Apple escapes the china tariff because china wants to avoid being boxed into the bottom of world market for production.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-18 14:28:00 UTC
Apple escapes the china tariff because china wants to avoid being boxed into the bottom of world market for production.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-18 14:28:00 UTC
There is a difference between contributors, commenters, followers, and lurkers – but it’s only in the degree of participation. Everybody learns.
The difference between how I teach and the mainstream is that I create king of the hill games so that men feel comfortable playing the game of climbing to the top.
I teach as by sport not by lecture.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-18 13:10:00 UTC
Happily married masculine men and feminine women are not the problem. They embrace the compromise of exchange. It’s the people who want outsized returns in the short term whether male or female that seek parasitism by circumvention of the compromise of exchange.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-18 12:20:00 UTC
CONTROLLING OUR HYPERCONSUMPTION AND INVESTING IT IN BETTER RETURNS.
Make women feel safe, and as the eastern europeans say ‘able to be weak’. Which they mean, able to love and feel and free of worry, and they will be their best. “Men work, women love, and this way we serve one another.”
The problem is women’s competitive virtue signaling under consumer hyperconsumption is the equivalent of men who are addicted to watching sports but not doing them.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-18 11:48:00 UTC
REGARDING EXERCISE
(response to recently released study)
We are, like all herd and pack animals, but unlike solitary hunters, evolved to conserve energy and save it for movement with the pack and herd toward opportunity and away from risk. Herds will seek safety in the herd, and continuously move to new territory. Pack animals will patrol their territory together. Solitary hunters will patrol their territory alone. This is why it is harder to domesticate, foxes than wolves, and easiest to domesticate herds.
This is why team sports are so important for those with lower industriousness, and why the ‘high’ from exercise is so important to form an addiction to for solitary exercise. It is also why boys need dominance play in sports or hunting in order to stay fit.
Training ourselves to do other than conserve energy takes incentives and often quite a bit of effort.
Running worked for me despite my asthma because the high was addictive. Lifting weights at home while watching the news every morning was addictive. But nothing was more addictive than wrestling despite the autists disgust at sweaty male bodies.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-18 10:37:00 UTC
REGARDING GANS’ GENERATIVE ANTHROPOLOGY
Someone just asked, so for those that are interested in such things, Eric Gans’ Generative Anthropology, is compatible and non-contradictory with Propertarianism.
It is however a description of potential (cooperation on policy) not one of limits (resolution of differences by law), and it is narrative (literary and analogical) not operational (descriptive and scientific).
Gans is also from the French and Marxist Critical theory schools, which explains his use of literary rather than scientific device.
My work, particularly my work on grammars, and my work using neural economy, provide an operational explanation for the emphasis on the consequences of language.
But I place dramatically more emphasis on truth as a competitive evolutionary advantage, and tolerance beyond the kin group as a competitive evolutionary disadvantage.
This is the opposite of his position.
