September 18th, 2018 2:28 PM
Apple escapes the china tariff because china wants to avoid being boxed into the bottom of world market for production.
September 18th, 2018 2:28 PM
Apple escapes the china tariff because china wants to avoid being boxed into the bottom of world market for production.
September 18th, 2018 12:47 PM
—“The greatest predictors of political belief are high openness/low conscientiousness (for liberals) and low openness/high conscientiousness (for conservatives.) That’s why the vast majority of artists, musicians, performers and people in creative domains in general are liberal. “— Joel Harvey
September 19th, 2018 10:46 AM
(via Brandon Hayes)
Drastic Decline In Mental Health Starting in 2009 – the postmodernists have literally made this generation insane.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqCNTopdBBs
September 18th, 2018 12:20 PM
[H]appily married masculine men and feminine women are not the problem. They embrace the compromise of exchange. It’s the people who want outsized returns in the short term whether male or female that seek parasitism by circumvention of the compromise of exchange.
September 19th, 2018 10:00 AM
REFORM MOVEMENT IS GAINING MOMENTUM
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4621647-Albuquerque-Forfeiture-Suit.html
September 18th, 2018 11:48 AM CONTROLLING OUR HYPERCONSUMPTION AND INVESTING IT IN BETTER RETURNS. [M]ake women feel safe, and as the eastern europeans say ‘able to be weak’. Which they mean, able to love and feel and free of worry, and they will be their best. “Men work, women love, and this way we serve one another.” The problem is women’s competitive virtue signaling under consumer hyperconsumption is the equivalent of men who are addicted to watching sports but not doing them.
September 18th, 2018 6:54 PM
—“Look at the veneration and mythic aspect of the founders and other heroes of American history. Some even have what we could call temples. Especially Washington, Jefferson, (maybe Franklin, though there seems to be something more human about how we remember him), Lee, Stonewall Jackson, Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Patton, JFK, maybe even Reagan, although I think the gleam is wearing off his spirit as we realize the fraud perpetrated by many who used the vehicle of his name. Whether we agree with them all or not, they’re figures in a sort of American pantheon, and to at least some segment of society or other, they all represent certain archetypal, ideal qualities.”– Eric Best
Correct. 😉
September 18th, 2018 11:46 AM TRUTH. WE JUST FIND THEM DISGUSTING. SO JUST SAY IT.
—“The Leftist tendency is to conflate the Rightist Disgust response to various things as phobias. In other words, the Left confuses Disgust for Fear.”—
[T]he right is just too well mannered to say: “Actually it’s because we find your/their ____________ behavior disgusting and revolting because it is a genetic defect, and harmful to the tribe.” I mean. Why can’t we just say that? “You know, We don’t like dogs dragging their anuses on the carpet, or ___________ doing ________. Genetic defects are disgusting to us. And you’re advocating for genetic defects that are disgusting. (We have a purity instinct. They don’t. Hence women’s fascination with the discussion of children’s bodily fluids and excrements.)
September 18th, 2018 2:47 PM 88% OF PRIME AGE MEN THAT ARE OUT OF THE WORK FORCE, ARE SO BECAUSE OF HEALTH OR CHOICE.
—“Some new research on our of the labor force prime age men: Inactive, Disconnected, and Ailing: A Portrait of Prime-Age Men Out of the Labor Force (ht Noah Smith) This report is intended to enrich our understanding of who these prime-age “inactive” men are. It summarizes evidence from past research and fills out our picture of these men, providing some details about their past and present social and emotional lives. We introduce an under-utilized dataset little-known to economists and sociologists, the “National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III,” or NESARC-III. Consistent with other survey data, the NESARC-III indicates that in 2013, 11 percent of prime-age men were outside the labor force. Roughly 45 percent of them indicate that their current situation involves illness or disability. Roughly 15 percent of inactive men are in school, 5 to 10 percent are retired, and another 5 to 10 percent are homemakers or caregivers. About a quarter of prime-age inactive men do not fit any of these categories. Contrary to the common view that most of these men have “dropped out” of the labor force after becoming discouraged by the job market, few prime-age inactive men indicate this to be true, and only 12 percent of able-bodied prime-age inactive men indicate in household surveys that they want a job or are open to taking one. We confirm research by other scholars that a large number of inactive men are unambiguously and seriously sick or disabled. We provide new information, showing that many inactive men have poor physical health, poor mental health, or both. Over one-third of them (and nearly three in five disabled inactive men) are in the bottom quarter, nationally, of both physical and mental health. Inactive men have fewer skills than employed men and live in poorer homes, often relying on public safety nets to get by. Two-thirds of inactive men personally received government assistance in the preceding year. One-third of inactive men have been incarcerated (including nearly half of disabled inactive men). Along with other evidence presented here on mobility-impeding behavior, such high incarceration rates suggest employment challenges.”—
Read more at https://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2018/09/inactive-disconnected-and-ailing.html#vGZ3m1Ip2sUtCWot.99
September 18th, 2018 9:22 AM REGARDING GANS’ GENERATIVE ANTHROPOLOGY [S]omeone just asked, so for those that are interested in such things, Eric Gans’ Generative Anthropology, is compatible and non-contradictory with Propertarianism. It is however a description of potential (cooperation on policy) not one of limits (resolution of differences by law), and it is narrative (literary and analogical) not operational (descriptive and scientific). Gans is also from the French and Marxist Critical theory schools, which explains his use of literary rather than scientific device. My work, particularly my work on grammars, and my work using neural economy, provide an operational explanation for the emphasis on the consequences of language. But I place dramatically more emphasis on truth as a competitive evolutionary advantage, and tolerance beyond the kin group as a competitive evolutionary disadvantage. This is the opposite of his position. However, when I read him I do not see falsehood, only another attempt to justify a norm rather than to create an excellence using similar understanding of the function of information that he calls language.