I can’t wait until you crazies are extinct.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-29 22:12:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1950318549849034929
I can’t wait until you crazies are extinct.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-29 22:12:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1950318549849034929
Stephen. Usual adoption curve into standardization 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-29 17:26:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1950246666080268505
Q: –“If being gay is genetics, how is the gene passed down?”–
AFAIK it’s the mother’s in-utero reaction to the fetus. Whether this is due to hormonal or immune system reactions we don’t know but appears to be both. We do know that it does not provoke the miscarriage response.
AFAIK it has nothing to do with the fetus and everything to do with the mother. Which is why it runs in families.
Boys are more fragile in the first place because male brain is specialized by intentional developmental perturbation. Sexual differentiation in males acts as a controlled poisoning of the developmental process—sacrificing robustness to enable specialization.
This fragility is a cost of the evolutionary strategy of using male variability to test advantageous traits under evolutionary pressure.
Nature experiments with the male and saves successes via reproduction with females.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-29 01:07:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1950000154331009133
no. Grok lacks the memory. I don’t know why.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-29 00:50:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1949995894587150832
again, it needs training. I’m just kind of blown away at how good it is just using the books.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-28 23:25:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1949974640056566102
yes. that’s different from the provision of the answer. The AI was correct. But not correct enough for the precision you were looking for. Again, this is a matter of training and prompt configuration. The point is it still applies the method correctly and comes up with the right answer.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-28 23:25:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1949974425023000982
CurtGPT will give a tighter answer, and if then asked for the natural law case it will be very precise. I just tried and results as expected.
one of the current ‘limits’ to CurtGPT is that it doesn’t always use NLI methods if it can be answered conventionally. This is something that I need to update in the system prompts.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-28 22:29:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1949960361727131986
It does truth as well. the ‘big’ questions are just predominantly ethical and moral (political).
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-28 22:23:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1949959027120648607
love you man. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-28 22:21:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1949958350147293196
You only get to make a first impression once. I don’t expect to open it for public use until it’s been fully trained on at least Volume 2. Otherwise people will find edge cases and the dismiss the AI before it’s trained well enough to cover those edge cases. I just want to avoid negative impressions.
In a perfect world I would like it trained on volumes 1-4 before we went public. That’s only possible if we have funding to hire the team to perform the training.
I’ve been working on it today, but ChatGPT ‘got lost’ relatively quickly. And noticing it requires quite a bit of skill.
So I want the process down cold before we add trainers.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-28 22:02:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1949953758978330898