Form: Outline

  • MYTHICISM IN THE ABRAHAMIC TRADITION VS HISTORY IN THE EUROPEAN TRADITION |VERSU

    MYTHICISM IN THE ABRAHAMIC TRADITION VS HISTORY IN THE EUROPEAN TRADITION

    |VERSUS|: Europeans: Aristocracy, History and Natural Law
    vs
    Semites: Priesthood, Mythicism and Authoritarian Law.

    Context (Origins)
    Much of the mythicism in the Abrahamic tradition is relatively recent…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-14 20:09:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790474555330326679

  • THE EIGHT DIMENSIONS OF HUMAN VARIATION 0. Neoteny Bias: Degree of Domestication

    THE EIGHT DIMENSIONS OF HUMAN VARIATION
    0. Neoteny Bias: Degree of Domestication Syndrome.
    1. Quality Bias: Quality and Quantity of Grey and White Matter, and the underlying biochemistry.
    2. Development Bias: Sensory > Motor > Language > Reasoning > Social Awareness > Self Regulation
    3. Predator (specific) vs Prey(general) Bias: Hemispheric Prey(General) Right vs Predator(specific) Left
    4. In Time Empathizing vs Over Time Systematizing Bias: Integration of hemispheres and regions: prey, empathizing, vs Isolation of hemispheres and regions: predator, systematizing.
    5. Sexual Reproduction Resource Bias: Sex Variation in Female Short term Prey Consumption sensitivity, and Masculine Long Term Predatory Systematizing sensitivity.
    6. Sexual Survival and Reproduction Bias (Status): The female prey strategy seeks status advantage for hyper attention, hyperconsumption, low risk cooperation, evasion of risk by evasion of responsibility for conflict resolution and use of indirect conflict by seduction, false promise, undermining, sedition, and treason but incapable of organizing at scale.
    Versus Male predatory strategy seeks status avantage for hyperability, hypercapitalizion, high risk cooperation, persuit of risk for pursut of responsibility despite need for conflict production or resolution, and use of direct argument, persuasion, threat, violence, and capable of organizing at scale.
    7. The most successful strategy of the feminine consist of “Baiting Into Hazard”. – And the masculine fails for it every time. The question is, WHY? The left uses the female strategy, but WHY? And why are so many vulnerable to sedition by the female strategy?


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-13 21:17:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1790129172758564865

  • THE WOKE PERSONALITY (MIND) Its a Psychological Illness, Disease or Defect Depen

    THE WOKE PERSONALITY (MIND)
    Its a Psychological Illness, Disease or Defect Depending upon Its Cause:
    Cognitively Female:
    – Borderline Personality Disorder
    – Histrionic Personality Disorder
    Cognitively Male:
    – Antisocial Personality Disorder (Sociopathy, Psychopathy)
    – Narcissistic Personality Disorder
    Note the sex differences in attention, with the female exaggerated demand for attention expressing externally and the male expressing internally.
    What is ‘broken’ in the brain and mind’s processing of information that requires attention (priority)?
    The rough estimates in the population are 30% histronic (female) and 20% antisocial (male) – based on existing research findings. This appears to be historically consistent.

    Cheers
    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-28 14:34:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1784592105521770497

  • (NLI) European Group Strategy in multiple forms: 1. CURRENT EUROPEAN GROUP STRAT

    (NLI)
    European Group Strategy in multiple forms:
    1. CURRENT EUROPEAN GROUP STRATEGY: TEXT
    2. THE LIST OF PRINCIPLES EXPLAINED
    3. EXPLAINED AS COMMON LAW
    4. AS POETRY BY ALEXANDER POPE 😉
    https://naturallawinstitute.com/2024/04/nli-t-shirts-european-group-strategy-in-multiple-forms/


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-26 14:48:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1783870732197359914

  • THE HIERARCHY OF CYCLES (SOME OF THEM) 1. Cognition and Recovery cycles (Work an

