Testing whether the facebook content review actually blocked me or not.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-08 01:21:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1159273331318775808
Reply addressees: @VolkischWeeb @Uzumeme_
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1159270192100151296
IN REPLY TO:
@gothickagura
@Uzumeme_ @curtdoolittle i don’t know but he just tweeted “tet” probably a boomer technical difficulty
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1159270192100151296
Just remember that as we march deterministically to bloody civil war, that during and after, they’re going to hold YOU culpable. They have a saying “traitors first” and that boils down almost entirely to politicians, journalists, and activists. If there is a list, you’re on it.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 22:34:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1159231487293743106
Reply addressees: @rezaaslan
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158879846887333888
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158879846887333888
Maybe. I’ve grown organically and I don’t know if I want to grow by association to anything other than rule of law. I’m thinking of it. But not sure.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 19:51:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1159190310309830657
Reply addressees: @MaMo_
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1159182432341508096
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1159182432341508096
Might be blocked for calling out his use of Abrahamic sophisms (Pilpul, Critique) in the past. He’s a master of them. But once you know how the lies are constructed (it takes a bit) and you know enough logic and grammar of reciprocity, you can tear them apart. (and get blocked)
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 18:14:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1159166013738561538
Reply addressees: @dar_warrior @Noahpinion
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1159165512749846528
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@dar_warrior @Noahpinion “Tweet is unavailable”
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1159165512749846528
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@dar_warrior @Noahpinion “Tweet is unavailable”
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1159165512749846528
( Repeat: I really appreciate links to typos. The side effect of prolific writing, touch typing over 100wpm, and autistic pattern recognition is that I literally don’t see them even if I’m looking for them. So it’s very, very, appreciated. Thank you. )
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 17:34:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1159155865443868672
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:56:26 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576513757447259
INDIANS AND LEVEL OF DENIAL ABOUT INDIA’S PROBLEMS
(context: denial or equivalency as means of excusing conditions)
India has a revolting incidence of reported birth defects, and even worse incidence of unreported birth defects.
The reasons are a) it’s filthy, polluted, irradiated, c) high fertility (poor female bodily resources), d) poor antenatal care, e) poor maternal nutrition, f) high cousin marriage rate, g) high carrier rate for hemoglobinopathies, h) drug use pervasive.
Consanguinity rates in India vary 1%-4% in the northern region to as high as 40-50% in the southern region.
Exposures to teratogens before and after conception.
11%. Alcohol 2.2%. Radiation 4% category X drug 5.71% Other categories of drugs during their first trimester 55.28% for cat. A to 6% for cat. D drugs. Availability of drugs. Non-prescribed drugs and self-medication.
The north is 2/3 Iranic, the south 2/3 Dravidian. I’m all for indian nationalism. But stay on your continent. And keep the genes there. Seriously. And stop making excuses. Clean yourselves, and your country, and learn birth control or sterilization.
(and yes, I work from papers. using data., As always. )
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3758715/
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:52:48 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576499472540102
–One thing Igor has not mentioned is that Ibn Khaldun’s theory applies to all human organizations: families, business, economic sectors, economies, intellectual disciplines arts and sciences, and not just political sectors. And it’s interesting (and telling) that westerners discovered the former and muslims discovered the latter. The value of the monarchies is that they constitute a MARKET for rotation, which is what occurred throughout european history.–
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:47:45 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576479632890151
KING OF THE HILL GAMES, ALL DAY EVERY DAY.
—I am just doing my job which is finding a provocative statement to generate discussion and expose people’s thoughts, that would not be exposed by surveys.—
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:45:26 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576470524453809
ANGLOS HAVE LOST PARITY WITH ASHKENAZI SINCE THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION DUE TO DYSGENIC REPRODUCTION: 13.9 IQ POINTS. from 113/114->100, or 1.21 IQ PER DECADE
HIGHLIGHTS
•We respond to a quartet of critical commentaries on Woodley et al. (2013)
• We show inspection time is not a Jensen effect, unlike simple reaction time
• We reanalyse data and recover dysgenic trends in simple RT
• The meta-regression involving just US and UK studies shows a 13.9 IQ point decline
•Emphasis should be on testing new predictions not purely methodological criticism
Abstract
Previously Woodley, te Nijenhuis and Murphy (2013) tested the hypothesis that Victorian era British and American samples exhibited higher g on average than relatively more modern populations sampled from the US, UK, Canada, Australia and Finland, using measures of simple visual reaction time in a meta-analytic study.
Based on 13 age-matched studies from Western countries conducted between 1884 and 2004 yielding 16 data points we estimated a decline of − 13.35 IQ points. Here we respond to a quartet of critical commentaries on our paper penned by five prominent intelligence researchers (James Flynn, Theodore Nettelbeck, Irwin Silverman, Julia Dodonova and Yuri Dodonov).
We show via various reanalyses of the data and also via careful consideration of the arguments presented that the original finding of a potential secular decline in simple reaction time performance is robust.
A recurrent criticism of our finding stems from earlier work showing no secular trends with respect to inspection time over a 20-year period in Australia despite the possibility of co-occurring dysgenic fertility.
We deal with this via the method of correlated vectors, which reveals the presence of a ‘genetic g’ common factor on which simple RTs, WAIS g loadings and subtest heritabilities load positively and significantly, but on which inspection time does not load.
This indicates that inspection times are associated with local information processing, unlike simple reaction times, which are associated with global processing (i.e. g).
The robustness of our original finding is best illustrated however by our final meta-regression, in which the use of six methods variance-controlled reaction time means taken from the US and the UK between 1889 and 1993, coupled with a newly-estimated age-matched reference standard deviation, reveal a seemingly robust secular trend towards slowing reaction time in these two countries, which translates into a potential dysgenics rate of − 1.21 IQ points per decade, or − 13.9 points in total between 1889 and 2004.
(… ) We thank our critics for helping us to arrive at a much more precise estimate of the decline in general intelligence.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:44:53 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576468293237116