AGAIN, ALL STEREOTYPES ARE TRUE. BUT AS I’VE SAID THE MAJOR DIFFERENCES ARE IN COGNITIVE LOAD OF PERSONALITY TRAIT, NOT TRAIT DIFFERENCES, AND ERGO – SIZE OF UNDERCLASSES. —“there are no differences between Blacks and Whites on four of the seven personality constructs. Blacks are slightly more extroverted and emotionally stable, and Whites are slightly more agreeable. … (but) differences in the Big 5 are moderated by the cognitive loading of the personality scales.”— Tate and McDaniel [1]
Form: Short Note
-
have to understand. It is not in a woman’s interest to limit her consumption, pa
https://www.bolde.com/many-smart-gorgeous-women-single-almost-epidemic/You have to understand. It is not in a woman’s interest to limit her consumption, particularly of attention and liberty, when men are no longer necessary.
The question is then how do we re-empower men so that they have the same freedom? Retained earnings.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-14 10:21:00 UTC
-
We can’t reinstitute monogamy, only end subsidy and malincentive, and produce st
We can’t reinstitute monogamy, only end subsidy and malincentive, and produce status, tax, and rights incentives. Monogamy will return to the majority in whose interest it is, and not for that minority in whose interest it is not. In practice this will mean that reproductively desirable will restore reproduction and those others shall not.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-14 10:17:00 UTC
-
September 14th, 2018 10:17 AM [W]e can’t reinstitute monogamy , only end subsidy
September 14th, 2018 10:17 AM
[W]e can’t reinstitute monogamy, only end subsidy and malincentive, and produce status, tax, and rights incentives. Monogamy will return to the majority in whose interest it is, and not for that minority in whose interest it is not. In practice this will mean that reproductively desirable will restore reproduction and those others shall not.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a post
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-13 07:47:00 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle shared a post
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-13 07:45:00 UTC
-
MacDonald’s Position
Kevin MacDonald’s position is (I think) that our vulnerability is genetic, and while I think that’s probably partly true, because it’s back in the record forever, and the reason is we were all kin. But my position is that as in all OUR liberal (commercial) orders, the value of profit supersedes the value of self defense (which does not plague the far eastern civilizations), and christianity made it worse. In other words, universalism is a commercial utility but a genetic disease. As such my opinion is that any civilization can eventually develop trust if they produce the institutions and decrease the underclass population. And that western civilization must adopt the east’s strategy of self defense as a limit on profiting at the expense of genetic advantage.
-
MacDonald’s Position
Kevin MacDonald’s position is (I think) that our vulnerability is genetic, and while I think that’s probably partly true, because it’s back in the record forever, and the reason is we were all kin. But my position is that as in all OUR liberal (commercial) orders, the value of profit supersedes the value of self defense (which does not plague the far eastern civilizations), and christianity made it worse. In other words, universalism is a commercial utility but a genetic disease. As such my opinion is that any civilization can eventually develop trust if they produce the institutions and decrease the underclass population. And that western civilization must adopt the east’s strategy of self defense as a limit on profiting at the expense of genetic advantage.
-
Kevin MacDonald’s position is (I think) that our vulnerability is genetic, and w
Kevin MacDonald’s position is (I think) that our vulnerability is genetic, and while I think that’s probably partly true, because it’s back in the record forever, and the reason is we were all kin. But my position is that as in all OUR liberal (commercial) orders, the value of profit supersedes the value of self defense (which does not plague the far eastern civilizations), and christianity made it worse. In other words, universalism is a commercial utility but a genetic disease. As such my opinion is that any civilization can eventually develop trust if they produce the institutions and decrease the underclass population. And that western civilization must adopt the east’s strategy of self defense as a limit on profiting at the expense of genetic advantage.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-12 08:55:00 UTC
-
And yes, when cooperating, deception as a means of externalizing risk or obtaini
And yes, when cooperating, deception as a means of externalizing risk or obtaining discounts is the OPTIMUM strategy as long as you don’t run out of possible cooperators (cities).
This is why constant suppression and homogeneity and reputations matter: so you quickly exhaust your market for deception.
The problem for whites is that while we developed the first high trust civilization we are (as Kevin MacDonald has stated) extremely vulnerable to use of our trust signals.
The principle reason being that we have eliminated the entire suite of means of suppression deception from our civilization.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-12 08:51:00 UTC