October 7th, 2018 11:20 AM HOW MUCH AGENCY DO WE HAVE? Via Eric Danelaw The broader question is, how much agency do we have? Women and men demonstrably think very differently because of the difference between utility and truth, and between proportionality and reciprocity, and between dysgenia and eugenia. Why do we assume that this same cognitive bias is limited to gender rather than a balance between the genders, and that different groups don’t just demonstrate the male cognitive bias or the female cognitive bias? Truth, Reciprocity, and Physical Violence that Ends when Ended, VERSUS Fraud, Proportionality, and Reputation Destruction that Never Ends until Destroyed. Violence and Threats versus Shaming, Ridicule, Gossip, Straw Manning, Rallying, and Reputation Destruction. Those are the Male versus female competitive strategies. HERD <—————> PACK Utility <—————> Truth Proportionality <——> Reciprocity Equality <————-> Meritocracy Dysgenia <———–> Eugenia r <——————–> K F<——————–> M There is nothing in mankind that is complicated other than the lies we tell ourselves and others in order to achieve our desired ends.
Form: Question
-
what would demographic evidence of the past 150 years tell you?
what would demographic evidence of the past 150 years tell you?
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-06 16:43:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1048614714597695488
Reply addressees: @AprioriTraditi1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1048596911748395008
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1048596911748395008
-
how would you say that scientifically?
how would you say that scientifically?
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-04 20:12:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1047942474604404737
Reply addressees: @MonsieurBouvard
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1047940715714699265
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1047940715714699265
-
All speech consists of measurements. But measurements of what? And are they trut
All speech consists of measurements. But measurements of what? And are they truthful (accurate) measurements or untruthful (Fraudulent) measurements?
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-04 19:56:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1047938581371740160
-
All speech consists of measurements. But measurements of what? And are they trut
All speech consists of measurements. But measurements of what? And are they truthful (accurate) measurements or untruthful (Fraudulent) measurements?
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-04 15:56:00 UTC
-
Matthew: what is the difference between the unquestionable and the inviolable?
Matthew: what is the difference between the unquestionable and the inviolable?
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-01 14:21:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046767053783347200
Reply addressees: @MattMcLester
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046764515642290178
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1046764515642290178
-
Victor, I can’t quite understand this news. Can you help? —“І от маємо чергову
Victor, I can’t quite understand this news. Can you help?
—“І от маємо чергову проміжну перемогу! Сьогодні комісія з самоврядування Київради підтримала місцеву ініціативу про відновлення райрад в столиці. Незабаром це надзвичайно важливе питання розглядатимуть в сесійній залі.”—
Dyakuyu.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-21 15:47:00 UTC
-
September 21st, 2018 10:38 AM GREAT QUESTION OF THE DAY —“Which is more valuab
September 21st, 2018 10:38 AM GREAT QUESTION OF THE DAY
—“Which is more valuable credit or debt”— Justin Fortune
[T]his is an interesting question. The to the creditor it represents income in exchange for risk. To the debtor it represents consumption in exchange for risk. To the debtor and creditor both, it represents dependence upon a neutral enforcer (insurer). To the polity it represents economic velocity and the general increase in purchasing power. It is far harder to find opportunities to lend (to knowledge) than it is to find opportunities to borrow (to knowledge) and leverage. So for example it is very hard to find outsized opportunities for interest, but if you have credit available with which to seize and opportunity to capture a windfall discount due to timing, then credit is by far the most valuable. And the opportunity to seize outsized returns on production is far greater than on consumption (rents). Hence my advocacy of elimination of interest on consumption, retention of interest on production, and investment, such that we eliminate rents, and direct all credit to the seizure of opportunities for outsized returns.
-
September 21st, 2018 10:38 AM GREAT QUESTION OF THE DAY —“Which is more valuab
September 21st, 2018 10:38 AM GREAT QUESTION OF THE DAY
—“Which is more valuable credit or debt”— Justin Fortune
[T]his is an interesting question. The to the creditor it represents income in exchange for risk. To the debtor it represents consumption in exchange for risk. To the debtor and creditor both, it represents dependence upon a neutral enforcer (insurer). To the polity it represents economic velocity and the general increase in purchasing power. It is far harder to find opportunities to lend (to knowledge) than it is to find opportunities to borrow (to knowledge) and leverage. So for example it is very hard to find outsized opportunities for interest, but if you have credit available with which to seize and opportunity to capture a windfall discount due to timing, then credit is by far the most valuable. And the opportunity to seize outsized returns on production is far greater than on consumption (rents). Hence my advocacy of elimination of interest on consumption, retention of interest on production, and investment, such that we eliminate rents, and direct all credit to the seizure of opportunities for outsized returns.
-
Well, if parents are spending disproportionately more time with children but chi
Well, if parents are spending disproportionately more time with children but children are getting WORSE, then what does that mean?
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-20 12:10:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1042747950852714498