The Aristotelian – Truth – Reason proper – Market Tripartism between aristocracies. The Confucian – Wisdom – Reasonableness – Kinship Hierarchy below Aristocracy The Vedic – Wisdom – Explanation of Harmony – Myth – Aristocracy imposes Classes The Zoroastrian – The Ideal – Wisdom – Aspirational Myth – Surrender to Aristocracy The Abrahamic – The Great Deceit – Authoritarian Lies – Resist Aristocracy Truth: Europeanism Wisdom: Sinism Myth: Hinduism Ideals: Zoroastrianism Lies: Abrahamism
Form: Outline
-
Civilizations Develop Persuasive Strategies
The Aristotelian – Truth – Reason proper – Market Tripartism between aristocracies. The Confucian – Wisdom – Reasonableness – Kinship Hierarchy below Aristocracy The Vedic – Wisdom – Explanation of Harmony – Myth – Aristocracy imposes Classes The Zoroastrian – The Ideal – Wisdom – Aspirational Myth – Surrender to Aristocracy The Abrahamic – The Great Deceit – Authoritarian Lies – Resist Aristocracy Truth: Europeanism Wisdom: Sinism Myth: Hinduism Ideals: Zoroastrianism Lies: Abrahamism
-
Evolution of Money
|Trade| Trade > Market > City, > Contract > Credit > Accounts > Unit of commodity money, Coinage > Notes > Currency > Fiat Currency Babylonians used the Shekel or a single unit of barley as commodity money, including rules of debt in 3000 bc. Metals were used as proto-money in egypt and babylon by the same period. Europeans are familiar with arm-bands of metal as stores of wealth. Coinage was invented in the Aegean, India, and China around the same time – the end of the bronze age dark age – in the 700-600s bc. The oldest coin I know of is from the Temple of Artemis at Ephesus. It is most likely that coinage was NOT developed in the fertile crescent because commodity money was sufficient for the density of land trade. It is most likely that it developed in the aegean because of the heterogeneity of production and sea trade. It is most likely that it developed in china because of the political, regulatory and tax structure, and the long distance of trade. There certainly is universal incentive to create coinage to pay for military service although plunder was enough of an incentive. I do not know enough about trade patterns in ancient india to speculate on the generation of demand for coinage – or why india was less successful than china in consolidation – I assume it is distance, geography and demographic distances.
-
Evolution of Money
|Trade| Trade > Market > City, > Contract > Credit > Accounts > Unit of commodity money, Coinage > Notes > Currency > Fiat Currency Babylonians used the Shekel or a single unit of barley as commodity money, including rules of debt in 3000 bc. Metals were used as proto-money in egypt and babylon by the same period. Europeans are familiar with arm-bands of metal as stores of wealth. Coinage was invented in the Aegean, India, and China around the same time – the end of the bronze age dark age – in the 700-600s bc. The oldest coin I know of is from the Temple of Artemis at Ephesus. It is most likely that coinage was NOT developed in the fertile crescent because commodity money was sufficient for the density of land trade. It is most likely that it developed in the aegean because of the heterogeneity of production and sea trade. It is most likely that it developed in china because of the political, regulatory and tax structure, and the long distance of trade. There certainly is universal incentive to create coinage to pay for military service although plunder was enough of an incentive. I do not know enough about trade patterns in ancient india to speculate on the generation of demand for coinage – or why india was less successful than china in consolidation – I assume it is distance, geography and demographic distances.
-
QUICK TRANSLATION BEWEEN PHILOSOPHY AND PROPERTARIANISM (NATURAL LAW) Metaphysic
QUICK TRANSLATION BEWEEN PHILOSOPHY AND PROPERTARIANISM (NATURAL LAW)
Metaphysics: Realism, naturalism, operationalism, empiricism, survival, compatibilism, cooperation, propertarianism, acquisitionism, action.
Ontology: realism/naturalism, soft determinism, three faculties: physical, intuitionistic, and mind as motion(no name for it in philosophical terms: experience consists of continuous recursive hierarchical temporal memory – memory of memory continuously constructed by continuous prediction from sequences of sense perception.) the problem is getting people from the observer to perception consisting of change (action) not state.
Grammars: As far as I can tell The Grammars (which you don’t know yet) produce the most parsimonious paradigm. Philosophy considers ideals, rarely if ever costs, means of production(models), possibilities(consequences and externalities).