However, when I read him I do not see falsehood, only another attempt to justify a norm rather than to create an excellence using similar understanding of the function of information that he calls language.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-18 09:22:00 UTC
1 – Antibiotic Resistance. 2 – The next Pandemic: “Disease X” 3 – The expansion of third world population such that medical resources are overwhelmed. 4 – The restoration of decline into poverty because of that demographic expansion. Well shared vision bill. ‘Cept that I am absolutely positive nothing can be done about the last two, and absolutely determined to prevent our genocide because of it. There has to remain a reserve of human capital to survive that cataclysm. QUOTES: Joe Shute,The Telegraph•September 18, 2018 —“When I ask which challenges to global health security he fears the most, Gates outlines three: antibiotic resistance, cuts to government funding to improve health in the world’s poorest countries, and the next unknown disease, referred to by the World Health Organisation simply as ‘Disease X’. “We are not fully prepared for the next global pandemic,” he says. “The threat of the unknown pathogen – highly-contagious, lethal, fast-moving – is real. It could be a mutated flu strain or something else entirely. The Swine Flu and 2014 Ebola outbreaks underscored the threat.” There is another threat on his mind, one which has often been treated as the ‘elephant in the room’ in the world of international development. Namely, the population explosion in Africa’s poorest countries and its future impact – either fueling poverty, political instability, conflict and refugees, or sparking a new boom in world growth as happened in India and China. … above all is one simple fact that even the eternally optimistic Gates warns could mean “to put it bluntly decades of progress in the fight against poverty and disease may be on the verge of stalling”. In short, as birth rates falter in the developed world, in the poorest parts of Africa they are booming. By 2050, the ten poorest countries on the continent are projected to more than double in population. “The thing that is mind-blowing is if the demographers who have been very accurate on these things are right about Africa, then you are going from 1bn today to 2bn at middle of century, to 4bn at the end of the century,” he says.”—
1 – Antibiotic Resistance. 2 – The next Pandemic: “Disease X” 3 – The expansion of third world population such that medical resources are overwhelmed. 4 – The restoration of decline into poverty because of that demographic expansion. Well shared vision bill. ‘Cept that I am absolutely positive nothing can be done about the last two, and absolutely determined to prevent our genocide because of it. There has to remain a reserve of human capital to survive that cataclysm. QUOTES: Joe Shute,The Telegraph•September 18, 2018 —“When I ask which challenges to global health security he fears the most, Gates outlines three: antibiotic resistance, cuts to government funding to improve health in the world’s poorest countries, and the next unknown disease, referred to by the World Health Organisation simply as ‘Disease X’. “We are not fully prepared for the next global pandemic,” he says. “The threat of the unknown pathogen – highly-contagious, lethal, fast-moving – is real. It could be a mutated flu strain or something else entirely. The Swine Flu and 2014 Ebola outbreaks underscored the threat.” There is another threat on his mind, one which has often been treated as the ‘elephant in the room’ in the world of international development. Namely, the population explosion in Africa’s poorest countries and its future impact – either fueling poverty, political instability, conflict and refugees, or sparking a new boom in world growth as happened in India and China. … above all is one simple fact that even the eternally optimistic Gates warns could mean “to put it bluntly decades of progress in the fight against poverty and disease may be on the verge of stalling”. In short, as birth rates falter in the developed world, in the poorest parts of Africa they are booming. By 2050, the ten poorest countries on the continent are projected to more than double in population. “The thing that is mind-blowing is if the demographers who have been very accurate on these things are right about Africa, then you are going from 1bn today to 2bn at middle of century, to 4bn at the end of the century,” he says.”—
[S]omeone just asked, so for those that are interested in such things, Eric Gans’ Generative Anthropology, is compatible and non-contradictory with Propertarianism. It is however a description of potential (cooperation on policy) not one of limits (resolution of differences by law), and it is narrative (literary and analogical) not operational (descriptive and scientific). Gans is also from the French and Marxist Critical theory schools, which explains his use of literary rather than scientific device. My work, particularly my work on grammars, and my work using neural economy, provide an operational explanation for the emphasis on the consequences of language. But I place dramatically more emphasis on truth as a competitive evolutionary advantage, and tolerance beyond the kin group as a competitive evolutionary disadvantage. This is the opposite of his position. However, when I read him I do not see falsehood, only another attempt to justify a norm rather than to create an excellence using similar understanding of the function of information that he calls language.
[S]omeone just asked, so for those that are interested in such things, Eric Gans’ Generative Anthropology, is compatible and non-contradictory with Propertarianism. It is however a description of potential (cooperation on policy) not one of limits (resolution of differences by law), and it is narrative (literary and analogical) not operational (descriptive and scientific). Gans is also from the French and Marxist Critical theory schools, which explains his use of literary rather than scientific device. My work, particularly my work on grammars, and my work using neural economy, provide an operational explanation for the emphasis on the consequences of language. But I place dramatically more emphasis on truth as a competitive evolutionary advantage, and tolerance beyond the kin group as a competitive evolutionary disadvantage. This is the opposite of his position. However, when I read him I do not see falsehood, only another attempt to justify a norm rather than to create an excellence using similar understanding of the function of information that he calls language.