Curt Doolittle

Form: Outline

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544152551 Timestamp) WORLD HISTORY: WEST AND EAST AGAINST CENTER ONE The Neolithic World The First Dark Age (The Expansion?) TWO The Bronze World (bronze) The Sea People’s Dark Age THREE The Ancient World (Iron) The Semitic Dark Age FOUR +The European Restoration… Then… (Steel) +The English Revolution because of it. +The American Revolution because of it. -The French Counter Revolution because of it. -The German Counter Revolution (Unification) because of it. -The Jewish Counter Revolution because of it …….- In Germany …….- In Russia and the Borderlands -The Indian Independence Revolution because of it -The Chinese Counter Revolution because of it. -The Jewish Counter Revolution because of it …….- In America -The French, Jewish, Fem. Counter Revolution because of it -The Islamic Hyper-Counter Revolution because of it. +The World Wide Revolution to Restore the Restoration (Now) -The Jewish, French, Russian, Chinese, South American Resistance to the Restoration (In Progress) THE SECOND SEMITIC DARK AGE? -Globalism, Islamism, Decline, with east asia as an island?

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544152551 Timestamp) WORLD HISTORY: WEST AND EAST AGAINST CENTER ONE The Neolithic World The First Dark Age (The Expansion?) TWO The Bronze World (bronze) The Sea People’s Dark Age THREE The Ancient World (Iron) The Semitic Dark Age FOUR +The European Restoration… Then… (Steel) +The English Revolution because of it. +The American Revolution because of it. -The French Counter Revolution because of it. -The German Counter Revolution (Unification) because of it. -The Jewish Counter Revolution because of it …….- In Germany …….- In Russia and the Borderlands -The Indian Independence Revolution because of it -The Chinese Counter Revolution because of it. -The Jewish Counter Revolution because of it …….- In America -The French, Jewish, Fem. Counter Revolution because of it -The Islamic Hyper-Counter Revolution because of it. +The World Wide Revolution to Restore the Restoration (Now) -The Jewish, French, Russian, Chinese, South American Resistance to the Restoration (In Progress) THE SECOND SEMITIC DARK AGE? -Globalism, Islamism, Decline, with east asia as an island?

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544196465 Timestamp) EMMANUEL TODD’S FAMILY STRUCTURES 1. Absolute Nuclear Family: a. Spouse selection: Free, but obligatory exogamy. b. Inheritance: Indifference – no precise rules, frequent use of wills. c. Family Home: no cohabitation of married children with their parents. d. Representative Nations, Peoples, Regions: Anglo-Saxon world, Holland, Denmark. e. Representative Ideology: Christianity, Capitalism, `Libertarian’ Liberalism, and Feminism.

    1. Egalitarian Nuclear Family:
      a. Spouse selection: Free, but obligatory exogamy.
      b. Inheritance: Egalitarian – equality between brothers.
      c. Family Home: no cohabitation of married children with their parents.
      d. Representative Nations, Regions: northern France, northern Italy, central & southern Spain, central Portugal, Greece, Romania, Poland, Latin America, Ethiopia.
      e. Representative Ideology: Christianity (Catholicism); the “Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite” form of Liberalism.

    2. Authoritarian Family:
      a. Spouse selection: Parents, little or no marriage between children of brothers.
      b. Inheritance: Anti-Egalitarian – inequality between brothers, transfer of patrimony to one son.
      c. Family Home: cohabitation of the married heir with his parents.
      d. Representative Nations, Peoples, Regions: Germany, Austria, Sweden, Norway, Belgium, Bohemia, Scotland, Ireland, peripheral regions of France, northern (Basque) Spain, northern Portugal, Japan, Korea, Jews, Romany Gypsies.
      e. Representative Ideology: Fascism, various separatist and autonomous (anti-universalist) movements.

    4: Exogamous Community Family: a. Spouse selection: Parents, no marriage between the children of two brothers. b. Inheritance: Egalitarian – equality between brothers. c. Family Home: cohabitation of married sons with their parents. d. Representative Nations, Regions: Russia, Yugoslavia, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Hungary, Finland, Albania, central Italy, China, Vietnam, Cuba and north India. e. Representative Ideology: Communism, Socialism.

    1. Endogamous Community Family:
      a. Spouse selection: Custom, frequent marriage between the children of brothers.
      b. Inheritance: Egalitarian – equality between brothers.
      c. Family Home: cohabitation of married sons with their parents.
      d. Representative Nations, Peoples, Regions: Arab world, Turkey, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tadzhikistan.
      e. Representative Ideology: Islam.

