Curt Doolittle

Form: Short Note

  • “What is your political stance?”— How about Conservative(aristocratic), Libert

    —“What is your political stance?”—

    How about Conservative(aristocratic), Libertarian (rule of law), which means my stance is EUGENIC.

    And certainly not Progressive (priestly), Humanist (rule by discretion), which means DYSGENIC.

    As far as I know:

    (a) we either rule by discretion or rule by law (not legislation but law).

    (b) we either rule by eugenics and wealth, or rule by dysgenics and poverty.

    Because all political orders are deterministic. You either get a massive middle class (classical liberalism), get a caste system (india, south america), or you get a massive underclass (islam).

    Because in the end your relative standard of living is dependent upon the size of your underclass. Really. That’s all it is. Seriously.

    So choose between paying the piper now (conservative wealth and eugenics) or paying the piper later (progressive poverty and dysgenics ).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 13:27:00 UTC

  • Psychopathy like autism is not a problem other than incentives are more importan

    Psychopathy like autism is not a problem other than incentives are more important to psychopaths than normies. One of the reasons for (((other groups))) success with our high trust group is that they are in fact more sociopathic.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 12:40:00 UTC

  • (working while playing breaking benjamin, perfect circle, tool, nickelback full

    (working while playing breaking benjamin, perfect circle, tool, nickelback full discographies on shuffle. now, i need my porsche, and some good weather and a couple of pretty girls…. )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 11:58:00 UTC

  • THE PROBLEM OF SYMBOLIC EXISTENCE Or to quote my long time friend Frank Lovell,

    THE PROBLEM OF SYMBOLIC EXISTENCE

    Or to quote my long time friend Frank Lovell, Knowledge of unicorns exists, even if unicorns do not exist. And even this statement depends upon how we demarcate between Knowledge with Information. We actually don’t have a vocabulary for existence as idea or information other than ‘symbol’. And symbol is often confused with ‘glyph’. So, assuming we demarcate symbol and glyph unicorns exist only symbolically while horses exist existentially.

    So for existence we have grammars:

    || platonic < symbolic < constructive(operational) <- descriptive(existential) -> analogistic > literary > and fictional(isms) ||

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 11:57:00 UTC

  • (notes for later) SERIES The Crossing Westworld Altered Carbon Mr Robot The Terr

    (notes for later)

    SERIES

    The Crossing

    Westworld

    Altered Carbon

    Mr Robot

    The Terror

    The Last Kingdom / Vikings

    GOT

    Breaking Bad / Dexter

    Stranger Things

    The Returned / Glitch

    Slasher / The Killing / Dark / River / Frozen Dead

    House of Cards / The Crown

    MOVIES

    – SUCCESS:

    Spectral (not quite aliens but damn near)

    – NEAR MISSES:

    Pyramid, Void, Ghost Story, Black Mirror MetalHead Episode.

    FAILS

    The Mist (no reason for the failure either – stupid.)

    Lost in Space

    Dark Matter (came close but too much budget cut after season one.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 11:29:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://twitter.com/SRCHicks/status/987689348370857984/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=SRCHicks&utm_content=987689348370857984

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 09:51:00 UTC

  • THE PARETO PRINCIPLE AT WORK (A POWER LAW) by Noah J Revoy The worst 20% of the

    THE PARETO PRINCIPLE AT WORK (A POWER LAW)

    by Noah J Revoy

    The worst 20% of the group creates 80% of the negative externalities.

    The worst 20% of that subgroup causes 80% of that groups negative externalities.

    Another way to say that is: Out of a population of 326 million people living in USA, 13 million (4%) create 64% of the harmful externalities.

    The best 20% of the group creates 80% of the positive externalities.

    The best 20% of that subgroup causes 80% of that groups positive externalities.

    Another way to say that is: Out of a population of 326 million people living in the USA, 13 million (4%) create 64% of the beneficial externalities.

    THe people at the bottom aren’t just unproductive, they’re harmful.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 09:19:00 UTC

  • I think SAT’s are the best proxy we currently have in freely available data. I t

    I think SAT’s are the best proxy we currently have in freely available data. I think they are at best useful for determining sortition for university work – in other words, they successfully fulfill their purpose. They are problematic proxies for IQ since some of us (myself included) do not really reach our biological IQ until our early twenties, and others are completed by late high school. I have very high confidence in Ravens. However, while iq traits tend to scale, in heritable IQ there is an asymmetry between Spatial and Verbal, with heritability of verbal more dependent on the mother. This is rather obvious in retrospect, and explains why some groups with high verbal performance also express higher rates of homosexuality and behavioral effeminacy.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 09:14:00 UTC

  • Male and Female Cognitive Compatibility (Naxalt)

    All general rules of arbitrary precision must of necessity refer to a distribution. The fact that there may be voluntary and involuntary outliers in that distribution does not influence the correspondence of the general rule. It is nearly impossible for women to learn to think as such for evolutionary reasons. It is necessary for men to think as such, for those same reasons. This is why ‘compatibility but inequality’ thesis is the best to live by. We must know when the other ‘sensibility’ (female case, male general rule) provides the answer to the question. Apr 19, 2018 7:57pm

  • Male and Female Cognitive Compatibility (Naxalt)

    All general rules of arbitrary precision must of necessity refer to a distribution. The fact that there may be voluntary and involuntary outliers in that distribution does not influence the correspondence of the general rule. It is nearly impossible for women to learn to think as such for evolutionary reasons. It is necessary for men to think as such, for those same reasons. This is why ‘compatibility but inequality’ thesis is the best to live by. We must know when the other ‘sensibility’ (female case, male general rule) provides the answer to the question. Apr 19, 2018 7:57pm