Operationalism: testimony in operational terms (one continuous consistent commensurable system of falsifiable measurement)
Science: testimony in empirical terms (observation of demonstrated evidence) expressed in a commensurable terms (operational).
Epistemology: Competition between justification(hypothesis), operation(theory) and empiricism(evidence) at increasing scales (self-reason via positiva-justification, via-negativa and via-positiva-tests, via-negativa market survival)
Truthfulness: Due diligence against ignorance, error, bias, deceit, in performative, promissory testimony in complete sentences that are consistent, correspondent, operational, limited, complete, and coherent.
Axiology: value: acquisitionism: acquisition of property in toto defined by demonstrated interest (IOW self reported values never reflect demonstrated preference, and demonstrated preference can always be expressed as acquisition of property in toto -a gain yielding a fully commensurable system of measurement),
Ethics: Reciprocity – via negativa, all ethnical and moral questions are decidable by tests of fully accounted reciprocity.
Sociology: Compatibilism, Tripartism, Trifunctionalism.
Cooperationism(Economics): Returns on Time in a division of labor.
In other words: I’m describing economics. Which, as others have stated before me, appears to function as the union of the disciplines.
PHILOSOPHY SUPERCEDED BY SCIENCE
Philosophy: Do we think philosophy produces Truth, Meaning, or Choice? As far as I can tell Law, Economics, Science, Mathematics, and the human logical facility (differences in constant relations) produce testimony.
So what is the remaining function of philosophy? Reorganization of preferences and means of achieving them given the truth we have identified with “science in toto”: (law, economics, science, math, logical facility).
In other words, discovery of truth (science) selection of preference (philosophy), sedation or abandonment (theology).
Which makes sense to me since Math(measurement) Science(matter) and Economics(people) produce evidence, law produces testimony and decidability independent of preference, and philosophy produces preference, and as far as I can tell theology allows people to escape the work of philosophy, law, and science – leading to graceful failure as our knowledge and ability decreases from science to norm or law, to philosophy, to theology.
Philosophy served as the stage between unorganized thinking and science, and that anything that still in philosophy that had any value in decidability has been replaced by science and scientific epistemology.
Metaphysics: Replaced by Paradigms and grammars
Paradigms consisting of market for parsimony. Parsimony consisting of Action. Action consisting of Actionable, Testifiable, Warrantable, Free of Incentive to Deceive. Consisting of: Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Rational Choice, Reciprocity, full accounting.
Humans have developed a series of paradigms that deflate inflate, or fictionalize the most parsimonious but complete paradigm (above). In P we call these the ‘grammars’. (You can search our site for the grammars).
Humans possess the ability to determine constant and inconstant relations (differences). And to control the use of their detection of differences. We call this ability reason when used informally. We call comparisons of sets as means of testing constant relations ‘logic’. We have produced many logics. Mathematics is the most basic – consisting of one constant relation: position. In the discipline of logic we test rules of inference. However, logic isn’t closed and so all logic al assertions are contingent.As such all non-trivial logic is falsificationary. ALL of the grammars are logics of increasing tests of constant relations within different limits.
Epistemology: Replaced by Theory.
Free association(falsify by reason) > hypothesis(falsify by action) > theory (falsify by market) > law (falsify by limits- or ‘exhaustion’ if you prefer)
Truth: Replaced by Testimony (categorically, internally, operationally, externally, rational, reciprocal
Ethics: replaced by Reciprocity ((productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer free of …)
Politics: Rule of law, professional judiciary, monarchy as judge of last resort, houses for classes for markets of commons, mixed economy, soft demonstrated (market) eugenics, direction of savings to the production of commons.
Strategy: most rapid adaptability (rate of evolution)
Aesthetics: Transcendence (Evolution)
Those are are all decidable propositions (Truths). That does not mean that one cannot express or a group cannot express different preferences.
It’s hard to accept but philosophy in the pursuit of truth has ended. All philosophy can tell us is choice (preference) because preferences are not true. Philosophy as a method of moral fictionalism survives in Europe. Philosophy as propaganda sophistry and deceit exists everywhere.
But truth and decidability have been usurped entirely by science: testimony.
This is why philosophy departments are now included with religion in libraries and in academic budgets.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 09:23:00 UTC
-
QUICK TRANSLATION BEWEEN PHILOSOPHY AND PROPERTARIANISM (NATURAL LAW) Metaphysic
QUICK TRANSLATION BEWEEN PHILOSOPHY AND PROPERTARIANISM (NATURAL LAW)
Metaphysics: Realism, naturalism, operationalism, empiricism, survival, compatibilism, cooperation, propertarianism, acquisitionism, action.
