Form: Quote Commentary

  • Maria’s Colorful Explanation of Current Condition

    Mar 12, 2020, 5:56 PM by Maria Al Masani Makienko

    —“Most civilizations, cultures, states, tolerate polygamy. The problem is, women are freaking expensive. And unless you’re desperately poor and need women to share the farm labor, are short of men because of war, men can’t afford them, and educated women won’t tolerate it.)”—Eric Danelaw

    I think you are right that before the sexual revolution + modern dating apps, women were expensive. Now they are cheap to [CD: some] men they perceive higher value (looks +game) and unavailable to the rest. Women sense executive traits like disagreeableness in a male executive that Pickup artists mimic. This is before anyone becomes a Thot. Thots go for outright aggressive men. Thots are a female tiger woods – a set of maladaptive behaviour in the PreTinder era only seen in sex workers and male professional athletes. With current technology x no prohibitions on sexual promiscuity there is no cost for the most virile disagreeable men maintaining big harems while contributing little to society, while men who would actually make a good father who are reasonably in shape but no 6 pack, loyal, faithful, great income, not a doormat but not a jerk like me … they get none. And I am not anti social and do not denigrate people without cause. At this point thots look at fitness x how anti social a male is, and the top 10% of that gets laid at the cost of a drink or a slice of pizza and a gym membership and the rest get nothing. And it has a real impact on policies. In short, we are experiencing a historically unprecedented dysgenic distortion of the sexual marketplace whereby contraception, modern technologies like tinder, a hook up culture promoted by (((Hollywood))), radical feminism all lower women’s sexual marketplace value to a couple drinks+ gym membership at 20, a couple slices of Pizza + gym membership at 25. At at 30, she would be lucky for a slice of pizza. At 40 her value is 0. I do not think women had such low cost in any society in any time in history because condoms, the pill and Tinder were not invented yet. Finally Haidt brings a valid point about decay, that any dysgenic or degenerate individualist behaviours might not harm the commons in the first generation, a mild negative impact on some in the second, but have a brutal devastating impact on the commons in the third. I think in images so translating it into text is difficult and wordy, but through P I hope to be able to be more articulate and concise in my wording to better express the image and pattern I see without wasting time. So thank you for bearing with me as I learn the language and grammar. In my generation, the sexual marketplace is a distorted hellscape that only benefits Weinsteins and Epstein’s

  • Maria’s Colorful Explanation of Current Condition

    Mar 12, 2020, 5:56 PM by Maria Al Masani Makienko

    —“Most civilizations, cultures, states, tolerate polygamy. The problem is, women are freaking expensive. And unless you’re desperately poor and need women to share the farm labor, are short of men because of war, men can’t afford them, and educated women won’t tolerate it.)”—Eric Danelaw

    I think you are right that before the sexual revolution + modern dating apps, women were expensive. Now they are cheap to [CD: some] men they perceive higher value (looks +game) and unavailable to the rest. Women sense executive traits like disagreeableness in a male executive that Pickup artists mimic. This is before anyone becomes a Thot. Thots go for outright aggressive men. Thots are a female tiger woods – a set of maladaptive behaviour in the PreTinder era only seen in sex workers and male professional athletes. With current technology x no prohibitions on sexual promiscuity there is no cost for the most virile disagreeable men maintaining big harems while contributing little to society, while men who would actually make a good father who are reasonably in shape but no 6 pack, loyal, faithful, great income, not a doormat but not a jerk like me … they get none. And I am not anti social and do not denigrate people without cause. At this point thots look at fitness x how anti social a male is, and the top 10% of that gets laid at the cost of a drink or a slice of pizza and a gym membership and the rest get nothing. And it has a real impact on policies. In short, we are experiencing a historically unprecedented dysgenic distortion of the sexual marketplace whereby contraception, modern technologies like tinder, a hook up culture promoted by (((Hollywood))), radical feminism all lower women’s sexual marketplace value to a couple drinks+ gym membership at 20, a couple slices of Pizza + gym membership at 25. At at 30, she would be lucky for a slice of pizza. At 40 her value is 0. I do not think women had such low cost in any society in any time in history because condoms, the pill and Tinder were not invented yet. Finally Haidt brings a valid point about decay, that any dysgenic or degenerate individualist behaviours might not harm the commons in the first generation, a mild negative impact on some in the second, but have a brutal devastating impact on the commons in the third. I think in images so translating it into text is difficult and wordy, but through P I hope to be able to be more articulate and concise in my wording to better express the image and pattern I see without wasting time. So thank you for bearing with me as I learn the language and grammar. In my generation, the sexual marketplace is a distorted hellscape that only benefits Weinsteins and Epstein’s

  • All Our Gods Were War Gods – We Were an Army First.

