Curt Doolittle

Form: Short Note

  • I miss Ukraine

    I miss Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-28 20:29:00 UTC

  • I realize this is hard to understand, but in the simplest example, most cultures

    I realize this is hard to understand, but in the simplest example, most cultures conflate religion and law. Ours maintained the separation. We preserve separation and therefore competition everywhere. Because sovereignty is our founding principle -t hat which makes us westerners. All other virtues of western civlization derive from – are a consequence of – sovereignty. Our separation of church (weak) and state (strong) is just what we think of most frequently. Or our separation of powers. But these separations exist to preserve sovereignty. We merely justify them as good because we intuit the preservation of sovereignty as a good where most other cultures are incapable of producing institutions that can survive competition.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-28 14:37:00 UTC

  • In order to preserve our excellences we must continue to practice deconflation o

    In order to preserve our excellences we must continue to practice deconflation of ideas. This means we must specialize in MULTIPLE disciplines rather than specialize in just one method of government.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-28 14:17:00 UTC

  • Three Coercions: Public Speech, Credit and Finance, Military and Law. If a peopl

    Three Coercions: Public Speech, Credit and Finance, Military and Law. If a people specializes in these three disciplines they can rule.

    We killed the Templars, and allowed false speech, then permitted access to rule without military service.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-28 14:16:00 UTC

  • (Listening to google’s new head of AI thinking…. actually this whole industry

    (Listening to google’s new head of AI thinking…. actually this whole industry is still in the dark ages. There is a vast difference between the identifications of symbols and their relations, and the operations that are possible with symbols. I don’t have time to comment on every field, but PROPERTARIANISM HAS MADE IT POSSIBLE TO DO SO.)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-28 14:08:00 UTC

  • I generally attack feminism and democracy, rather than people of competing cultu

    I generally attack feminism and democracy, rather than people of competing cultures and races. The reason is that it’s our women’s voting patterns that create the vulnerability of our people to other cultures and races.

    Attack the alterable cause not the unalterable one.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-28 14:05:00 UTC

  • MOST PEOPLE FLEEING IMMIGRATION / RACE / TAXES New Jersey (NYC / Newark ) New Yo

    MOST PEOPLE FLEEING

    IMMIGRATION / RACE / TAXES

    New Jersey (NYC / Newark )

    New York (NYC)

    Illinois (Chicago)

    Connecticut (NYC /Hartford/Bridgeport/Danbury/New Haven / Meriden)

    Massachusetts (Boston / Springfield )

    Mississippi

    Maryland (Baltimore)

    ECONOMICS

    Ohio (Cleveland, Cincinnati, Toledo)

    Kansas

    West Virginia

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-27 16:35:00 UTC

  • More Operationalism

    (economics, philosophy) I’ve been working with framing the debate against naive mathematics as similar to the debate against naive empiricism, because economics makes use of both naive empiricism and naive mathematics. For a very long time – since at least the greeks – we have advanced the fallacy that the universe is written in mathematical language. And we have advanced the fallacy that mathematics provides the gold standard by which to test our observations and theories. But, skipping ahead a bit, mathematics consists of a set of operations with which we maintain constant relations, and where we describe aggregates OF UNDERLYING OPERATIONS (transformations), without knowing the constitution of those underlying operations. So: 4) Conceptually identifiable phenomenon. 3) Empirically measurable phenomenon. 2) Mathematical description of patterns of those phenomenon. 1) Operational construction of those phenomenon. 0) Information In much of human inquiry we have been incorrectly categorizing the problem as the discovery of patterns we observe, rather than the problem of operations that constitute them. 0) Information 1) Operations 2) Mathematics 3) Computers 4) “Recipes” 5) “Language” Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev Ukraine.

  • More Operationalism

    (economics, philosophy) I’ve been working with framing the debate against naive mathematics as similar to the debate against naive empiricism, because economics makes use of both naive empiricism and naive mathematics. For a very long time – since at least the greeks – we have advanced the fallacy that the universe is written in mathematical language. And we have advanced the fallacy that mathematics provides the gold standard by which to test our observations and theories. But, skipping ahead a bit, mathematics consists of a set of operations with which we maintain constant relations, and where we describe aggregates OF UNDERLYING OPERATIONS (transformations), without knowing the constitution of those underlying operations. So: 4) Conceptually identifiable phenomenon. 3) Empirically measurable phenomenon. 2) Mathematical description of patterns of those phenomenon. 1) Operational construction of those phenomenon. 0) Information In much of human inquiry we have been incorrectly categorizing the problem as the discovery of patterns we observe, rather than the problem of operations that constitute them. 0) Information 1) Operations 2) Mathematics 3) Computers 4) “Recipes” 5) “Language” Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev Ukraine.

  • MORE OPERATIONALISM (economics, philosophy) I’ve been working with framing the d

    MORE OPERATIONALISM

    (economics, philosophy)

    I’ve been working with framing the debate against naive mathematics as similar to the debate against naive empiricism, because economics makes use of both naive empiricism and naive mathematics.

    For a very long time – since at least the greeks – we have advanced the fallacy that the universe is written in mathematical language. And we have advanced the fallacy that mathematics provides the gold standard by which to test our observations and theories.

    But, skipping ahead a bit, mathematics consists of a set of operations with which we maintain constant relations, and where we describe aggregates OF UNDERLYING OPERATIONS (transformations), without knowing the constitution of those underlying operations.

    So:

    4) Conceptually identifiable phenomenon.

    3) Empirically measurable phenomenon.

    2) Mathematical description of patterns of those phenomenon.

    1) Operational construction of those phenomenon.

    0) Information

    In much of human inquiry we have been incorrectly categorizing the problem as the discovery of patterns we observe, rather than the problem of operations that constitute them.

    0) Information

    1) Operations

    2) Mathematics

    3) Computers

    4) “Recipes”

    5) “Language”

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-27 08:38:00 UTC