Curt Doolittle

Form: Short Note

  • Dump the f35. Fail

    Dump the f35. Fail.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-21 22:38:00 UTC

  • Click for video: videos/10000000_2052633388111923_7818106080967455100_n_10154853

    Click for video: videos/10000000_2052633388111923_7818106080967455100_n_10154853370007264.mp4 Random good people. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-21 12:51:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-21 09:39:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-21 09:05:00 UTC

  • Um. Dear muslims. You kill westerners, well, we’re just assuming you’re undomest

    Um. Dear muslims. You kill westerners, well, we’re just assuming you’re undomesticated animals but that we will keep trying.

    But when you assassinate Russians you’re dealing with people that stole an empire from the mongols. They’re waaaay scarier than muslims.

    You have no idea what you clowns just did.

    Russians are not ‘hopeful’ like the west.

    They understand you.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-19 21:42:00 UTC

  • PREDICTION VS EXPLANATION I classify falsifiability under ‘scope consistency’: l

    PREDICTION VS EXPLANATION

    I classify falsifiability under ‘scope consistency’: limits, parsimony, and falsifiability. Technically they are all properties of scope. But to test scope we must test all dimensions of scope.

    Also, like internal consistency, i use external correspondence rather than ‘predictability’ since ‘prediction’ generally invites the ludic fallacy (probability). We cannot predict much in the economy, because any observation and measurement we make effects it. the physical sciences progress quckly because they are the most simple, becuase they are the least variant. social sciences advance more slowly because we adapt where the physical world can’t.

    So science requires that we ‘match the data’ recorded in retrospect, not that we predict. Instead, prediction is a reductio test of simple systems. Ergo, the explanation horizon depends reflects the rate of adaptation. so we must choose more prediction in some cases (physical science) and more explanatory power in other cases (social science) simply because the horizons vary so much between reaction (the physical world) and action (the social world).

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-19 11:24:00 UTC

  • Humans are very simple creatures. The mind operates by very predictable means, b

    Humans are very simple creatures. The mind operates by very predictable means, by very clear incentives. It’s the layer cake of justificatinos, excuses,lies we tell ourselves and each other that make it possible.

    We need to achieve a certain state. We attempt to achieve that state by the means available to us, and the techniques available to us.

    Why? Because most of us are uncompetitive, average, nothings, or worse, and we need a means of feeling like we’re winning or succeeding that is a game rather than a problem. Everyone tries to invent a signal-game of some sort because so little of what we do is meaningful to anyone other than ourselves.

    This used to be obtained through spiritualism of one form or another. But with the fall of religion we see secular people searching for all sorts of excuses to achieve the same ends by other means.

    It’s ok. It’s like breathing. We gotta do it. – Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-18 21:20:00 UTC

  • Westerners are unique in our deconflation of subjects – separation of the scient

    Westerners are unique in our deconflation of subjects – separation of the scientific/factual, legal/testimonial, moral/philosophical, festival, literary/emotional, religious/spiritual into separate disciplines most of which possess their own disciplinary languages.

    The most likely reason for the chinese failure to advance as rapidly as the west despite their much longer history and opportunity, is (a) harmony over resolution (b) lying in every possible context to prevent disruption of harmony (c) shift from empirical to ‘moral’ (rational) government.

    I’ve worked pretty hard and I think successfully at this curious western phenomenon we call ‘truth’, and I think I’ve successfully translated all the disciplines into a single scientific language.

    But I can’t even imagine any other civilization getting close to this state. Their concepts and languages and cultures are such a significant barrier that even among europeans the anglos are the only people to preserve deconflation.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-17 13:47:00 UTC

  • I can see us turning into The Inquisition

    I can see us turning into The Inquisition.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-16 21:42:00 UTC

  • If I we can get 5-10 of us who can prosecute, and if we can get 100 of you to us

    If I we can get 5-10 of us who can prosecute, and if we can get 100 of you to use propertarian reasoning in arguments on the web – that’s all it will take – we will change the world. If we have 300 than know the basic principles they are enough.

    We can overturn the century of lies.

    And then we call up our soldiers….

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-16 12:47:00 UTC