Form: Outline

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1545835406 Timestamp) SHOW PREP: AI. RPL. INITIAL: JF’s THEORY. ai..modification…biology.. PART I.

    1. Fear of weapons – they will happen. As soon as the power to weight ratio is solved, Men are no longer much use.
    2. Fear of job displacement – we can compensate for most of it as long as we limit immigration.

    3. Limiting problems are cost/energy/chice-competition

    PART II. What I am unsure about and what I am sure about. UNSURE 1. Unsure about limits of emergence as memory increases. Appears that symbolic recursive performs the same function at cost of state and precision, and increased demand for communication. Appears that consequent layers will produce same functionality without the information loss. SURE 1. Continuous forecasting … of WHAT?

    1. Go, chess, checkers, are ‘simple’ problems.
      Speech recognition, driving, are simple problems.
      Adaptation to continuous problems is HARD.

    2. Decidability => Required => Intent
      Consciousness = Social/Moral
      Comprehensible – Human Action as Language (networks are not open to introspection).
      Property as Moral Calculation
      Hemispheric Competition

    3. Problem of discovery is not intelligence but testing ideas.
      Small number of fundamental innovations in the frame (darwin, einstein, menger, mathiness/probability/operations)
      Small number of fundamental methods of lying.

    4. Liability of human work doesn’t end. Nuclear devices, chemical weapons, hazardous chemicals etc.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1545835406 Timestamp) SHOW PREP: AI. RPL. INITIAL: JF’s THEORY. ai..modification…biology.. PART I.

    1. Fear of weapons – they will happen. As soon as the power to weight ratio is solved, Men are no longer much use.
    2. Fear of job displacement – we can compensate for most of it as long as we limit immigration.

    3. Limiting problems are cost/energy/chice-competition

    PART II. What I am unsure about and what I am sure about. UNSURE 1. Unsure about limits of emergence as memory increases. Appears that symbolic recursive performs the same function at cost of state and precision, and increased demand for communication. Appears that consequent layers will produce same functionality without the information loss. SURE 1. Continuous forecasting … of WHAT?

    1. Go, chess, checkers, are ‘simple’ problems.
      Speech recognition, driving, are simple problems.
      Adaptation to continuous problems is HARD.

    2. Decidability => Required => Intent
      Consciousness = Social/Moral
      Comprehensible – Human Action as Language (networks are not open to introspection).
      Property as Moral Calculation
      Hemispheric Competition

    3. Problem of discovery is not intelligence but testing ideas.
      Small number of fundamental innovations in the frame (darwin, einstein, menger, mathiness/probability/operations)
      Small number of fundamental methods of lying.

