—
Judaism=Desire to Exclude
Christianity=Desire to Include
Islam=Desire to Dominate
—Casey Carroll
Aristocracy = Desire to ????
Defend?
Accumulate Strength?
Deny Others Access?
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-09 12:30:00 UTC
—
Judaism=Desire to Exclude
Christianity=Desire to Include
Islam=Desire to Dominate
—Casey Carroll
Aristocracy = Desire to ????
Defend?
Accumulate Strength?
Deny Others Access?
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-09 12:30:00 UTC
Ethical Models
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-08 08:13:00 UTC
The Enlightenment Strategies
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-08 08:12:00 UTC
I am still stuck with the problem that
1) THE THREE CITIES
a) The anglos had the right language mode (science), the right political model (rule of law common law), the right commons model (market for commons) but the wrong theory of man (equality),.
b) the germans had the wrong language model (literary rationalism), a typical political model (bibartate continental law), a typical commons model (decision by professional bureaucracy), and the right theory of man (hierarchy).
c) the jews had the wrong language model (legalistic pseudoscience), political model (propaganda), commons model (none), and the wrong theory of man (separatism)
2) THE PEDAGOGICAL VS THE DECIDABLE
The german model is one of regulation for the prevention of conflicts at the expense of innovation. The american is one of dispute resolution for the preservation of liberty in experimentation.
The german model of man is empirical while the anglo model is ideological – a superior german transition from aristocracy to bureaucracy.
The german model is pedagogical an literary (literary philosophy), and the anglo model is anti-pedagogical, and limited to dispute resolution..
The german model is to seek rational optimums while the american model is to use competition to discover optimums.
3) What troubles me is the success of the pedagogical german model in contrast to decideable anglo model. I am an anglo analytic philosopher. I know my function. But does that mean other authors will have to create pedagogical models of my work and that it is THEY who will be successful and not I?
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-08 08:07:00 UTC
It’s predecessor: Houses for the classes constituting a market for the construction of commons despite differences.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-01 08:13:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/715814423244513283
Reply addressees: @Bly_Kalm @ronellepretor
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/715809285712781312
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/715809285712781312
[S]CIENCE REPLACES PHILOSOPHY Existence (need for action) Aesthetics (the sciences of experiences / experience / spirituality) Testimony (the sciences of truth telling / knowledge / psychology) Law (the sciences of cooperation / each other / sociology) Engineering (the hard sciences / the universe / physics) [M]ETHODS OF COMMUNICATION Law(cooperation), Laws Aesthetics(pleasure), Experiences Literature(conflation), Analogies Science (deflation). Names. PHILOSOPHY IS COMPLETE
[S]CIENCE REPLACES PHILOSOPHY Existence (need for action) Aesthetics (the sciences of experiences / experience / spirituality) Testimony (the sciences of truth telling / knowledge / psychology) Law (the sciences of cooperation / each other / sociology) Engineering (the hard sciences / the universe / physics) [M]ETHODS OF COMMUNICATION Law(cooperation), Laws Aesthetics(pleasure), Experiences Literature(conflation), Analogies Science (deflation). Names. PHILOSOPHY IS COMPLETE
(this post is under construction for use in teaching propertarianism)
(We want to teach amoral language so that we can avoid deceit. propertarianism then extends Testimonialism: truth telling.)
COMMUNICATION
Transfer of properties by analogy culminating in the transfer of experience (meaning) by the process of “suggestion”.
The process of creating shared experiences using symbols – primarily language.
TRUTH
(reconstruction of same experience)
(where the experience corresponds to reality)
FALSEHOOD
Imagination
Error
Bias
Wishful Thinking
Obscurantism
Suggestion
Deceit
SUGGESTION
Loading
Framing
Shaming
Rallying
Chanting
Overloading
OVERLOADING
Mysticism/Supernaturalism
Narrative/Literature
Rationalism/Verbalism
Pseudoscience/Innumeracy
UNLOADING
Truthfulness
TRUTHFULNESS
Due diligence that we have not engaged in deception, or error, bias, wishful thinking, obscurantism, suggestion, and deceit.
DUE DILIGENCE
We perform due diligence by testing every dimension of knowledge we know how to. (just as we have different mathematics for each of the increasing dimensions):
Identity and Category
Internal Consistency (logic)
External Correspondence (empirical consistency)
Existential Possibility (operational definitions)
Parsimony, Limits, Full Accounting (limits)
Morality (Productive, Fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, limited to externality of the same.)
KNOWLEDGE
There is only one sequence to knowledge, and all others are false:
Perception(observation) -> Free Association(awareness) -> Hypothesis(guess) -> Theory(Due Diligence) -> Law(Survival) -> Tautology(identity/name) -OR- False
Knowledge is not a qualifier as some pretend, nor does it or can it convey truth content. It is anything in any state of the process of knowledge evolution that we can observe, are aware of, imagine possible, seems consistent, cannot seem to falsify, that is not yet false.
Knowledge: anything that works for the purposes we intend and we cannot yet deem false.
SCIENCE
Science = Truth telling. While we cannot know if we speak the most parsimonious truth, or whether we speak the truth, what we can do
THE ECONOMICS OF TRANSFERRING EXPERIENCES
(we use scientific language because it imposes the lowest cost of truth testing upon the audience. we avoid scientific language because we wish to impose costs upon the audience. We embrace unscientific language when we want to deceive.)
THE CREATIVITY OF MEANING AND THE CRITICISM OF TRUTH
(two part process: 1-transfer meaning, 2-test for truth – Reverse, Obverse)
WARRANTY
(skin in the game)
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-21 03:58:00 UTC
I think that I may finally understand what the nietzchean’s have been telling me, and can tranlate it into scientific language. Property acheives what authority had to. but in that sense it is still authoritarian. but without a cult the militia will not guarantee its persistence. And the militia benefits from aristocracy but does not necessarily need or desire truth.
Incentives.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-14 06:11:00 UTC