Operationalism: testimony in operational terms (one continuous consistent commensurable system of falsifiable measurement)
Science: testimony in empirical terms (observation of demonstrated evidence) expressed in a commensurable terms (operational).
Ontology: realism/naturalism, soft determinism, three faculties: physical, intuitionistic, and mind as motion(no name for it in philosophical terms: experience consists of continuous recursive hierarchical temporal memory – memory of memory continuously constructed by continuous prediction from sequences of sense perception.) the problem is getting people from the observer to perception consisting of change (action) not state.
Epistemology: Competition between justification(hypothesis), operation(theory) and empiricism(evidence) at increasing scales (self-reason via positiva-justification, via-negativa and via-positiva-tests, via-negativa market survival)
Truthfulness: Due diligence against ignorance, error, bias, deceit, in performative, promissory testimony in complete sentences that are consistent, correspondent, operational, limited, complete, and coherent.
Axiology: value: acquisitionism: acquisition of property in toto defined by demonstrated interest (IOW self reported values never reflect demonstrated preference, and demonstrated preference can always be expressed as acquisition of property in toto -a gain yielding a fully commensurable system of measurement),
Ethics: Reciprocity – via negativa, all ethnical and moral questions are decidable by tests of fully accounted reciprocity.
In other words: I’m describing economics. Which, as others have stated before me, appears to function as the union of the disciplines.
Philosophy: Do we think philosophy produces Truth, Meaning, or Choice? As far as I can tell Law, Economics, Science, Mathematics, and the human logical facility (differences in constant relations) produce testimony. As far as I can tell The Grammars (which you don’t know yet) produce the most parsimonious paradigm. Philosophy considers ideals, rarely if ever costs, means of production(models), possibilities(consequences and externalities). So what is the remaining function of philosophy? Reorganization of preferences and means of achieving them given the truth we have identified with “science in toto”: (law, economics, science, math, logical facility).
In other words, discovery of truth (science) selection of preference (philosophy), sedation or abandonment (theology).
Which makes sense to me since Math(measurement) Science(matter) and Economics(people) produce evidence, law produces testimony and decidability independent of preference, and philosophy produces preference, and as far as I can tell theology allows people to escape the work of philosophy, law, and science – leading to graceful failure as our knowledge and ability decreases from science to norm or law, to philosophy, to theology.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 08:51:00 UTC
-
QUICK TRANSLATION BEWEEN PHILOSOPHY AND PROPERTARIANISM (NATURAL LAW) Metaphysic
QUICK TRANSLATION BEWEEN PHILOSOPHY AND PROPERTARIANISM (NATURAL LAW)
Metaphysics: Realism, naturalism, operationalism, empiricism, survival, compatibilism, cooperation, propertarianism, acquisitionism, action.
Operationalism: testimony in operational terms (one continuous consistent commensurable system of falsifiable measurement)
Science: testimony in empirical terms (observation of demonstrated evidence) expressed in a commensurable terms (operational).
Ontology: realism/naturalism, soft determinism, three faculties: physical, intuitionistic, and mind as motion(no name for it in philosophical terms: experience consists of continuous recursive hierarchical temporal memory – memory of memory continuously constructed by continuous prediction from sequences of sense perception.) the problem is getting people from the observer to perception consisting of change (action) not state.
Epistemology: Competition between justification(hypothesis), operation(theory) and empiricism(evidence) at increasing scales (self-reason via positiva-justification, via-negativa and via-positiva-tests, via-negativa market survival)
Truthfulness: Due diligence against ignorance, error, bias, deceit, in performative, promissory testimony in complete sentences that are consistent, correspondent, operational, limited, complete, and coherent.
Axiology: value: acquisitionism: acquisition of property in toto defined by demonstrated interest (IOW self reported values never reflect demonstrated preference, and demonstrated preference can always be expressed as acquisition of property in toto -a gain yielding a fully commensurable system of measurement),
Ethics: Reciprocity – via negativa, all ethnical and moral questions are decidable by tests of fully accounted reciprocity.
In other words: I’m describing economics. Which, as others have stated before me, appears to function as the union of the disciplines.
Philosophy: Do we think philosophy produces Truth, Meaning, or Choice? As far as I can tell Law, Economics, Science, Mathematics, and the human logical facility (differences in constant relations) produce testimony. As far as I can tell The Grammars (which you don’t know yet) produce the most parsimonious paradigm. Philosophy considers ideals, rarely if ever costs, means of production(models), possibilities(consequences and externalities). So what is the remaining function of philosophy? Reorganization of preferences and means of achieving them given the truth we have identified with “science in toto”: (law, economics, science, math, logical facility).