    Mar 15, 2020, 3:53 PM –“The Norse/Germanic war gods can be distinguished by – among other things – the fact that each are connected to a particular aspect of war. Thor, for example, is involved in the brute physical combat; Odin in the magical and psychological forces at work; and Tyr in the legal decisions and principles of justice surrounding war.”–

  • All Our Gods Were War Gods – We Were an Army First.

    Mar 15, 2020, 3:53 PM –“The Norse/Germanic war gods can be distinguished by – among other things – the fact that each are connected to a particular aspect of war. Thor, for example, is involved in the brute physical combat; Odin in the magical and psychological forces at work; and Tyr in the legal decisions and principles of justice surrounding war.”–

  • Like I Said: Nationalization to Protect Industry

    —“France is ready to use the ultimate weapon to protect its biggest companies from the market turmoil set in motion by the coronavirus: nationalization.”—

      What does nationalization mean? The state ‘buys’ the corporation (its shares), directly from the company (not existing investors), at a discount (30%-50%), at market prices, vacates all non-vendor debt (all borrowing), restoring fiscal health, and appoints a receiver, and a board member, with veto power over dispersals. The state may also invest additional funds for strategic purposes. Especially research and development, or modernization.

  • Like I Said: Nationalization to Protect Industry

    —“France is ready to use the ultimate weapon to protect its biggest companies from the market turmoil set in motion by the coronavirus: nationalization.”—

      What does nationalization mean? The state ‘buys’ the corporation (its shares), directly from the company (not existing investors), at a discount (30%-50%), at market prices, vacates all non-vendor debt (all borrowing), restoring fiscal health, and appoints a receiver, and a board member, with veto power over dispersals. The state may also invest additional funds for strategic purposes. Especially research and development, or modernization.

  • Use Stimulus by Rate of Response and Effect

    Mar 18, 2020, 9:04 PM There’s never been a worse time for fiscal stimulus – Econlib econlib.org

    There’s never been a worse time for fiscal stimulus
    STIMULUS BY RATE OF RESPONSE AND EFFECT MONETARY stimulus refers to lowering interest rates, quantitative easing, or other ways of increasing the amount of money or credit. DIRECT stimulus (my term) refers to direct distribution of cash to consumers who can then alter the structure of production with collective (‘state’,’environmental’) indirect debt rather than individual, family, business and industry debt. this is the ONLY method of preventing exaggerated worldwide demand, network, and price recalculation, in the face of ignorance. Giving consumers liquidity removes IGNORANCE (uncertainty) while the economy changes. It is ignorance, uncertainty, and recalculation by trial and error under duress that causes undesirable economic contractions rather than desirable economic adaptations. DEBT NATIONALIZATION (my term) refers to paying down consumer credit all mortgages and granting credit to those with paid or substantially paid mortgages. RESCUE INVESTMENT (my term) – Providing loans directly to business industry in response to shocks, so that they can survive or even motball during recessions. NATIONALIZATION refers to the state taking over the ownership of a STRATEGIC industry, providing necessary cash reserves and cash-flow while the necessary organization adapts to shocks (temporary) or change (permanent). However, investors must be zeroed during this time and may only buy back their interest for having failed to preserve enough liquidity to insure against shocks. In this case the state buys the company for nothing, and resells it. FISCAL stimulus refers to increasing government consumption or transfers or lowering taxes. Effectively this means increasing the rate of growth of public debt, except that particularly Keynesians often assume that the stimulus will cause sufficient economic growth to fill that gap partially or completely. See multiplier (economics).

