Form: Project Update

  • OVERSING UPDATE We are down to 111 open issues that we must close before we open

    OVERSING UPDATE

    We are down to 111 open issues that we must close before we open the beta program, and of them 56 are reports we need to complete (50%). Leaving 55 issues that are sources of confusion for users because they do not work as expected.

    There are two controls: timecards and forecasts that are not right (they need full workflows, rather than the simple states).

    The workspace is not displaying the management query when no programs, projects, or deliverables are selected (meaning

    Saving the workspace is still a non-standard operation.

    The Calendar Control on the workspace isn’t quite right.

    The Progress Bars on the schedule panel aren’t updating

    Drag and Drop isn’t working on Table View.

    The subtasks of Stories are still showing on the board view.

    The tasks that need scheduling this week aren’t correctly displaying on the panel.

    Smart Search is missing some variables.

    Permissions on who can configure workflows.

    There is a usability change we want to make, which is to move the task-types into a panel, and out from under the task filter panel so that we can show counts.

    We want to break the ribbon for selecting states into stages so the user more clearly sees the relationship between stages(which cross programs and projects) to stages which are specific to programs and projects.)

    NITS

    The rest are largely nits, most of which fall into usability.

    BIG STUFF

    Web site content.

    Documentation.

    I”M NOT SURE

    That costs are working correctly.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-24 10:42:00 UTC

  • OVERSING UPDATE I think were we are at the point on Oversing that I get to say “

    OVERSING UPDATE

    I think were we are at the point on Oversing that I get to say “I told you so” about denormalization.

    I love php because of its use of strings. you can store all sorts of nonsense like they do in WordPress, and just pull out what you need, rather than building lots of dimensions. For entities with limited relations it’s just so wonderful. And if you need more information you denormalize to a document database (non-relational) for quick retrieval.

    Oversing is pretty demanding. But we benefit from the fact that unlike say, Facebook, and more like say Atlassian, we don’t commingle customer data. So that means that the largest database we encounter is a single large customer.

    This one issue we have left (we tried one experiment and it doesn’t work) is one in which the workspace tells you a lot about the counts of each filter you can apply. And in normalized form these are individually inexpensive but collectively costly.

    So we sort of have this choice: Make everything visible but use security only to limit access (most likely). Denormalize everything we can and hope that the tests hold up. (increases fragility). Just test the basics and pay the performance penalty (unlikely).

    I prefer the first in an open business. But I can see some businesses hiding information like titles and descriptions.

    (I love geek-i-tude)

    Curt.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-11 08:41:00 UTC

  • WORKING OUTLINE I haven’t updated the outline since July, and I seem to do it ev

    http://www.propertarianism.com/propertarian-posts-by-chapter/PROPERTARIANISM – WORKING OUTLINE

    I haven’t updated the outline since July, and I seem to do it every six months, so it’s due. But here is the outline of Propertarianism.

    I don’t publish the text, which I write in Scrivener. Although the text is simply edited in many cases. But pretty much all of propertarianism and testimonialism are here.

    It’s organized as a philosophy: Metaphysics, Epistemology, Ethics, Politics and Aesthetics. But I’ve added psychology(individual), sociology(group), evolutionary strategy (cross-group), and War to merge science, philosophy, psychology, social science, political science, religion and war, with group evolutionary strategy.

    Only a crazy person would try to unify every discipline into a single system of thought expressible in a single universal language. lol

    Curt


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-10 01:52:00 UTC

  • RELIGION Yep. Its not going to take me as long as I thought. Just a few more mon

    RELIGION

    Yep. Its not going to take me as long as I thought. Just a few more months I think.

    I knew the organizational structure and the incentives. I just had to solve the content and justification problem.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-06 04:19:00 UTC

  • OVERSING UPDATE Oversing v1 combines the features: Slack, Yammer, Trello, Asana,

    OVERSING UPDATE

    Oversing v1 combines the features: Slack, Yammer, Trello, Asana, Wrike, MS Project, Mavenlink, Atlassian Jira, Changepoint, Tenrox, MS Sharepoint.

    For services organizations of any scale the key differences with v1 are

    a) Usability – Facebook with projects and tasks,

    b) As simple as Asana and Trello, and as rich or more so than Atlassian.

    And soon… a better version of document production than Atlassian’s Confluence (almost – no plugin for WordPress yet, and we want to give people the power of WordPress, by embedding Oversing content inside of it.)

    And soon … sort of super-Wunderlist (almost, don’t have the mobile app done yet) But it’s a really interesting UI metaphor like picking up, working with, and placing cards – with smart copy and paste behavior. Took me six weeks to come up with it. Very cool.

    It’s a v1 release. It’s not as much as we wanted in the first version, but its more than anyone else put in their first version. And by v3 it will be all we wish it to be.

    I can make a list of things I don’t like.

    – We have 60 reports left to write, and I can think of dozens more.

    – need to expand the features of the timeline significantly.

    – some of the basic maintenance tables in the admin interface use a switch on/off metaphor and I think it’s confusing.

    – Minor improvements to scheduling individuals on the time(schedule) tab.

    Curt. (Excited)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-25 06:49:00 UTC

  • OVERSING UPDATE – VERY COOL STUFF: “GAMIFICATION” Kirill and Vitalii are coding

    OVERSING UPDATE – VERY COOL STUFF: “GAMIFICATION”

    Kirill and Vitalii are coding the ‘Gamification’ features in Oversing. It;s very much like a MMPORG or adventure game, where there is an internal economy by which you give feedback and ratings to work by your fellow work-citizens, and were you can accumulate various kinds of ‘coins’ and ‘inventory’ for whatever you work on by which to obtain bonuses.