    2. Asymmetrical Community Family:
      a. Spouse selection: Custom, prohibition on marriages between the children of brothers, but a preference for marriages between the children of brothers and sisters.
      b. Inheritance: Egalitarian – equality between brothers.
      c. Family Home: cohabitation of married sons with their parents.
      d. Representative Regions: southern India.
      e. Representative Ideology: Same

    7: Anomic Family: a. Spouse selection: Free, but without obligatory exogamy; consanguine marriage possible and sometimes frequent. b. Inheritance: Indifference – uncertainty about equality between brothers, inheritance rules egalitarian in theory but uncertain in practice. c. Family Home: cohabitation of married children with parents rejected in theory but accepted in practice. d. Representative Nations, Peoples, Regions: e. Representative Ideology: Buddhism, Christianity, and Communism, but potentially anything.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544196465 Timestamp) EMMANUEL TODD’S FAMILY STRUCTURES 1. Absolute Nuclear Family: a. Spouse selection: Free, but obligatory exogamy. b. Inheritance: Indifference – no precise rules, frequent use of wills. c. Family Home: no cohabitation of married children with their parents. d. Representative Nations, Peoples, Regions: Anglo-Saxon world, Holland, Denmark. e. Representative Ideology: Christianity, Capitalism, `Libertarian’ Liberalism, and Feminism.

    1. Egalitarian Nuclear Family:
      a. Spouse selection: Free, but obligatory exogamy.
      b. Inheritance: Egalitarian – equality between brothers.
      c. Family Home: no cohabitation of married children with their parents.
      d. Representative Nations, Regions: northern France, northern Italy, central & southern Spain, central Portugal, Greece, Romania, Poland, Latin America, Ethiopia.
      e. Representative Ideology: Christianity (Catholicism); the “Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite” form of Liberalism.

    2. Authoritarian Family:
      a. Spouse selection: Parents, little or no marriage between children of brothers.
      b. Inheritance: Anti-Egalitarian – inequality between brothers, transfer of patrimony to one son.
      c. Family Home: cohabitation of the married heir with his parents.
      d. Representative Nations, Peoples, Regions: Germany, Austria, Sweden, Norway, Belgium, Bohemia, Scotland, Ireland, peripheral regions of France, northern (Basque) Spain, northern Portugal, Japan, Korea, Jews, Romany Gypsies.
      e. Representative Ideology: Fascism, various separatist and autonomous (anti-universalist) movements.

    4: Exogamous Community Family: a. Spouse selection: Parents, no marriage between the children of two brothers. b. Inheritance: Egalitarian – equality between brothers. c. Family Home: cohabitation of married sons with their parents. d. Representative Nations, Regions: Russia, Yugoslavia, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Hungary, Finland, Albania, central Italy, China, Vietnam, Cuba and north India. e. Representative Ideology: Communism, Socialism.

    1. Endogamous Community Family:
      a. Spouse selection: Custom, frequent marriage between the children of brothers.
      b. Inheritance: Egalitarian – equality between brothers.
      c. Family Home: cohabitation of married sons with their parents.
      d. Representative Nations, Peoples, Regions: Arab world, Turkey, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tadzhikistan.
      e. Representative Ideology: Islam.

    2. Asymmetrical Community Family:
      a. Spouse selection: Custom, prohibition on marriages between the children of brothers, but a preference for marriages between the children of brothers and sisters.
      b. Inheritance: Egalitarian – equality between brothers.
      c. Family Home: cohabitation of married sons with their parents.
      d. Representative Regions: southern India.
      e. Representative Ideology: Same

    7: Anomic Family: a. Spouse selection: Free, but without obligatory exogamy; consanguine marriage possible and sometimes frequent. b. Inheritance: Indifference – uncertainty about equality between brothers, inheritance rules egalitarian in theory but uncertain in practice. c. Family Home: cohabitation of married children with parents rejected in theory but accepted in practice. d. Representative Nations, Peoples, Regions: e. Representative Ideology: Buddhism, Christianity, and Communism, but potentially anything.