In other words, discovery of truth (science) selection of preference (philosophy), sedation or abandonment (theology).
Which makes sense to me since Math(measurement) Science(matter) and Economics(people) produce evidence, law produces testimony and decidability independent of preference, and philosophy produces preference, and as far as I can tell theology allows people to escape the work of philosophy, law, and science – leading to graceful failure as our knowledge and ability decreases from science to norm or law, to philosophy, to theology.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 20:13:00 UTC
-
The Natural Law of European People in Most Reductive Form
(getting close to most reductive and complete form)SOVEREIGNTY REQUIRES RECIPROCITYReciprocity in Nature: ( …cooperation and consciousness … ) Reciprocity in Deed(Actions): Due Diligence in tests of productive, fully informed[6], voluntary transfer[7] of demonstrated interests[2] within the limits of proportionality[4], free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality[8]; and warrantied, within the limits of restitutability[5]. Reciprocity in Word(Speech): Due Diligence in categorical and internal consistency within the limits of human faculties; operationally possible within the limits of human abilities, empirically correspondent within the limits of realism, naturalism and operationalism, rational within the limits of bounded rationality[1], reciprocal in rational choice, and fully accounted within stated limits. If you cannot pass those tests you cannot claim to engage in reciprocity in display, word, or deed. If you cannot engage in reciprocity you are either ignorant or ir-reciprocal. Even if you are ignorant, once informed, and continue you are ir-reciprocal. DECIDABILITY We may boycott(separate) if not a threat, cooperate(cohabitate) if we can, or prey(war) upon one another if we must. Since all irreciprocity constitutes free riding, parasitism, or predation, the only reason to let another individual or group exist, is reciprocity – all others are not only enemies, but devolutionary, and prohibiting the transcendence of man into the gods we imagined. This is the Natural Law. EUROPEAN GROUP STRATEGY: An Entrepreneurial Militia, Using Technology, Adaptability, Maneuver, and Speed Under Contractual Warfare, Oath, Duty, Loyalty Status in exchange for Heroism, Wealth, Excellence, Beauty With Differences adjudicated by Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Under Natural Law of Reciprocity, Jury, Thang or Senate, King as judge of last resort. Leaving only survival in markets for everything: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polity, defense, and war. Causing suppression of the reproduction of the less able, and the devotion of the savings in surplus to the production of commons, and the disproportionate returns on the commons. And devoting high investment to the raising of our offspring to produce and defend the commons. (…) Transcendence of man into gods the gods we imagined. THE LAW OF OPTIMUM POLITIES A Power distribution of the Natural law(Suppression of Parasitism); A Pareto Distribution of Assets (organize voluntary production); A Nash Distribution of Rewards (Market Income); An Egalitarian Distribution of Commons (Earnings); At the cost of A Suppression of Reproduction of the Demonstrated Underclasses (Eugenics); Equal Distribution of Defense of all of the above. And Zero Tolerance for Violation of any of the above (Intolerance). EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION The history of western civilization consists of the incremental suppression of parasitism from all walks of life by use of the west’s unique, empirical, common, judge discovered natural law. Western Man domesticated himself just as he had plants and animals before. And both our aristocracy our people profited from the process. But, man was not exploited — he was domesticated from a animal to a human through generations of cultural selection pressure and aggressive culling of malcontents and free riders. OPTIMUM HUMAN ORDER There is no more coherent or successful nor possibly superior means for humans to evolve into the gods we imagine, with each generation living in the optimum conditions while doing so. ENFORCEMENT “So perhaps you don’t understand. This isn’t a negotiation. This isn’t a compromise. These are demands. We will restore our sovereignty, and leave you in peace, or we will conquer, enslave, or kill you – and all like you – until your consent is no longer required.” === Definitions:
Bounded Rationality: man is not omniscient, omnipotent, or free or error, and seeks practical action in satisfaction of wants within his limits rather than optimums.
Demonstrated Interest: man demonstrates continuous consumption, acquisition, preservation. Anything man demonstrates an interest in consuming, acquiring, preserving, whether by action or refraining from action, constitutes a demonstrated interest. In P law we categories demonstrated interest as Property-in-toto when referring to individuals or Capital-in-toto when referring to commons and we enumerate all categories of both under the definition of property-in-toto.
