Form: Quote Commentary

photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/84339750_198464524885042_5102217394399477760_o_198464521551709.jpg “NAME CALLING DOOLITTLE NUMBER 9999999999….”

—“I don’t know how many things you’ve been accused of being, but here’s one you might find interesting.🤣”— A Friend

(re: doolittle)

….—“He’s a wannabe Nassim Taleb. He’s trying to re invent stoicism.”–Sabo Vojvodic

LOL…. That’s pretty much missing the ballpark.. by a few continents…

I did work on religion for a year, and did push for stoicism as one of the answers to mindfulness – until I understood it’s the stoic method of discipline but not it’s virtues.

So, it’s really just a matter of complexity. People don’t have a frame for Propertarianism other than ideology, philosophy.

If I sold red lollipops people would understand Red Lollipops.

If I sold something trivial like “The NAP”, people would understand Red-Lollipop NAP.

But I sell, a methodology producing a universally commensurable value natural vocabulary, grammar, and logic across all fields, a table of grammars explaining all paradigms of communication, an explanation of the means of undermining western civilization by the use of abrahamic method of deception – the polar opposite of aristotelian testimony – a method of falsifying testimony using that language to complete the scientific method, the formal logic of the psychological and social sciences, uniting hard and soft sciences, the strict construction of law, using that language and method, a constitution restoring the american constitution and the foundations of western civilization; and and explanation for the success of western civilization and the failure or stagnation or decline of other civilizations.

Ok. So. We’ve had a the socrates(criticis) plato(justificationism) aristotle (falsificaton) program; The paul-whomever-augustine program; the Bacon-Locke-smith-hume program to restore aristotle, the rousseau-Kantian-german idealist program (thru Heidegger) to undermine aristotle, and the marxist-postmodernist-feminist-denialist program to undermine the entire western tradition again. And in my view im’ completing the hilbert-brouwer/bridgman-maxwell-darwin-crick-menger-popper-kuhn-hayek program that was interrupted by the war, and the invasion of the west by the marxists and jews.

And for some reason it’s hard to imagine that P is on the same scale as Aristotle – When, it’s really just rewriting and completing Aristotle’s project in fully scientific prose. (Not that it was my intention. It’s just the outcome.)

So yeah. It’s waaaaaay too much for people to understand P if they don’t know the history of thought.”NAME CALLING DOOLITTLE NUMBER 9999999999….”

—“I don’t know how many things you’ve been accused of being, but here’s one you might find interesting.🤣”— A Friend

(re: doolittle)

….—“He’s a wannabe Nassim Taleb. He’s trying to re invent stoicism.”–Sabo Vojvodic

LOL…. That’s pretty much missing the ballpark.. by a few continents…

I did work on religion for a year, and did push for stoicism as one of the answers to mindfulness – until I understood it’s the stoic method of discipline but not it’s virtues.

So, it’s really just a matter of complexity. People don’t have a frame for Propertarianism other than ideology, philosophy.

If I sold red lollipops people would understand Red Lollipops.

If I sold something trivial like “The NAP”, people would understand Red-Lollipop NAP.

But I sell, a methodology producing a universally commensurable value natural vocabulary, grammar, and logic across all fields, a table of grammars explaining all paradigms of communication, an explanation of the means of undermining western civilization by the use of abrahamic method of deception – the polar opposite of aristotelian testimony – a method of falsifying testimony using that language to complete the scientific method, the formal logic of the psychological and social sciences, uniting hard and soft sciences, the strict construction of law, using that language and method, a constitution restoring the american constitution and the foundations of western civilization; and and explanation for the success of western civilization and the failure or stagnation or decline of other civilizations.

Ok. So. We’ve had a the socrates(criticis) plato(justificationism) aristotle (falsificaton) program; The paul-whomever-augustine program; the Bacon-Locke-smith-hume program to restore aristotle, the rousseau-Kantian-german idealist program (thru Heidegger) to undermine aristotle, and the marxist-postmodernist-feminist-denialist program to undermine the entire western tradition again. And in my view im’ completing the hilbert-brouwer/bridgman-maxwell-darwin-crick-menger-popper-kuhn-hayek program that was interrupted by the war, and the invasion of the west by the marxists and jews.

And for some reason it’s hard to imagine that P is on the same scale as Aristotle – When, it’s really just rewriting and completing Aristotle’s project in fully scientific prose. (Not that it was my intention. It’s just the outcome.)

So yeah. It’s waaaaaay too much for people to understand P if they don’t know the history of thought.