    4. Liability of human work doesn’t end. Nuclear devices, chemical weapons, hazardous chemicals etc.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1546012377 Timestamp) Evolution or Scope of Religion over time. Phase 1: Burials > (Possible 1a: Marking as Monument?) > Phase 2: Sacrifices > Phase 3: Seasons > Phase 4: Politics > Phase 5: Education Each of these is rather obvious in progression as complexity increases. The only ‘evil’ here is monotheism. The greatest evil in history is Abrahamic Monotheism. And it is our duty to eradicate this mental disease from mankind over the next few centuries. It is the most important advance we can give to our people. Truth is enough.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1546012377 Timestamp) Evolution or Scope of Religion over time. Phase 1: Burials > (Possible 1a: Marking as Monument?) > Phase 2: Sacrifices > Phase 3: Seasons > Phase 4: Politics > Phase 5: Education Each of these is rather obvious in progression as complexity increases. The only ‘evil’ here is monotheism. The greatest evil in history is Abrahamic Monotheism. And it is our duty to eradicate this mental disease from mankind over the next few centuries. It is the most important advance we can give to our people. Truth is enough.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1546872950 Timestamp) A NOTE ON PROGRAMMING AND PARADIGMS 1) There are diminishing returns on extension of paradigms 2) At some point overextension of paradigms produces errors 3) These overextensions (exhaustions of opportunity) lead to innovations (generally increasing precision of the paradigm or falsifying it by recombination.) OOP was particularly useful in the creation of reusable code in the era before so many libraries and so much open source. Many of our most popular languages today are actually script languages written over huge functional libraries. I prefer OOP because i feel I can structure readable and maintainable programs. My view (which is traditional) is that just as we have layers of the brain, we have layers of the computer. The base to interface with the hardware. the second to transfer hardware information into commensurable symbols, and the third to manipulate those commensurable symbols to achieve goals. This makes it possible for vendors to produce slightly different hardware and different operating systems run on that hardware. Just as our brains allow us to function in different groups, in different environments, with different languages.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1546971405 Timestamp) Curt Doolittle 1 – The first spirits: Ancestors (oldest gods – burials), 2 – The old gods (fertility,hearth – hunter gatherer), 3 – The heroic gods (indo european – archetypes), 4 – The race’s gods (ascendent man, germanic, nordic) 5 – The imperial gods (semitic and medieval.) 6 – The new gods (man)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1546971405 Timestamp) Curt Doolittle 1 – The first spirits: Ancestors (oldest gods – burials), 2 – The old gods (fertility,hearth – hunter gatherer), 3 – The heroic gods (indo european – archetypes), 4 – The race’s gods (ascendent man, germanic, nordic) 5 – The imperial gods (semitic and medieval.) 6 – The new gods (man)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1547315158 Timestamp) DEFLATING TERMS BY THE MEANS OF CONSISTENCY IN THE DIMENSIONS THAT THEY MEASURE. (important) DIMENSIONS AND MEANS OF CONSISTENCY-TESTING 1. Axioms = Logic (words) : internal consistency : Declared. 2. Theories (‘laws’) = Science (actions) : external correspondence : Discovered 3. Algorithms (operations) = Testimony : Constructed. 4. Rational Choice (incentives) = Preference or Good : intuited. 5. Law (Reciprocity) = Decidability: Demonstrated. COHERENCE REQUIRES CLOSURE 1. No means of consistency-testing within any dimension provides CLOSURE. (‘incompleteness’). 2. Closure is increased only by appeal to the next higher dimension. 3. Closure is impossible for other than tautologies, but warranty of due diligence is producible by test of COHERENCE, which is CONSISTENCY in all dimensions. PROOFS? 1. A proof is a test of internal consistency. 2. A proof is therefore a test of possibility. 3. All proofs are open to falsification by appeal COHERENCE, meaning the due diligence of testing every dimension for consistency. 4. Ergo the function of logic and axioms is only to falsify the false, not prove the true. This is the ‘difficult’ part of ‘relearning’ that mathematics (positional naming) and the attempt to have logic (language) mirror one another, has led to the near universal fallacy that proof provides truth rather than due diligence against error, bias, and deceit. 5. Egro, logics FALSIFY but they do not convey truth content – except in the minority and reductio set of cases – in logic which are akin to prime numbers in mathematics: rare. (This is what Curtus Maximus is explaining via Godel). In the sense of Rothbard/Mises/Hoppe the (((fraud))) of kantian logic combined with the (((fraud))) of CONFLATION, mises attempted to conflate logic, empiricism, science, morality, and law into one ‘monopoly ‘ akin to jewish law, or kant’s attempt at secular restatement of the church’s faith – and failed. Rothbard attempted to conflate liberty with jewish libertinism. Freedom with libertinism. and thereby to license parasitism upon the commons, which is the group evolutionary strategy of his ancestors as well as women. Whether his ancestral group strategy of parasitism is genetic or cultural or a combination is something we do not know. We do however know that all his kin exhibit this behavior just as all women exhibit this behavior. Ergo, everything rothbard says is a lie. Mises might be rescued from his sophisms and pseudoscience if it were not for Rothbard and Hoppe’s defense of rothbard. But the (((Mises institute))) has done profound harm to our civilization by preserving and promoting Rothbard (rand)’s justification of libertinism, rather than the anglo saxon rights of anglo saxons: sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, charity, and every (enfranchised) man a sheriff. As far as I know, the only epistemological framework is free association > hypothesis > theory > law > Failure > Repeat to revise (refine). All of the vocabulary of ‘logic’ and proof, all of which is justificationary and false, is now reduced to superstitious language. And all attempts to say ‘prove it’ are also justificationary and false. One cannot prove a truth, one can only ask for sufficient information to falsify it. And contrary to the entire history of philosophy, the principle means of falsification is deconfliction, completing scope and limits, accounting for cost, testing the possibility of action, rationality of action, and reciprocity of display word and deed. The people who invented lying are as good at lying as the people who invented truth are good at truth.