Curt Doolittle

Form: Quote Commentary

  • photos_and_videos/AJesterWearsAHornedCrown_30zo9SMVqg/49482188_10156885904212264

    photos_and_videos/AJesterWearsAHornedCrown_30zo9SMVqg/49482188_10156885904212264_3447419241744039936_o_10156885904202264.jpg Gold is for the mistress, silver for the maid,

    Copper for the craftsman cunning at his trade.

    “Good!” said the Baron, sitting in his hall,

    “But Iron — Cold Iron — is master of them all.”

    –kipling

    By request. lolzMaxim V FilimonovSo you’re not Darth Doolittle, you’re in fact Thor Doolittle.

    (looks Slavic and Germanic at the same time, good)Dec 31, 2018, 12:19 PMCurt DoolittleI have more incommon with slavs these days than I do anglos…Dec 31, 2018, 12:23 PMEric GroseWhere’s the babes?Dec 31, 2018, 12:44 PMGary KnightCurt Doolittle you are what you eat 😏Dec 31, 2018, 12:45 PMCurt DoolittleSomeone asked me for this, I think to add quotes to it. And I backdated it thinking it wouldn’t show up in the feed. sigh….Dec 31, 2018, 12:47 PMMike WinchesterWhere are the skulls of your enemies?Dec 31, 2018, 12:58 PMBill JoslinLike itDec 31, 2018, 1:06 PMTodd Galipeanhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oo9buo9MtosDec 31, 2018, 1:33 PMAndrew ClaytonIronDec 31, 2018, 5:34 PMRolo Tomasikrom!Dec 31, 2018, 6:55 PMCurt DoolittleDec 31, 2018, 7:06 PMAP KrahlI would have it printed if I were you and stash it somewhere. Some descendant will find it 100 years from now and be so confused.Dec 31, 2018, 11:26 PMAhren TuathailHear the lamentations of their women.Jan 1, 2019, 3:53 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-31 12:14:00 UTC

  • RUSSELL MEAD ON 2018’S ENDING OF THE LIBERAL ORDER Now we need to replace it wit

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/2018s-biggest-loser-was-the-liberal-international-order-11546199900WALTER RUSSELL MEAD ON 2018’S ENDING OF THE LIBERAL ORDER

    Now we need to replace it with something much better.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-31 08:51:00 UTC

  • NO MORE RINSE AND REPEAT by Bill Joslin A complete breakdown of civility creates

    NO MORE RINSE AND REPEAT

    by Bill Joslin

    A complete breakdown of civility creates the circumstance for the right type of militia to rise and out of that the right type of elites to take over. Anything else is a rinse and repeat of what’s always occurred in the past – revolutions as proxies and vassals of stronger sovereigns.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-30 16:26:00 UTC

  • A QUOTE: THE PAINFUL TRUTH —“( 1 – The first question upon which all others de

    A QUOTE: THE PAINFUL TRUTH

    —“(

    1 – The first question upon which all others depend is why not to suicide? One can choose cooperation with the world, conflict and competition with the world, or boycott of the world. Boycott means suicide. This choice is that of personal philosophy.

    2 – The second question upon which all others depend is why engage in cooperation rather than boycott, free riding, parasitism, and predation? One can choose cooperation, predation or boycott of others. Boycott means suicide. This question is that of ethics.

    3 – The third question is for the group, and one upon which all others depend is why engage in cooperation rather than boycott, or free riding, parasitism, and predation? This question is that of politics.

    4 – There is only one reason for the strong not to kill, enslave, or enserf the weak and to take their land, their women and their things. And that is a condition of perfect reciprocity. For it is the only condition more rewarding and lower cost than predation. The fact that reciprocity is mutually beneficial is but an excuse the weak use to grant themselves the illusion of equality with the strong. For the strong it is only a matter of superior returns, not morality. This is the end result of the three questions of life, ethics, and politics. All others are comforting lies.

    5 – One BEGS for Liberty by permission. One FORCES sovereignty at the point of a spear, tip of an arrow, blade of a sword, and barrel of a gun. That’s the difference between failed beggars for liberty and successful warriors for sovereignty.

    Eat The Weak.

    )”—-

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-30 15:13:00 UTC

  • THIS IS WHY WE DON’T NEED A MOB. by Bill Joslin With the current state of affair

    THIS IS WHY WE DON’T NEED A MOB.

    by Bill Joslin

    With the current state of affairs, in the first world, a total breakdown of civility would occur through spontaneous short term, erratic street violence (riots, looting. Which congregated, then disperses to re-congregate elsewhere) inside the OODA-LOOP of authorities.

    (See Toronto G20 tactics of black bloc)

    From a standpoint of cybernetics, this creates a circumstance and action with in third parties. Party one: rioters, party two: law enforcement… Party one renders party two ineffective which results in party three (everyone else) to react.