  • Consciousness > Cooperation > Narration > Animism > Anthropomorphism > Idealism

    Consciousness > Cooperation > Narration > Animism > Anthropomorphism > Idealism > Abrahamism (judaism, islam) > Christian Theology > Rational Philosophy > Law > Science > Logic > Mathematics

    December 8th, 2018 1:11 PM

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544282741 Timestamp) SEX DIFFERENCES IN PERSONALITY – REFERENCES

    1. Buss DM. Psychological sex differences: Origins through sexual selection. Am Psychol. 1995;50:164–168. [PubMed]
    2. Del Giudice M. On the real magnitude of psychological sex differences. Evol Psychol. 2009;7:264–279.
    3. Eagly AH. The science and politics of comparing women and men. Am Psychol. 1995;50:145–158.
    4. Eagly AH, Wood W. The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. Am Psychol. 1999;54:408–423.
    5. Ellis L, Hershberger S, Field E, Wersinger S, Pellis S, et al. Sex differences: Summarizing more than a century of scientific research. New York: Psychology Press; 2008.
    6. Fausto-Sterling A. Myths of gender: Biological theories about women and men (2nd ed.) New York: Basic Books; 1992.
    7. Geary DC. Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences (2nd ed.) Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2010.
    8. Halpern DF, Benbow CP, Geary DC, Gur RC, Hyde JS, et al. The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2007;8:1–51. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
    9. Hyde JS. The gender similarities hypothesis. Am Psychol. 2005;60:581–592. [PubMed]
    10. Lippa RA. The gender reality hypothesis. Am Psychol. 2006;61:639–640. [PubMed]
    11. Lippa RA. Gender differences in personality and interests: When, where, and why? Pers Soc Psychol Compass. 2010;3:1–13.
    12. Maccoby EE, Jacklin CN. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1974.
    13. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988.
    14. Hedges LV. What are effect sizes and why do we need them? Child Dev Perspect. 2008;2:167–171.
    15. Davies APC, Shackelford TK. Two human natures: How men and women evolved different psychologies. In: Crawford C, Krebs D, editors. Foundations of evolutionary psychology. New York: Erlbaum; 2008. pp. 261–280.
    16. Schmitt DP, Realo A, Voracek M, Allik J. Why can’t a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in big five personality traits across 55 cultures. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008;94:168–182. [PubMed]
    17. Trivers RL. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B, editor. Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971. Chicago, IL: Aldine; 1972. pp. 136–179.
    18. Kokko H, Jennions M. Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. J Evol Biol. 2008;21:919–948. [PubMed]
    19. Buss DM, Schmitt DP. Evolutionary psychology and feminism. Sex Roles. 2011 doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-9987-3.
    20. Ashton MC, Lee K, Pozzebon JA, Visser BA, Worth NC. Status-driven risk taking and the major dimensions of personality. J Res Pers. 2010;44:734–737.
    21. Bourdage JS, Lee K, Ashton MC, Perry A. Big Five and HEXACO model personality correlates of sexuality. Pers Indiv Diff. 2007;43:1506–1516.
    22. Del Giudice M, Angeleri R, Brizio A, Elena MR. The evolution of autistic-like and schizotypal traits: A sexual selection hypothesis. Front Psychol. 2010;1:41. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
    23. Haselton MG, Miller GF. Women’s fertility across the cycle increases the short-term attractiveness of creative intelligence. Hum Nat. 2006;17:50–73. [PubMed]
    24. Jonason PK, Li NP, Webster GD, Schmitt DP. The dark triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy in men. Eur J Pers. 2009;23:5–18.
    25. Lee K, Ogunfowora B, Ashton MC. Personality traits beyond the Big Five: Are they within the HEXACO space? J Pers. 2005;73:1437–1463. [PubMed]
    26. Markey PM, Markey CN. The interpersonal meaning of sexual promiscuity. J Res Pers. 2007;41:1199–1212.
    27. Miller GF, Tal IR. Schizotypy versus openness and intelligence as predictors of creativity. Schizophr Res. 2007;93:317–324. [PubMed]
    28. Nettle D, Clegg H. Schizotypy, creativity and mating success in humans. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2006;273:611–615. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
    29. Schmitt DP. The big five related to risky sexual behavior across 10 world regions: Differential personality associations of sexual promiscuity and relationship infidelity. Eur J Pers. 2004;18:301–319.
    30. Schmitt DP, Buss DM. Sexual dimensions of person description: Beyond or subsumed by the big five? J Res Pers. 2000;34:141–177.
    31. Schmitt DP, Shackelford TK. Big five traits related to short-term mating: From personality to promiscuity across 46 nations. Evol Psychol. 2008;6:246–282.
    32. Bentler PM, Newcomb MD. Longitudinal study of marital success and failure. J Consult Clin Psych. 1978;46:1053–1070.
    33. Kelly EL, Conley JJ. Personality and compatibility: A prospective analysis of marital stability and marital satisfaction. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987;52:27–40. [PubMed]
    34. Nettle D. Individual differences. In: Dunbar R, Barrett L, editors. Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007. pp. 479–490.
    35. Wiebe RP. Delinquent behavior and the five-factor model: Hiding in the adaptive landscape. Indiv Diff Res. 2004;2:38–62.
    36. Hyde JS. Gender similarities still rule. Am Psychol. 2006;61:641–642. [PubMed]
