Form: Quote Commentary

  • The Hard Lesson

    —“The golden rule is nonsense and even the silver rule needs to be stated more precisely to be true.”—Martin Štěpán

  • The Hard Lesson

    —“The golden rule is nonsense and even the silver rule needs to be stated more precisely to be true.”—Martin Štěpán

  • Property is Held by Force

    Mar 30, 2020, 2:25 PM

    —“Property is held by force. When someone claims a possession as their property, it means they will use force to keep it in their control.”—Chuckie Pfeiff

    Now, why couldn’t I make it that simple. 😉 Demonstrated interest in fact. Possession in fact. Property by Defense. Property Norm By reciprocal defense Property Rights by institutional defense.

    1. I demonstrate an interest in fact
    2. I possess it in fact (contingent upon whether it’s possessable)
    3. I demand the reciprocity of property by defense.
    4. We create the institution of property by reciprocity
    5. We create the institution of property rights by creating an institution to insure the institution of property.
  • Property is Held by Force

    Mar 30, 2020, 2:25 PM

    —“Property is held by force. When someone claims a possession as their property, it means they will use force to keep it in their control.”—Chuckie Pfeiff

    Now, why couldn’t I make it that simple. 😉 Demonstrated interest in fact. Possession in fact. Property by Defense. Property Norm By reciprocal defense Property Rights by institutional defense.

    1. I demonstrate an interest in fact
    2. I possess it in fact (contingent upon whether it’s possessable)
    3. I demand the reciprocity of property by defense.
    4. We create the institution of property by reciprocity
    5. We create the institution of property rights by creating an institution to insure the institution of property.
  • I Gained My Knowledge by Investigating and Prosecuting Them for White Collar Crimes

    Apr 1, 2020, 6:12 PM Actually I know about (((them))) from prosecuting them for RICO, racketeering, churning, mortgage scams, wire fraud, bribery of court officials, data theft, tax evasion, lovely crimes like buying a ravine next to a child care, for next to nothing, and then trying to get a permit to build a halfway house next to it for sex offenders, and trying to force them to buy it at a ridiculous price out of self defense. It taught me both the law, and how it was being abused. I don’t care what wisdom literature says I care what results from Pilpul, Critique, and diasporic ethics. Now, my solution is to fix our laws so that ‘good people stay’ and ‘bad people leave’, but it’s not like I’m led by someone else’s opinion, or ‘the church’s gossip’. It’s because despite growing up with no experience in such things, I was able to identify a pattern of (((group))) behavior and how it’s endemic in the subculture and how it’s argued in (((their))) law and tradition. And research throughout history demonstrates that it’s been persistent for most of the past thousand years at least in europe. But it’s the same reason that the egyptians cast (((them))) out. So it’s got to be older than the past thousand years. So no. My experience is with closing their businesses, seizing their assets, putting them in prison – not reading what people said about them. I got out of it because it was too depressing. But I could have made an amazing career from it if I had the stomach for it. Deception and baiting into hazard are heroic for that part of the world in general. Cheating is a heroic win for (((them))). As is undermining every host people’s group harmony by fomenting conflict. Avoiding engaging in production is an ethic. And specializing in rent seeking is an industry. Yet, all of the above is crime for europeans. So, (((their))) history is selective. We are conscious of our history – including our history of conquest and genocide. We just choose not to do it any longer. The question is, why are (((they))) unconscious of their history, and why don’t (((they))) stop doing it, and why don’t (((they))) stop others from doing it? Because it’s a group advantage. Why? Crimes against the commons it turns out are more rewarding than crimes against private property. Because crimes against the commons can be passed off as voluntary – even though they were created by construction (baiting into hazard.) Don’t abandon your tradition and history. But learn what’s evil in it and change. A diasporic civilization with a highly competent majority that specializes in organized crime to privatize the commons.

  • I Gained My Knowledge by Investigating and Prosecuting Them for White Collar Crimes

    Apr 1, 2020, 6:12 PM Actually I know about (((them))) from prosecuting them for RICO, racketeering, churning, mortgage scams, wire fraud, bribery of court officials, data theft, tax evasion, lovely crimes like buying a ravine next to a child care, for next to nothing, and then trying to get a permit to build a halfway house next to it for sex offenders, and trying to force them to buy it at a ridiculous price out of self defense. It taught me both the law, and how it was being abused. I don’t care what wisdom literature says I care what results from Pilpul, Critique, and diasporic ethics. Now, my solution is to fix our laws so that ‘good people stay’ and ‘bad people leave’, but it’s not like I’m led by someone else’s opinion, or ‘the church’s gossip’. It’s because despite growing up with no experience in such things, I was able to identify a pattern of (((group))) behavior and how it’s endemic in the subculture and how it’s argued in (((their))) law and tradition. And research throughout history demonstrates that it’s been persistent for most of the past thousand years at least in europe. But it’s the same reason that the egyptians cast (((them))) out. So it’s got to be older than the past thousand years. So no. My experience is with closing their businesses, seizing their assets, putting them in prison – not reading what people said about them. I got out of it because it was too depressing. But I could have made an amazing career from it if I had the stomach for it. Deception and baiting into hazard are heroic for that part of the world in general. Cheating is a heroic win for (((them))). As is undermining every host people’s group harmony by fomenting conflict. Avoiding engaging in production is an ethic. And specializing in rent seeking is an industry. Yet, all of the above is crime for europeans. So, (((their))) history is selective. We are conscious of our history – including our history of conquest and genocide. We just choose not to do it any longer. The question is, why are (((they))) unconscious of their history, and why don’t (((they))) stop doing it, and why don’t (((they))) stop others from doing it? Because it’s a group advantage. Why? Crimes against the commons it turns out are more rewarding than crimes against private property. Because crimes against the commons can be passed off as voluntary – even though they were created by construction (baiting into hazard.) Don’t abandon your tradition and history. But learn what’s evil in it and change. A diasporic civilization with a highly competent majority that specializes in organized crime to privatize the commons.

