(thank you)
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-02 14:04:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/991679939375136768
Reply addressees: @mtukatana
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/991529476617048064
IN REPLY TO:
@notoriusBMI
reciprocity, completely laundered of sophism(abrahamism), superstition, mysticism, magic, falsehoods, and lies.
Truth is enough.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/991529476617048064
—“Studying postmodern philosophy at university is painful for me as I don’t like sophistry.”—
Sorry man. But take heart, the study of their sophistry only assists us in understanding the enemy. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-02 13:44:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/991674733316984833
done
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-02 12:35:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/991657554483785728
Reply addressees: @cashmoneyglock
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/991654924961263616
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/991654924961263616
—“Studying postmodern philosophy at university is painful for me as I don’t like sophistry.”—
Sorry man. But take heart, the study of their sophistry only assists us in understanding the enemy. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-02 09:44:00 UTC
True.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-02 01:23:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/991488234273296384
Reply addressees: @FriedrichHayek
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/991424608770244614
IN REPLY TO:
@FriedrichHayek
Marx played tennis with the net down, he lied, produced fake data, went silent when he figured out his whole system was logically incoherent, pretended he had solved problems by assuming magic and impossible causation. He was a massive train wreck of a thinker. #fact https://t.co/BMyR61YUrt
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/991424608770244614
(pareto in everything)
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-02 01:22:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/991487980626939906
Reply addressees: @karlbykarlsmith
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/991439180881330181
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/991439180881330181
—“Where are you on the ‘origins’ questions, life and the universe? Do you think it matters if we are here by chance or by design?”—Matt Lawlor As far as I know we are nothing but a consequence of emergent complexity as life is the only known means of defeating entropy – with cooperation a multiplier, communication a multiplier, and intelligence a multiplier. So just as we see particles (wave effects) culminating in the components of atoms, culminating in elements, culminating in materials, culminating in cycles, culminating in biology, culminating in advanced life forms, I just see our existence as the net result of trial and error made possible by relatively ideal conditions in our rather rural safe zone in the galaxy in the relatively ideal conditions in this zone of the universe. It’s a beautiful thing that we exist, and we exist at this very young stage of the universe, and it’s possible or likely that we are a relatively rare thing in this galaxy if not in the universe, but the fact that sentient life exists is probably a relatively deterministic consequence of the value of conservation of energy in the face of permanent entropy. I think we are rare and the only crime we can commit is not seeking to be the gods we can be, in case there are no others yet, because of infrequency of conditions.
—“Where are you on the ‘origins’ questions, life and the universe? Do you think it matters if we are here by chance or by design?”—Matt Lawlor As far as I know we are nothing but a consequence of emergent complexity as life is the only known means of defeating entropy – with cooperation a multiplier, communication a multiplier, and intelligence a multiplier. So just as we see particles (wave effects) culminating in the components of atoms, culminating in elements, culminating in materials, culminating in cycles, culminating in biology, culminating in advanced life forms, I just see our existence as the net result of trial and error made possible by relatively ideal conditions in our rather rural safe zone in the galaxy in the relatively ideal conditions in this zone of the universe. It’s a beautiful thing that we exist, and we exist at this very young stage of the universe, and it’s possible or likely that we are a relatively rare thing in this galaxy if not in the universe, but the fact that sentient life exists is probably a relatively deterministic consequence of the value of conservation of energy in the face of permanent entropy. I think we are rare and the only crime we can commit is not seeking to be the gods we can be, in case there are no others yet, because of infrequency of conditions.
“CURT, WHAT IS YOUR POSITION ON THE ORIGIN OF LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE?”
—“Where are you on the ‘origins’ questions, life and the universe? Do you think it matters if we are here by chance or by design?”—Matt Lawlor
As far as I know we are nothing but a consequence of emergent complexity as life is the only known means of defeating entropy – with cooperation a multiplier, communication a multiplier, and intelligence a multiplier.
So just as we see particles (wave effects) culminating in the components of atoms, culminating in elements, culminating in materials, culminating in cycles, culminating in biology, culminating in advanced life forms, I just see our existence as the net result of trial and error made possible by relatively ideal conditions in our rather rural safe zone in the galaxy in the relatively ideal conditions in this zone of the universe.
It’s a beautiful thing that we exist, and we exist at this very young stage of the universe, and it’s possible or likely that we are a relatively rare thing in this galaxy if not in the universe, but the fact that sentient life exists is probably a relatively deterministic consequence of the value of conservation of energy in the face of permanent entropy.
I think we are rare and the only crime we can commit is not seeking to be the gods we can be, in case there are no others yet, because of infrequency of conditions.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-01 18:01:00 UTC
—“What are geographic and natural factors constrains progress of afghanistan as state?”—
Land Locked. No meaningful rivers. Limited fertile land. Mountains that are very cold in winter, poor land that is very hot in summer, and worse, like the middle east sits at the nexus of multiple civilizations always at war. The systemic, universal disaster of any people conquered and colonized by arabs and islam, and the total destruction of the entire region by Mongol Conquest, a long period of decline, a failure of the british empire to civilize it as it had done in india. The russian conquest. The American ‘punishment’. I mean. really, it’s terrible. during through the end of the ice age it was a reasonably good territory. But it’s been a disaster since its peak.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-01 12:05:00 UTC