Form: Quote Commentary

  • Criminality Is Genetic and Dysgenia Is an Institutional Failure

    Mar 2, 2020, 11:48 AM

    —“No. Steven Pinker explained this very well. If parenting had an effect at all, it would turn up in the shared environment. It doesn’t.”—JayMan @JayMan471 —“How do you explain single mothers parenting vastly increasing incarceration and unsocial behaviour.”— tweeter

    1) Mothers do not remarry(control, infantilization) or permit others to parent, fathers do. 2) Single mothers don’t cohabit with grandparents as substitute. 3) Single mothers transfer insecurity to children (instability) 4) Increase in female psychosis under feminism. Tolerance?

    —“None of those things.”—JayMan@JayMan471

    What is it instead? ๐Ÿ˜‰ b/c those things compensated for class (genetic) differences. Which is what I assume you’re going to say. Add: 5) school environment exacerbates. 6) pharmaceuticals (and drugs) exacerbate. 7) recent evidence (female) social media. 8) increase in under-lower class size. So, one can say: 9) increase in anti social behavior. 10) increase in population with it. 11) increase prosecution of it. Edit: ( 11a. in class sortition bc of colleges, and concentrating dysgenia at the bottom – this one is important. ) or 12) decrease in institutional means of compensating for it, suppressing it, and preventing it with marriage, family, community, norm, tradition, and institution. And we can frame the question: (a) are we more aware of it? (b) is there more of it (decline)? (c) are there more people biasing it (population)? (d) are informal and formal institutions no longer controlling it? (e) environmental factors (as w/ lead) (f) all of the above. I read the same papers everyone else does. the disputes are generally categorized as misinterpretation of the top down correlative and categorical; bottom up constructive and individual; and incentives in the constructive that test both. Unfortunately, full accounting is rare. So, to deal with pinker’s assertion that it’s purely genetic, sure. The question then is whether we are just more aware of it, just prosecute it more, increasing dysgenia, or we are failing to mask it with institutions. ie: My original comment’s suggestion: institutions failing. And again, when Jayman disagrees with me it’s because he jumps to the conclusion that I’m making an argument that I am not. ๐Ÿ˜‰ The argument is: Institutional failure. Because dysgenia at present is caused by institutional failure. All of these causes are institutional failures.

  • Fragility of Openness of Philosophy + Interest Rate Banking.

    Mar 3, 2020, 9:01 PM FRAGILITY OF OPENNESS OF PHILOSOPHY + INTEREST RATE BANKING. by Maria Al Masani Makienko The reaction of the Muslim world to the same parasites was the commoners demanded silence from the intelligentsia, to quarantine the disease and the most backward form of Islam ever invented to protect the commoners from (((parasitism))) that they could ill afford. I think why middle eastern jews have not been a threat to us, but Asheknazi jews have been a threat to the west is allowing interest rate banking, where we ban interest. This created a group that the majority did not trust due to the parasitic nature of interest banking and often persecuted, so in turn they had strategies to undermine the host culture. You do not see this behavior from Separdic nor Mizarhi Jews. Then you have hereditary PTSD and epegentic behavior in response to the persecution that’s a response to allowing for a long period of time only one out-group minority to provide interest rate banking. Muslim commoners protected themselves from (((parasitism))) and (((undermining)))) through inflicting violence on intellectual class to refrain to develop as a society in the 80s rather than be exposed the the virus of (((undermining))) and keeping intellectual debate to the privacy of salons. As mocked as they were, the Muslim poor were not wrong to do so because they defended their self interest. Blacks in the US in contrast have a 75% out of wedlock birthrate that they can afford with the American welfare state of white people’s taxes. We do not have enough white people creating a great tax base so poor Arabs can afford to raise children in a resource scarce food scarce region. Your openness that allows you to develop intellectual and invent iphones and tech companies opens you to (((undermining))).


    Correct. And excellent. Maria is exceptionally good at providing the Muslim world’s view with western logic and prose. She’s amazing. Note: Staying on message: they could not solve the reciprocity and truth problems nor nationalized consumer interest – we just haven’t put them into practice yet.

  • Fragility of Openness of Philosophy + Interest Rate Banking.

    Mar 3, 2020, 9:01 PM FRAGILITY OF OPENNESS OF PHILOSOPHY + INTEREST RATE BANKING. by Maria Al Masani Makienko The reaction of the Muslim world to the same parasites was the commoners demanded silence from the intelligentsia, to quarantine the disease and the most backward form of Islam ever invented to protect the commoners from (((parasitism))) that they could ill afford. I think why middle eastern jews have not been a threat to us, but Asheknazi jews have been a threat to the west is allowing interest rate banking, where we ban interest. This created a group that the majority did not trust due to the parasitic nature of interest banking and often persecuted, so in turn they had strategies to undermine the host culture. You do not see this behavior from Separdic nor Mizarhi Jews. Then you have hereditary PTSD and epegentic behavior in response to the persecution that’s a response to allowing for a long period of time only one out-group minority to provide interest rate banking. Muslim commoners protected themselves from (((parasitism))) and (((undermining)))) through inflicting violence on intellectual class to refrain to develop as a society in the 80s rather than be exposed the the virus of (((undermining))) and keeping intellectual debate to the privacy of salons. As mocked as they were, the Muslim poor were not wrong to do so because they defended their self interest. Blacks in the US in contrast have a 75% out of wedlock birthrate that they can afford with the American welfare state of white people’s taxes. We do not have enough white people creating a great tax base so poor Arabs can afford to raise children in a resource scarce food scarce region. Your openness that allows you to develop intellectual and invent iphones and tech companies opens you to (((undermining))).


