it’s not only predictable it’s deterministic. the question is one of boiling the frog: how long before what we perceive as outliers emerge as the pattern: profiting from asymmetry. So you’re displaying the normal, expected human behavior of not observing something until it’s close enough to affect you revealing the pattern.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-25 19:31:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1948828452616073259
Roma’s criminality was offset by it’s small scale, absence of political influence, and their utility as laborers at a discount when they were in the area.
Jewish ‘criminality’ was offset by its plausible deniability and hiding behind voluntary choice until it’s consequences manifested at enough scale to unify either the public in self defense or the state in need of the capital produced through their irreciprocities.
We see the same behavior in men vs women today – women’s criminality is tolerated because it’s indirect but we are presently observing the consequence of that criminality at scale when unregulated (as it was under traditional and common law).
Jewish group strategy is just female group strategy (prostitutes) just as european group strategy is just male group strategy (pirates).
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-25 19:29:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1948828017322852559
Q: –“Does the work involve mathematical models in the form of symbolic equations relating abstracted components?” —
@HenningSittler
Great question (really).
No. Operational prose is the limit of reducibility in language without introducing generalization that causes ambiguity and thus deductive and inductive error. So whereas simple examples demonstrating regularity are reducible to mathematical or symbolic form, lead to observation of possible generalizations the opposite occurs when one’s scope is the test of particulars. This is a common error in ‘mathiness’ which is itself a statistical grammar of reducibility of regularities. We have within the past decades disambiguated mathematical reducibility from programmatic (algorithmic) reducibility, my work adds operational reducibility. So in these grammars Math: regularity > algorithmic: irregularities > actions: particulars, each serves as a differences in precision for different complexities of operation (degrees of uniqueness).
Essentially math: set logic(highly constrained), algorithms: constrained operational logic, unconstrained operational logic.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-25 19:16:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1948824728141222118
like i said. you are a smart man. which is why i admire you and the work you do for our people. ;). -hugs.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-25 18:05:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1948806901883699619
Thats the point, isn’t it? Except the templars did not abuse the people. They were destroyed by the monarchy over debts, not the people over abuses. (slaving being principal among them.) The jews were prohibited property precisely to prevent them from using their 300% interest to entrap farmers who were subject to climatological randomness. They sold alcohol and prostitution on credit. and of course engaged in usury (hazarding) not credit (shared risk).
Whats unique is their separatism and nepotism in organizing against host populations as their group strategy. But amplified by the training in writing accounting and credit they received from the egyptians precisely because they were regional outcasts: so that they would have greater fealty to egypt than loyalty to other regional tribes.
Macdonald and I came to similar conclusions by different means. He from modernity backward using academic record, and me from antiquity forward by linguistic analysis and the record in the law.
The difference IMO is in my study of their abrahamic institutionalizing of the female means of lying. An unpleasantry that is the first substantive explanatory science of lying.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-25 18:04:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1948806591735890295
Interesting and legitimate take – in that representation is generalized the the brain as physical relations. This isn’t what plato meant – it is what he should have meant. But a forgiving interpretation of him is as warranted as one of aristotle. The were headed in the right direction even if not precisely correct.
LLMs use words as measures and develop generalized concepts. Brains build from sense experience and disambiguate into referential precision with words. This means we should and do see convergence in llms and brains.
So the platonic realm is a deterministic production of neural representation rather than extant independent of it. This is plato’s ‘mistake’. But his point, in general otherwise was correct.
You are very smart so i could go into depth with you on this concept and it would be an interesting conversation.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-25 17:48:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1948802577854070842
They specialized in profit from “baiting into hazard” (seduction) which is intolerable in every other civ but oddly permissible in european civ. An allied with the state against the peopl.They were prosecuted whenever locals had enough of it. (And, this remains there reason for conflict today.) If you need more explanation, just ask.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-25 17:27:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1948797354720854311
Depends on duration of windows of astronomic, geological, ecological, climatological opportunity.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-25 01:41:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1948559104982872568
READ my next few posts. I answer the question.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-23 22:30:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1948148811962155242
4o.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-23 06:12:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1947902672952299714