(response) How long have you been following me? Because if you don’t know when and why I use the imperative form, it cant be long. I don’t have a name for your particular form of “disapproval by shaming” – as distinct from an appropriate argument against falsehood – but it is strangely a behavior as gender-specific as NAXALT. I should name it. Agency requires we can separate the preferable, from the good, from the true. And address each accordingly as a personal preference, shared preference, or truth independent of preference or good. Whatever we call it, it’s one of the gender-specific cognitive biases that conflates preference, good, and truth, such that there is no distinction between the preferable, the presumption of knowledge of the good and the disregard for the true. Using this form of disapproval means one lacks Agency. It means that one is not fully human, but still a mammal lacking reason, but able to speak – even if not sensibly.
Form: Reply
-
“Aren’t Central banks failing?”—Jacob Liam Youngman No evidence of it. Just th
—“Aren’t Central banks failing?”—Jacob Liam Youngman
No evidence of it. Just the opposite, that central banking has made it possible to drag backward nations out of poverty by the billions.
You can say that keynesian monetary policy in an attempt to limit unemployment has been a failure if for no other reason than it inflates away all the increases in productivity.
You can say that keynesian economic theory and monetary policy does in fact iteratively deepen and extend corrections, such that at some point without extraordinary measures risk impossibility of correct comfortably.
You can say that keynesian monetary policy and fiscal policy suppresses reproduction and creates demand for immigration that creates civil wars.
But these are problems of keynesian (saltwater) monetary policy not chicago monetary policy, and not central banking.
It is almost impossible to argue against the utility of central banking ( using shares in the economy as currency). You just can’t (with any degree of intellectual honesty).
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-09 09:35:00 UTC
-
Priceless. Love you man. I wish I had your wit. 😉
Priceless. Love you man. I wish I had your wit. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 17:57:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993912738937221120
Reply addressees: @Outsideness
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993745869932396544
IN REPLY TO:
@Outsideness
@curtdoolittle Got one here: https://t.co/Vy7pXEcTdX
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993745869932396544
-
Howard Van Der Klauw yes well the secret of religious devotion especially for wo
Howard Van Der Klauw yes well the secret of religious devotion especially for women is that the truth is less important than belonging (conformity).
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 14:59:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993868065828896769
-
Yes, well the secret of religious devotion especially for women is that the trut
Yes, well the secret of religious devotion especially for women is that the truth is less important than belonging (conformity). It is almost impossible to find a woman that is not a victim of this particular cognitive drive. It supercedes her reason at nearly all times, and is the cause of victim mentality in women who are simply unsafe and fall in to victim spirals seeing rapists everywhere.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 11:00:00 UTC
-
Howard Van Der Klauw yes well the secret of religious devotion especially for wo
Howard Van Der Klauw yes well the secret of religious devotion especially for women is that the truth is less important than belonging (conformity).
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 10:59:00 UTC
-
it’s a quote from my mother regarding the behavior of people aggressively trying
it’s a quote from my mother regarding the behavior of people aggressively trying to exit the church parking lot after mass…… I think I heard it every single sunday for the duration of my childhood
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 23:16:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993630797751095296
Reply addressees: @TheAustrian_ @_boethius @ClassicalTheis
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993556256739725312
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993556256739725312
-
yeah, but you know there are far worse things an legions of extremely forgiving
yeah, but you know there are far worse things an legions of extremely forgiving extremely charitable idiots. You just DON”T LET THEM VOTE.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-07 00:05:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993280715801399296
Reply addressees: @RevengeSgt
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993279987397615617
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993279987397615617
-
I mean, wizard of earthsea, the Iliad and Odyssey, Beowulf, the hobbit and lord
I mean, wizard of earthsea, the Iliad and Odyssey, Beowulf, the hobbit and lord of the rings, the Nibelungenlied, La Morte De Artur, Ivanhoe, Frankenstein, [????], Starship Troopers, The Foundation Series, The Forever War, Dune.
that’s a pretty nice canon.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-06 21:46:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/993245672706138112
-
The Overconfidence Of The Contemporary Populace
Usually people who want to debate aren’t knowledgeable enough, intelligent enough, or intellectually honest enough to bother with, but given a moderator I’ll try. —“Are Property Regimes Ponzi Schemes?”– Property isn’t a ponzi scheme (it’s not false) however it will (often) increasingly lead to the concentration of wealth, until it no longer can, unless certain safeguards are put in place (natural law). The reason for this concentration of wealth is that we tolerate financial rents today like we tolerated land rents of yesterday. The problem has been prohibiting rents. We can actually prevent rents today. But that means the price of such prevention is working while younger and older, direct redistribution of liquidity, the ending of consumer intersets, very strict nationalism to prevent immigration, and a requirement that women produce more than replacement rate children. So as always problems can be fixed if you’re a scientist, but not if you’re merely a rationalist, or a purveyor of moralistic fairy tales.