Curt Doolittle

Form: Question

  • ” QUESTION: Hi Curt, if you don’t mind I’ve got a question on Sovereignty after

    —” QUESTION: Hi Curt, if you don’t mind I’ve got a question on Sovereignty after reading your recent posts.

    Is Sovereignty only achieved through combing agency and reciprocity (I think I’ve seen you say this somewhere)? In which case, thinking about this in terms of individualism vs collectivism:

    -Groups of people who lack individual agency, but act as a collective can only ever beg for what they want (the herd).

    -Individuals who possess agency, but are unwilling to reciprocate with one another will be unable to achieve results at scale (lone wolves).

    -Therefore it’s not individualism vs collectivism; it’s agency AND reciprocity which when combined creates Sovereignty (the pack).

    Not sure if I’m stretching things here?”—- Andy Lunn

    ANSWER:

    Um. (a) very well structured argument, (b) correct conclusion. (c) nice work! A+

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-05 11:55:00 UTC

  • September 5th, 2018 11:55 AM QUESTION : —“Hi Curt, if you don’t mind I’ve got

    September 5th, 2018 11:55 AM QUESTION:

    —“Hi Curt, if you don’t mind I’ve got a question on Sovereignty after reading your recent posts. Is Sovereignty only achieved through combing agency and reciprocity (I think I’ve seen you say this somewhere)? In which case, thinking about this in terms of individualism vs collectivism: -Groups of people who lack individual agency, but act as a collective can only ever beg for what they want (the herd). -Individuals who possess agency, but are unwilling to reciprocate with one another will be unable to achieve results at scale (lone wolves). -Therefore it’s not individualism vs collectivism; it’s agency AND reciprocity which when combined creates Sovereignty (the pack). Not sure if I’m stretching things here?”—- Andy Lunn

    ANSWER: Um. (a) very well structured argument, (b) correct conclusion. (c) nice work! A+

  • Ström] any weight to this?Updated Sep 2, 2018, 7:45 PM

    http://rdos.net/eng/asperger.htm@[100002360673037:2048:Simon Ström] any weight to this?Updated Sep 2, 2018, 7:45 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-02 19:45:00 UTC

  • –“Q: Why do people refer to American whites as Caucasian?”—

    Of the four major races: Negroid, Australoid, Mongoloid, and Caucusoid, we tend to use the term ‘Caucasian’ to refer to Europeans, because that’s the only choice the government gives us on our surveys. To be accurate it should be northern european (atlantic-germanic) eastern european (slavic), southern european(mediterranean), old european(balkans), anatolian european (greek, sardinian, boot of italy). Iranic, semitic, turkic. and so on. This is more important in america because we have had a civil war over race and we are very close to having another.

  • –“Q: Why do people refer to American whites as Caucasian?”—

    Of the four major races: Negroid, Australoid, Mongoloid, and Caucusoid, we tend to use the term ‘Caucasian’ to refer to Europeans, because that’s the only choice the government gives us on our surveys. To be accurate it should be northern european (atlantic-germanic) eastern european (slavic), southern european(mediterranean), old european(balkans), anatolian european (greek, sardinian, boot of italy). Iranic, semitic, turkic. and so on. This is more important in america because we have had a civil war over race and we are very close to having another.

  • “WHY DO WOMEN ENGAGE IN NAXALT?”— —“Question – why do women hate generalizat

    —“WHY DO WOMEN ENGAGE IN NAXALT?”—

    —“Question – why do women hate generalizations more than men? Women far more inclined to say “yes but not all X are like that!”, where as men get the… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=288948118368752&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 12:08:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035499605990035456

  • —“Q: Why the Rise in Nazbol?”–

    (not the russian political party, the modern equivalent) I think (a) there are three symbols of power to ‘regress’ to: 1) the soviet/russians/communists, 2) the nazis, 3) and the church, … and that people have given up on the enlightenment. (and the monarchies). In the west the church is dead. So we are really left with the two fascisms: authoritarian working class (bolshevism) and authoritarian executive class (naziism). I’m in the minority which says that the answer is nationalism and constitutional monarchy under natural law, where we have a judicial cult that prosecutes the parasites and liars until none remain. My understanding is that NazBol is a combination of communism and nazism and that it’s reducible to Strasserism. But I am not ‘clued in’ on pop movements. —“Strasserism was the strand of Nazism that called for a more radical, mass-action and worker-based form of National Socialism, hostile to Jews not from a racial perspective, but from an anti-capitalist basis, to achieve a national rebirth. It derives its name from Gregor and Otto Strasser, the two Nazi brothers initially associated with this position”—-

  • —“Q: Why the Rise in Nazbol?”–

    (not the russian political party, the modern equivalent) I think (a) there are three symbols of power to ‘regress’ to: 1) the soviet/russians/communists, 2) the nazis, 3) and the church, … and that people have given up on the enlightenment. (and the monarchies). In the west the church is dead. So we are really left with the two fascisms: authoritarian working class (bolshevism) and authoritarian executive class (naziism). I’m in the minority which says that the answer is nationalism and constitutional monarchy under natural law, where we have a judicial cult that prosecutes the parasites and liars until none remain. My understanding is that NazBol is a combination of communism and nazism and that it’s reducible to Strasserism. But I am not ‘clued in’ on pop movements. —“Strasserism was the strand of Nazism that called for a more radical, mass-action and worker-based form of National Socialism, hostile to Jews not from a racial perspective, but from an anti-capitalist basis, to achieve a national rebirth. It derives its name from Gregor and Otto Strasser, the two Nazi brothers initially associated with this position”—-

  • how do india china and japan do it?

    how do india china and japan do it?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-27 00:33:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033875131230240768

    Reply addressees: @AporiaSSB

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033870005866295297

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033870005866295297

  • East Asian Verbal IQ is ordinary. The entire advantage is mathematical?

    East Asian Verbal IQ is ordinary. The entire advantage is mathematical?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 20:32:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033814553631621126