    Law enforcement will either up-authoritarian tactics (see kettling of Toronto G20 on day three) which makes life unbearable for party three, or if law enforcement doesn’t ramp up authority, continues to demonstrate their ineffectiveness – which party three then loses faith in law enforcement (i.e. status quo) (see Sons of Odin and block watch groups in the UK around emerging no go zones)

    In other words, men of action – tradesmen, army, engineers (as Tom laid-out) will take matters into their own hands – no out of political ideology, heroism or profit, but rather to protect their loved one, their community and their property.

    By establishing small territories of peace and security (neighbourhoods, two or three block radius) – other in surrounding areas will migrate too or join in their tactics. Essentially what they do is create the first two commons – monopoly of violence over an area (territory) and trust. (See “warlords” in eastern Ukraine with community courts and patrols)…

    Naturally, organically, instinctively – they create the very foundation of of the changes we seek – without any affiliation, central command, ideology, thought leaders.

    What we need to do is ensure they understand what it is they are doing, why they do it, and why they had to do it(property, reciprocity). This is so they don’t seek to re-establish status quo and hand over their safe zones to the old regime – we must show them WHY THEY MUST LEAD and continue to do so.

    We dont need a mob, an army etc, because good men, in times of need, will stand and defend their loved ones, their kith and kin and Their property. Our societies are not filled with gun owning, would-be-revolutionaries. They are filled with dad’s, husbands, brothers – sheepdogs, who don’t want to see the commons they spend their days building and maintaining totally destroyed for ideological agendas. In the US these guys tend to be the ones who own guns – they tend to also be cautious (because they have something to lose) and tend to be the last to a fight, and the last stand if it can message to that. (Which is why the state of affairs continues unchallenged as of yet)

    (I’ll take these guys over well versed, well trained, ideologues any day. Zealots chap my ass)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-30 13:47:00 UTC

  • by Tom McSweeny Talking to the Left doesn’t bring them on side because it doesn’

    by Tom McSweeny

    Talking to the Left doesn’t bring them on side because it doesn’t demonstrate value add/roi nor change their behaviour. The left is happy debating, discussing, talking, letting everyone say their piece and valuing the contribution they made out of principle rather than results, happy with instant grat and short term outcomes supporting their ideologies and ideals: “Would you look at that, the people fleeing their own shithole are happy they are in our green and pleasant lands…didn’t we do good.” And in all fairness: outcome achieved. Long term though, that way lies death.

    We play the long game: the survival of our people (eugenic conquest through space and time). Arguing with the short term gamers is like listening to a spiced soy latte t-shirt commie: “Pleeeease, can’t you just see this is the better way”. Fuck that. That’s not us. We don’t need to make the case to them, we are the case.

    We are largely also the current leverage holders (tradesman: rw, army: rw, engineers: rw). Why is that? Because we are those who deal in reality, as is.

    So how do we red pill them that will not listen? Well, people believe what they do rather than do what they believe. We win by demonstrating, offering the opportunity for them to mimic us, and personally assisting with training each other (which is what these ongoing convs online are). Talk means nothing. But taking the young woman currently “fun timing” her way down the value ladder and showing her there is plenty to enjoy without long term cost, or the skinny soy boy cringe and showing him with a bit of effort he too can be the chad family man with ten loving kids, a hundred loving grandkids, be stacked and rich…that how we do it.

    Let us recall Jesus’s statement: “I am the way and the truth and the life”. And remember we are seeking to provide what we can demonstrate to be the best way for all concerned. If the opportunity is there, then the only thing left to say is “fuck them” if they don’t take it.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-30 12:29:00 UTC

  • by Gary Knight Thinking on JBP and sovereign individualism. It’s interesting tha

    by Gary Knight

    Thinking on JBP and sovereign individualism.

    It’s interesting that he often cites ancient genetic causes for hierarchy as a defence against SJW complaints regarding patriarchy and capitalism.

    He correctly identifies the depth of hierarchy and inequality in ancient biological programming that goes right back to our most remote ancestors.

    E.g. Dominance hierarchies in lobsters.

    What’s frustrating is he doesn’t apply the same analogy to Western Dominance.

    He attributes the Christian ethic as the source of the classical liberal / enlightenment values that birthed individualism as the source of Western Success (although he doesn’t say ‘Western success’ explicitly.

    It seems apparent in my readings about indo-Europeans that the West developed sovereignty mostly as a bi-product of distributive power which was an accident of geography – sufficient rivers, fertile land, hills, crags and natural barriers to break up the European landscape into defensible City states which led cultural development away from centralised monopoly governments that formed in the Middle East, Egypt etc.

    I think Peterson flaw is he gives to much credit to Christianity in his arguments for promoting the sovereign individual and fails to see the ancient source code for this cultural feature.

