Curt Doolittle

Form: Quote Commentary

  • Testimony (awesome)

    Mar 4, 2020, 3:01 PM (ok. so this made my day)

    —“There is such a great benefit to mastering even a small aspect of P in personal life. I am still trying to figure a lot of it out, but whatever I do has served me a lot personally far more than my useless university education that was the biggest waste of money. I am glad I went to trade school after. What Curt Doolittle is teaching is why originally people were hoping to get paying $60,000+ in student loans to what has devolved into baiting into hazard into debt slavery for a marxist indoctrination center that rewards a useless piece of paper. I am really grateful to this.”— Maria Al Masani Makienko

    The problem is that it’s hard to know the value of P until you know it. So we need enough people to ‘verify’ P’s utility so that we stop people from having to pay 60K in debt for what should be a thousand dollars or so in basic courses. If we do that we change the world.

  • The Manufacture of Ignorance

    Mar 4, 2020, 4:05 PM by Andrew M Gilmour Categorically speaking, logic, numbers and geometry are universal abstracts. It’s not a new insight. They just stopped teaching it nearly a hundred years ago. Or rather, i’ve never found a good book on it after the 1920s. Building a paradigm around geometry (spatial perception) enforces realism and empiricism. “Knowing” must come from the objective world. The subjective is only preference (desired).

  • The Manufacture of Ignorance

    Mar 4, 2020, 4:05 PM by Andrew M Gilmour Categorically speaking, logic, numbers and geometry are universal abstracts. It’s not a new insight. They just stopped teaching it nearly a hundred years ago. Or rather, i’ve never found a good book on it after the 1920s. Building a paradigm around geometry (spatial perception) enforces realism and empiricism. “Knowing” must come from the objective world. The subjective is only preference (desired).

  • Learning P Is Like Going Back to School

    Mar 4, 2020, 5:57 PM by Ryan O’Connor

    —“First competence: consume P accurately.”—Luke Weinhagen

    Still working on step one. It’s like going back to school… okay, not LIKE it, it IS going back to school – and learning a new subject. I’m reading English, but it feels like a foreign language – having to re-read and look up terms, check context. I haven’t had to really use my brain this much in years 😅 But thanks for everyone who puts it all out and breaks it down for the rest of us.

  • Learning P Is Like Going Back to School

    Mar 4, 2020, 5:57 PM by Ryan O’Connor

    —“First competence: consume P accurately.”—Luke Weinhagen

    Still working on step one. It’s like going back to school… okay, not LIKE it, it IS going back to school – and learning a new subject. I’m reading English, but it feels like a foreign language – having to re-read and look up terms, check context. I haven’t had to really use my brain this much in years 😅 But thanks for everyone who puts it all out and breaks it down for the rest of us.

  • A Social Reason Why We Need to Restore the Militia

    Mar 5, 2020, 10:37 PM by Alex Hill

    —“Many of the guys I served with immediately did security contracting after we got out. I’d much rather have the National Guard disbanded, and a local militia structure for veterans returning home fall into leadership positions, should they chose, for volunteer service at home. I think a lot of veteran dysfunction is from a loss of purpose. When you’re on your own and no longer just a wolf in the pack so to speak, it’s aggravating. That, and the disillusionment when you realize all that toil and suffering was for nothing were the worst parts for me anyway.”—

    The other reason is so that we can mobilize en mass in the face of disaster – which we obviously can’t in response to (a) natural disasters, (b) this current epidemic – things which are organizational problems that are best solved through command and control. Markets discover. Command is necessary when we are reacting not discovering. Edit

  • The Wallet Game Is in Both Party’s Interest if You “buy” Within Your Means.

