1) Bounties for Reporting,
2) Punishments for Assisting
3) Denaturalization
4) Deportation
Source date (UTC): 2024-09-14 14:14:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1834958903844478984
1) Bounties for Reporting,
2) Punishments for Assisting
3) Denaturalization
4) Deportation
Source date (UTC): 2024-09-14 14:14:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1834958903844478984
Individualism (libertarianism) – individual responsibility (Ascendant Masculine)
vs
Commons-ism (Classical Liberalism – popular responsibility (Established Masculine)
vs
Communism (Socialism) – state responsibility (Feminine)
Source date (UTC): 2024-09-02 13:31:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1830599387330076844
Wife (Husband),
Sexy (Sport-Fit),
Below 14%Bf (Below 18%Bf)
Cook (Fix Everything, Maintain Everything),
Mother (Father),
Caretaker(Caretaker, especially erratic emotions),
Businesswoman (Businessman, Athlete, Musician, etc)
Hyperconsumer (Hyperproducer)
Debt Creator (Debt Reducer)
Hypergamous (Monogamous)
Just Devoted Now (Loyal Later Anyway)
Demanding (Tolerant)
Never Happy (Usually Satisfied)
And.. it goes downhill faster from there.
Reply addressees: @GiaMMacool
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-14 02:22:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1823545722031288320
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1823385978829963414
(NOTES FROM CALL)
CYCLES THAT ARE INTERSECTING AND TOGETHER CAUSING LONG TERM CORRECTION RECESSION DEPRESSION
– Inflation … all that debt had to result in inflation.
– War Risk and Trade – long term
– Housing Shortage – Big Sort Consequence
– Collapse of production wages via offshoring (wage arbitrage)
– Overproduction of white collar (legal, finance, government)
– Generational issues – capital ending and workers decreasing
– Intersexual Market collapse and reproductive collapse.
– Nonsense – degree education and debt instead of IQ/Personality test etc. General collapse of education system including much of ‘higher ed’.
– Resulting collapse of minimum general knowledge in the population necessary for political participation.
– Repatriation of Industry – time and blue collar not white collar
– AI not anywhere close and still seeing low level labor cuts
– Millions of white collar post 1980 expansion will vaporize.
– End of low end web dev and demand for higher level ML and LLM (math)
– NVidia vs other chip makers
– All AI chip makers vs neuromorphic chips.
– Apple b/c of iPhone vulnerability
– Conversion back to military industrial complex
– Harris will throw policy that won’t pass, and it will accelerate internal conflict – and accelerate external confidence in aggressive expansion.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-05 21:19:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1820570456736301056
Notes:
“Correction” to happen, just when – timing is difficult – triggers are random…
– Inflation … all that debt had to result in inflation.
– War Risk and Trade – long term
– Housing Shortage – Big Sort Consequence
– Collapse of production wages via offshoring (wage arbitrage)
– Overproduction of white collar (legal, finance, government)
– Generational issues – capital ending and workers decreasing
– Intersexual Market collapse and reproductive collapse.
– Nonsense – degree education and debt instead of IQ/Personality test etc. General collapse of education system including much of ‘higher ed’.
– Resulting collapse of minimum general knowledge in the population necessary for political participation.
– Repatriation of Industry – time and blue collar not white collar
– AI not anywhere close and still seeing low level labor cuts
– Millions of white collar post 1980 expansion will vaporize.
– End of low end web dev and demand for higher level ML and LLM (math)
– NVidia vs other chip makers
– All AI chip makers vs neuromorphic chips.
– Apple b/c of iPhone vulnerability
– Conversion back to military industrial complex
– Harris will throw policy that won’t pass, and it will accelerate internal conflict – and accelerate external confidence in aggressive expansion.
Reply addressees: @boltzmann_net
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-05 21:12:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1820568705681739776
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1820545670018916499
Inflation
War Risk and Trade
Generations
Repatriation of Industry
NVidia vs other chip makers
Apple b/c of iPhone vulnerability
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-05 21:19:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1820561594922742031
Again given the possible constitution of a god or gods:
1 – Outside the universe
2 – Of the universe
3 – Within the universe
4 – A consequence of mankind
5 – A product of mankind.
If the Laws of Nature, including the Natural Law, is consistent regardless of that constitution, what is the difference in our attribution of origin when the ‘commands’ are the same no matter which?
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-01 15:17:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1819029804902952961
RESTORING NECESSARY AND SUFFICIENT REPLACEMENT REPRODUCTION, THE FAMILY, MARRIAGE, AND DATING
As far as I know the only solution is some combination of this ‘short list’ (our full list is much longer):
– Restoring separation of sexes during education, restoring ability grouping in grades, and restoring adversarial competition to males in education, and if possible gamification of all education.