    In a sense he feels the words of Abrahamism gifted us new programming for regarding the individual as sacred when it seems we had in us from our martial ethic and domestication allowed the extension of sovereignty down the classes as we had more people capable of the agency to hold the idea.

    Which is why Christian Africa doesn’t have individualism and market success – software can’t take root in hardware that can’t process it.

    ——-

    If I was to use a loose metaphor I feel like Western Sovereignty is like a European plant species that was kept tame my the conditions in which it rooted.

    But once conditions changed and it had its shot it just spread across the earth and dominated – but first it had to be hardened by time and circumstance.

    Eg The plant species Lantana species is a potted flower in the UK.

    Once it was exported to Australia it thrived in the sunlight and grew rampant, choking out competitors.

    I see Western Sovereignty the same.

    Shaped my marital conflict over distributive geography and then once the conditions changes it became hyper-fertile and encompassed the world.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-30 08:54:00 UTC

  • JOSLIN ON CONTINUING THE LONGEST RUNNING SYSTEM OF MODERN GOVERNMENT by Bill Jos

    JOSLIN ON CONTINUING THE LONGEST RUNNING SYSTEM OF MODERN GOVERNMENT

    by Bill Joslin

    I have an admission, a confession…

    I still, after all these years, see classical liberalism and the anglo-enlightenment as a shining jewel in history; rare and valuable. But it was flawed. The flaw pertains to reifying critical concepts of its success into universal ideals. Namely equality (ideal) out of isonomy (realz), tolerance as an ideal versus tolerance of trivial and arbitrary differences (the real).

    Now I don’t see that these were critical flaws but rather a result of kinship and common sense being embedded in a long history of social norms of a homogeneous polity. They, at the time, didn’t need explicit statements on the limits to these concepts because they were “self-evident” and taken for granted within the normative domain.

    Overtime, what was taken for granted was forgotten, and Christian sentiment of universal love blew these operational necessities out of reality and into civic ideals.

    I would find much joy in holding this centrist stance, but in good faith cannot. I cannot because kin-selection backfilles for these flaws (homogeneity in the founding cultures) and paints a scene of future failure (universal franchise pushes kin-interests into the polictical sphere i.e. loss of unity in the polity).

    Civic values can provide that homogeneity but will always be vulnerable to lower resolution means (biology, ethnicity, race)

    We can correct CL, IMO. We can correct the errors. This line of development would put us toward the middle. Completing the enlightenment – which is really what we are doing. But we can’t do that without addressing identity and identity properties (kinship). Which right now puts us at the edge of the fringe.

    (The flaws currently poked at CL are not what CL was in its initial incarnations but rather what the romantics did to CL after they became the agenda setters in the 19th century)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-29 11:56:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/49616526_10156881060392264_860771476

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/49616526_10156881060392264_8607714768762961920_n_10156881060387264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/48961951_10156881062662264_5234628732169224192_n_10156881062657264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/48913078_10156881062807264_7359362883295117312_n_10156881062802264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/49206496_10156881062952264_664739522990309376_n_10156881062947264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/49465169_10156881062332264_699780550545637376_o_10156881062327264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/49152986_10156881061762264_1277893873120575488_n_10156881061757264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/49586749_10156881063017264_2412514023862960128_n_10156881063012264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/49533927_10156881063127264_265684190144495616_n_10156881063117264.jpg John EdwardJared and Ivanka’s Christmas was something else.Dec 29, 2018, 12:29 PMHank Hill-whipDick in a box?Dec 29, 2018, 1:12 PMJames BrittinghamI can’t believe you accused me of “sophistry” for saying Odin was a symbol of the Aryan penis.Dec 30, 2018, 12:33 AM photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/48985061_10156881063527264_981778113107066880_n_10156881063522264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/48932503_10156881063572264_637526524303507456_n_10156881063567264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/49044825_10156881063662264_1483555654785302528_n_10156881063657264.jpg ADULT, CRUDE, POSSIBLY OFFENSIVE, CHRISTMAS HUMOR

    I have no idea why I find this stuff so ridiculous – it’s such a contradiction. But people keep creating more and more of them every year. The creativity of halloween and christmas never cease to amaze me.

    Apparently some “evil elf” movie has been made over the past few years that has contributed to the trend. So these little sadisms are spreading all over the internet. My favorites are the ‘serial killer’ elves which is just WRONG on so many levels.

    Shared only with ‘friends’.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-29 11:03:00 UTC

  • Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig….. (R

    Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig….. (Robert Heinlein)

    … But with unlimited government funding, and the incentive to provide ‘a desirable education’, it is an endless job opportunity. (Igor Rogov)

    Marxism Postmodernism Feminism vs Science, Economics, Law, History, and Sovereignty in a nutshell.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-29 09:17:00 UTC