Curt Doolittle

Form: Outline

  • THE THREE-C,Q METHOD 1. Compliment 2. Comment 3. Connection 4. Question How to a

    THE THREE-C,Q METHOD

    1. Compliment

    2. Comment

    3. Connection

    4. Question

    How to answer questions in text.

    THE E-PRIME METHOD

    1. Eliminate the verb to be, and plan your sentence accordingly.

    THE OPERATIONAL METHOD

    1. Complete sentences

    2. Operational vocabulary

    3. Single POV

    4. Describe a complete change in state.

    PROPERTARIAN METHOD

    1. Using economic terms

    2. To describe changes in property in toto as a consequence of both incentives and changes in state.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 18:58:00 UTC

  • PATTERNS OF IMPORT by Bill Joslin. Like epistemology and ethics, graceful failur

    PATTERNS OF IMPORT

    by Bill Joslin.

    Like epistemology and ethics, graceful failure applies here.

    Epistemology

    1. With perfect (adequate) information – science, empiricism

    2. With partial information we fall back on heuristics (rules of thumb) – coherence and internal consistency

    3. Without adequate information we fall back on faith, intuition

    Ethics:

    1. With adequate information – consequentialism

    2. with partial information – virtue ethics

    3. without adequate information – deontic ethics (duty to rules)

    Identity

    1. With high-trust commons (accumulated social capital) – Civ nat (demonstrated shared values)

    2. with partial trust – ethnicity (shared traditions and culture)

    3. in absence of trust – biology (race gender etc)

    These are matters of proximity as well:

    1. In close knit isolated communities – if approached by a stranger

    2. far distance – race (low resolution friend foe detection)

    3. mid distance – clothing cultural clues (mid resolution)

    4. close distance – behavior (high resolution)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 18:18:00 UTC

  • WHAT DOES “GO” MEAN: 1. A moral license – it has to be explained (the declaratio

    WHAT DOES “GO” MEAN:

    1. A moral license – it has to be explained (the declaration)

    2. A set of demands – they have to be published and made. (a constitution)

    3. A plan of transition – ( what it sounds like)

    4. A means of altering the status quo (incremental pressure to drive the parties to the table)

    I have a clear understanding of the means of political acceleration.

    I have a very clear understanding of the boogaloo strategy and have for years. The point is to make it so vividly certain it isn’t necessary – but you can’t fake it. The threat has to be a promise for it to work.

    If I have to, I”ll work at sounding very scary when the time comes. “And that is why you will agree to these terms in our mutual interest. Otherwise if we must fight to win, we will win, and our terms of settlement will worsen everyday”.

    And if we must, then we must, and if men are not willing to do what they must – they are not men worth having.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-29 18:50:00 UTC

  • IN A PERFECT WORLD…. We want a monarchy with veto power if we can eventually g

    IN A PERFECT WORLD….

    We want a monarchy with veto power if we can eventually get one.

    We need a cabinet (a management team)

    We need a prime minister that is not a senator

    We need a senate (market for commons)

    This senate can only produce contracts between the states in matters of revenue, infrastructure, trade.

    The house is eliminated.

    The state is a corporation run by the management team,

    The divisions include the judiciary, the military-state-intel, the treasury, the insurer. The fed reserve is gone and pulled into the treasury.

    Each state shall have a governor, cabinet, senate(territory), upper house(business), and lower house(families)

    Each governor appoints two senators.

    The blue cities are forcibly converted to Free Cities(if we fight) or States(if we agree). All state lines are fungible on the neighborhood level. Any new state can be formed anew.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-29 11:28:00 UTC

  • THE SERIES: GSRRM > PILPUL > SOPHISM > FALSE PROMISE CRITIQUE > ABRAHAMISM (impo

    THE SERIES: GSRRM > PILPUL > SOPHISM > FALSE PROMISE CRITIQUE > ABRAHAMISM

    (important) (core)

    GSRRM is a form of avoidance by conflating disapproval with falsehood. It uses escalating means of shaming in order to achieve with disapproval what is true but they cannot tolerate.

    SOPHISM or PILPUL is a tool of distraction and deception. In general it relies on uses of GSRRM, Idealism (abstractions), plus loading, framing, suggesting, obscuring, to (a) create a paradigm (b) that overloads your reason (b) and uses suggestion (c) to force you to appeal to your intuition (d) thus causing you to substitute your value judgements (e) thus creating a false impression of agreement, when the speaker has the opposite intentions in mind: deceit. Why? All communication requires we listen to a series of symbols that suggest a story of anything from a name to an epic narrative. At some point we understand (synchronize) with the speaker, and then either we or the speaker or both perform due diligence to warranty that we do not misunderstand. Sophism uses this period of suggestibility to cause you to fill in the blanks with information that corresponds to what the speaker says, but not to reality or any future reality. These systems fool you into falsehood.

    FALSE PROMSE, or SEDUCTION to avoid a reciprocal trade. (repeat that a few times so you grasp it). A false promise or seduction so that you will pay a cost and the other party will not.