– Reforming education to include the family, household, and reproduction not just labor in the economy, and adding basic natural law and behavioral econ, basic economics, basic contract law, basic accounting and basic project management to the entire cirriculum. Then restoring both physical education, mindfulness (self regulatory) education, and basic understanding of physical crafts to education,
– Ending all marxist-sequence sex-class-race demoralization, undermining, conflict generation, and sedition both in education – and all other aspects of life. And requiring requalification of all teachers and professors by the anti-dei education (possibly in our work on natural law). Requiring demonstrated competency in the productive workforce prior to teaching above first grade. Also ending tenure for primary education, and with teachers serving ‘at the pleasure of the governor’. This will cause an increase in teacher compensation and an increase in teacher quality.
– Ending the multiplicity of female-dominated pseudoscience, propaganda, and gut courses in the academy that cause debt, delays household formation and reproduction but does not contribute to long term productivity or income – especially once the scale of reformation is large enough for correction.
– Massive gamification of higher education, by both restoration of early formal education in the trades, production of computer simulations and group role playing of extant roles all centralized and supported by a massive database of course content.
– Requiring universities to insure a degreed student is fit for service. Requiring universities to borrow and lend students the money for their educations, limiting the university’s ability to collect the debt, and restoring proper incentives. Prohibiting profitability by freshman ‘churn’. Requiring teaching professors be full time assistant or full professors. Requiring separation of teaching and research institutions to restore primacy of teaching and requiring research funded by investment whether private, corporate, or public. Requiring Professorial management of each college in the institution and dramatically limiting the scope of administration. Requiring all domestic students of equal academic and social performance be accommodated before the first international student is allowed. (Yes I do understand the consequences of these demands, but the university has become the equivalent of the highly corruption medieval church prior to the reformation, and a seditious church at that.)
– Restoring military influence in basic research in pursuit of strategic military and economic advantage regardless of field, with the charter of restoring and preserving national competitive advantage in all such fields. \
– Restoring IQ, personality, and moral ‘profiling’ (tests) in employment, thus obviating the need for degrees for the majority of positions.
– Restoring employment by any criteria desired, ending all bias other than capability.
– Ending anti-male and anti-white employment and contract bias, meaning formally restoring rule of law by prohibiting legal institutionalization of discrimination.
– Taxing singles to pay for married’s children because singles are not contributing to long term tax production nor providing for their unemployment, medical, and retirement
– Making it less desirable to hire women by making businesses and governments pay for women’s childbearing and time off.
– Accounting for costs by individual citizen to show their debt vs contribution in taxes or children or military service (only a minority of white men are tax contributors and the majority of women and nearly all minorities are tax ‘sinks’. This is the primary reason we must end immigration and reverse it.
– Requiring marriage and replacement children to vote (if voting even means anything any longer. it seems we would be better with courts than democracy)
– Possibly (?) requiring marriage and children for urban residency.
– Constitutional amendment that the family is the subject of investment policy not the individual’s ability for consumption. In other words, it will take a lot of incentives combined to restore the priority of the family.
– Investing in research and development of artificial wombs enabling even single men and women to acquire replacement level children. Plus ending the prohibition on genetic research that prohibits the elimination of negative traits.
This will restore not only the family but the economy of the family and as a consequence the reproduction growth and economy of the polity.
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-15 21:24:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1812961572425461760
WHAT DOES NEOLIBERAL MEAN?
(“Think Regan”)
LIST OF -ISMS:
Conservative: Traditional values, free markets with some protectionism, limited economic regulation but strong state in law and order.
Classical Liberal: Individual liberty, free markets, limited government, protection of individual rights.
Neoliberalism: Market-driven, minimal government intervention, deregulation, and privatization.
Libertarian: Personal freedom, minimal government, extreme free-market capitalism.
Liberal (in americas): Social equality, mixed economy, government intervention for welfare and rights protection.
Progressive: Social reform, economic equality, strong government intervention, and regulatory measures.
Left: Collective rights, extensive government intervention, social and economic equity, ranging from social democracy to socialism.
CAUSALITY: THE FAILURES OF THE EXPERIMENTS
At about the same time, both Communist-socialist Revolutions had failed globally, and the Keynesian Revolution failed in the anglosphere (domestically).
Neoliberalism is a return to classical liberalism while retaining the inescapable traps of the experiments with marxism, socialism, communism and keynesianism.
HISTORY
The term “neoliberalism” evolved as a response to shifts in economic thought and policy during the 20th century. It represents a revival and adaptation of classical liberal economic principles, emphasizing free markets, deregulation, and a reduced role for the state in economic affairs.
Classical Liberalism (19th Century):
Foundations: Classical liberalism, championed by thinkers like Adam Smith, David Ricardo, and John Stuart Mill, emphasized free markets, limited government intervention, individual liberty, and private property rights.
