photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/84193619_200206914710803_8969347600587161600_n_200206908044137.jpg THIS IS WHYTHIS IS WHY

Source date (UTC): 2020-02-05 20:27:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/84193619_200206914710803_8969347600587161600_n_200206908044137.jpg THIS IS WHYTHIS IS WHY

Source date (UTC): 2020-02-05 20:27:00 UTC
—“Thinking in wwii terms isn’t useful”—Greg Hamilton
Thinking in terms of the french revolution isn’t either.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-05 13:41:00 UTC
That’s not an argument, it’s an ORRRGSSM! https://youtu.be/cgcpqO_if2E via @YouTube
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-05 01:41:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224870613208178688
RT @PrisonPlanet: If the Democrats can’t even run a primary election, how are they going to run a country?
#IowaCaucas
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-04 19:40:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224779768744247301
So there is plenty of room for faith, And you will find Aristotle and Jesus among his few prophets; and European man almost exclusively God’s translators – from his hand into the language of man: mathematics, science, and the Natural Law. And european man God’s only messenger.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-04 18:47:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224766413606457345
Reply addressees: @Sov3r3ignSoul @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224764932463480835
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Sov3r3ignSoul @JohnMarkSays The science says Physical law, Natural law, and Christian extension of kinship love, constitute the laws of the Universe. These Laws are the only evidence of god’s word, written in god’s hand. If any faith is incompatible with those laws, then it’s not god’s word but man’s lie.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1224764932463480835
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Sov3r3ignSoul @JohnMarkSays The science says Physical law, Natural law, and Christian extension of kinship love, constitute the laws of the Universe. These Laws are the only evidence of god’s word, written in god’s hand. If any faith is incompatible with those laws, then it’s not god’s word but man’s lie.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1224764932463480835
RT @JayMan471: That was always the Sword of Damocles sitting over globalism https://twitter.com/spwells/status/1224703224122355712
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-04 18:29:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224761829106339840
RT @Outsideness: The NRx take is that Trump is better than you deserve (however little that says).
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-04 18:28:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224761733228658696
THE NATURAL LAW DOES NOT CHANGE HUMAN BEHAVIOR, IT ACCOUNTS FOR IT, AND LIMITS ONLY IRRECIPROCITY
by Scott Strong
The Natural Law doesn’t change human nature…it accounts for it.
As for the diversity issue, that’s easy – less diversity, more homogeneity. We stop attempting to go against what humans do naturally…sort into groups with those who share our values and either trade if possible or war if threatened.
Also, there may be many religions but we only know of one that is compatible with the law. The rest will be expunged and can continue lying themselves into an inbred hole elsewhere.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-04 15:56:00 UTC
—“I regret (spending on) my economics major, but not for lack of employability.
It mostly boils down to epistemological reasons. My program was a joint program with a math minor and math heavy versions of all the econ classes in the econ major.
I think a lot of the economic intuition you get from the intro class, like thinking on the margin and in terms of opprotunity costs, and getting some intuitive sense of how variables should move together.
But you run into problems as soon as you try to quantify things. If you treat it like a science, you have no ability to run experiments, so you’re limited in your ability to determine if causality exists, its direction, or which of the millions of possible confounding variables are at play.
Treating it like math isn’t much better. We were doing all sorts of complicated multivariable maximizations to find comparative statics and optimal household/firm behavior… except there is no way to reliably determine the functions or contstraints in our maximizations.
Consequently firms/individuals don’t use the techniques of academic economists. Investment firms are similarly uninterested in what academic economists have to say about the business cycle. Their work is of zero predictive value to anybody putting money on the line.
These ways of doing economics often lead to wildly different conclusions, so I’ve certainly lost faith in profession as is, but probably also in our ability to ever make meaningful and concrete statements about the economy with any certainty.
I’ve also just developed other intellectual interests over the years, mostly in the humanities. It’s my senior spring right now though, so I’m just going to take my degree and start working.
Obviously a lot of the skills, especially math, I learned ended up being valuable in the job market, but I could have easily done physics or engineering instead.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-04 15:51:00 UTC
REACTION TO PROGRESSIVE THREATS AGAINST CONSERVATIVES
—“Dear Democrats, Liberals, and Leftists: (a) when you threaten to disarm us (b) to put us into ‘re-education camps, (c) to replace us, or worse, we take this as a threat and a promise – and we understand – and maybe you should understand, that our ethic is not equality but reciprocity – and as such you are giving license to do to you what you threatened to do to us. We are going to restore collective punishment. We won’t discriminate. If you don’t police your own, you’re advocating their behavior. So you’re all equally guilty.”—
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-04 15:44:00 UTC