IF I AM CORRECT, THEN ETHICAL INTUITIONISM IS CORRECT But they authors just didn’t have Mises, Rothbard and Hoppe to help them. (I did.) What Mises, Rothbard and Hoppe didn’t have, was the past twenty years of scientific research to rely upon. And the diverse set of ethical intuitions are not diverse at all. He he he he… It’s awesome. “All rights are reducible to property rights.” True. “All moral and ethical intuitions are reducible to property rights” is true also. The first is a legal statement. The second is a biological one. Libertarians figure it out. Not all of it. But they did it. I just put the cherry on the topping.
Form: Short Note
-
Ethical Intuitionism Is Correct (I Think) (via Praxeology)
IF I AM CORRECT, THEN ETHICAL INTUITIONISM IS CORRECT But they authors just didn’t have Mises, Rothbard and Hoppe to help them. (I did.) What Mises, Rothbard and Hoppe didn’t have, was the past twenty years of scientific research to rely upon. And the diverse set of ethical intuitions are not diverse at all. He he he he… It’s awesome. “All rights are reducible to property rights.” True. “All moral and ethical intuitions are reducible to property rights” is true also. The first is a legal statement. The second is a biological one. Libertarians figure it out. Not all of it. But they did it. I just put the cherry on the topping.
-
MOVEMENTS IN EUROPE
http://www.welt.de/politik/ausland/article119933288/Diese-Europaeer-wollen-eine-Abspaltung-vom-Mutterland.htmlSECESSION MOVEMENTS IN EUROPE
Source date (UTC): 2013-11-27 17:37:00 UTC
-
Lotharingia. It matters
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f54_1337075813Watch Lotharingia.
It matters.
Source date (UTC): 2013-11-27 17:34:00 UTC
-
Ken Hopf, who I consider one of the smartest critical rationalists outside of ac
Ken Hopf, who I consider one of the smartest critical rationalists outside of academia, and someone I intuitively agree with, reminds me that, despite my efforts, I still can fail to make my case, even with the best.
I need to work harder.
Criticism is more valuable than agreement.
Source date (UTC): 2013-11-27 09:37:00 UTC
-
Almost Everything You Need To Know About American Elections
THE WAR AGAINST WHITE MARRIED PEOPLE Add gender and marital status, and thats all you need to understand. “93% of blacks, 70% of Latinos, 60% of those under 30, and 62% of single people, voted for Obama. And white married couples over 30 years of age voted for Romney. Not much else matters.” –Dick Morris
-
Almost Everything You Need To Know About American Elections
THE WAR AGAINST WHITE MARRIED PEOPLE Add gender and marital status, and thats all you need to understand. “93% of blacks, 70% of Latinos, 60% of those under 30, and 62% of single people, voted for Obama. And white married couples over 30 years of age voted for Romney. Not much else matters.” –Dick Morris
-
ENOUGH LYING OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE. This is just, getting, well, … frankly it
http://freebeacon.com/iran-white-house-lying-about-details-of-nuke-deal/C’MON. ENOUGH LYING OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE.
This is just, getting, well, … frankly it’s gone all the way down to absurdly comical.
Source date (UTC): 2013-11-27 01:06:00 UTC
-
BUT IS IT GENETIC?
Yes, conservatives are INNATELY more critical of free-riders: “North Eurasian and Circumpolar hunter-gatherers (Hutterites and Amish, Puritans) will be more prone to altruistic punishment than those from Middle Old World culture area (Jews, Gypsies, Chinese)” “…. *** Puritan groups seem particularly prone to bouts of moralistic outrage directed at those of their own people seen as free riders and morally blameworthy.***” -Kevin MacDonald AND SO: Whether it is cultural or genetic or both doesn’t matter so much, although I’m in the 60/40 camp in favor of genetic on this topic. And the pareto rule would suggest that as long as you’re in a 90/10 proposition or less, diversity isn’t a problem. But two things are certain: a) people don’t actually assimilate outside of their gene pool, and b) our tribal differences – our tribal DIVERSITY is something very precious for everyone. Probably the ‘cuircumpolar’ in particular. Because that individualism is economically superior to group-ishness.
-
BUT IS IT GENETIC?
Yes, conservatives are INNATELY more critical of free-riders: “North Eurasian and Circumpolar hunter-gatherers (Hutterites and Amish, Puritans) will be more prone to altruistic punishment than those from Middle Old World culture area (Jews, Gypsies, Chinese)” “…. *** Puritan groups seem particularly prone to bouts of moralistic outrage directed at those of their own people seen as free riders and morally blameworthy.***” -Kevin MacDonald AND SO: Whether it is cultural or genetic or both doesn’t matter so much, although I’m in the 60/40 camp in favor of genetic on this topic. And the pareto rule would suggest that as long as you’re in a 90/10 proposition or less, diversity isn’t a problem. But two things are certain: a) people don’t actually assimilate outside of their gene pool, and b) our tribal differences – our tribal DIVERSITY is something very precious for everyone. Probably the ‘cuircumpolar’ in particular. Because that individualism is economically superior to group-ishness.