Operational, Operationalism: possible to perform and speak of performing, a sequence of subjectively testable human actions. where subjectively testable means by imitating (physical), sympathizing (thinking), empathizing (feeling).
Limits of Proportionality: incentive to defect given predictable future given accumulated results of reciprocal display word and deed. (Defense against systemic undermining).
Restitutability: the possibility of restitution, and sufficient resources to perform restitution.
Fully Informed: Reciprocal in Speech (testimony).
Voluntary Transfer: loss, consumption, transfer of possession, right, or title
Negative Externality: involuntary transfer against the demonstrated intersets of those not involved in the action or exchange.
-
The Natural Law of European People in Most Reductive Form
(getting close to most reductive and complete form)SOVEREIGNTY REQUIRES RECIPROCITYReciprocity in Nature: ( …cooperation and consciousness … ) Reciprocity in Deed(Actions): Due Diligence in tests of productive, fully informed[6], voluntary transfer[7] of demonstrated interests[2] within the limits of proportionality[4], free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality[8]; and warrantied, within the limits of restitutability[5]. Reciprocity in Word(Speech): Due Diligence in categorical and internal consistency within the limits of human faculties; operationally possible within the limits of human abilities, empirically correspondent within the limits of realism, naturalism and operationalism, rational within the limits of bounded rationality[1], reciprocal in rational choice, and fully accounted within stated limits. If you cannot pass those tests you cannot claim to engage in reciprocity in display, word, or deed. If you cannot engage in reciprocity you are either ignorant or ir-reciprocal. Even if you are ignorant, once informed, and continue you are ir-reciprocal. DECIDABILITY We may boycott(separate) if not a threat, cooperate(cohabitate) if we can, or prey(war) upon one another if we must. Since all irreciprocity constitutes free riding, parasitism, or predation, the only reason to let another individual or group exist, is reciprocity – all others are not only enemies, but devolutionary, and prohibiting the transcendence of man into the gods we imagined. This is the Natural Law. EUROPEAN GROUP STRATEGY: An Entrepreneurial Militia, Using Technology, Adaptability, Maneuver, and Speed Under Contractual Warfare, Oath, Duty, Loyalty Status in exchange for Heroism, Wealth, Excellence, Beauty With Differences adjudicated by Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Under Natural Law of Reciprocity, Jury, Thang or Senate, King as judge of last resort. Leaving only survival in markets for everything: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polity, defense, and war. Causing suppression of the reproduction of the less able, and the devotion of the savings in surplus to the production of commons, and the disproportionate returns on the commons. And devoting high investment to the raising of our offspring to produce and defend the commons. (…) Transcendence of man into gods the gods we imagined. THE LAW OF OPTIMUM POLITIES A Power distribution of the Natural law(Suppression of Parasitism); A Pareto Distribution of Assets (organize voluntary production); A Nash Distribution of Rewards (Market Income); An Egalitarian Distribution of Commons (Earnings); At the cost of A Suppression of Reproduction of the Demonstrated Underclasses (Eugenics); Equal Distribution of Defense of all of the above. And Zero Tolerance for Violation of any of the above (Intolerance). EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION The history of western civilization consists of the incremental suppression of parasitism from all walks of life by use of the west’s unique, empirical, common, judge discovered natural law. Western Man domesticated himself just as he had plants and animals before. And both our aristocracy our people profited from the process. But, man was not exploited — he was domesticated from a animal to a human through generations of cultural selection pressure and aggressive culling of malcontents and free riders. OPTIMUM HUMAN ORDER There is no more coherent or successful nor possibly superior means for humans to evolve into the gods we imagine, with each generation living in the optimum conditions while doing so. ENFORCEMENT “So perhaps you don’t understand. This isn’t a negotiation. This isn’t a compromise. These are demands. We will restore our sovereignty, and leave you in peace, or we will conquer, enslave, or kill you – and all like you – until your consent is no longer required.” === Definitions:
Bounded Rationality: man is not omniscient, omnipotent, or free or error, and seeks practical action in satisfaction of wants within his limits rather than optimums.
Demonstrated Interest: man demonstrates continuous consumption, acquisition, preservation. Anything man demonstrates an interest in consuming, acquiring, preserving, whether by action or refraining from action, constitutes a demonstrated interest. In P law we categories demonstrated interest as Property-in-toto when referring to individuals or Capital-in-toto when referring to commons and we enumerate all categories of both under the definition of property-in-toto.
