Um. Fascism = Monopoly. Everyone wants a monopoly – whether left right or center. The west however rose at its unprecedented pace in the ancient and modern worlds, under tripartism and markets for cooperation, while maintaining underclass eugenics (suppression). So basically fascism won. The ‘examples’ being set for the rest of the world are china, russia and saudi arabia – a trend in the research that was identified in the 90’s. Democracy in the 19th and 20th and the French Revolution’s counter-empiricism will be, as in the ancient world, remembered as nothing more than a revolt made possible by temporary excesses in income made possible by european technological superiority and the use of it in colonization. In less than a century that competitive advantage (capital) has been spent down, and the world is dividing again into large caste systems (india, south america, the muslim world) and nationalisms (china, japan, south korea). With the west by fully accidental means, choosing to follow india, south america, and the levant, into permanent class warfare.
Form: Short Note
-
Fascism Won. Eugenicists Were Right.
Um. Fascism = Monopoly. Everyone wants a monopoly – whether left right or center. The west however rose at its unprecedented pace in the ancient and modern worlds, under tripartism and markets for cooperation, while maintaining underclass eugenics (suppression). So basically fascism won. The ‘examples’ being set for the rest of the world are china, russia and saudi arabia – a trend in the research that was identified in the 90’s. Democracy in the 19th and 20th and the French Revolution’s counter-empiricism will be, as in the ancient world, remembered as nothing more than a revolt made possible by temporary excesses in income made possible by european technological superiority and the use of it in colonization. In less than a century that competitive advantage (capital) has been spent down, and the world is dividing again into large caste systems (india, south america, the muslim world) and nationalisms (china, japan, south korea). With the west by fully accidental means, choosing to follow india, south america, and the levant, into permanent class warfare.
-
The Inversion of the IQ Controversy.
THE INVERSION OF THE IQ CONTROVERSY The IQ Controversy misses the point that it is not so much exceptional ability, which exists in all groups, that is so demonstrably advantageous for the GROUP, but the relative absence of lack of ability at the bottom end that is advantageous for the group. In other words, one can raise the average IQ of a group by trying to increase the number at the top, despite regression to the mean, or one can reduce the number at the bottom thereby changing the mean to which populations regress. And while we now know that lower intelligence is the product of accumulated defects, and that higher intelligence is the produce of eliminating defects, not necessarily any particular gain, the problem should be fairly obvious in that the greatest investment peoples can make in their present and future is the suppression of reproduction in the lower classes in exchange for redistribution.
-
The Inversion of the IQ Controversy.
THE INVERSION OF THE IQ CONTROVERSY The IQ Controversy misses the point that it is not so much exceptional ability, which exists in all groups, that is so demonstrably advantageous for the GROUP, but the relative absence of lack of ability at the bottom end that is advantageous for the group. In other words, one can raise the average IQ of a group by trying to increase the number at the top, despite regression to the mean, or one can reduce the number at the bottom thereby changing the mean to which populations regress. And while we now know that lower intelligence is the product of accumulated defects, and that higher intelligence is the produce of eliminating defects, not necessarily any particular gain, the problem should be fairly obvious in that the greatest investment peoples can make in their present and future is the suppression of reproduction in the lower classes in exchange for redistribution.
-
Degree vs IQ – And Where I Get My Categories.
ROUGH DISTRIBUTION OF IQ BY DEGREE. Now, what these distributions tell us is that the Minimum IQ for university level courses (calculations) is > 120 rather than the past > 115. And That means, again, that all university degrees are nonsense under 120, and that this vast debt does nothing but indoctrinate people into the cult of the state. — Learn by invention – 130 Physics 129 Mathematics 128.5 Computer Science 128 Economics 127.5 Chemical engineering 127 Material Science 126 Electrical Engineering 125.5 Mechanical Engineering — Learn by research — 125 Philosophy 124 Chemistry 123 Earth Sciences 122 Industrial Engineering 122 Civil Engineering 121.5 Biology — Learn by reading- 120.1 English/Literature 120 Religion/Theology 119.8 Political Science 119.7 History 118 Art History 117.7 Anthropology 116.5 Architecture — Learn by instruction- 116 Business 115 Sociology 114 Medicine (nursing etc) 112 Communication (marketing) 109 Education 106 Public Administration — Learn by imitation – ( … ) to 93. — Learn by repetition- ( … ) to 85. — Limited ability to learn – ( … ) below 85 IN PRISONS AS WELL – THE BOTTOM DETERMINES THE MEDIAN —“We definitely don’t understand the entire package as far as how IQ explains the process leading to an inmate engaging in misbehavior,” Morris said. “It’s more about IQ playing a role, and that it’s not only about a particular person’s IQ, but it’s about collective IQ in an environment of confinement.”—
-
Degree vs IQ – And Where I Get My Categories.