    37. Costa PTJ, McCrae RR. Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. J Pers Assess. 1995;64:21–50. [PubMed]
    38. Ashton MC, Lee K. Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2007;11:150–166. [PubMed]
    39. Zuckerman M, Kuhlman DM, Joireman J, Teta P, Kraft M. A comparison of three structural models for personality: The big three, the big five, and the alternative five. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993;65:757–768.
    40. DeYoung CG. Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006;91:1138–1151. [PubMed]
    41. Digman JM. Higher-order factors of the Big Five. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997;73:1246–1256. [PubMed]
    42. Musek J. A general factor of personality: Evidence for the Big One in the five-factor model. J Res Pers. 2007;41:1213–1235.
    43. Just C. A review of literature on the general factor of personality. Pers Indiv Diff. 2011;50:765–771.
    44. Rushton JP, Irwing P. The general factor of personality: Normal and abnormal. In: Chamorro-Premuzic T, von Stumm S, Furnham A, editors. The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of individual differences. London: Blackwell; 2011.
    45. Saucier G. What are the most important dimensions of personality? Evidence from studies of descriptors in diverse languages. Pers Soc Psychol Compass. 2009;3:620–637.
    46. DeYoung CG, Quilty LC, Peterson JB. Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the big five. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007;93:880–896. [PubMed]
    47. Cattell RB, Cattell HEP. Personality Structure and the new Fifth Edition of the 16PF. Educ Psychol Meas. 1995;55:926–937.
    48. Cattell HEP, Mead AD. The Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF). In: Boyle GJ, Matthews G, Saklofske DH, editors. The Sage Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment: Personality Measurement and Testing. London: Sage; 2008.
    49. Costa PTJ, Terracciano A, McCrae RR. Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001;81:322–331. [PubMed]
    50. Hough LM, Oswald FL, Ployhart RE. Determinants, detection and amelioration of adverse impact in personnel selection procedures: Issues, evidence and lessons learned. Int J Select Assess. 2001;9:152–194.
    51. Lucas RE, Deiner E, Grob A, Suh EM, Shao L. Cross-cultural evidence for the fundamental features of extraversion. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000;79:452–468. [PubMed]
    52. Powell DM, Goffin RD, Gellatly IR. Gender differences in personality scores: Implications for differential hiring rates. Pers Indiv Diff. 2011;50:106–110.
    53. Weisberg YJ, DeYoung CG, Hirsh JB. Gender differences in personality across the ten aspects of the Big Five. Front Psychol. 2011;2:178. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
    54. Booth T, Irwing P. Sex differences in the 16PF5, test of measurement invariance and mean differences in the US standardisation sample. Pers Indiv Diff. 2011;50:553–558.
    55. Soto CJ, John OP, Gosling SD, Potter J. Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big Five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011;100:330–348. [PubMed]
    56. French BF, Finch WH. Confirmatory factor analytic procedures for the determination of measurement invariance. Struct Equ Modeling. 2006;13:378–402.
    57. Meredith W. Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika. 1993;58:525–543.
    58. Widaman KF, Reise KF. Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In: Bryant KJ, Windle M, editors. The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1997. pp. 281–324.
    59. Church AT, Burke PJ. Exploratory and confirmatory tests of the Big 5 and Tellegen’s 3-dimensional and 4-dimensional models. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;66:93–114. [PubMed]
    60. Harner EJ, Whitmore RC. Multivariate measures of niche overlap using discriminant analysis. Theor Popul Biol. 1977;12:21–36. [PubMed]
    61. Reiser B. Confidence intervals for the Mahalanobis distance. Commun Stat-Simul C. 2001;30:37–45.
    62. Zou GY. Exact confidence interval for Cohen’s effect size is readily available. Stat Med. 2007;26:3054–3056. [PubMed]
    63. Huberty CJ. Mahalanobis distance. In: Everitt BS, Howell DC, editors. Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. Chichester: Wiley; 2005.
    64. De Maesschalck R, Jouan-Rimbaud D, Massart DL. The Mahalanobis distance. Chemometr Intell Lab. 2000;50:1–18.
    65. Noftle EE, Shaver PR. Attachment dimensions and the big five personality traits: associations and comparative ability to predict relationship quality. J Res Pers. 2006;40:179–208.
    66. Merz EL, Roesch SC. A latent profile analysis of the Five Factor Model of personality: modeling trait interactions. Pers Indiv Diff. 2011;51:915–919. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
    67. Conn SR, Rieke ML, editors. The 16PF fifth edition technical manual. Champagne, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, Inc; 1994.
    68. Rossier J, Meyer de Stadelhofen F, Berthoud S. The hierarchical structures of the NEO PI-R and the 16 PF 5. Eur J Pers Assess. 2004;20:27–38.
    69. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2010. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org.
    70. Archer J. Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression? Behav Brain Sci. 2009;32:249–266. [PubMed]
    71. Biernat M. Toward a broader view of social stereotyping. Am Psychol. 2003;58:1019–1027. [PubMed]

