Curt Doolittle

Form: Short Note

  • I THINK THIS WORKS doolittle – negativa haidt – practica peterson – positiva

    I THINK THIS WORKS

    doolittle – negativa

    haidt – practica

    peterson – positiva

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-11 11:31:00 UTC

  • Punishing Columbia University?

    WHAT SHALL BE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY’S PUNISHMENT FOR THE FRANKFURT SCHOOL? For crimes against humanity, against western civilization, against the united states of america, what shall be the punishment for Columbia University? 1) Sponsorship of a Natural Law School and Degree? 2) “Cornell Style” Forcible Restructuring of Curriculum and Staff? 3) Total Purge of Staff and Replacement? 4) Closure, Destruction, And Prosecution?

  • Punishing Columbia University?

    WHAT SHALL BE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY’S PUNISHMENT FOR THE FRANKFURT SCHOOL? For crimes against humanity, against western civilization, against the united states of america, what shall be the punishment for Columbia University? 1) Sponsorship of a Natural Law School and Degree? 2) “Cornell Style” Forcible Restructuring of Curriculum and Staff? 3) Total Purge of Staff and Replacement? 4) Closure, Destruction, And Prosecution?

  • I don’t get involved in ‘****gates’

    ( I don’t get involved in ‘***gates’. Rallying and shaming is for common folk. Sorry. The substantive problem is the lack of rule of law under natural law with which we can prosecute by violence acts of harm, theft, fraud, and deceit. Everything else is just monkeys hooting at one another across territories. So either pull out your weapons and beat, break, kill, and burn, or look in the mirror at the monkey. It’s about that effective. )

  • I don’t get involved in ‘****gates’

    ( I don’t get involved in ‘***gates’. Rallying and shaming is for common folk. Sorry. The substantive problem is the lack of rule of law under natural law with which we can prosecute by violence acts of harm, theft, fraud, and deceit. Everything else is just monkeys hooting at one another across territories. So either pull out your weapons and beat, break, kill, and burn, or look in the mirror at the monkey. It’s about that effective. )

  • Against Fantasy Moral Literature

    Yeah, I really don’t like ‘moral literature’. the rule of deconflation (deflation): use literature for analogies. Use natural law for morality (moral accounting). Use Truth for testimony (science), and avoid ‘moral literature’. Because it was the conflationary content of moral literature that allowed the conservatives of the 19th and 20th centuries to fail to produce a counter to cosmopolitan pseudoscience, and french moralism, and german rationalism.

  • Against Fantasy Moral Literature

    Yeah, I really don’t like ‘moral literature’. the rule of deconflation (deflation): use literature for analogies. Use natural law for morality (moral accounting). Use Truth for testimony (science), and avoid ‘moral literature’. Because it was the conflationary content of moral literature that allowed the conservatives of the 19th and 20th centuries to fail to produce a counter to cosmopolitan pseudoscience, and french moralism, and german rationalism.

  • ( Group of Indians speaking to each other in English because they can’t understa

    ( Group of Indians speaking to each other in English because they can’t understand each other’s regional tongue. fascinating. )

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-10 14:19:00 UTC

  • British went diasporic in 1830 beacuase of the empire and adopted the jewish str

    British went diasporic in 1830 beacuase of the empire and adopted the jewish strategy separating them from germanic civ.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-09 22:33:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/807352539305820160

    Reply addressees: @TheBurkeanOak

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/807329589747847168

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/807329589747847168

  • Ever since I made the statement that women have a far harder time knowing which

    Ever since I made the statement that women have a far harder time knowing which men to trust I see it FREAKING EVERYWHERE.

    I had a strange conversation with a woman today and I kept thinking “she can’t be that stupid” but then a man got involved and I explained it to him and it was fine. I think women understand each other’s devious motives, but I think women really have no idea at all when they look at men, and listen to us. How do we read? Do we read that we’re scary? What? I don’t get it.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-09 20:00:00 UTC