    Correct. And excellent. Maria is exceptionally good at providing the Muslim world’s view with western logic and prose. She’s amazing. Note: Staying on message: they could not solve the reciprocity and truth problems nor nationalized consumer interest – we just haven’t put them into practice yet.

  • Religion Is an Exercise in Herd Management.

    Mar 4, 2020, 10:37 AM RELIGION IS AN EXERCISE IN HERD MANAGEMENT. by Maria Al Masani Makienko Religion is an exercise in herd management. I am a fashion designer who has to herd women. I prefer dealing with religious women as they are less self destructive and therefore less catty and jealous. Voltaire said that if there is no god He should be invented so his servants don’t steal from him. I don’t think Evangelicalism or Christian Zionism is a religion nor has social utility since it produces “trad-thots” and didn’t Jesus, the founder of Christianity say “judge a tree by its fruits.” I agree with looking at various branches of religion based on social utility. I can vouch for Christian Orthodoxy, not just because of my husband but the incredible community it produces in Ottawa from Lebanese, to Ukrainian, to Serbian, Moldavian to Ethiopian and Egyptian: the women are feminine kind and beautiful, men are masculine, warm community that helps each other, healthy strong families. You see similar family health in the Muslim community in Ottawa, and again its from sticking to tradition combined with patriarchy instead of emphasizing progress prevents opening a door for parasites to sabotage.

  • Religion Is an Exercise in Herd Management.

    Mar 4, 2020, 10:37 AM RELIGION IS AN EXERCISE IN HERD MANAGEMENT. by Maria Al Masani Makienko Religion is an exercise in herd management. I am a fashion designer who has to herd women. I prefer dealing with religious women as they are less self destructive and therefore less catty and jealous. Voltaire said that if there is no god He should be invented so his servants don’t steal from him. I don’t think Evangelicalism or Christian Zionism is a religion nor has social utility since it produces “trad-thots” and didn’t Jesus, the founder of Christianity say “judge a tree by its fruits.” I agree with looking at various branches of religion based on social utility. I can vouch for Christian Orthodoxy, not just because of my husband but the incredible community it produces in Ottawa from Lebanese, to Ukrainian, to Serbian, Moldavian to Ethiopian and Egyptian: the women are feminine kind and beautiful, men are masculine, warm community that helps each other, healthy strong families. You see similar family health in the Muslim community in Ottawa, and again its from sticking to tradition combined with patriarchy instead of emphasizing progress prevents opening a door for parasites to sabotage.

  • Mar 4, 2020, 11:24 AM “There is no female Mozart because there is no female Jack

    Mar 4, 2020, 11:24 AM

    “There is no female Mozart because there is no female Jack the Ripper.”-Camille Paglia

    via brandon hayes

  • Mar 4, 2020, 11:24 AM “There is no female Mozart because there is no female Jack

    Mar 4, 2020, 11:24 AM

    “There is no female Mozart because there is no female Jack the Ripper.”-Camille Paglia

    via brandon hayes

  • “reciprocity Obsoletes Morality”

    Mar 4, 2020, 12:17 PM By Stephen Thomas I once said “Reciprocity obsoletes Morality” Morality is too vague. Reciprocity is precise. Just as the gun obsoletes the arrow. Reciprocal framing (Reciprocity in function) obsoletes moral framing (Morality in function). Precision is required for righteousness. Reciprocity, always.

  • “reciprocity Obsoletes Morality”

    Mar 4, 2020, 12:17 PM By Stephen Thomas I once said “Reciprocity obsoletes Morality” Morality is too vague. Reciprocity is precise. Just as the gun obsoletes the arrow. Reciprocal framing (Reciprocity in function) obsoletes moral framing (Morality in function). Precision is required for righteousness. Reciprocity, always.

  • Testimony (awesome)

    Mar 4, 2020, 3:01 PM (ok. so this made my day)

    —“There is such a great benefit to mastering even a small aspect of P in personal life. I am still trying to figure a lot of it out, but whatever I do has served me a lot personally far more than my useless university education that was the biggest waste of money. I am glad I went to trade school after. What Curt Doolittle is teaching is why originally people were hoping to get paying $60,000+ in student loans to what has devolved into baiting into hazard into debt slavery for a marxist indoctrination center that rewards a useless piece of paper. I am really grateful to this.”— Maria Al Masani Makienko

    The problem is that it’s hard to know the value of P until you know it. So we need enough people to ‘verify’ P’s utility so that we stop people from having to pay 60K in debt for what should be a thousand dollars or so in basic courses. If we do that we change the world.