolution.. The german model is to seek rational optimums while the american model is to use competition to discover optimums. 3) THE SUCCESS OF THE PEDAGOGICAL OVER THE DECIDABLE What troubles me is the success of the pedagogical german model in contrast to decidable anglo model. I am an anglo analytic philosopher. I know my function. But does that mean other authors will have to create pedagogical models of my work and that it is THEY who will be successful and not I?