  • Learning “Curt Speak” (P-Logic) is a Process.

    Apr 2, 2020, 6:00 PM

    —“When I started following Curt years back (how long has it been???) I used to get in fights with him over his fucking neologisms. I didn’t know I actually agreed with him at first—mostly. There’s enough to disagree with as it is for a new guy—and learning Curt speak is a process.”—Daniel Roland Anderson

  • Learning “Curt Speak” (P-Logic) is a Process.

    Apr 2, 2020, 6:00 PM

    —“When I started following Curt years back (how long has it been???) I used to get in fights with him over his fucking neologisms. I didn’t know I actually agreed with him at first—mostly. There’s enough to disagree with as it is for a new guy—and learning Curt speak is a process.”—Daniel Roland Anderson

  • God Is God, Jesus Is Jesus, and Monopoly Its Not

    Apr 14, 2020, 9:33 AM

    —“Just because most organized religions are corrupt money and power machines, doesn’t make the Christ any less the God of this world… Look at what the nation under God has become.”—Patrick Huntley

    Scientifically speaking, of god’s laws, christ added a minor improvement to natural law – one that is counter-intuitive to primitive man – and that gave women and the underclasses a philosophy of self respect and social value despite being left behind by the rapid advancements of the ancient material world, just like marxism, socialism, feminism, and postmodernism tried to give social value to the women, underclasses, and immigrants in the modern material world. God is god. Jesus is Jesus. His contribution is profound. But it is profound as a minor improvement on god’s laws that perhaps could not have been discovered until so many people in the underclasses were left behind by the advancements in the ancient world. The modern world’s jews updated this EMOTIONAL (Spiritual) jewish social construction in the ancient world and it’s claim of prosecution by their aristocratic betters, from claims of political power and informational power, to claims of economic, political, and informational power. This is contrary to the european tradition of reason, stoicism, Epicureanism, the play, and celebratory festivals that were costly and the asian tradition of buddhism which was cheap both of which achieve their ends without destroying the host aristocracy as did christianity, judaism, and islam. Christianity was a cheap way of powerless people to obtain status and self image at the cost of destroying the host political order. Islam the same. Judaism the same. Religion destroys in exchange for psychological comfort. The question was and is, whether we can produce a religion that doesn’t destroy in exchange. So far that is the roman: reason, stoicism, Epicureanism, the play, and celebratory festivals that are expensive. The success of western civlization is due to our traditional social order of a universal militia, law, and their traditions. The underclass religions of abrahamism are a means by which those that would be slaves, serfs, servants, the poor, and mothers could seek mindfulness in an increasingly advanced world that was leaving them behind – and by which a cast of priests – also being left behind by modernity – could rule them for profit. Man is not moral or good. He is amoral and practical. It is our institutions of suppression of the bad that limit him to the good.

  • God Is God, Jesus Is Jesus, and Monopoly Its Not

    Apr 14, 2020, 9:33 AM

    —“Just because most organized religions are corrupt money and power machines, doesn’t make the Christ any less the God of this world… Look at what the nation under God has become.”—Patrick Huntley

    Scientifically speaking, of god’s laws, christ added a minor improvement to natural law – one that is counter-intuitive to primitive man – and that gave women and the underclasses a philosophy of self respect and social value despite being left behind by the rapid advancements of the ancient material world, just like marxism, socialism, feminism, and postmodernism tried to give social value to the women, underclasses, and immigrants in the modern material world. God is god. Jesus is Jesus. His contribution is profound. But it is profound as a minor improvement on god’s laws that perhaps could not have been discovered until so many people in the underclasses were left behind by the advancements in the ancient world. The modern world’s jews updated this EMOTIONAL (Spiritual) jewish social construction in the ancient world and it’s claim of prosecution by their aristocratic betters, from claims of political power and informational power, to claims of economic, political, and informational power. This is contrary to the european tradition of reason, stoicism, Epicureanism, the play, and celebratory festivals that were costly and the asian tradition of buddhism which was cheap both of which achieve their ends without destroying the host aristocracy as did christianity, judaism, and islam. Christianity was a cheap way of powerless people to obtain status and self image at the cost of destroying the host political order. Islam the same. Judaism the same. Religion destroys in exchange for psychological comfort. The question was and is, whether we can produce a religion that doesn’t destroy in exchange. So far that is the roman: reason, stoicism, Epicureanism, the play, and celebratory festivals that are expensive. The success of western civlization is due to our traditional social order of a universal militia, law, and their traditions. The underclass religions of abrahamism are a means by which those that would be slaves, serfs, servants, the poor, and mothers could seek mindfulness in an increasingly advanced world that was leaving them behind – and by which a cast of priests – also being left behind by modernity – could rule them for profit. Man is not moral or good. He is amoral and practical. It is our institutions of suppression of the bad that limit him to the good.