Curt Doolittle

Form: Sketch

  • We Imposed Truth On An Unwilling World

    Aryanism -> Aristocracy -> Christanity -> Puritanism -> Imperialsm -> American Hegemonialism -> …..???? Do we evolve Aryanism once again, and do we return to our ancient ‘industry’ of domesticating and transcending man? Or do we fall into another dark age? Or do we disappear from the earth? No other civilization has done this. It is possible no other can. Is there any higher purpose that a man can be called to fight for? I can’t think of any. We discovered truth. We imposed it on an unwilling world. It was profitable.

  • We Imposed Truth On An Unwilling World

    Aryanism -> Aristocracy -> Christanity -> Puritanism -> Imperialsm -> American Hegemonialism -> …..???? Do we evolve Aryanism once again, and do we return to our ancient ‘industry’ of domesticating and transcending man? Or do we fall into another dark age? Or do we disappear from the earth? No other civilization has done this. It is possible no other can. Is there any higher purpose that a man can be called to fight for? I can’t think of any. We discovered truth. We imposed it on an unwilling world. It was profitable.

  • The Competition Between Truth And Lies

    EUGENIC (truth)vsDYSGENIC (lies)
    Reasonable Philosophy Rational Philosophy Analytic Philosophy Scientific (Operational) PhilosophyTradition and Mysticism Theological Philosophy Pseudoscience and Postmodernism (What lie will they invent next?)

  • The Competition Between Truth And Lies

    EUGENIC (truth)vsDYSGENIC (lies)
    Reasonable Philosophy Rational Philosophy Analytic Philosophy Scientific (Operational) PhilosophyTradition and Mysticism Theological Philosophy Pseudoscience and Postmodernism (What lie will they invent next?)

  • 1) the properties of x equal the properties of x. (identity/tautology) these axi

    1)

    the properties of x equal the properties of x. (identity/tautology)

    these axioms allow me to say x (identity/tautology)

    -and-

    the properties of x are sufficiently equal to the properties of y for the purpose of this argument (ok) (category)

    2)

    These axioms x and those axioms y allow me to say z for the purpose of this argument, becuase that argument depends only on the axioms of x and y.

    -and-

    the properties of known x are shared with the properties of unknown y for the purpose of communicating the meaning of y. (ok) (meaning)

    3)

    given the properties of x and the properties of y, we can deduce z. (deduction) (No, no, no, no….!!!!!)

    – and –

    given the axioms x and the axioms y, we and deduce z. (deduction) (No, no, no, you can only guess z might be possible, however unlikley)

    4)

    given this subset of properties of x and this subset of properties of y, we can deduce z from the properties of x or y that are not a subset of x and y. (conflation) (No No No No…..!!!!)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-13 07:51:00 UTC

  • House per class; members selected by lot; equidistribution of budget; survive le

    House per class; members selected by lot; equidistribution of budget; survive legal dissent instead of majority assent.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-12 05:23:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/775203262756712448

    Reply addressees: @danielcraigb @tlot

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/774985981632077824

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/774985981632077824

  • THE WEST’S EVOLUTION OF ARYRANISM: DOMESTICATION Aryanism -> Aristocracy -> Chri

    THE WEST’S EVOLUTION OF ARYRANISM: DOMESTICATION

    Aryanism -> Aristocracy -> Christanity -> Puritanism -> Imperialsm -> American Hegemonialism -> …..????

    Do we evolve Aryanism once again, and do we return to our ancient ‘industry’ of domesticating and transcending man? Or do we fall ito another dark age? Or do we disappear from the earth?

    No other civilization has done this. It is possible no other can.

    Is there any higher purpose that a man can be called to fight for?

    I can’t think of any.

    We discovered truth. We imposed it on an unwilling world.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-06 06:16:00 UTC

  • WHY IS IT THAT WE DON”T MIX ECONOMIES? Military (Slavery) – labor dependent Comm

    WHY IS IT THAT WE DON”T MIX ECONOMIES?

    Military (Slavery) – labor dependent

    Communist (Serfdom) – skill dependent

    Democratic Socialist (freedom) – mentally dependent

    Capitalist (liberty) – capital dependent

    If nations are smaller there are more ‘top slots’ but each having less free capital for use in corruption available.

    All era’s face information problems when they scale.

    This is ours.

    The answer is always the same: information and institutions.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-05 05:48:00 UTC

  • THE COIN: EXPERIENCE, MEANING AND ANALOGY VS POSSIBILITY, EXISTENCE, AND TRUTH O

    THE COIN: EXPERIENCE, MEANING AND ANALOGY VS POSSIBILITY, EXISTENCE, AND TRUTH

    On this side we have meaning – experiential possibility.

    On this other side we have computability and operationalism: existential possibility

    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-02 03:34:00 UTC

  • TRUE NAMES (notes to self for current line of thought) —“Any sufficiently true

    TRUE NAMES

    (notes to self for current line of thought)

    —“Any sufficiently true property of the universe appears to the trained eye as a model rather than reality.”—Jonathan Page

    Constancy and determinism and true names. True = True Name. True name is “invariant”.

    If we pass the tests of dimensional consistency that I suggest with the 6/7 model, then it is very hard to say we do not have a true name.

    We can test the dimensions of the universe with mathematics.

    We can test the dimensions of cooperation with various forms of reason.

    But I am not sure that either in mathematics, or in reason, that once we surpass a certain (small) number of dimensions, that we are in-fact talking about a property of the universe, or whether we have entered the realm of models alone.

    There is possibly no limit to the manifold RELATIONS that we can model using dimensions to track those relations. I mean, this is what I suggest is a superior method of constructing artificial intelligences for very, very, fast searches. I suspect this is the long term answer to post-human intelligences. I kind of doubt that anything could touch it. And in this sense, mathematical searching *WILL* surpass proceduralism.

    What I am unsure about is whether we are describing the universe then, or whether we are describing a model constrained by the properties of the universe.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-02 03:16:00 UTC