  • On the Pill

    Mar 20, 2020, 1:02 PM www.sciencedaily.com sciencedaily.com

    — “We validated methods for assessing the volume of the hypothalamus and confirm, for the first time, that current oral contraceptive pill usage is associated with smaller hypothalamic volume.” “The sample size of the study was quite small: 50 women, 21 of whom were on the pill. The study’s findings, which were presented at the Radiological Society of North America, found a six percent decrease in the size of the hypothalamus among women who took birth control pills.” “Women should not be too concerned about these associations, as there currently is not enough information to change hormonal contraceptive use based on this and similar studies,” Alexandra Herrera, a University of Southern California gerontologist who is not involved in the study, said.”— Herrara (Female)

    STUDY AUTHOR

    –“”We found a dramatic difference in the size of the brain structures between women who were taking oral contraceptives and those who were not,” Dr. Lipton said. “This initial study shows a strong association and should motivate further investigation into the effects of oral contraceptives on brain structure and their potential impact on brain function.””– Dr Lipton (Male)

    COMMENTS Note that (a) while the sample size is under 100, it’s not tiny. (b) 6% is a non trivial decline in hippocampal size, (c) the hippocampus is where your concept of the world is integrated and output for emotional reaction, (d) this is not the first study to illustrate the shrinkage. AND (a) both men and women emotionally coddle women. (b) the author of the comment is a woman. (c) she’s using the vocabulary of coddling. if you asked me how a drug would show up in a problem of emotional regulation i would say ‘somewhere within the hippocampal region”. STUDY: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/12/191204090819.htm

  • On the Pill

    Mar 20, 2020, 1:02 PM www.sciencedaily.com sciencedaily.com

    — “We validated methods for assessing the volume of the hypothalamus and confirm, for the first time, that current oral contraceptive pill usage is associated with smaller hypothalamic volume.” “The sample size of the study was quite small: 50 women, 21 of whom were on the pill. The study’s findings, which were presented at the Radiological Society of North America, found a six percent decrease in the size of the hypothalamus among women who took birth control pills.” “Women should not be too concerned about these associations, as there currently is not enough information to change hormonal contraceptive use based on this and similar studies,” Alexandra Herrera, a University of Southern California gerontologist who is not involved in the study, said.”— Herrara (Female)

    STUDY AUTHOR

    –“”We found a dramatic difference in the size of the brain structures between women who were taking oral contraceptives and those who were not,” Dr. Lipton said. “This initial study shows a strong association and should motivate further investigation into the effects of oral contraceptives on brain structure and their potential impact on brain function.””– Dr Lipton (Male)

    COMMENTS Note that (a) while the sample size is under 100, it’s not tiny. (b) 6% is a non trivial decline in hippocampal size, (c) the hippocampus is where your concept of the world is integrated and output for emotional reaction, (d) this is not the first study to illustrate the shrinkage. AND (a) both men and women emotionally coddle women. (b) the author of the comment is a woman. (c) she’s using the vocabulary of coddling. if you asked me how a drug would show up in a problem of emotional regulation i would say ‘somewhere within the hippocampal region”. STUDY: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/12/191204090819.htm

  • What Can the Average Person Grasp?

    Mar 20, 2020, 1:04 PM By John Mark

    —“So moral-reasoning in P is not hard. But what about the Grammars, Testimonial Truth, Operational Language, Strictly Constructed Laws, and the Abrahamic Method of Deceit?”– CD

    What can the avg person grasp, and/or what do we need to give them a glimpse of out of necessity? Strictly Constructed Laws – even if they don’t understand the details, this can be sold as solution to activist judges and undermining of the constitution. (You did a great job explaining it on most recent P-constitition video interview.) Abrahamic Method – the term itself triggers Christians, but the basic concept of “don’t say anything that excuses a violation of reciprocity” is understandable by the avg person. Testimonial Truth – details a bit much for avg person, but concept that there’s a checklist courts use to figure out whether a public figure is lying, I think is understandable, and may be necessary to “sell” free truthful speech vs free speech. And the avg person may be able to understand certain aspects of it, such as the concept of lying by omission or lying by mixing 2 concepts/definitions together.