    FICTIONALISM improves on SOPHISM but relying on telling more complex stores that undermine and overload the limits of the three human cognitive faculties: 1) the physical, 2) the logical, and the 3) emotional. The three techniques are 1) the magic-pseudoscience physical spectrum – the domain of pseudoscience, 2) the ideal-surreal rational spectrum- the domain of philosophy and 3) the supernatural-occult emotional spectrum – the domain of theology. These systems of deception offer discounts (false promises) of truthfulness and comprehension. They bait you into falsehood.

    CRITIQUE is a form of undermining by GSRRM, SOPHISM, and FICTIONALISM and then pointing out imperfections, or straw manning imperfections that are not there, exaggerated, irrelevant or meaningless, and not providing a superior competitive solution that can be compared. These systems undermine competing *truthfully stated systems of thought*.

    BAITING INTO HAZARD is a form of profiting from the use of the above techniques to profit from others error, fault, or failure of your engineering. Seduction and Usury are the canon examples.

    ABRAHAMISM combines all, and adds baiting into hazard, with false and unwarranted or unwarrantable promise as a means of profiting from undermining the host polity.

    If you understand this, you will have given names to the techniques of the enemy.

    The adoption of the female strategy of undermining males.

    By use of GSRRM as a substitute for solutions – usually to avoid payment, bearing of cost, or engaging in exchange.

    By the use of SOPHISM as a substitute for argument and reason.

    By the use of FALSE PROMISE to avoid an exchange.

    By the use of FICTIONALISMS to create more elaborate false promises.

    By the use of Critique to Undermine existing or proposed solutions without offering one that is viable.

    By the use of Abrahamism to combine all of these into a strategy for undermining host civilizations.

    Judaism to undermine, christianity to weaken islam to destroy civilization and reduce it to dysgenic ignorance and poverty.

    Marxism to foster conflict between classes with a monopoly underclass. Postmodernism to foster conflict between science and fictionalisms – and to undermine western civilization by undermining truth merit and markets. Feminism to foster conflict between the genders and destroy the family. Political correctness to suppress the truth.

    The enemy wants control they cannot manage like females want control they cannot manage if they have it. They follow the intuition of the herd. Conversely, we live in packs (families). We want no one to have control. We build a civilization without control. We built a civilization of markets and the resulting uncertainty. And we find joy in it. And we rescued mankind from ignorance with it.

    Aristotelianism, Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Logic, Testimony(Truth), History, Economics, Natural Law, Technology, Science, Mathematics and the Natural Eugenics of Markets between the classes to evolve man into the gods europeans imagined, while reveling in our achievements all the way to the heavens we will create.

    He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing.

    Truth is a weapon.

    It has always been our weapon.

    Take it from this forge.

    Wield it.

    Win.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 14:44:00 UTC

  • PROBLEMS THE POLICE FACE (1) police are expensive and patrol large territories i

    PROBLEMS THE POLICE FACE

    (1) police are expensive and patrol large territories in expensive vehicles with expensive equipment.

    (2) because police are expensive they do not travel in groups, and do not practice european policing of de-escalation- europe is small and densely populated.

    (3) Therefore officers rely on manipulation, deception, intimidation, and force, to subdue an individual and ‘drag him into the system’. Whereas you or I only need to break contact, they have to bring people into the system. The reason is that they don’t have discretionary power (as do sheriffs and judges.) This is because they can get sued if they are forgiving but you do something stupid. So their only defense is to get you into the system.

    (4) Revenue for a police department and justice system is funded by taxes, tickets and fines, and worst of all, property seizures. This has produced the malincentives we predicted.

    (5) Police are in a position of high risk, high responsibility, and under multiple conflicting incentives for which they can lose job and pension for any normal human error. This is a no-win situation for them. So they tend to develop procedures that are the safest for them and their careers, by choosing processes that put the officer in the position of making THE FEWEST DECISIONS. This is the problem.

    (6) The police do not control the bad laws that they operate under. Their job is to bring people into the system and let the system and system processes do the work – thereby (mostly) using time and isolation for heated afraid or excited people to calm down.

    (7) The data is what it is and the cops know the data: Black americans are disproportionately impulsively violent and will run, drug users are disproportionately unpredictable and dangerous even with bodily fluids or needles, and hispanic americans are disproportionately involved in gangs and dangerous, and white americans are disproportionately cunning and dangerous.

    (8) Police will not stay in the job if they have IQ’s over 105, so they hire average people for the job, because frankly it’s a lot of paperwork, and a lot of putting up with unpleasant people, and a lot of very high stress followed by very boring procedure. So for an average guy it’s a high income high status job – with decision making above his pay grade.

    (9) Some police forces are run well and others not, and there is no requirement that police come from the area nor stay in an area and learn the ‘crook book’ for the area. Instead, better police forces hire and train better officers, who then take positions that pay more money in less ‘prime’ territories.