    THE HIERARCHY OF CYCLES (SOME OF THEM)
    1. Cognition and Recovery cycles (Work and Recovery)
    2. Learning and Forgetting Curves (Adaptation)
    3. Fashion Cycles (Novelty and Status)
    4. Culture Cycles (Sortition and Status)
    5. Economic Cycles (Opportunities to Cooperate)
    6. Generational Cycles (Agency and Status)
    7. and Civilizational Cycles (Opportunities to Cooperate)

    COGNITIVE ENDURANCE CYCLES
    The concept of individual differences in attention span and cognitive endurance is well-established in the field of psychology and has significant implications for learning. Several theories and models have been proposed to explain these differences:
    (a) Expenditure
    Cognitive Load Theory (John Sweller, 1988):
    This theory suggests that learning is hampered when the cognitive load (the amount of mental effort required to process information) exceeds an individual’s working memory capacity.
    Some learners may have a higher tolerance for cognitive load, allowing them to concentrate for longer periods without experiencing mental fatigue.
    Attention Restoration Theory (Stephen Kaplan, 1995):
    This theory proposes that prolonged mental effort leads to directed attention fatigue, which can be restored through exposure to natural environments or other restorative experiences.
    Individuals with better attention restoration abilities may be able to concentrate for longer periods without experiencing exhaustion.
    Self-Regulated Learning (Barry Zimmerman, 1989):
    This model emphasizes the role of metacognition, motivation, and strategic action in learning. Effective self-regulated learners are able to monitor their own cognitive states and adjust their learning strategies accordingly.
    Learners with strong self-regulation skills may be better equipped to manage their attention and persist in the face of frustration or fatigue.
    Working Memory Capacity (Alan Baddeley and Graham Hitch, 1974):
    Working memory refers to the cognitive system responsible for temporarily holding and manipulating information during complex cognitive tasks.
    Individuals with higher working memory capacity may be able to process more information simultaneously and maintain concentration for longer periods.
    Personality Traits and Temperament:
    Personality traits such as conscientiousness, grit (Angela Duckworth, 2007), and self-control (Walter Mischel, 1972) have been linked to persistence and the ability to sustain effort in the face of challenges.
    Temperamental differences, such as those described by the “effortful control” dimension in Mary Rothbart’s theory of temperament (1989), may also contribute to individual variations in attention and cognitive endurance.
    (b) Recovery:
    The time needed to recover from cognitive load and mental fatigue varies among individuals and depends on several factors, such as the intensity and duration of the cognitive task, the individual’s cognitive capacity, and the effectiveness of their recovery strategies. While there is no single, universally accepted time frame for cognitive recovery, several theories and research findings offer insights into this process:

    Ultradian Rhythms:
    Nathaniel Kleitman (1963) proposed that the human body operates on 90-120 minute biological cycles called ultradian rhythms, which alternate between periods of high and low alertness.
    This concept was further popularized by Ernest Rossi (1991), who suggested that taking a break every 90-120 minutes can help optimize cognitive performance and reduce mental fatigue.
    Microbreaks and Recovery:
    Studies have shown that taking short breaks (e.g., 5-10 minutes) during prolonged cognitive tasks can help maintain performance and reduce fatigue (Henning et al., 1997; Tucker, 2003).
    These microbreaks can involve brief physical activity, relaxation techniques, or simply disengaging from the task at hand.
    Sleep and Cognitive Recovery:
    Sleep plays a crucial role in cognitive recovery and memory consolidation (Stickgold, 2005; Walker, 2009). A full night’s sleep (7-9 hours for adults) is often necessary for complete cognitive recovery after a day of mentally demanding activities.
    Naps, particularly those that include slow-wave sleep (around 60-90 minutes), have also been shown to provide cognitive benefits and support recovery from mental fatigue (Mednick et al., 2003).
    Attention Restoration Theory:
    As mentioned earlier, Attention Restoration Theory (Kaplan, 1995) suggests that exposure to natural environments or other restorative experiences can help reduce mental fatigue and improve cognitive performance.
    The time needed for attention restoration may vary depending on the individual and the quality of the restorative experience, but research suggests that even short exposures (e.g., 10-15 minutes) to nature can provide cognitive benefits (Berman et al., 2008).
    Individual Differences and Recovery:
    Individual factors such as age, physical fitness, and cognitive reserve can influence the time needed for cognitive recovery (Stern, 2009; Hillman et al., 2008).
    Additionally, the use of effective coping strategies, such as stress management techniques and social support, can help facilitate recovery from mental fatigue (Sonnentag & Fritz, 2007)

