Yes. Female sense making does not scale beyond the social group.
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-29 23:29:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1994911516488077440
Form: Reply
-
John Adams did use the term “reciprocity” in his writings, though primarily in d
John Adams did use the term “reciprocity” in his writings, though primarily in diplomatic, political, and legal contexts rather than as a standalone moral principle.
For instance, in letters discussing treaties and alliances, he emphasized reciprocity as mutual equality, such as in alliances with France on “Terms of perfect Equality and Reciprocity” or in trade negotiations where he argued for “true Reciprocity” in liberties and rights between nations.
He also applied it to social contract ideas, like the reciprocal nature of protection and allegiance, noting that when protection is withdrawn, allegiance dissolves.
These uses align with Enlightenment-era notions of balanced obligations but do not directly frame reciprocity as a synonym for ethics or morality in the way modern philosopher.
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-29 23:01:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1994904658280923339
-
This is why I love and admire you J. This is better than I am capable of myself.
This is why I love and admire you J. This is better than I am capable of myself. I keep looking for someone who can carry the torch and you keep showing up with the embers. Thanks for all you do.
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-29 19:35:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1994852723515408549
-
He’s a midwit. Just a prolific one. As a book reviewer he’s fine. Beyond that he
He’s a midwit. Just a prolific one. As a book reviewer he’s fine. Beyond that he’s just attention seeking by provocation.
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-29 17:20:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1994818861548671269
-
PS: You clearly do not understand reducibility, formalism or formal operations,
PS: You clearly do not understand reducibility, formalism or formal operations, nor the universal application and infallibility of CRD, nor grasp the degree of rigor in the work. Instead you are a nitwit with a political grudge because I have been and remain a critic of the nitwit right.
And I know you are an outcast, failure, and one of the nitwits of the right, and you are venting against your failure, in a realm far beyond your comprehension by using terms you do not understand. But it’s just childish venting using the feminine strategy of undermining because you lack competency to articulate an argument of masculine rationality.
I don’t take you seriously. Instead I use you as an example of the emergence of failure on the right made possible by social media – thus exposing the character of, and lack of intelligence and ability of – the nitwittery of the fringes of the dissident right.
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-29 03:47:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1994614243178729567
-
Its Chomsky. It means every addition increases disambiguation. This is true for
Its Chomsky. It means every addition increases disambiguation. This is true for every state and operation from the quantum background through to language at the other. Its the law of negative entropy.
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-29 03:37:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1994611552209817964
-
А
А
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-29 03:00:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1994602267002216911
-
Smart. Ontologies emphasize hierarchical knowledge structures and semantic relat
Smart.
Ontologies emphasize hierarchical knowledge structures and semantic relations, while algebras focus on operational rules and symbols. I’d need to write something meaningful to show correlations and contrasts, but I see the source of your intuition. Off the top of my head I can see both the natural conflict between them, the overlap when applied to ai, and an opportunity for insight into the grammars of operational prose versus quantities and ratios. Mostly I see that math is a lower dimensional logic that is internally commensurable and natural law is a much higher dimensional logic that must be made commensurable externally. So It may be that those differences describe the specrum sufficiently.
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-28 09:28:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1994337468477472974
-
Thanks Ricky. Back at you. Hugs. 😉
Thanks Ricky. Back at you. Hugs. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-28 04:30:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1994262706107363537
-
Updates for decades? Unlikely. Otherwise awesome. 😉
Updates for decades? Unlikely. Otherwise awesome. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2025-11-27 11:53:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1994011759238353221