yes
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-08 05:32:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1997901971991470279
yes
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-08 05:32:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1997901971991470279
Yes. Unfortunately.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-08 03:43:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1997874565733843148
Brad’s sense of humor is infrequently exposed… lol
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-07 15:52:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1997695707273449510
@MattPirkowski
: Yes. Well done. Mathematics is a constrained grammar within the domain of the universal grammar of all language that is subjectively testable via internal consistency and externally demonstrable by empirical evidence.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-07 00:28:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1997463273231565240
Of course it’s true.
And no it’s relatively recent scholarship.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-06 14:18:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1997309642565960077
Yes, tho, at present rubio is emerging as the better presidential candidate.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-06 06:56:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1997198473935180112
Joshcha
Because aside from missiles, bombers, and carriers with aircraft, everything else – meaning everything human scale – was irrelevant. It was the policing action of the gulf wars and twin towers crises (containing islam as we had communism) that returned us to traditional land based warfighting. Now we’re back to geostrategic warfighthing. And we no longer have the economic and technological advantage or population we did when we tried to end empires in the last century. In proper european tradition, we left the great transformation undone. So we left the world wars undone.
As for your ‘why-not’ question: the military isn’t a business – it can’t take novel risks without preserving present capabilities. It’s bad enough that no plan survives contact with the enemy. It’s worse if a technology you depend upon doesn’t.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-06 06:55:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1997198210067321298
If you think those are ‘big words’ you don’t intellectually get out much…
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-06 05:41:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1997179607607611856
I agree with you. And I think I agree with your assessment. And I would say then this is just our mutual biases as coming from the makers of empires vs the victims of empires.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-06 00:05:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1997094957140824099
Well it would end the UN. And the UN is hostile to the anglosphere, if not the entire eurosphere. And as far as I know, our mission of dragging the rest of mankind into modernity (other than islam, which will take another century) is complete.
And so, yes.
Expel the UN.
Source date (UTC): 2025-12-06 00:01:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1997094049652900220