    Mar 6, 2020, 9:37 AM

    —“It’s the women who AREN’T looking to be supported who are often the most difficult. For … if they don’t need you for your financial support, that must mean they want you for emotional support. Which is a lot more complicated.”— by Michael Churchill

    Be valuable: sexual, social, economic, political, military market value. This is as easy as (a) stay fit, (b) avoid risks to brain (drugs, alcohol), and fix broken brains (therapy, drugs, psychedelic treatments.) Live within the means of the value you create. Quality women will upgrade for consumption of stimulation at lower emotional, psychological, and compromise cost – men are not fulfilling masculine role for the given variability of woman’s demand for masculine traits. Quality men will upgrade for consumption of femininity at lower emotional, psychological, and compromise cost, given the invariability of the value of femininity to men. As we age our ability to learn, adapt, and compromise decreases – we demand greater consilience. Successful high school sweethearts from similar backgrounds with similar values working together to raise a family have least risk of divergence of consilience. Two Parent Working Families with Children in School create insufficient shared experience for relationship persistence. Our forecast of future value of one another is poor. Marriages currently operate via trade-ins for this reason. And while the cost of depreciation on a car is high; The cost of depreciation on marriage is far, far higher. This is why we must restore:

    – Bring capital to people not people to capital – Civil Society so we are invested in the commons and one another. – Possibility of single parent income – Reduction or eliminate of 4 year high-debt education for all but extreme (outlier) cases. – Physical, emotional, and mental fitness by mindfulness training, physical fitness, and P-logic so that we have no deciets over the nature of man and what is possible for man.

  • The Wallet Game Is in Both Party’s Interest if You “buy” Within Your Means.

    Mar 6, 2020, 9:37 AM

    —“It’s the women who AREN’T looking to be supported who are often the most difficult. For … if they don’t need you for your financial support, that must mean they want you for emotional support. Which is a lot more complicated.”— by Michael Churchill

    Be valuable: sexual, social, economic, political, military market value. This is as easy as (a) stay fit, (b) avoid risks to brain (drugs, alcohol), and fix broken brains (therapy, drugs, psychedelic treatments.) Live within the means of the value you create. Quality women will upgrade for consumption of stimulation at lower emotional, psychological, and compromise cost – men are not fulfilling masculine role for the given variability of woman’s demand for masculine traits. Quality men will upgrade for consumption of femininity at lower emotional, psychological, and compromise cost, given the invariability of the value of femininity to men. As we age our ability to learn, adapt, and compromise decreases – we demand greater consilience. Successful high school sweethearts from similar backgrounds with similar values working together to raise a family have least risk of divergence of consilience. Two Parent Working Families with Children in School create insufficient shared experience for relationship persistence. Our forecast of future value of one another is poor. Marriages currently operate via trade-ins for this reason. And while the cost of depreciation on a car is high; The cost of depreciation on marriage is far, far higher. This is why we must restore:

    – Bring capital to people not people to capital – Civil Society so we are invested in the commons and one another. – Possibility of single parent income – Reduction or eliminate of 4 year high-debt education for all but extreme (outlier) cases. – Physical, emotional, and mental fitness by mindfulness training, physical fitness, and P-logic so that we have no deciets over the nature of man and what is possible for man.

  • Collapse of The Universe Would Be as Rapid as Expansion of The Universe

    Mar 6, 2020, 10:06 AM I have known about this theory for a few years, because I follow WItten’s work. It is the most believable AND most terrifying explanation of the universe’s ending, because it corresponds to spooky action at a distance, meaning that collapse of the universe would be as rapid as expansion of the universe. It’s the least implausible solution that answers every open question other than the physical construction of the background (higgs field). (Note that the profession doesn’t consider it terribly plausible.)

  • Collapse of The Universe Would Be as Rapid as Expansion of The Universe

    Mar 6, 2020, 10:06 AM I have known about this theory for a few years, because I follow WItten’s work. It is the most believable AND most terrifying explanation of the universe’s ending, because it corresponds to spooky action at a distance, meaning that collapse of the universe would be as rapid as expansion of the universe. It’s the least implausible solution that answers every open question other than the physical construction of the background (higgs field). (Note that the profession doesn’t consider it terribly plausible.)