    LEARNING AND FORGETTING CYCLES
    there are various theoretical perspectives on the time frames associated with the adoption of habits, learning, mastery, and recovery from trauma. Let’s explore some of these ideas:

    Habit formation (3-4 weeks):
    In his book “The Power of Habit” (2012), Charles Duhigg popularized the idea that habits can be formed in 21 days, based on a passage from Maxwell Maltz’s “Psycho-Cybernetics” (1960).
    More recent research, such as Phillippa Lally’s study “How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world” (2010), suggests that the average time for habit formation is 66 days, with a range of 18 to 254 days, depending on the complexity of the habit and individual differences.
    Adoption of frames of reference in learning (3-4 years):
    Jean Piaget’s theory of cognitive development proposes that children go through four stages, each lasting several years. The preoperational stage (ages 2-7) is characterized by the development of symbolic thinking and language, which shape a child’s understanding of the world.
    Lev Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory emphasizes the role of social interaction and cultural tools in cognitive development. His concept of the “zone of proximal development” suggests that learning occurs through the guidance of more knowledgeable others, a process that extends over several years.
    Mastery of a discipline (10,000 hours or 10 years):
    In his book “Outliers” (2008), Malcolm Gladwell popularized the idea that it takes roughly 10,000 hours of deliberate practice to achieve mastery in a field, based on research by Anders Ericsson.
    However, the exact time frame for mastery varies depending on the domain and individual factors. For example, in their paper “The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert Performance” (1993), Ericsson and colleagues found that elite musicians had accumulated an average of 10,000 hours of practice by age 20.
    Recovery from trauma (3-4 years):
    Judith Herman’s book “Trauma and Recovery” (1992) outlines three stages of trauma recovery: safety, remembrance and mourning, and reconnection. She suggests that this process typically takes several years, with individual variations.

    FASHION CYCLES
    Several theorists have proposed explanations for shorter-term cycles in areas such as fashion, consumer behavior, and popular culture. Some notable examples include:
    Everett Rogers (1931-2004): In his book “Diffusion of Innovations” (1962), Rogers proposed a model for how new ideas and products spread through a population. His model includes five adopter categories: innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards.
    Henrik Vejlgaard (contemporary): In his book “Anatomy of a Trend” (2008), Vejlgaard proposed a “Diamond-Shaped Trend Model” to describe how trends in fashion, design, and culture move through different segments of society, from trendsetters to mainstream consumers.
    Dick Hebdige (1951-): In his book “Subculture: The Meaning of Style” (1979), Hebdige examined the cyclical nature of youth subcultures and their styles, arguing that they emerge as forms of resistance but are eventually co-opted by mainstream culture.
    Thorstein Veblen (1857-1929): In his book “The Theory of the Leisure Class” (1899), Veblen introduced the concept of “conspicuous consumption,” arguing that the wealthy consume highly visible goods to display their status. This behavior trickles down to lower classes, driving fashion cycles.
    Georg Simmel (1858-1918): Simmel, a German sociologist and philosopher, wrote about fashion cycles in his essay “Fashion” (1904). He argued that fashion is driven by the dual desires for individuality and conformity, leading to a cyclical process of innovation and imitation.
    Alfred Kroeber (1876-1960): Kroeber, an American anthropologist, studied women’s fashion between 1844 and 1936. In his paper “On the Principle of Order in Civilization as Exemplified by Changes of Fashion” (1919), he identified regular cycles in dress length and width.
    Paul Nystrom (1878-1969): Nystrom, an American marketing scholar, proposed a theory of fashion adoption in his book “Economics of Fashion” (1928). He argued that fashion moves through stages of introduction, acceptance, and obsolescence.