    So there are just a lot of things going on. Where instead, we should probably have three classes of officers, at three pay grades, the top being criminal lawyers (proto-judges), the middle being today’s armed officers, and the bottom being de-escalation officers, and we should try to use numbers rather than concentration of force to deescalate and bring people in.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-27 07:19:00 UTC

  • IT”S NOT JUST RECIPROCITY: THE METHOD When you’re testing for reciprocity ask: 1

    IT”S NOT JUST RECIPROCITY: THE METHOD

    When you’re testing for reciprocity ask:

    1 – Is it productive? Do we both have more capital under subjective value after the transfer or not?

    2 – Is it fully informed? Meaning, truthful and complete.

    3 – Is it voluntary a voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests?

    4 – Is it free of imposition of costs by externality on the demonstrated interests of others?

    5 – Is the other party warrantying that it is productive, fully informed, voluntary, and free of externality?

    6 – Is it restitutable if it is warrantied? Meaning is is possible to perform restitution, and is the other party capable of paying restitution?

    For example:

    WHEREAS;

    Party A wants to deny party B the right to bear arms.

    WHERE;

    1. Is it productive? Well no. It’s an attempt to reduce some harm at the cost of enabling another harm, but there is a difference in preference over the choice of bearing those harms.

    2. Is it fully informed? Well no. It’s an attempt to circumvent accounting for the tradeoff in risks, under the pretense that a preference is equal to a truth.

    3. Is it voluntary. Well no, it is involuntary or the question would not arise.

    4. Is it free of imposition of costs by externality on the demonstrated interests of others? Well, no, not limiting the right to bear arms imposes costs (risk) upon those who might be harmed by those with arms, and limiting it imposes costs (risk) upon those who defend self family commons and government from usurpation.

    5. Is it warrantied and warrantable. No. Neither side can warrantee the other.

    6. Is it restitutable. No life is not restitutable wither in defense of rights or in defense of self.

    7. Can an alternate solution be made? Of course. Pay the cost of protecting your interests rather than depriving others of the right to protect their interests.

    THEREFORE

    9. The alternative solution is (a)to have those people who wish to bear the risk of a disarmed public pay for their defense, or (b) for those who wish change to finance and move to a separate geography with different limits.

    This is a cursory treatment but you get the idea.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-26 16:41:00 UTC

  • EDUCATIONAL REFORM 1. Restore Grammar(imitating), Logic(understanding), Rhetoric

    EDUCATIONAL REFORM

    1. Restore Grammar(imitating), Logic(understanding), Rhetoric(Speaking) – Add Propertarianism (truth, ethics, morality) as well as the grammars and lying.

    2. Restore the Epic Cycle (the indo european expansion, the matter of Greece and Rome, the matter of Germanics),

    Add the and the Evolution of our Religions

    3. Restore Art History – Add scientific, Technological, and Economic, political, and military History (repeating)

    4. Add money, accounting, banking, interest, and investing, micro and macro economics as early as possible.

    5. Convert the teaching of math from symbolic an sets to operational so that far more people are able to grasp it. Restore high repetition work loads in mathematics (asian method)

    6. Restore competitive teaching and separate the boys and girls.

    7. Restore overlapping age groups so students are subject to repetition. (one room method)

    8. Restore divisions of classes into students of similar abilities learning at similar rates.

    9. Add teachers following students through the years (Finnish method)

    10. Restore the combination of physical, verbal, and recitation in groups as technique during the grammar years. (Simon says method)

    11. Restore competitive physical activity as a daily requirement.

    12. Restore military discipline and corporal punishment until high school (zero tolerance). Add parental punishment and parental classrooms. Add forcible sterilization for failure.

    13. Reform the dietary recommendations to limit carbohydrates and sugars to the absolute minimum.

    14. Privatize all schools under the ownership of teachers. Restore catholic and protestant schools.

    15. Develop standardized tests that measure progress in the above including personality, intelligence, and current state of knowledge.

    16. Restore the German method of apprenticeship throughout.

    17. Seek to reduce school hours, especially morning hours, beginning at age 14, and split between working (apprenticeship) and schooling.

    18. Eliminate homework wherever possible.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-26 11:54:00 UTC

  • Evolution of Religion: (Organized religion): Feast > Death(Burial) > Tribes (tru

    Evolution of Religion:

    (Organized religion): Feast > Death(Burial) > Tribes (trust building) > Seasons-Astrology (Calendaring) > Scripture (Writing) > Monotheism (conflict)

    DEBT PAYMENTS

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-24 07:57:00 UTC

  • HOW THE PROPERTARIAN ORGANIZATION FUNCTIONS Listen. John opens the sales funnel

    HOW THE PROPERTARIAN ORGANIZATION FUNCTIONS

    Listen. John opens the sales funnel – with promise of revolution and renaissance. I produce content that creates the legitimacy of the solution. The team picks up on the people with potential. The SN group then educates them in how to convert political natural law to applied personal philosophy. The Institute takes the best and teaches them the law. This is our “organization”. We will need to move to promotion this year and we will be able to do that because enough parties are involved now, and we have enough momentum. We need to roughly double the number of top people this year. And do it again the next. Then we will start owning the discourse. (And when I start making the videos on lying it’s going to go viral.)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-22 11:58:00 UTC