September 18th, 2018 12:20 PM
[H]appily married masculine men and feminine women are not the problem. They embrace the compromise of exchange. It’s the people who want outsized returns in the short term whether male or female that seek parasitism by circumvention of the compromise of exchange.
September 18th, 2018 11:48 AM CONTROLLING OUR HYPERCONSUMPTION AND INVESTING IT IN BETTER RETURNS. [M]ake women feel safe, and as the eastern europeans say ‘able to be weak’. Which they mean, able to love and feel and free of worry, and they will be their best. “Men work, women love, and this way we serve one another.” The problem is women’s competitive virtue signaling under consumer hyperconsumption is the equivalent of men who are addicted to watching sports but not doing them.
September 18th, 2018 9:22 AM REGARDING GANS’ GENERATIVE ANTHROPOLOGY [S]omeone just asked, so for those that are interested in such things, Eric Gans’ Generative Anthropology, is compatible and non-contradictory with Propertarianism. It is however a description of potential (cooperation on policy) not one of limits (resolution of differences by law), and it is narrative (literary and analogical) not operational (descriptive and scientific). Gans is also from the French and Marxist Critical theory schools, which explains his use of literary rather than scientific device. My work, particularly my work on grammars, and my work using neural economy, provide an operational explanation for the emphasis on the consequences of language. But I place dramatically more emphasis on truth as a competitive evolutionary advantage, and tolerance beyond the kin group as a competitive evolutionary disadvantage. This is the opposite of his position. However, when I read him I do not see falsehood, only another attempt to justify a norm rather than to create an excellence using similar understanding of the function of information that he calls language.
September 19th, 2018 10:46 AM
(via Brandon Hayes)
Drastic Decline In Mental Health Starting in 2009 – the postmodernists have literally made this generation insane.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqCNTopdBBs
September 18th, 2018 2:28 PM
Apple escapes the china tariff because china wants to avoid being boxed into the bottom of world market for production.
September 18th, 2018 12:47 PM
—“The greatest predictors of political belief are high openness/low conscientiousness (for liberals) and low openness/high conscientiousness (for conservatives.) That’s why the vast majority of artists, musicians, performers and people in creative domains in general are liberal. “— Joel Harvey
September 18th, 2018 12:20 PM
[H]appily married masculine men and feminine women are not the problem. They embrace the compromise of exchange. It’s the people who want outsized returns in the short term whether male or female that seek parasitism by circumvention of the compromise of exchange.
September 18th, 2018 11:48 AM CONTROLLING OUR HYPERCONSUMPTION AND INVESTING IT IN BETTER RETURNS. [M]ake women feel safe, and as the eastern europeans say ‘able to be weak’. Which they mean, able to love and feel and free of worry, and they will be their best. “Men work, women love, and this way we serve one another.” The problem is women’s competitive virtue signaling under consumer hyperconsumption is the equivalent of men who are addicted to watching sports but not doing them.
September 18th, 2018 11:46 AM TRUTH. WE JUST FIND THEM DISGUSTING. SO JUST SAY IT.
—“The Leftist tendency is to conflate the Rightist Disgust response to various things as phobias. In other words, the Left confuses Disgust for Fear.”—
[T]he right is just too well mannered to say: “Actually it’s because we find your/their ____________ behavior disgusting and revolting because it is a genetic defect, and harmful to the tribe.” I mean. Why can’t we just say that? “You know, We don’t like dogs dragging their anuses on the carpet, or ___________ doing ________. Genetic defects are disgusting to us. And you’re advocating for genetic defects that are disgusting. (We have a purity instinct. They don’t. Hence women’s fascination with the discussion of children’s bodily fluids and excrements.)
September 18th, 2018 9:22 AM REGARDING GANS’ GENERATIVE ANTHROPOLOGY [S]omeone just asked, so for those that are interested in such things, Eric Gans’ Generative Anthropology, is compatible and non-contradictory with Propertarianism. It is however a description of potential (cooperation on policy) not one of limits (resolution of differences by law), and it is narrative (literary and analogical) not operational (descriptive and scientific). Gans is also from the French and Marxist Critical theory schools, which explains his use of literary rather than scientific device. My work, particularly my work on grammars, and my work using neural economy, provide an operational explanation for the emphasis on the consequences of language. But I place dramatically more emphasis on truth as a competitive evolutionary advantage, and tolerance beyond the kin group as a competitive evolutionary disadvantage. This is the opposite of his position. However, when I read him I do not see falsehood, only another attempt to justify a norm rather than to create an excellence using similar understanding of the function of information that he calls language.