    POPULAR CULTURE CYCLES
    Popular culture, which encompasses music, film, television, and other forms of mass media entertainment, also exhibits cyclical patterns. Several theorists have examined these cycles from different perspectives:
    Marshall McLuhan (1911-1980): McLuhan, a media theorist, proposed that the medium of communication itself shapes the content and impact of popular culture. In his book “Understanding Media” (1964), he argued that the rise of electronic media would lead to a “global village” and a retribalization of society, altering the cycles of popular culture.
    George Lipsitz (1944-): In his book “Time Passages: Collective Memory and American Popular Culture” (1990), Lipsitz examined how popular culture reflects and shapes collective memory. He argued that popular culture cycles are tied to larger social and political cycles, serving as a site of struggle over meaning and identity.
    Simon Reynolds (1963-): In his book “Retromania: Pop Culture’s Addiction to Its Own Past” (2011), Reynolds analyzed the increasing tendency of popular music and culture to recycle and revive past styles. He argued that this “retromania” is a product of digital technology, cultural nostalgia, and the exhaustion of innovation.
    Jean Baudrillard (1929-2007): Baudrillard, a postmodern theorist, argued that in contemporary society, reality has been replaced by simulations and signs. In his book “Simulacra and Simulation” (1981), he suggested that popular culture cycles are part of a larger process of “hyperreality,” where the distinction between the real and the imaginary is blurred.
    Pierre Bourdieu (1930-2002): In his book “Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste” (1979), Bourdieu examined how cultural preferences and practices, including engagement with popular culture, are shaped by social class and education. He argued that cultural cycles are tied to the reproduction of social hierarchy.

    ECONOMIC CYCLES
    Economic cycle theories, such as the Kondratiev wave, also known as the long wave or K-wave, propose that capitalist economies go through long-term cycles of boom and bust. The most notable theorists in this area include:
    Nikolai Kondratiev (1892-1938): Kondratiev was a Russian economist who identified long economic cycles lasting 50-60 years. He argued that these cycles consisted of alternating periods of high and low growth, and were driven by technological innovations.
    Joseph Schumpeter (1883-1950): Schumpeter built upon Kondratiev’s work and proposed that these long waves were driven by clusters of technological innovations, which he termed “creative destruction.” He argued that the boom and bust cycles were an inherent part of the capitalist system.
    Simon Kuznets (1901-1985): Kuznets identified medium-term economic cycles lasting 15-25 years, now known as Kuznets swings or cycles. These cycles were related to infrastructure investments, such as construction and transportation.
    Clement Juglar (1819-1905): Juglar identified short-term business cycles lasting 7-11 years, characterized by periods of economic expansion followed by periods of recession.
    Ralph Nelson Elliott (1871-1948): Elliott developed the Elliott Wave Theory, which proposes that financial markets move in repeating, fractal-like patterns driven by investor psychology. While not strictly an economic cycle theory, it is often applied to the analysis of stock markets and other financial instruments.

    GENERATIONAL CYCLES
    In their book “The Fourth Turning,” William Strauss and Neil Howe refer to the ancient Roman concept of “saeculum” when discussing generational cycles.

    A “saeculum” was a long human lifetime, which ancient Romans believed was the maximum length of time it took for a generation to be born, come of age, grow old, and then die out. They believed that this cycle repeated itself in a recurring pattern.

    Strauss and Howe adapted this concept to their theory of generational cycles in American history. They argue that each saeculum lasts about 80 to 90 years, encompassing four generations or “turnings,” each lasting around 20-22 years.
    These four turnings are:
    The High
    The Awakening
    The Unraveling
    The Crisis
    According to their theory, as each generation ages and moves through the four stages of life (childhood, young adulthood, midlife, and elderhood), their collective attitudes and behaviors shape the mood and direction of the nation, leading to the rise and fall of institutional life and the rhythms of history.