    We also include a sort of “karma” which is the balance between your gives and gets, as well as ‘likability” which is a pretty elaborate calculation. So you have ‘likeability’, ‘karma’, an inventory of rewards (that you can use to win gift cards and days off for example),

    This ‘economy’ allows us to create all sorts of interesting measurements and ‘games’ in Oversing – again with the purpose of invalidating arbitrary middle management opinion, and creating systems of social (egalitarian and informational) peerage in the workplace rather than managerial (sucking-up and disinformational) hierarchy. The idea is that we want to search for and reward work behavior that we desire.

    After Gamification we will add the Culture, Moral, Personality, and “IQ” surveys to the profile , as well as the ‘Survey’ entity (a type of task container) – visible only to you the user. These statistics will allow you to see how you, your personality, abilities, background and skills map to others in your discipline, those with similar skills, others in your organization, and compare yourself to their performance. (next year we will expose cross-organizational data as well).

    We see this as perhaps the most important user-centric feature in Oversing.

    Why? ‘Cause it merges game, social, and business to provide feedback that encourages inclusiveness through transparency rather than perpetuating the alienation of the industrial and information eras.

    Curt


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-12 06:50:00 UTC

  • OVERSING UPDATE Just finished our call with Forrester. Awesome. We did it. We ma

    OVERSING UPDATE

    Just finished our call with Forrester. Awesome. We did it. We made a general purpose platform where everyone else has made niche products. Mid market. Awesome. He he he…. 🙂


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-11 15:21:00 UTC

  • OK. Update the website day. All the way back to October 16th I think. Ack

    OK. Update the website day. All the way back to October 16th I think. Ack.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-07 06:54:00 UTC

  • GETTING MY MIND IN ORDER : CURRENT TOPICS OF INQUIRY Current topics I’m working

    GETTING MY MIND IN ORDER : CURRENT TOPICS OF INQUIRY

    Current topics I’m working on (obvious probably):

    1) Structure of the presentation of content in the book. I keep coming back to the 48 laws of power, except that each ‘reading’ is from each of our mythic periods.’ This has been with me since the beginning and every time I think differently I come back to it. But I’m also abandoning the essay form, and coming closer to the legal or ‘great book’ form, supported by parables (references). The problem is that I just don’t believe I have the stamina or time to compile those references without employing a grad student or two for every chapter and verse.

    2) What does the next western civic ‘religion’ look like after Democratic Secular Socialist Humanism (Neo-Puritanism) if we are to reconstruct the distributed civic society, and in doing so restore distributed ownership, care-taking, and policing of the commons? I think a few of us have a pretty clear idea of how to construct the institution itself, and provide incentives to participate in it. So my opinion is continuing to solidify on the church/bank/regiment model

    3) Can I articulate sufficiently how the great lies are constructed using obscurant loaded and framed languages distributed in overloaded volumes? I think I have a good sense of it but I feel like if I spent another year on it, that I would nail it. I don’t feel I have that year.

    4) Can I turn strict propertarian construction into a series of lessons that it is easy to learn? I think I was approaching it too editorially and can show how to construct it with a simple process and some examples. . But I think I will do that near the end, once I’ve created many examples to draw from.

    5) Should I bother to write a computer model to demonstrate it even if doing so will incur a penalty of locking the work to a technical period in time? (it’s easy to model propertarianism). I think I might write it for myself just as Axelrod and company have, but I think I won’t reference it in the work.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-18 06:39:00 UTC

  • (personal workflow) (dropbox, evernote, box, mac) (oversing thoughts) In Oversin

    (personal workflow) (dropbox, evernote, box, mac) (oversing thoughts)

    In Oversing, We need to rely on either our own storage technology (as does Slack – which is just Amazon), or use one of Evernote, Box, or Dropbox’s technologies.

    So today I’m working through integrating Evernote into Oversing (or Oversing into Evernote) and as part of the research, I”m going through the new Dropbox apps today. (I am biased toward Evernote because of a similar design philosophy)

    I use Mac “Notes” for quick ideas, notes, reminders and my to-do list. I write long pieces in Evernote’s Web UI, (which is still the best text editor I have found). And for very long pieces and complex work I use Textwrangler. And for business stuff I use Word. Everything is always stored ‘somewhere’.

    For backup and file storage across devices, I use Dropbox. I don’t need any user interfaces other than the one’s I have in the operating system. I put everything I could ever want to save under the dropbox folder, treating it as ‘~/documents’. I don’t use the ~/documents folder, I have changed the default screenshot directory in osx to point to a new directory ~/screenshots to save on performance and desktop clutter. And I have folder shortcuts on my doc so that I can drag items to certain folders without using the Finder app. Also, I do NOT back up my ~/downloads folder, and I clean it every now and then.

    So when I go through the dropbox addins I just don’t sort of get why you need them. Very transparent technology.

    Box on the other hand has taken the enterprise route by providing security and permissions that Dropbox and Evernote dont’

    So you sort of have this hierarchy (which I’m sure most people understand) of Evernote (personal) -> Dropbox (Professional) -> Box (enterprise).

    Unfortunately, the only viable price alternative is to do it ourselves. And that seems a shame. The cost of enterprise applications is not so much the data and servicing the data, but the costs of storage of large volumes of work related files. So you sort of have to price as such. One of the tricks is to only store small things and then send the user to Dropbox/Box/Google account for large file storage but that doesn’t work for IP related work which we have to guarantee providence over, and which must be subject to audits.

    Argh.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-18 05:30:00 UTC