Click for video: photos_and_videos/videos/30638170_1823000561338134_693044572946694144_n_10156303502627264.mp4
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 20:40:00 UTC
Form: Short Note
-
Click for video: photos_and_videos/videos/O2RaHKwGBhkYXNoX3Y0X2hxMV9mcmFnXzJfdml
Click for video: photos_and_videos/videos/O2RaHKwGBhkYXNoX3Y0X2hxMV9mcmFnXzJfdmlkZW8RABgYdmlkZW9zLnZ0cy5jYWxsYmFjay5wcm9kGRwVABW8mQIAKBJWSURFT19WSUVXX1J_10156303497642264.fna&oh=d93d0a520d1449ed339fcce4c1065a19&oe=5BDB5B55&_nc_rid=44a28776fb3d452 Jaimz BeelCan’t read the text… Any help?Apr 21, 2018 9:20pmWilliam Douglas HamiltonGERMANIA!Apr 21, 2018 9:28pmTyler Karl LiaDifferent Aryan groups migrating and creating the Iranic, Hellenic, Italic, Celtic, Slavic and Germanic groups.Apr 21, 2018 10:43pm
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 20:40:00 UTC
-
Click for video: videos/30638170_1823000561338134_693044572946694144_n_101563035
Click for video: videos/30638170_1823000561338134_693044572946694144_n_10156303502627264.mp4
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 20:40:00 UTC
-
Click for video: videos/33316747_1671225629621013_713735983248716983_n_101563034
Click for video: videos/33316747_1671225629621013_713735983248716983_n_10156303497642264.mp4
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 20:40:00 UTC
-
Future of Employment
We have entered an age where all increases in productivity are offset by increases in inflation, the purpose of which is to preserve employment, of people who are increasingly unemployable, and wage suppression of the working (meaning non-calculating, professional, non-entrepreneurial) classes will continue indefinitely as the world increasingly adds competing labor to the world labor pool. Every person in the middle is only 20% more productive than consumptive, and then only so for certain period of his or her life. so every person at the bottom quartile requires five people to pay for his existence throughout his life. Ergo, we must choose between decreasing the standard of living for all but the upper quintile, and constantly increasing inequality, or suppressing the rates of reproduction of the bottom and producing increasingly consistent equality. There is no alternative. Economics is just an extension of physics.
-
Future of Employment
We have entered an age where all increases in productivity are offset by increases in inflation, the purpose of which is to preserve employment, of people who are increasingly unemployable, and wage suppression of the working (meaning non-calculating, professional, non-entrepreneurial) classes will continue indefinitely as the world increasingly adds competing labor to the world labor pool. Every person in the middle is only 20% more productive than consumptive, and then only so for certain period of his or her life. so every person at the bottom quartile requires five people to pay for his existence throughout his life. Ergo, we must choose between decreasing the standard of living for all but the upper quintile, and constantly increasing inequality, or suppressing the rates of reproduction of the bottom and producing increasingly consistent equality. There is no alternative. Economics is just an extension of physics.
-
Intelligence
I think SAT’s are the best proxy we currently have in freely available data. I think they are at best useful for determining sortition for university work – in other words, they successfully fulfill their purpose. They are problematic proxies for IQ since some of us (myself included) do not really reach our biological IQ until our early twenties, and others are completed by late high school. I have very high confidence in Ravens. However, while iq traits tend to scale, in heritable IQ there is an asymmetry between Spatial and Verbal, with heritability of verbal more dependent on the mother. This is rather obvious in retrospect, and explains why some groups with high verbal performance also express higher rates of homosexuality and behavioral effeminacy.
-
Intelligence
I think SAT’s are the best proxy we currently have in freely available data. I think they are at best useful for determining sortition for university work – in other words, they successfully fulfill their purpose. They are problematic proxies for IQ since some of us (myself included) do not really reach our biological IQ until our early twenties, and others are completed by late high school. I have very high confidence in Ravens. However, while iq traits tend to scale, in heritable IQ there is an asymmetry between Spatial and Verbal, with heritability of verbal more dependent on the mother. This is rather obvious in retrospect, and explains why some groups with high verbal performance also express higher rates of homosexuality and behavioral effeminacy.
-
–“What’s You’re Political Stance?”–
—“What is your political stance?”— How about Conservative (aristocratic), Libertarian (rule of law), which means my stance is EUGENIC. And certainly not Progressive (priestly), Humanist (rule by discretion), which means DYSGENIC. As far as I know: (a) we either rule by discretion or rule by law (not legislation but law). (b) we either rule by eugenics and wealth, or rule by dysgenics and poverty. Because all political orders are deterministic. You either get a massive middle class (classical liberalism), get a caste system (india, south america), or you get a massive underclass (islam). Because in the end your relative standard of living is dependent upon the size of your underclass. Really. That’s all it is. Seriously. So choose between paying the piper now (conservative wealth and eugenics) or paying the piper later (progressive poverty and dysgenics ).
-
–“What’s You’re Political Stance?”–
—“What is your political stance?”— How about Conservative (aristocratic), Libertarian (rule of law), which means my stance is EUGENIC. And certainly not Progressive (priestly), Humanist (rule by discretion), which means DYSGENIC. As far as I know: (a) we either rule by discretion or rule by law (not legislation but law). (b) we either rule by eugenics and wealth, or rule by dysgenics and poverty. Because all political orders are deterministic. You either get a massive middle class (classical liberalism), get a caste system (india, south america), or you get a massive underclass (islam). Because in the end your relative standard of living is dependent upon the size of your underclass. Really. That’s all it is. Seriously. So choose between paying the piper now (conservative wealth and eugenics) or paying the piper later (progressive poverty and dysgenics ).