    CIVILIZATION CYCLES
    Several theorists have proposed various theories about the cyclical nature of civilizations throughout history. Some of the most notable ones include:
    Oswald Spengler (1880-1936): In his book “The Decline of the West,” Spengler proposed that civilizations have a natural lifespan and go through cycles of birth, growth, maturity, and decline.
    Arnold J. Toynbee (1889-1975): In his 12-volume work “A Study of History,” Toynbee argued that civilizations rise and fall in response to external and internal challenges.
    Pitirim Sorokin (1889-1968): In his book “Social and Cultural Dynamics,” Sorokin proposed that societies oscillate between three cultural mentalities: ideational, sensate, and idealistic.
    Carroll Quigley (1910-1977): In his book “The Evolution of Civilizations,” Quigley proposed that civilizations go through seven stages of development: mixture, gestation, expansion, age of conflict, universal empire, decay, and invasion.
    Samuel P. Huntington (1927-2008): In his book “The Clash of Civilizations,” Huntington proposed that in the post-Cold War world, conflicts would arise primarily from cultural and religious differences between civilizations.
    Neil Howe and William Strauss (b. 1947 and 1947-2007, respectively): In their books “Generations” and “The Fourth Turning,” they propose a cyclical theory of history based on repeating generational archetypes and cycles called “saecula.”
    Ibn Khaldun (1332-1406): This Arab historian proposed a cyclical theory of the rise and fall of civilizations in his book “The Muqaddimah,” based on the concept of “asabiyyah” or social cohesion.

    Closing
    So there you have a sampling of the hierarchy of cycles that begin with individual differences in cognition and result in the collective consequence of those differences at different time frames.

    Cheers,
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @Kamuela


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-22 18:43:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782480401929269248

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782468790388736097

  • ARGUMENTS AGAINST UBI 1) Hostility between productive and unproductive segments

    ARGUMENTS AGAINST UBI
    1) Hostility between productive and unproductive segments of society. If productive people feel they are being excessively burdened to support others, social tensions could rise. Some might leave for countries without UBI. And the social cohesion risks exacerbating rather than ameliorating. (I would certainly leave the country and take my companies with me if it occurred.)

    2) Leisure activity justification for low income people on the dole mean they will not gain work experience and worse, they will justify it by creating even more ‘status’ signals promoting idleness and attention seeking instead, continuing the destruction of the (white) lower classes we have seen due to ‘ghetto’ culture expansion.

    3) The same problem with minimum wage: the loss of incentive to expand ability and responsiblity and income creating the low income trap. This will be worse as the economy continues to lose competitiveness only made possible by our control of world reserve currency and military capacity to police world free trade. THe USA must withdraw from policing world trade and is doing so. The USA is using economic warfare to constrain hostile competitors. But these strategies will protect American economic advantage, especially reserve currency status, and military dominance only for a short period of time. We are currently hoping that our economic warfare will collapse the four remaining agrarian empires and complete the postwar strategy of creating a planet of nation states and relatively free trade. If this strategy fails, americans will rapidly become as poor as europeans. And europeans no longer can export defense, political,and trade costs to the USA.

    4) Immigration incentives will vastly accelerate just when the present wave of automation drives more people out of the workforce expanding the lower middle and upper proletarian classes that had a temporary advantage between the rise of the industrial revolution, the postwar economic advantage, the computer revolution, and the expansion of those many white collar jobs is just about to evaporate (which is not considered in the studies of workforce participation collapse that are currently published.)

    5) Asymmetric reproduction incentives – “white,asian, ashkenazi” cultures require high investment parenting. Cities suppress reproduction but largely for those who rely on high invsetment parenting. Convrersely both factors accelerate reproduction of lower class low investment parenting populations, which will only accelerate under UBI.

    6) Estimates of UBI’s inflationary impact vary, but most suggest it would be substantial, especially for housing and other inelastic goods. Rents and home prices would likely absorb much of the UBI. Some estimates suggest additional inflation could be 3-5% or more – and inflation that negates much of UBI’s benefit. In effect, UBI would function as a massive upward redistribution of wealth.

