Geoffrey;
True.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-06 00:00:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1997093680520499549
Geoffrey;
True.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-06 00:00:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1997093680520499549
A
Without a doubt or reservation. A.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-05 23:59:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1997093449808646424
We are just starting our outreach. But yes, that’s the feedback we’re getting from everyone.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-05 23:16:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1997082701078450563
(Love you man)
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-05 22:20:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1997068562117357602
lol…. I”ll echo grok’s conclusion. š
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-05 22:19:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1997068251285885183
None of these statements are anything other than painfully obvious. The only questionable one is bitcoin, because if the fed takes a position on it as a stabilization vehicle then he’ll be wrong.
The BTC tech is weak for reasons we all understand. But a non-dilutable share in the economy that is also spendable is a pretty useful utility.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-03 20:11:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1996311302164357408
Again. Brilliant.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-03 15:34:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1996241582631096623
My argument would be that the innovations in Chinese open source models is a matter of reducing compute without significant degradation of signal, but the innovations in closed source models are in computation and computability.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-03 01:05:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1996023031857381566
Paper with Citations.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-03 00:55:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1996020391694008724
Short answer:
You are confusing two different issues: heritability within populations and directional selection across populations.
Once tempo traits are established as heritable (which you concede), environmental gradients cannot produce long-duration tempo divergence without producing allele frequency divergenceābecause tempo traits are polygenic, not plastic-switch traits.
Environmental mimicry produces local, reversible, non-stable variation.
The observed patternāpersistent tempo differentiation, predictive PGS variation, cross-regional directionality, and post-migration persistenceāis the signature of a genetic cline under long-term life-history selection.
To deny this, you must assert that selection operated for centuries or millennia yet somehow did not change allele frequenciesāan impossibility under any quantitative genetic framework.
So the hypothesis is not underdetermined.
The environmental-only model fails parsimony, fails decidability, and violates the known behavior of polygenic traits.
LONG ANSWER available on request.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-02 20:56:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1995960409547997325