Usually people who want to debate aren’t knowledgeable enough, intelligent enough, or intellectually honest enough to bother with, but given a moderator I’ll try. —“Are Property Regimes Ponzi Schemes?”– Property isn’t a ponzi scheme (it’s not false) however it will (often) increasingly lead to the concentration of wealth, until it no longer can, unless certain safeguards are put in place (natural law). The reason for this concentration of wealth is that we tolerate financial rents today like we tolerated land rents of yesterday. The problem has been prohibiting rents. We can actually prevent rents today. But that means the price of such prevention is working while younger and older, direct redistribution of liquidity, the ending of consumer intersets, very strict nationalism to prevent immigration, and a requirement that women produce more than replacement rate children. So as always problems can be fixed if you’re a scientist, but not if you’re merely a rationalist, or a purveyor of moralistic fairy tales.
Form: Reply
-
( Um. Women? Stupid? How many women has Derek Jeter given herpes? And they keep
( Um. Women? Stupid? How many women has Derek Jeter given herpes? And they keep lining up for more…. )
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-06 17:09:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993175950199283715
-
FWIW: evidence is that your gut doesn’t matter as much as your posture, shoulder
FWIW: evidence is that your gut doesn’t matter as much as your posture, shoulders and arms. Get strong first.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-06 16:17:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993162788548857856
-
(((Activists)))
(((Activists)))
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-06 16:12:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993161498657804288
Reply addressees: @ArthurTrent15
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993157205032689664
IN REPLY TO:
@ArthurTrent15
@curtdoolittle When you say “they”…?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993157205032689664
-
I dunno, it’s pretty hard to argue otherwise, and grammatically it’s impossible
I dunno, it’s pretty hard to argue otherwise, and grammatically it’s impossible to argue otherwise, and empirically it’s hard to argue it’s not a counter-revolution against empiricism. German fantasy, Ashkenazi Pseudoscience, and French Sophism are pretty hard to tolerate.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-06 10:37:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993077322906521601
Reply addressees: @georgiegirl1828
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/992912045002625027
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/992912045002625027
-
ITS GREAT UNDER NATIONALISM, YES. 🙂
ITS GREAT UNDER NATIONALISM, YES. 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-04 22:32:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/992532543219163139
Reply addressees: @ThePakistaniRe1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/992530847709483013
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/992530847709483013
-
My answer to Given the current accelerating rate of ideological and racial polar
My answer to Given the current accelerating rate of ideological and racial polarization, how likely is it in America that the country will enter an era of large-scale sectarian violence at some point in this century? https://www.quora.com/Given-the-current-accelerating-rate-of-ideological-and-racial-polarization-how-likely-is-it-in-America-that-the-country-will-enter-an-era-of-large-scale-sectarian-violence-at-some-point-in-this-century/answer/Curt-Doolittle?srid=u4Qv
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-04 22:09:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/992526628310999041
-
love you brother. 😉
love you brother. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-04 20:39:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/992503938581782528
Reply addressees: @ThePakistaniRe1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/992501535425859586
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/992501535425859586
-
The Ambitions of Cattle
—“Curt, what are your thoughts on metamodernism?”— No matter how you slice it, activists on the left are nothing more than human cattle seeking the monopoly of a cattle herd, the indifference (equality) of cattle in a herd, and the safety of cattle in the herd, in order to obtain a sense of ‘not being left behind’, and ‘a sense of control over a world” in which the continuous production of differences and hierarchies is constantly equilibrated by markets that are by definition out of our control, but entirely in our service. People who obtain their direction from the movement of the herd, their information from the herd, and color their decisions from the herd, display the cognitive biases of the herd: the sentiments of women. Meanwhile the conservative says “if we simply raise good families, and produce good commons the markets will provide by externality all that we can want or imagine”. These are the cognitive biases of the pack. The sentiments of men. It was men who made markets, property, families, marriage, continuous innovation, and the worship of the sun and stars, against the will of women, who at all times and all places seek to return us to the primitivism that is not in their interest but ours. The left are to be sated, comforted, and disciplined, but like women, never permitted to fulfill their ambitions and return us to primitivism.
-
The Ambitions of Cattle
—“Curt, what are your thoughts on metamodernism?”— No matter how you slice it, activists on the left are nothing more than human cattle seeking the monopoly of a cattle herd, the indifference (equality) of cattle in a herd, and the safety of cattle in the herd, in order to obtain a sense of ‘not being left behind’, and ‘a sense of control over a world” in which the continuous production of differences and hierarchies is constantly equilibrated by markets that are by definition out of our control, but entirely in our service. People who obtain their direction from the movement of the herd, their information from the herd, and color their decisions from the herd, display the cognitive biases of the herd: the sentiments of women. Meanwhile the conservative says “if we simply raise good families, and produce good commons the markets will provide by externality all that we can want or imagine”. These are the cognitive biases of the pack. The sentiments of men. It was men who made markets, property, families, marriage, continuous innovation, and the worship of the sun and stars, against the will of women, who at all times and all places seek to return us to the primitivism that is not in their interest but ours. The left are to be sated, comforted, and disciplined, but like women, never permitted to fulfill their ambitions and return us to primitivism.