Curt Doolittle

Form: Quote Commentary

  • ELIMINATING THE VERB TO BE (COPULA). IS IT REQUIRED? —“Is failure to use ePrim

    ELIMINATING THE VERB TO BE (COPULA). IS IT REQUIRED?

    —“Is failure to use ePrime in P an error? Why/not?”—Jonathan Besler

    Brandon Hayes: No; you can speak truthfully without speaking operationally.

    Curt Doolittle: Also. You can falsify another’s speech by translating it to operational prose. Again, like many things, once you learn the form you will identify when people are lying, and how they are lying, and gain the ability to explain how they are lying – including why they might be. And if someone questions the truth of your statements you can expand them to the fully operational form and demonstrate that you were merely exercising convenience. Just recall that lying in P means you failed due diligence – you don’t need to intend to. Its like transferring stolen property. You were involved and participated in the crime because you failed due diligence.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-08 18:54:00 UTC

  • “Homogeny is closer to equality, but absolute equality only exists as entropy(de

    —“Homogeny is closer to equality, but absolute equality only exists as entropy(devolution). What we want is an equilibrium where benefits of division of labor most outweigh the costs of diverging interests.”—Martin Štěpán

    (This is an example why I spent years at this task. To make new leadership for a new world. And look at these guys. Something happened. A new critical mass. It’s beautiful.)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-08 09:47:00 UTC

  • “THE OVERTON WINDOW IS TAKING ABUSE” by Brandon Hayes Curt: The Overton window i

    “THE OVERTON WINDOW IS TAKING ABUSE”

    by Brandon Hayes

    Curt:

    The Overton window is taking abuse. We push on it from the inside so it expands. There are also people on both fringes pulling the edges of discourse from the outside. We’re breaking the window frame; and we ought to. Discourse is all acceptable; it’s certain action that isn’t. So, we’re crushing a concept.

    As the window opens more perspective frames break. I’ve been attempting to frame the conversation around the edges so previous frames of for sense-making that offered clarity become obsolete. (Say capitalism/socialism… the frame is false; we’re forcing the issue).

    Your timeline has always been money from what I could tell. The future has events that provide clarity/turning points. (2020 election for instance)

    At this point anything that alters the emotional underlay of the populace suites us because emotional breakdowns are perspective altering. The detractors, those that look to minimize emotional fluctuations only work to create emotional fragility and unstable frames (as they are emotionally based). [All chaos suites those that can reinstitute order. We’re the only ones offering anything fair]

    No one can survive sanely inside themselves searching for happiness. The recent JBP breakdown proves the solid open individualist frame [the one JBP purports as paramount] doesn’t hold up under pressure to change the whole world. It crumbles and falls apart because it’s more than anyone can do.

    See I believe it’s ok to need others. It’s necessary. I’ve been lucky to have those I can lean and depend on. I have been blessed with those I can trust. And now I have a system to vet everyone and can teach it to everyone else. (Thank you)

    We’re winning and people join winning teams. It’s a matter of getting them to put their money where their mouth is. And since money is abundant and it’s time that’s scarce; they have every reason. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-08 09:42:00 UTC

  • TESTIMONY —“Lots of pro-boogaloo folks and others are looking for solutions. I

    TESTIMONY

    —“Lots of pro-boogaloo folks and others are looking for solutions. It starts with being pro-second Amendment. Then they identify the enemy.. Then they start looking for Solutions. Only Propertarianism actually offers solutions. For the price that is going to be paid for a chance to fix this wreck, it had better work.”—Rick Tavi

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-08 09:39:00 UTC

  • “I must give you credit, because once you notice the relatively subtle methods o

    —“I must give you credit, because once you notice the relatively subtle methods of deceit through framing, etc., you can’t stop noticing, and it can be tremendously valuable. Even in legal brief-writing. “Your Honor, notice how they attempted to deceive you by….” … People are too accustomed to thinking of deceit only in terms of outright lies. But the other methods of deceit are crucial to understand as well. You have been instrumental in my understanding of those.— A Friend.

    Hugs brother.

    It’s hard to believe the promise we make, that if you learn P, it will influence you – and once you understand how the deceits are constructed you see them everywhere.

