Form: Quote Commentary

  • Untitled

    https://nationalpost.com/opinion/barbara-kay-heres-what-happens-when-the-gender-gap-index-is-adjusted-for-bias?fbclid=IwAR2YAyUL_a3J-dUXcf2JKChdn9nQyXB7Iej9pwFyfiEzR7j6soX_h3rH7uI

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-09 11:38:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/50051891_10156903511222264_694605462

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/50051891_10156903511222264_694605462

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/50051891_10156903511222264_694605462846308352_o_10156903511207264.jpg Bill JohnsonMr. Coleman is a gentleman, scholar, and breeder of fine horses and ideas. Bravo!Jan 8, 2019, 10:13 PMBill JohnsonHave spent quite a bit of time digesting the ‘Definitions’ section. Curt has vision and spunk. At a minimum.Jan 8, 2019, 10:15 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-08 14:19:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/49898250_10156901812982264_261101919

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/49898250_10156901812982264_261101919

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/49898250_10156901812982264_261101919601164288_o_10156901812977264.jpg (via james)Micah Pezdirtz-ahem- i take credit for this one 😉Jan 7, 2019, 4:47 PMPatrick QuinlanRussia, hmm? 🤔Jan 7, 2019, 4:52 PMClaire Rae RandallNever! Those nice lying Demonrats! LOL!Jan 7, 2019, 4:59 PMԴավիդ ՎելլաThey should be made to wear vests with the names of their sponsors just like football players. This should apply to journalists too.

    They’ll have “sponsored by Israel/ Russia/ Saudi Arabia” or “sponsored by George Soros/ Jeff Bezos”Jan 7, 2019, 5:38 PMAndrew ClaytonI’m gonna go with: approaching zeroJan 7, 2019, 6:42 PM(via james)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-07 16:45:00 UTC

  • Aaron Kahland The answer can, in part, be explained by how the low intelligent p

    https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/55383/1/MPRA_paper_55383.pdfby Aaron Kahland

    The answer can, in part, be explained by how the low intelligent play the prisoner’s dilemma game compared with the highly intelligent. The research can be found here:

    https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/55383/1/MPRA_paper_55383.pdf

    The study found that

    —‘…it is cognitively demanding to sustain cooperation in a ten-round repeated prisoner’s dilemma. … In our experiment, as in the twin study of Segal and Hershberger (1999), pairs of players with higher cognitive ability are substantially better at cooperating. Further, we find that is the cognitive ability of a pair of players, and not the ability of an individual player, that predicts cooperation.’—

    High IQ leads to higher rates of co-operation. Trust is both a consequence of and necessity for long term co-operation or multi-co-operations.

    And this gets to the crux of why Nassim Nicholas Taleb’s discussion of IQ is so fundamentally flawed. It isn’t about the individual – it is about the group.

    To paraphrase Clinton, ‘it’s the group stupid!’


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-07 16:34:00 UTC

  • by William Douglas Watson Since people are willing fight for religious beliefs (

    by William Douglas Watson

    Since people are willing fight for religious beliefs (defend), they are considered property in toto. That means they should not be infringed upon if they are compatible with the rest of civilization.

    Curt has no interest in hindering our right to practice our religion, only in hindering the use of ANY METHOD to perform or advocate for theft (parasitism).

    He hasn’t always done a good job of making this clear (recently he has been trying to clarify) but that is not his job.

    His job is to write law. Our job is to make the law digestible for others.

    In a propertarian society we would have much greater religious freedom to actually live out our faith. Real freedom of association (positiva) would be restored because we would have freedom to disassociate (negativa).

    So, as an example, you could no longer be forced to bake cakes that advocated for “alternative lifestyles”.

    This is just a quick example of a current hot button issue but if you give it some thought I’m sure that you could find many other examples where we, as Christians, would benefit from the restoration of just this one aspect of natural law.

    (cd: approved)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-07 15:59:00 UTC

  • SIMPLE ANSWERS DEPARTMENT —“The Spanish empire was centrally run. The British

    SIMPLE ANSWERS DEPARTMENT

    —“The Spanish empire was centrally run. The British was based on free enterprise.”—Richard Hall

    The british empire was based upon rule of law, which results in free enterprise.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-06 15:56:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1081942550641082370

  • “High average IQ in a polity creates confidence that individuals you interact wi

    —“High average IQ in a polity creates confidence that individuals you interact with are not constrained to non-reciprocal behavior”–Micah Pezdirtz


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-06 15:00:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1081928461260914688

  • ARE THE MOST ACCURATE MEASURE IN SOCIAL SCIENCE via Brandon Hayes, via Rosenborg

    http://www.spsp.org/news-center/blog/stereotype-accuracy-response?fbclid=IwAR02Jlx5CLeUKLE4ovolOnAI3UMKZCxwAjVfBayrt1UKCvlhBoiDuu_hpTsSTEREOTYPES ARE THE MOST ACCURATE MEASURE IN SOCIAL SCIENCE

    via Brandon Hayes, via Rosenborg Predmetsky

    (worth repeating) (just like IQ the most accurate measure in psychology).

    from: http://www.spsp.org/news-center/blog/stereotype-accuracy-response/

    THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE

    This blog is not the place to review the overwhelming evidence of stereotype accuracy, though interested readers are directed to SPSR and our updated reviews that have appeared in Current Directions in Psychological Science (Jussim et al, 2015) and Todd Nelson’s Handbook of Stereotypes, Prejudice and Discrimination (Jussim et al, 2016). Summarizing those reviews:

    Over 50 studies have now been performed assessing the accuracy of demographic, national, political, and other stereotypes.

    Stereotype accuracy is one of the largest and most replicable effects in all of social psychology. Richard et al (2003) found that fewer than 5% of all effects in social psychology exceeded r’s of .50. In contrast, nearly all consensual stereotype accuracy correlations and about half of all personal stereotype accuracy correlations exceed .50.[1]

    The evidence from both experimental and naturalistic studies indicates that people apply their stereotypes when judging others approximately rationally. When individuating information is absent or ambiguous, stereotypes often influence person perception. When individuating information is clear and relevant, its effects are “massive” (Kunda & Thagard, 1996, yes, that is a direct quote, p. 292), and stereotype effects tend to be weak or nonexistent.

    This puts the lie to longstanding claims that “stereotypes lead people to ignore individual differences.”

    There are only a handful of studies that have examined whether the situations in which people rely on stereotypes when judging individuals increases or reduces person perception accuracy. Although those studies typically show that doing so increases person perception accuracy, there are too few to reach any general conclusion. Nonetheless, that body of research provides no support whatsoever for the common presumption that the ways and conditions under which people rely on stereotypes routinely reduces person perception accuracy.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-06 14:41:00 UTC

  • “One genius can change the world, a million smart guys can not.”—John Jones Um

    —“One genius can change the world, a million smart guys can not.”—John Jones

    Um…. not quite. One genius can REVOLUTIONIZE the world, a million smart people can and do change it constantly.

    Even such, lone geniuses are almost non-existent, since it appears to take three generations to cook a genius in a field, and we tend to memorialize the first when it’s usually two or three that result from that cooking.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-06 11:55:00 UTC

  • SIMPLE ANSWERS DEPARTMENT —“The Spanish empire was centrally run. The British

    SIMPLE ANSWERS DEPARTMENT

    —“The Spanish empire was centrally run. The British was based on free enterprise.”—Richard Hall

    The british empire was based upon rule of law, which results in free enterprise.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-06 10:56:00 UTC