ROUGH DISTRIBUTION OF IQ BY DEGREE. Now, what these distributions tell us is that the Minimum IQ for university level courses (calculations) is > 120 rather than the past > 115. And That means, again, that all university degrees are nonsense under 120, and that this vast debt does nothing but indoctrinate people into the cult of the state. — Learn by invention – 130 Physics 129 Mathematics 128.5 Computer Science 128 Economics 127.5 Chemical engineering 127 Material Science 126 Electrical Engineering 125.5 Mechanical Engineering — Learn by research — 125 Philosophy 124 Chemistry 123 Earth Sciences 122 Industrial Engineering 122 Civil Engineering 121.5 Biology — Learn by reading- 120.1 English/Literature 120 Religion/Theology 119.8 Political Science 119.7 History 118 Art History 117.7 Anthropology 116.5 Architecture — Learn by instruction- 116 Business 115 Sociology 114 Medicine (nursing etc) 112 Communication (marketing) 109 Education 106 Public Administration — Learn by imitation – ( … ) to 93. — Learn by repetition- ( … ) to 85. — Limited ability to learn – ( … ) below 85 IN PRISONS AS WELL – THE BOTTOM DETERMINES THE MEDIAN —“We definitely don’t understand the entire package as far as how IQ explains the process leading to an inmate engaging in misbehavior,” Morris said. “It’s more about IQ playing a role, and that it’s not only about a particular person’s IQ, but it’s about collective IQ in an environment of confinement.”—
-
ROUGH DISTRIBUTION OF IQ BY DEGREE. Now, what these distributions tell us is tha
ROUGH DISTRIBUTION OF IQ BY DEGREE.
Now, what these distributions tell us is that the Minimum IQ for university level courses (calculations) is > 120 rather than the past > 115. And That means, again, that all university degrees are nonsense under 120, and that this vast debt does nothing but indoctrinate people into the cult of the state.
— learn by invention –
130 Physics
129 Mathematics
128.5 Computer Science
128 Economics
127.5 Chemical engineering
127 Material Science
126 Electrical Engineering
125.5 Mechanical Engineering
— learn by research —
125 Philosophy
124 Chemistry
123 Earth Sciences
122 Industrial Engineering
122 Civil Engineering
121.5 Biology
— learn by reading-
120.1 English/Literature
120 Religion/Theology
119.8 Political Science
119.7 History
118 Art History
117.7 Anthropology
116.5 Architecture
116 Business
–learn by instruction-
115 Sociology
114 Medicine (nursing etc)
112 Communication (marketing)
–learn by repetition –
109 Education
106 Public Administration
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-20 17:32:00 UTC
-
Untitled
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-20 16:11:00 UTC
-
The way to understand personality traits is to fill in the blanks: “In negotiati
The way to understand personality traits is to fill in the blanks:
“In negotiations with others [trait] helps me with ….. “
1) Ordliness (risk minimization) <-vs–> (reward maximization) Industriousness
2) Confrontation (risk minimization) <–vs–> (opportunity maximization) Politeness.
As far as I know all emotions can be expressed in three dimensions:
x) Dominance (Aggression) vs (Flight) Submission
y) Pain vs Pleasure.
z) Excitement vs Calm
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 20:34:00 UTC
-
MALE AND FEMALE COGNITIVE COMPATIBILITY All general rules of arbitrary precision
MALE AND FEMALE COGNITIVE COMPATIBILITY
All general rules of arbitrary precision must of necessity refer to a distribution. The fact that there may be voluntary and involuntary outliers in that distribution does not influence the correspondence of the general rule. It is nearly impossible for women to learn to think as such for evolutionary reasons. It is necessary for men to think as such, for those same reasons. This is why ‘compatibility but inequality’ thesis is the best to live by. We must know when the other ‘sensibility’ (female case, male general rule) provides the answer to the question.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 19:57:00 UTC