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1547315158 Timestamp) DEFLATING TERMS BY THE MEANS OF CONSISTENCY IN THE DIMENSIONS THAT THEY MEASURE. (important) DIMENSIONS AND MEANS OF CONSISTENCY-TESTING 1. Axioms = Logic (words) : internal consistency : Declared. 2. Theories (‘laws’) = Science (actions) : external correspondence : Discovered 3. Algorithms (operations) = Testimony : Constructed. 4. Rational Choice (incentives) = Preference or Good : intuited. 5. Law (Reciprocity) = Decidability: Demonstrated. COHERENCE REQUIRES CLOSURE 1. No means of consistency-testing within any dimension provides CLOSURE. (‘incompleteness’). 2. Closure is increased only by appeal to the next higher dimension. 3. Closure is impossible for other than tautologies, but warranty of due diligence is producible by test of COHERENCE, which is CONSISTENCY in all dimensions. PROOFS? 1. A proof is a test of internal consistency. 2. A proof is therefore a test of possibility. 3. All proofs are open to falsification by appeal COHERENCE, meaning the due diligence of testing every dimension for consistency. 4. Ergo the function of logic and axioms is only to falsify the false, not prove the true. This is the ‘difficult’ part of ‘relearning’ that mathematics (positional naming) and the attempt to have logic (language) mirror one another, has led to the near universal fallacy that proof provides truth rather than due diligence against error, bias, and deceit. 5. Egro, logics FALSIFY but they do not convey truth content – except in the minority and reductio set of cases – in logic which are akin to prime numbers in mathematics: rare. (This is what Curtus Maximus is explaining via Godel). In the sense of Rothbard/Mises/Hoppe the (((fraud))) of kantian logic combined with the (((fraud))) of CONFLATION, mises attempted to conflate logic, empiricism, science, morality, and law into one ‘monopoly ‘ akin to jewish law, or kant’s attempt at secular restatement of the church’s faith – and failed. Rothbard attempted to conflate liberty with jewish libertinism. Freedom with libertinism. and thereby to license parasitism upon the commons, which is the group evolutionary strategy of his ancestors as well as women. Whether his ancestral group strategy of parasitism is genetic or cultural or a combination is something we do not know. We do however know that all his kin exhibit this behavior just as all women exhibit this behavior. Ergo, everything rothbard says is a lie. Mises might be rescued from his sophisms and pseudoscience if it were not for Rothbard and Hoppe’s defense of rothbard. But the (((Mises institute))) has done profound harm to our civilization by preserving and promoting Rothbard (rand)’s justification of libertinism, rather than the anglo saxon rights of anglo saxons: sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, charity, and every (enfranchised) man a sheriff. As far as I know, the only epistemological framework is free association > hypothesis > theory > law > Failure > Repeat to revise (refine). All of the vocabulary of ‘logic’ and proof, all of which is justificationary and false, is now reduced to superstitious language. And all attempts to say ‘prove it’ are also justificationary and false. One cannot prove a truth, one can only ask for sufficient information to falsify it. And contrary to the entire history of philosophy, the principle means of falsification is deconfliction, completing scope and limits, accounting for cost, testing the possibility of action, rationality of action, and reciprocity of display word and deed. The people who invented lying are as good at lying as the people who invented truth are good at truth.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1547572164 Timestamp) IN DEFENSE OF THE DEMAND FOR DUE DILIGENCE IN PUBLIC SPEECH, AND THE PUNISHMENT OF FALSE SPEECH. by John Mark (must read) (central argument) 1 – It is too difficult to teach Bullsh-t detection to masses of people with heavy biases and an avg IQ of 85-105 (depending on the nation). Half or more of the population (below 105-106) cannot tell what is true or not even if they try. The solution is not teaching; it won’t work. The solution is punishment. (Law) 2 – Allowing lying allows left-instinct people to rally using lies and false promises. It’s a Dangerous thing to allow. Too dangerous. 3 – Most people will have to refrain from making public pronouncements about matters which they have not done due diligence. This would be wonderful. 4 – You only have the “rights” you & your friends can defend. If someone wants to defend their “right” to be wrong, they are fighting in favor of lies against truth. (I will not be joining that team.) 5 – “More free speech” has failed. Because lying is faster, cheaper, easier than telling the truth. There is a world of difference between what the Left does (arbitrary, enforcing lies) & what we propose (scientific, enforcing truth). “The way most people want to live”…the left wants to pretend lies are true; the Right benefits from truth and wants the results of truth. The Right is better served by enforcing truth (punishing lies) than by allowing lies or “free speech” (aka lies winning). 6 – There would be more court cases for a while and then as people figure out what the consequences of their actions will be, the # of cases will drop significantly.

    • John Mark