Operational, Operationalism: possible to perform and speak of performing, a sequence of subjectively testable human actions. where subjectively testable means by imitating (physical), sympathizing (thinking), empathizing (feeling).
Limits of Proportionality: incentive to defect given predictable future given accumulated results of reciprocal display word and deed. (Defense against systemic undermining).
Restitutability: the possibility of restitution, and sufficient resources to perform restitution.
Fully Informed: Reciprocal in Speech (testimony).
Voluntary Transfer: loss, consumption, transfer of possession, right, or title
Negative Externality: involuntary transfer against the demonstrated intersets of those not involved in the action or exchange.
-
PART 5 – Findings of the Law
THE GOOD
PLEASURE
CHOICE
VALUE
PREFERENCE
GOOD
VIOLENCE
LOYALTY
EMPATHY
PANDERING
TOLERANCE —“Once you see that extending tolerance to immoral political behavior is ITSELF immoral, you can’t un-see it.”—Michael Churchill
TOLERATING A KNOWN THEFT
CHARITY
FAIRNESS
EQUALITY
FEMINISM
FEMININITY
MASCULINITY
IDENTITY
SELF DEFENSE
LIFE
SUICIDE
EUTHENASIA
ABORTION / EXPOSURE
AGE OF CONSENT
AGE OF CONCEPTION
PEDOPHILIA
PEDOPHILIC INCEST
INCEST
PROSTITUTION
HOMOSEXUAL RELATIONS
HOMOSEXUAL ‘MARRIAGE’
MARRIAGE
MISTRESSES AND LOVERS
POLYGAMY
SPANKING
GENERATIONS
REPRODUCTION
MISCAGENATION
EUGENICS
GENETIC modification
ARTIFICIAL REPRODUCTION
TRANSHUMANISM LIFEBOAT
CONFLICT
FREEDOM OF SPEECH
[include page=’freedom-of-speech-under-propertarianism’ content=’display’]
INTERPERSONAL SPEECH
DEFAMATION: GOSSIP, LIBEL, AND SLANDER
ON THE DUEL
THE BAD
POVERTY
DISEASE
ADDICTION
SOCIOPATHY
MENTAL ILLNESS
CONSPIRACY THEORIES
[insert page=’conspiracy’ display=’content’]
CRIME
DRUGS AND ALCOHOL
BRIBERY
BLACKMAIL
‘SCALPING’
INTEREST / USURY
[insert page=’2020/05/27/usury’ content=’display’]
“DERIVATIVES / I NSTRUMENTS”
RESTITUTION
PUNISHMENT
FAILURE OF SOCIAL SCIENCE — PUNISHMENT
SLAVERY
OTHERS
ASSOCIATION AND EXCLUSION
CLASS AND CLASSISM
RACE AND RACISM
OTHER CIVILIZATIONS, CULTURES, AND CLANS
ANIMALS
DRONES
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCES
THE AI QUESTION AND THE ANSWER
THE PROBLEM ISN’T THE AI, BUT IT’S WARRANTOR
ALIENS
MATTERS OF WAR
PROPAGANDA AND INFORMATION
IMMIGRATION
CONVERSION
RELIGION
WAR
TRADE CONFLICT
COLONIALISM
CONQUEST
CONQUEST
RULE
THE MARKET
Why and how Markets work
THE LIMIT OF MARKETS
WEIGHTS AND MEASURES
LICENSES
PRODUCT SAFETY
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
MONOPOLY
WORKDAYS
HOLIDAYS
TERRITORIAL COMMONS
CITIES, SUBURBS AND RURAL COMMUNITIES
SCALE
DENSITY
ARCHITECTURE
ORGANIZATION (LAYOUT)
ZONING
SPATIAL COMMONS
RESOURCES
THE LAND AIR AND SEAS
SPACE (EXTRA TERRESTRIAL)
MONUMENTS
POLLUTION
THE INFORMATIONAL COMMONS
PUBLIC SPEECH
THE POLITICIANS
THE MEDIA SOCIAL MEDIA
[insert page=’the-natural-law-on-media-content’ display=’content’]
THE ACADEMY
THE EDUCATORS
THE CHURCH
[insert page=’life-after-death’ display=’content’]
INSURANCE
NATURAL DISASTERS/ DAMAG ES
FAMINE/THE WATER IN THE DESERT/SHORTAGES
POVERTY/CHARITY/SHORTAGES
SHELTER: WINTER AND SUMMER
DISEASE