Well, if parents are spending disproportionately more time with children but children are getting WORSE, then what does that mean?
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-20 08:10:00 UTC
Well, if parents are spending disproportionately more time with children but children are getting WORSE, then what does that mean?
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-20 08:10:00 UTC
September 20th, 2018 8:10 AM
[W]ell, if parents are spending disproportionately more time with children but children are getting WORSE, then what does that mean?
September 20th, 2018 8:10 AM
[W]ell, if parents are spending disproportionately more time with children but children are getting WORSE, then what does that mean?
would it add value if i hung out there on mute while working?
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-10 00:08:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1038942316734701568
Reply addressees: @ThePomen
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1038936873866092544
IN REPLY TO:
@ThePomen
@curtdoolittle It is fine, It was a great stream. I should have warned beforehand. https://t.co/jQd77eYAaV It is mostly banter, but I tried to explain as much Swedish politics as I could
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1038936873866092544
is that a rational or empirical judgement?
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-09 23:39:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1038934829834878976
Reply addressees: @dagmar_schmitt @MartianHoplite
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1038830620741267457
IN REPLY TO:
@GudistGrug
@MartianHoplite @curtdoolittle Neither is nessisarily eugenic or dysgenic. They are simply different strategies that require selecting for different behaviors. Both have their place, but must be in balance.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1038830620741267457
Conservatives also tend to be more attractive?
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-05 23:33:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1037483843475963911
Reply addressees: @Real_Xi_Jinping
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1037478178829361152
IN REPLY TO:
@LRH_Superfan
@curtdoolittle Dunno
Basic conservatives want to regulate less so maybe less neurotics are drawn to them
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1037478178829361152
Conservatives are less plagued by neuroticism than liberals. Why?
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-05 23:09:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1037477854949330945
Conservatives are less plagued by neuroticism than liberals. Why?
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-05 19:09:00 UTC
QUESTION:
—“Hi Curt, if you don’t mind I’ve got a question on Sovereignty after reading your recent posts. Is Sovereignty only achieved through combing agency and reciprocity (I think I’ve seen you say this somewhere)? In which case, thinking about this in terms of individualism vs collectivism: -Groups of people who lack individual agency, but act as a collective can only ever beg for what they want (the herd). -Individuals who possess agency, but are unwilling to reciprocate with one another will be unable to achieve results at scale (lone wolves). -Therefore it’s not individualism vs collectivism; it’s agency AND reciprocity which when combined creates Sovereignty (the pack). Not sure if I’m stretching things here?”—- Andy Lunn
ANSWER: Um. (a) very well structured argument, (b) correct conclusion. (c) nice work! A+
QUESTION:
—“Hi Curt, if you don’t mind I’ve got a question on Sovereignty after reading your recent posts. Is Sovereignty only achieved through combing agency and reciprocity (I think I’ve seen you say this somewhere)? In which case, thinking about this in terms of individualism vs collectivism: -Groups of people who lack individual agency, but act as a collective can only ever beg for what they want (the herd). -Individuals who possess agency, but are unwilling to reciprocate with one another will be unable to achieve results at scale (lone wolves). -Therefore it’s not individualism vs collectivism; it’s agency AND reciprocity which when combined creates Sovereignty (the pack). Not sure if I’m stretching things here?”—- Andy Lunn
ANSWER: Um. (a) very well structured argument, (b) correct conclusion. (c) nice work! A+