  • Consciousness > Cooperation > Narration > Animism > Anthropomorphism > Idealism

    Consciousness > Cooperation > Narration > Animism > Anthropomorphism > Idealism > Abrahamism (judaism, islam) > Christian Theology > Rational Philosophy > Law > Science > Logic > Mathematics

    December 8th, 2018 1:11 PM

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544450153 Timestamp) BOOK LIST (IN ORDER) – PROPERTARIAN INSTITUTE COURSE IN WAR Victor Davis Hanson: – The Other Greeks – The Family Farm and the Agrarian Roots of Western Civilization. – The Western Way of War – Infantry Battle in Classical Greece – Why the West Has Won : Carnage and Culture John Keegan: – A History Of Warfare Martin Van Creveld: – The Culture of War – The Rise and Decline of the State – Pussycats – Why the Rest Keeps Beating the West – The Transformation of War: The Most Radical Reinterpretation of Armed Conflict Since Clausewitz William S Lind:
    – 4th Generation Warfare Handbook Various – Revolutionary, Insurrectionist, War of man against man. Martin Van Creveld: – A History of Strategy: From Sun Tzu to William S. Lind Curt Doolittle – (Essay) Sun Tzu, Machiavelli, Prussianism, and The Militia – Why strategy must be taught as a balance to morality. Why the Church (child), Academy (Youth), and Military (Adult) provide tripartite competition that prevents failure by moralization.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544393109 Timestamp) READING LIST – THE FALL AND RISE OF OUR RELIGIONS Bryan Ward-Perkins: The Fall of Rome: And the End of Civilization Catherine Nixey : The Darkening Age: The Christian(Jewish) Destruction of the Classical World Ramsay MacMullen: Paganism and Christianity 100-425 C.E Ramsay MacMullen: Christianity and Paganism in the Fourth To Eighth Centuries James C. Russell: The Germanization of Early Medieval Christianity Emmet Scott: Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited. Victor Davis Hanson: Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544450153 Timestamp) BOOK LIST (IN ORDER) – PROPERTARIAN INSTITUTE COURSE IN WAR Victor Davis Hanson: – The Other Greeks – The Family Farm and the Agrarian Roots of Western Civilization. – The Western Way of War – Infantry Battle in Classical Greece – Why the West Has Won : Carnage and Culture John Keegan: – A History Of Warfare Martin Van Creveld: – The Culture of War – The Rise and Decline of the State – Pussycats – Why the Rest Keeps Beating the West – The Transformation of War: The Most Radical Reinterpretation of Armed Conflict Since Clausewitz William S Lind:
    – 4th Generation Warfare Handbook Various – Revolutionary, Insurrectionist, War of man against man. Martin Van Creveld: – A History of Strategy: From Sun Tzu to William S. Lind Curt Doolittle – (Essay) Sun Tzu, Machiavelli, Prussianism, and The Militia – Why strategy must be taught as a balance to morality. Why the Church (child), Academy (Youth), and Military (Adult) provide tripartite competition that prevents failure by moralization.