Economic Policies: Advocated for laissez-faire economic policies, believing that free markets would lead to efficient allocation of resources and economic prosperity.
Rise of Keynesian Economics (Early to Mid-20th Century):
Great Depression and World War II: The economic hardships of the Great Depression and the subsequent global conflicts led to a questioning of classical liberalism’s ability to manage economic crises.
John Maynard Keynes: Keynesian economics emerged, advocating for active government intervention to manage economic cycles, stimulate demand, and ensure full employment. This led to the adoption of welfare state policies and regulatory frameworks in many Western countries.
Critique and Response (Mid-20th Century):
Post-War Consensus: By the mid-20th century, Keynesian economics and welfare state policies had become the norm in many Western democracies. However, there were growing concerns about the limitations of these policies, including high inflation, stagnation, and inefficiencies in state-run enterprises.
Chicago School and Austrian School: Economists like Friedrich Hayek, Milton Friedman, and others associated with the Chicago School and Austrian School began to critique Keynesian economics. They argued that excessive government intervention distorted markets, led to inefficiencies, and undermined individual freedoms.
Emergence of Neoliberalism (1970s-1980s):
Stagflation: The economic crises of the 1970s, characterized by high inflation and stagnant growth (stagflation), further discredited Keynesian policies and created an opening for neoliberal ideas.
Adoption by Policymakers: Neoliberalism gained prominence as a policy response to these economic challenges. Leaders like Margaret Thatcher in the UK and Ronald Reagan in the US embraced neoliberal policies, advocating for tax cuts, deregulation, privatization, and reduced government spending.
KEY FEATURES OF NEOLIBERALISM
Economic Liberalization:
Free Markets: Emphasis on free markets as the most efficient way to allocate resources.
Deregulation: Reducing government regulations on businesses and industries to promote competition and innovation.
Privatization:
Public to Private: Transferring ownership of state-owned enterprises and services to the private sector to increase efficiency and reduce public expenditure.
Fiscal Austerity:
Government Spending: Reducing government spending, particularly on welfare programs, to reduce budget deficits and national debt.
Tax Cuts: Implementing tax cuts, particularly for businesses and high-income earners, to stimulate investment and economic growth.
Globalization:
Trade and Investment: Promoting open international trade and investment, removing barriers to the flow of goods, services, and capital.
CONTEXTS AND IMPACT
Global Spread:
International Institutions: Neoliberal policies were promoted by international institutions like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, especially in developing countries through structural adjustment programs.
Policy Influence: Neoliberalism influenced economic policies worldwide, leading to widespread deregulation, privatization, and market-oriented reforms.
Criticism and Backlash:
Inequality and Social Impact: Critics argue that neoliberal policies have contributed to increasing economic inequality, social dislocation, and the erosion of public services.
Financial Crises: The deregulation of financial markets has been linked to financial crises, such as the 2008 global financial crisis, leading to renewed calls for regulatory oversight and reform.
Conclusion
Neoliberalism evolved as a response to the perceived failures of Keynesian economic policies and the economic challenges of the mid-20th century. It sought to revive and adapt classical liberal principles to promote free markets, deregulation, privatization, and reduced government intervention.
While it has significantly influenced global economic policies, neoliberalism has also faced substantial criticism for its social and economic impacts, leading to ongoing debates about the role of the state and markets in modern economies
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-07 17:48:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1799135824929271808
“The Uninvested Surplus Capital of the Civilization”
1. People may produce a surplus of capital.
2. The people’s can spend a surplus (consumption) or invest a surplus.
3. So surplus capital is that which is neither needed for consumption, use, or investment in production producing useful returns – at the sale and time frame that individuals, organizations, and industries and the private finance sector can organize capital to pursue.
3. Political Institutions seek to appropriate this surplus before it is consumed or invested by seduction (false promise), coercive behavior(incentive), interest, fees, taxation and debt expansion(material costs).
4. Institutions either consume this appropriated capital for themselves and their clientele, invest in commons that produce for the commons and clientele, or spend or invest ostensively for the commons and clientele.
5. Individuals and some groups, seek social status, meaning the capacity to attract opportunities for one’s benefit, and clientele who one can serve in exchange for this status and influence over opportunities, by attempting to appropriate and if feasible seek to maximize appropriated capital for their status and clientele, and if at all possible, obtain a monopoly over that appropriated capital.
ie: For social status, clientele, and personal benefit, it’s better to be the monopolist of a system even if tit causes the system to shrink.
CONSEQUENCE
The consequences of institutions appropriating and monopolizing the surplus capital, include: reduced economic growth, increased inequality, loss of trust in the institutions “Failure of Confidence in the Public Sector” or social unrest, or civil war, and transfer of confidence to institutions organizations and people that different factions in this social unrest DO trust.
Via Dr Bradley, re: Carroll Quigley.
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-16 21:38:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1791221684650885120