Form: Outline

  • Aristotelian reason as Realism, Naturalism (testimony) Socratic critique without

    Aristotelian reason as Realism, Naturalism (testimony)
    Socratic critique without solutions (undermining)
    Platonic idealism as pretense of knowledge (sophism)
    Theology as pretense of authority (deceit)
    Abrahamic theology as undermining with sophism,false promise, and deniability.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 20:10:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1218989025941491712

  • ASPIE/HFA EXPERIENCES 1. Sensory Overload 2. Problem with eye contact 3. Observi

    ASPIE/HFA EXPERIENCES

    1. Sensory Overload

    2. Problem with eye contact

    3. Observing social interactions not participating

    4. Social confusion when interacting

    5. Extremely concerned with pain or sadness of others.

    6. Crowd Anxiety

    7. Monopolizing conversation

    8. Sequence of obsessive interests

    Aspies live in an “intense world”

    Aspiness just causes social developmental delay.

    In exchange causes system developmental acceleration.

    More neurons, fewer mirror neurons,

    Emotion Blindness

    The extreme male brain.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-11 10:01:00 UTC

  • FAILURE POINTS: MALE, PACK, (K) vs FEMALE, HERD, (R) by Bill Joslin Friend or Fo

    FAILURE POINTS: MALE, PACK, (K) vs FEMALE, HERD, (R)

    by Bill Joslin

    Friend or Foe Detection Failures for Each Bias:

    1. FEMALE: far left presume everyone is a friend (Failed Foe Detection)

    2. MALE: failed right presume everyone’s an enemy (Failed Friend Detection

    (Curt: I’ve been looking for that rule. Well done!)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-10 11:31:00 UTC

  • YOU WANT PARSIMONY? 😉 RECIPE 1. A Heroic Narrative of Truth, Duty, Oath and Con

    YOU WANT PARSIMONY? 😉

    RECIPE

    1. A Heroic Narrative of Truth, Duty, Oath and Contract, Heroism, Excellence, Achievement, Mindfulness and The direction of dominance expression to the production of commons.

    2. Ethnocentrism, Nationalism, The universal military as the polity, The individual as the subject of Law and the Family as the subject of Policy

    3. Aristotelianism: Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Empiricism, Testimonial Truth (science)

    4. Rule of law by Natural Law of Reciprocity and markets in everything, including a Market for the Suppression of parasitism in court

    5. A Power Distribution of law, Pareto Distribution of Capital, and Nash Distribution of Returns.

    6. A majority genetic middle class and the suppression of the reproduction of the underclass (unproductive).

    DEPENDENCIES IN TESTIMONY

    1. Realism >

    2. Naturalism >

    3. Empiricism >

    4. Operationalism >

    … 5. Acquisition >

    … 6. Rational Choice – Demonstrated Preference >

    … 7. Reciprocity >

    8. Power Distribution of Law >

    9. Pareto Distribution of Assets >

    10. Nash Distribution of Rewards:

    11. Consistency, Coherence, Limits, Completeness

    12. Warrantied, within the Bounds of Restitution.

    WISDOM LITERATURES

    Aristotle….Rea|/Natural: ……….. ..Science (Decidability) Law

    Plato: ……. ..ldea|/Natural: ……….. ..Sophistry (Justification) Philo

    Confucian: Real/Myth-Natural:….~Reason(Harmony) Reason

    Hindu: …… ..UnreaI/Supernatura|..Wisdom (Harmony) Mytho.

    Persian …. ..Unrea|/Supernatura|…Wisdom (?) Mytho/Philo.

    Egyptian….UnreaI/Supernatura|…Wisdom (Order) Mytho.

    Semiticz…..Unrea|/Supernatura|:..Fraud(Authority) Theo.

    We are forever bound by the grammars of our wisdom literatures. (Grammar: paradigms, vocabulary, logic, grammar)

    WE INVENTED TRUTH AND THEY INVENTED LYING IN RESPONSE

    …. ..Female and Semitic vs Male and European

    ………………. ..Dysgenics vs Eugenics

    ………….. ..Consumption vs Capitalization

    ….Private Consumption vs Commons Production

    ……………..Undermining vs Order

    …Approva|/Disapproval vs True/False

    ………….|ncrementaIism vs zero tolerance

    …..PIausib|e Deniability vs Warranty

    …………………… ..GSRRM vs Truth Regardless of Cost

    …………………… ..Critique vs Falsification

    ………………………. ..Pi|puI vs Justification

    ………….. ..FaIse Promise vs Promise

    ……..Baiting into Hazard vs Offers of Reciprocity

    ……………………One Herd vs Many Packs

    GRAMMARS

    (Deflationary Grammars)

    Logic

    … Math

    … … Algorithms

    … … … Recipes, Protocols

    … … … … Sciences

    … … … … … The Law (Descriptive Grammar)

    … … … … Narration (history)

    … … … Fiction

    … … Fictionaisms

    … Deceit

    Fraud

    (Inflationary Grammars)

    DECEITS

    … Deceits

    … … … Fictionalism

    … … … …. Pseudoscience -> Magic

    … … … …. Idealism-> Surrealism, and

    … … … …. Supernaturalism->Occult

    === LIST (W/O DEFLATIONARY GRAMMARS) ===

    THE SPECTRUM :

    1. Sense(stimuli)

    … … Perception (composition)

    … … … Association

    2. Logic Facility (constant relations)

    … … Imagination Facility (prediction)

    … … … Reason Facility (comparison, permutation)