    And if you can see and name a thing, you can defeat a thing. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 21:22:00 UTC

  • ANGLO COMMON “ADVERSARIAL” LAW PERSISTED FOR A REASON —“Depending on the legal

    ANGLO COMMON “ADVERSARIAL” LAW PERSISTED FOR A REASON

    —“Depending on the legal market and parties involved, the adversarial nature of law can actually be quite constructive. You come to learn quickly who the honest but zealous advocates are, as opposed to the slimy, deceitful guys trying to hide evidence, defend absurd positions, etc. Especially in small markets, the two groups quickly separate, as oil and water, and interactions between the honest group are beneficial to themselves and their clients. The deceitful scum generally cost themselves and their clients in the long run. They value face over truth, and that’s soon apparent to those who value truth more highly.”–Brad Lehman

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 21:15:00 UTC

  • “Universal suffrage will eventually cause universal suffering.”—Clifton Knox (

    —“Universal suffrage will eventually cause universal suffering.”—Clifton Knox

    (Democracy is the slow road to communism. -hoppe)

    –“I am in favor of earned cumulative meritocratic suffrage based on demonstrated generational loyalty (military, political, social, legal, intellectual/scientific, economic, artistic)), investment in the commons, level of leadership, Territorial acquisition and settlement, establishment, leadership and defense of core instituons etc.

    Patriotic American families with deep roots and demonstrated excellence over the generations in building up our country and nation will have accumulated the most voting rights (no more one man one vote). (Houses are a better solution)

    Recent immigrants whose ancestors have contributed nothing or even taken from the country by drawing down welfare or voting irreciprocally will have no franchise rights.

    Each generation is accounted for.

    This system restores power to the WASP families that founded and built America and disempowers our enemies and rivals for power. It is also just.”—Scott De Warren

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 10:07:00 UTC

  • “Diversity is synonym for Division and Division’s not a strength it’s a weakness

    —“Diversity is synonym for Division and Division’s not a strength it’s a weakness. Strength arises from Unity not Division. Diversity between nations is a strength for humanity, but Division within Nations is a weakness.”–Bic Verger

    —“Diversity isn’t necessarily synonymous with division, it is however necessarily antonymous to equality.”—Martin Štěpán

    Equality is made possible by appealing to ending status and power competition using kin selection.

    Devolve the federal government once again and restore the constitution to an alliance of nation-states.

    Europe solved this problem and only napoleon undermined it.

    A large number of small homogenous nation states produces a market for different commons producing polities and the greatest tolerance for reiprocity and proportionality

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 09:15:00 UTC

  • Diversity + Proximity = Conflict —“There is not a single example throughout hu

    Diversity + Proximity = Conflict

    —“There is not a single example throughout human history that you can point to to prove that formula wrong over any extended period of time.

    It’s been tried, it always fails.” —JC Trott

    —“Multiculturalism is a euphemism for multiracialism.

    Multiculturalism doesn’t work and will never work.

    Countries have been organized on the basis of race since the dawn of civilization. A nation is a group of people living in a region who share a common race, language, and religion.

    Most of the world’s countries are ethnostates: Japan, China, Israel, multiple black countries in Africa, and multiple Arab Muslim countries in the ME.

    Only in white countries is “diversity” or “multiculturalism” being pushed, and that is because non-whites want to enjoy the safety and prosperity of white society. But they will necessarily destroy it if they come en masse. Therefore, whites are in the unique position of having to forcibly stop third-world invaders and remove those already here. If they do not, their white societies will be lost. And Jewish people are leading the propaganda campaign against whites from doing so, both by demonizing those who already advocate this as “racists” and by stupefying those who haven’t awakened with their “diversity is our strength” brainwashing.

    People aren’t flooding into Vietnam, El Salvador, Somalia, or Egypt en masse from other parts of the world. They are only doing this into the West (white countries). “—John Morrison

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 07:52:00 UTC

  • “The average or ‘normie’ conservative is not that much different than the averag

    —“The average or ‘normie’ conservative is not that much different than the average liberal. It’s harder to define what polarizes people in the middle to one side or the other. They certainly do polarize, and it can happen in relation to very specific traits or sympathies, but nevertheless they still share many overlapping traits or sympathies. We probably tend to think of the NAXALTs as outliers who are at the end of a spectrum, but they are more likely to fall somewhere in the middle of a spectrum where things are most variable. Trait Z may be extremely common in the left wing, and far less common on the right, but the place where conservatives will exhibit it most is probably somewhere towards the middle.”—Jennifer Dean

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-06 16:55:00 UTC