(Thank you)
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-18 00:31:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1946004814481203483
Form: Reply
-
Stefan: Devilish. Brilliant. Though perhaps, grants a bit of a pass to most of t
Stefan:
Devilish.
Brilliant.
Though perhaps, grants a bit of a pass to most of the middle ages…. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-17 23:56:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1945996113431183389
-
Maybe we’re both the same kind of crazy Austin. But it’s a great club we are in
Maybe we’re both the same kind of crazy Austin. But it’s a great club we are in if so. ;). – hugs.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-17 22:04:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1945967967570944298
-
Technically speaking it’s acting like an empire
Technically speaking it’s acting like an empire.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-17 14:41:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1945856444634693891
-
ours already does, or should at least
ours already does, or should at least….
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-17 04:51:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1945707901668278514
-
dont be silly. like any sales process investors and acquirers vary in ability ex
dont be silly. like any sales process investors and acquirers vary in ability expertise and interest. the sale is hard to easy depending upon them.
we don’t need them to adopt our ideas. that’s silly. but understanding why training AIs with our dataset works is challenging. and it’s hard to invest in what you don’t understand.
We can certainly explain to the top engineers. But even then they’re not the investors.
musk would be easy.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-17 04:48:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1945707182626128118
-
Brian, an era of better normative content vs present normative content, when the
Brian, an era of better normative content vs present normative content, when the problem is non-normativity (truth, reciprocity etc). To evolve LLMs from math and programmatic logic in which closure is a given to reasoning in which closure is not, is a hard problem. However, we can create a baseline (universal) from which we can test variances.
Now I’ve pinged you before a few times and received no response. And I don’t want to attempt to persuade you. But if you’re struggling and want the answer to the problem we can provide it, and you’re certainly smart enough to get it.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-17 00:07:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1945636356627337434
-
The nitwittery unable to accept Scott’s position demonstrate why the purity spir
The nitwittery unable to accept Scott’s position demonstrate why the purity spiraling on the right causes it eternal failure.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-15 14:48:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1945133264206741738
-
Hmmm. Unless the data has changed recently the only influence that limited hybri
Hmmm. Unless the data has changed recently the only influence that limited hybridization resulted in was immunological. I suspect because modern humans selected against their predecessors just as say Europeans have selected against earlier versions of Europeans.
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-14 22:01:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1944880041244155961
-
Understood. 😉
Understood. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2025-07-14 14:37:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1944768329966866653