    3. Grammar facility (statements)

    … … Paradigms (‘metaphysics’, ‘dimensions’)

    … … Vocabulary

    … … … Sounds

    … … … Signs (acts, actions)

    … … … Marks (records)

    … … … … accidental

    … … … … intentional

    … … … … … Mark

    … … … … … Symbol

    … … … … … … Glyph

    … … … … … Pictogram

    … … … … … Picture

    … … … … … Picture Series

    … … … … … Animation

    4. Communication Facility (“Language”)

    … Truths

    … … Logics (deflationary Grammars)

    … … Mathematics

    … … Sciences

    … … Rhetoric (argumentative, persuasive Grammars)

    … Descriptions

    … … Testimony

    … Ordinary Language

    … Narrations (inflationary Grammars)

    … … Narrative (description)

    … … … Storytelling (loading, framing)

    … Deceits

    … … … Fictionalism

    … … … …. Pseudoscience -> Magic

    … … … …. Idealism-> Surrealism, and

    … … … …. Supernaturalism->Occult

    … … … Obscurantism (Obscuring, Overloading)

    … … … … Propaganda

    … … … Misdirection (Deceit)

    … … … Fraud (for gain)

    … … … Harm (Evil, for harm regardless of gain)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 17:03:00 UTC

  • FYI Realism > Naturalism > Prediction > Operationalism > Empiricism > Acquisitio

    FYI

    Realism > Naturalism > Prediction > Operationalism > Empiricism > Acquisition > Rational Choice > Demonstrated Preference > Reciprocity > Power Distribution of Law > Pareto Distribution of Assets > Nash Distribution of Rewards:

    If it doesn’t pass, it’s false.Updated Jan 9, 2020, 3:55 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 15:55:00 UTC

  • False Promise, Baiting into Hazard, Pilpul+, Critique- Friedan = Denial Derrida

    False Promise, Baiting into Hazard, Pilpul+, Critique-

    Friedan = Denial
    Derrida et al = Sophistry
    Adorno-Fromm et all = Fictionalism
    Marx, Freud, Boas = Pseudoscience
    Krugman, Stiglitz et al= Pseudo-economics
    Cantor, Bohr = Pseudo-mathematics

    =Judaism > Christianity > Islam V2


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 02:39:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215100792224526337

  • 0. Competition: Law(Markets), Military(Duty), Faith (Piety) 1. Darwin Undermines

    0. Competition: Law(Markets), Military(Duty), Faith (Piety)
    1. Darwin Undermines faith
    2. Postwar Jewish Intentions Undermine all three.
    3. Successful Disintermediation of the Military from Politics.
    4. Immigration

    We would have made it without immigration. Just like Rome.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 02:04:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215092045934624770

    Reply addressees: @PoseidonAwoke @Germanhammer88

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215081575655800832


    IN REPLY TO:

    @PoseidonAwoke

    @Germanhammer88 @curtdoolittle Then why did European Christians conquor massive territories just like their Greek, and Roman ancestors? We only went insane after the industrialization of propaganda.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215081575655800832

  • FALSIFICATIONISM IN SOCIAL SCIENCE Realism > Naturalism > Operationalism > Empir

    FALSIFICATIONISM IN SOCIAL SCIENCE
    Realism > Naturalism > Operationalism > Empiricism > Acquisition > Rational Choice > Demonstrated Preference > Reciprocity > Power Distribution of Law > Pareto Distribution of Assets > Nash Distribution of Rewards:If it doesn’t pass, it’s false.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-07 18:48:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1214619738267115520

  • TIMELINE 200k ybp modern humans evolve 200k ybp homo hidelbergensis extinction 1

    TIMELINE
    200k ybp modern humans evolve
    200k ybp homo hidelbergensis extinction
    143k ybp homo erectus extinct
    *..75k ybp toba volcano event (extinction)
    *..7Xk ybp the earth nearly… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=548305105766384&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-07 00:42:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1214346431571668992

  • THE MAIN PROPERTARIAN INNOVATIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS THAT COMPLETE WESTERN LAW A

    THE MAIN PROPERTARIAN INNOVATIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS THAT COMPLETE WESTERN LAW AND ARISTOTELIAN EPISTEMOLOGY.

    by Alain Dwight

    My current copy/paste of what is P is pretty much a break down at the narrative level:

    Here’s what I think the main Propertarian innovations/clarifications are that complete western (common/tort) law and Aristotelian epistemology.

    1 – Testimonilaism: The tests you can use to attempt to falsify a claim and truth as real rather an ideal, meaning truth is an adjective meaning “claim I can warranty has survived all means of falsification known to man”

    Link:

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/01/14/what-does-truth-mean-and-what-is-its-adjective-form/

    2 – Law as descriptive (framed as the science of co-operation and agency): retaliation and high trust can be deterministically predicted based on measuring reciprocity and impositions against property-en-toto. Errosion of trust erodes social norms and this cascades down to the rest of commons required to accumulate agency and retain sovereignty.

    Natural law says “if you do this your group will fail.” Common/tort law is men saying “we’re not going to let you do this because we refuse to be a failed group.”

    3 – Property-en-toto: all investments acquired without violating reciprocity that a person is willing and able to defend (whereas certain forms of damage against normative and informational commons were exploitable loopholes in tort law – hence we see hte industrialization of professional deception)

    4 – Reciprocity as deterministic: reciprocity will be exchanged by co-operation when interactions are “productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntarily exchanged, and free of imposition upon others by externality.” Otherwise reciprocity will be exchanged by means of conflict.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-06 20:29:00 UTC