    7) Survival UBI estimates range from around $12k to $20k per person annually in the US. At $12k for 330M people, that’s ~$4T per year, or around 20% of GDP – doubling total tax revenue from a much smaller taxable base concentrating taxes already carried by the people most likely and able to flee the country. It would profoundly distort labor markets, business incentives, and more in ways that are concerning and difficult to predict. UBI this large would be massively disruptive economically.

    8) Estimates of workforce dropout from UBI range from 5% to 30% depending on the study & amount. A 20% reduction in labor participation is likely under a full-scale UBI. This would significantly reduce productivity & economic output. The labor force participation rate is already only 61%. The aging of the population over the next decades will make it worse. The decline in IQ given the asymmetry of reproduction between races and classes will amplify the shortage of IQ in the USA only sustaining by immigration from East Asia, Europe, and India’s upper castes, which would come to an end as competitiveness declined. This means a permanent loss of economic advantage and eventually the dollar to countries with larger populations with higher IQ ratios.

    9) Crime and social dysfunction from people no longer working in formal jobs is another serious concern with UBI. Rates of substance abuse, mental health issues, domestic violence, and crime – all idle hands make ill and crime will rise with unemployment. Even with some offsetting positive UBI effects, idle time often brews problems. Funding productive work (as in #5) and social programs would likely do more to fight crime than UBI.

    INSTEAD:
    10) Instead, paying people for productive work as under the WPA an to improve public goods would be much better than pure UBI. Infrastructure, education, healthcare, community programs, etc. are all chronically underfunded and could benefit enormously from some of the funds and labor that a UBI would absorb unproductively. The WPA model of creating socially valuable employment is promising.

    That’s the tip of the iceberg.

    Reply addressees: @josh61597760 @GiwdulBielsira @FerghaneA @PLIB_fr @ViandeTiede666 @Cobra_FX_ @_ThDa @PBlanrue @arthurhomines @NIMH_Rage @RageCultureMag @Doomit_Doomit @PaduStream @Etienne_Chouard @ObjectivismeFR @cercle_cobalt @Bunker_D_ @JRochedy @MonsieurPhi @liberteadoree @fare @VillonAdam @whatifalthist


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-12 19:33:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1778869085427666944

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1778861412435075511

  • WHY THE MASCULINE MUST TAKE RESPONSIBILITY TO CONSTRAIN THE PATHOLOGICAL FEMININ

    WHY THE MASCULINE MUST TAKE RESPONSIBILITY TO CONSTRAIN THE PATHOLOGICAL FEMININE
    GIVEN
    Sex Differences in Cognition:
    Feminine vs Masculine
    In Time vs Over Time
    Empathizing vs Systematizing
    Consuming vs Capitalizing
    Irresponsibility vs Responsibility
    Devotion vs Loyalty
    Small Scale vs Large Scale
    Herd vs Packs Global vs National
    Dysgenic vs Eugenic
    Devolutionary vs Evolutionary
    Left (parasitic) vs Right (productive)

    AND GIVEN
    Sex Differences in Limits:
    Masculine: There is a limit to what responsibility I can bear.
    –vs–
    Feminine: There is no limit to the consumption I can bear.

    THEREFORE
    Males must take responsibility for imposing limits on feminine hyperconsumption and limit feminine consumption to capital production and responsibility for it: Reproduction and the production of responsible offspring capable of continuous evolution under a condition of prosperity.

    OTHERWISE
    The feminine will destroy the civilization from within by hyperconsumption and evasion of responsibility for continuing the western tradition of maximization of individual responsibility for private and common producing a continuously eugenic and evolutionary and prosperous society.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-03 17:28:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1775576013117730816

  • The Seven Primary Reasons for Warfare Correspondence with a Surplus of Unmarried

    The Seven Primary Reasons for Warfare Correspondence with a Surplus of Unmarried Males
    (And note how many of these are currently occurring)

    *1. Evolutionary Psychology
    Some theories, grounded in evolutionary psychology, argue that males, particularly young males, have evolved dispositions towards risk-taking and aggression (more so in competitive contexts such as seeking mates). A surplus of unmarried males intensifies these competitive contexts, potentially leading to higher levels of aggression and violence, which can spill over into conflict.

    *2. Cultural and History
    The link between unmarried males and conflict can also be influenced by cultural norms and historical contexts. In some cultures, warrior ideals and martial valor are highly esteemed, potentially encouraging unmarried young men to seek status and recognition through military endeavors.

    *3. Youth Bulge Theory
    The “youth bulge” theory suggests that societies with a high proportion of young men (particularly those who are unmarried and unemployed) are more likely to experience social unrest and conflict. High numbers of young men competing for limited resources, including job opportunities and mates, can lead to increased aggression and a propensity for violence. Governments may find it politically expedient to channel these frustrations towards external conflicts.

    *4. Socio-Economic Factors
    A surplus of unmarried males often coincides with economic stagnation or hardship, where traditional paths to adulthood, including marriage and family formation, are delayed or inaccessible. This demographic and economic frustration can contribute to social instability, making societies more susceptible to radicalization and, ultimately, to conflict as a means of seeking change or venting collective frustrations.

    *5. Marriage and Social Stability
    Marriage is traditionally associated with social stability. Unmarried males, particularly in societies where marriage is a key rite of passage into full adult status, may feel marginalized. This marginalization can lead to the formation of disenfranchised groups more easily mobilized towards violent or radical causes, including war.

    *7. Political and Military Exploitation
    Leaders and political elites may exploit a surplus of unmarried males by directing their discontent towards external enemies or military endeavors. History is replete with examples where leaders have mobilized young men for wars of conquest, expansion, or diversion from internal issues. This mobilization can provide a temporary solution to domestic unrest but at the cost of human life and stability.

    *7. External Risk and Potential
    External threats from shifts in economic, political, demographic, and military power may make leaders and political elites less resistant to the costs of warfare when there is a surplus of unmarried, unemployed men available for war. And more so if those men are unsatisfied with their current condition or anticipation of future condition.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @partymember55


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-30 22:05:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1774196156991447040

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1774181281493840171

  • A WORLD WITHOUT MANIPULATION … Reciprocity … … Persuasion … … … Infl

    A WORLD WITHOUT MANIPULATION
    … Reciprocity
    … … Persuasion
    … … … Influence (suggestion)
    … … … … Manipulation
    … … … … … Deception
    … … … … … … Lying
    … … … … … … … Fraud
    … … … … … … … … Coercion


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-26 15:48:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772651792049779153

  • (Today) 1. All algorithms narrow the range of possible results. 2. Material evol

    (Today)
    1. All algorithms narrow the range of possible results.
    2. Material evolution largely expands the range of possibilities.
    3. Genetic evolution largely limits the range of expansion.
    4. Neuronal evolution (economies) narrow the range but expand the depth.

    My point being that there is INFORMATION in the organization of the structure of compounding cooperation between cells that produces oddly adaptive and coherent results while allowing some variation that may lead to advantage or adaptation – or may fail.

    The question is, why don’t more embryos fail? Why is it that despite mutations, so many embryos succeed?

    The answer is that life can be understood at the lowest level as constructed of machines (molecules and proteins).

    But that the adaptive process is possible across the entire organism from the individual cell to the entirety of the body and mind.

    This information is far more complex than our original ‘mechanical’ understanding of genetics assumed.

    Everything adapts both outward and inward – until the demand for adaptation exceeds the limit of adaptability.

    Assemblies, cells, organs, systems, the collection of systems we call teh body, as well as the mind, form a vast cooperative and adaptive network.

    The question we have is, how is that information stored? Well, it’s stored as neurons store information: by stable relations.

    But that isn’t very satisfactory. And that’s the problem we (the sciences) are trying to solve.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-25 16:54:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772306163222085632